Boosted Boards: from flight risk to $70 million failure
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Slidebean
Views: 816,224
Rating: 4.8521252 out of 5
Keywords: Boosted board, boosted board out of business, boosted board, boosted board going out of business, boosted boards, boosted board mini, boosted boards 2020, boosted boards closed, boosted boards out of business, boosted boards out of stock, slidebean, caya slidebean, company forensics, slidebean forensic, slidebean startups 101, startup company, startup failure, startup company review, electric skateboards, Boosted boards are out of business, electric skateboard
Id: jxPDeFT4oTE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 9min 41sec (581 seconds)
Published: Thu May 21 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
So basically a βreversed engineered in Chinaβ product that's a cheaper alternative.. welcome to the new age of innovation
I don't think China or the tariffs are the problem here. This is the classic Bay Area problem/Bay Area VC problem that kills many tech startups.
First, the Bay Area problem. Many tech companies start in the Bay Area and unfortunately, that's a bit of a world unto it's own. So solutions like this set out to solve the problem of mobility facing the Bay Area. But because it solves so many problems there, it can demand a much higher price. There is more money there than just about any other place and with the cost of living so high the high price can usually be justified. But then when you try to expand out of the market, now the people willing to pay that price is drastically reduced.
Effectively, micro mobility solves the problems in the Bay Area, but in many other cities with seasons, or long distance travel without a solid underlying public transportation network, you have become a rich person's toy.
But you can't lower the price because you've over engineered the hell out of it because you want it to be the best product available. This pit is very well documented. Some call it the chasm. The jump from a real product with Bay Area appeal to a real product with wide spread appeal kills lots of companies. And it is the hurdle that few product companies can make.
It's funny that he mentioned Tesla, because there is an example of this problem and a company that managed to cross it. The made lots is early adopter money in the roadster. Then the Model X and S solved the Bay Area problem. Now the Model 3 solves the global problem.
Further the model 3 solves that problem by not really compromising, but through good value engineering. That's what this company needed. Figure out how to make their product cheeper and still high quality through good value engineering.
The second problem is generally a VC problem, but is really rooted in the culture of Bay Area VCs. You have a problem, we can solve it when cash. The idea that more money can solve any problem and growth is more important than fundamentals is so intrinsically Bay Area that I kind of have to single them out. But it's also fundamental to the VC model.
A VC is an investment capital firm. They have investors in they're fund who invest based on a prospectus. They have a time line for that return, and they are trying to get the money in early and get it out within that time line. The problem is that time line is stupidly short. 10x in 5 years is the mantra. They want their money back so fast and they don't worry about business fundamentals because they don't have to be there for the long term. They will exit before the company fails. They just want market share at all costs.
But then you have a company that is bleeding money, has not ever turned a profit, and who has shit cash flow. Rather than working on the fundamentals of build a product, get early success, value engineer to improve margin, then value engineer to reduce price, gain widespread adoption, move to other market segments. They just move to other market segments because profitability isn't important. You can always get more capital.... till you can't.
I can't watch this, he's taken editing to a whole other level. He keeps cutting mid-sentence to different takes
Holy jump cuts
I don't understand who was the 'flight risk' here?
People need to understand that headlines like "A $60 million investment" doesn't necessarily mean that they immediately got $60 million in cash right away. The terms sheets for those investment rounds are never made public, and that can easily mean something like '$5 million per year for 3 years (if specific milestones are met) with 3 larger payments of $15 million at the end in preparation for large scaling operations", or something along those lines.
Implying that they somehow had $60 million on-hand all at once is disingenuous.
looks like the dude from Detective Pikachu
So...can I get them discounted now that they're out of business or do I just buy a knock off?
China's products always had a drawback and apart from the comfort zone. People are becoming crazy these days. The speed that kills, Speed that Cost passing through any school zone. Which is why it's so important to wear a helmet. The first thing we need to get the board is riding on over the cycle shop to pick one out.
And moreover, it is still not a cost-effective product.