Appointments C'ttee Bribery Probe - Newsfile on Joy News (18-2-17)

and then I need to take some of your messages and then we move on yes good yes right you group same he's right said and I talked to you you were grouped themselves okay I said they didn't be because the Lord did not require them to be okay precisely the point else makes exemptions to allow them to grow up in any center he's right but it's not harmonize so going forward great great agree okay so that's the gentleman you have there cuckoo Rocco jr. now this is a doctor to a do and he said during his interview on the BBC's HARDtalk he's excellence in an aquifer I do did not say he doesn't know don't pay attention to that part of my introduction the essence the essence was to be sure what the DfE has you know everything together so don't be attention to that okay so doctor have a satyr a descending that from Evans Georgia in the USA Thank You Kathleen addy says listening to news file the lady emphasizes all the negatives for implementing free SHS Wow it's as if the idea of an educated population is an attempt to a setting group if only there was this level of debates around frivolous expenditures like bus branding anyways then that's what I've intact by Kathleen Rd and then Selassie so Susie Sampson can you see Baku Baku is surprisingly in agreement with everything Mona is saying whenever there is a beautiful woman on the couple of your messages here the you have sent messages about topics issues we are yet to discuss so I need to you know prune and not to read those messages because we will get there most of you are excited about the fact that Kaku is back and then okay now Erik Mesa says something are you not a lawyer in law established that fund with conditions so if the conditions are not met allow the fund to rest if it's if it's that's easy for the Heritage Fund to be used anyhow and anytime why was a siphonophore talking about amendment of that law by Parliament or so so what's the attack you started without me I don't get it a jack a jack hardy says the NBC are afraid free education are free to free education because they know when the last man gets educated in gamma their party will collapse okay ja NS says who are the future leaders so should we keep the money while children or today don't get equal access to education I support the use of the Heritage Fund now well the MPP says a heritage fund is not in the consideration don't I know in malam says that Samson please tell the NDC okay please let's let's learn to just be there cross about it's okay you can call her okay you say that you wanted to give you a break then in the end DC government promised to also make sh s free after kicking against the policy in 2008 and 2012 which I used some fairy it's fun to support it okay Bonte Benjamin in a team of workers say something using the heritage fund for the future generation now is a laudable idea since the unborn can be born today let's support president ik of whether to succeed papa meow Sports says the same Council of State that advised the president Mohamed to release the infamous moon t3 and you think an 18 year old young man is not good enough to give such wise counsel come again well that's my point of view I think it's sacrilegious for anybody would think that because he's 18 you can apply to go to the Council of states first of all it's so choose the poverty of your understanding of whether Council of states represents dela a neat clock says the Heritage Fund is just 5% of the oil revenue to government so are we saying the rest of the 95 percent is still not enough for immediate needs if we admonish individuals to save and invest in future in finance why not they make meant to say in future okay Paul he says I don't get you why is the country for holy grey haired people you think children of young persons can't children or young peasants can't advise the President on any matter I disagree with you thanks for disagreeing every appear says that this opinion is what you can call okay I will not read that because you are reacting to the poor for he view it's okay let's let's agree to disagree but less my use too much of a harsh language okay now let's pause here and then come to deal with Parliament's and I think I start with a Nakamura on Parliament and I was there actually I'm wrapped my firm represents one of the persons involved we supposed to appear so as the early morning we did every operation got ready and when the time was up the committee announced that they are suspending because of a number of issues including that the records weren't all ready for the previous hearing and so everybody ought to be giving people are very skeptical about what will come out of Parliament's are you one of those well thank you something there's a difficult situation that I believe Parliament finds itself left from the answer let me say that the public hear the weather here is ongoing it's probably going to make it difficult for email if you like interference with where the evidence with the conclusion that evidence you truly need so this public hearing really is what gives me confidence that nothing can be manipulated no conclusion can be manipulated when the conclusion would be determined by the public themselves I need to make it difficult for anybody in Parliament to hide or manipulate the conclusion and the conclusion whichever way it goes will be very difficult for Parliament because if the allegations are proved not to be true then those members of several members of Parliament's large Lindy and DC minority who have made those categorical allegation Mahamaya and to others who have confirmed not only to just Mahamaya others were confirmed so 3 ya know several but sobriety sorry and there are many who have in common publicly but them so if there if those allegations are not true then what happens to them and if those allegations are true then what happens to Parliament so either way Parliament is going to be meant of course situation and the public hearings is will ensure that Parliament is not able to botch that difficult situation so we are in for a very interesting time now when we look at the substance of the matter here are categorical allegations be made by members of parliament and here gorica deniers of those same allegations being made by other members of parliament so there seemed to be no middle ground there seemed to be no middle ground there have been strong categorical allegations but yes this was done and this person was in the middle and he told me this and told us that then the other point is no this was not done and this and such and such a person is life so it will be interesting to see itís unraveled but there's also the possibility that maybe something actually happened in terms of money's changing hands adjust that the narration of the monies was what the allegations got wrong because if nothing absolutely happened it'll be extremely surprising for members of parliament to come and see that something happened when absolutely nothing happened so it's possible that something happened in terms of money changing hands it just at the narration as to the explanation for the money is working now if that is also possible very possible then it brings the question of those members of Parliament's many of whom are my friends who are enlarged in the minority what it means is that they took money is that dead no or should be in a position to know now those monies they were taking away in regular and yet they went ahead and took them but if the story is true as you say assuming without admitting then they were rather doing the right thing because they say we discovered later that wasn't coming from the official source because was we expecting allowances and on the basis of that we return the money to two circuits I'm saying to you very simply something the other point of taking the money you knew that those monies were not regular because you know the regular way that allowances are paid these people making the allegations many of them are old timers they've been in Parliament for minimum four years yes anyone who is named so you know so you know how money's up here at committee level when a committee does white and six beyond official hours and so allowances have to be paid the allowances are paid by the clock and you sign on to a document that as plagues on for you what's the purpose of the allowed money that you are getting is so lunatic you don't take the explanation that if it is true until the explanation that their leader brought it to them and they assume that the leader would have done all the signing and everyone was your little going to sign your signatures how was your leader notice that the signing of the signal is for accountability so if you took money and you didn't sign that means that Molly's you are taking we're not a compact sign for a group collective how can you take money it is somebody's sorry for you okay what happened something back at the point of taking the monies they should have known or the knew that these monies were irregular then later on they got to know that there was some leakage that they've taken manage so they returned a month possibility to is very clear and indeed many people believe that that is actually the case that malice came they took its knowing that this man is very irregular and later they realized that because indeed when you listen to some of the entirety so we have somebody say Oh have you seen the chakra you've taken have you gotten your share of that accompany something something so it means that it was only when they got to know that hey this thing has leaked that they retained it because when we are taking the money you should have known that this monies were irregular so what we are suggesting now is that whether the story is established as true or not however the outcome the accuses will be as guilty is that the case yes I see yes because you what do what it means that you took the money then later I realize that no this money that I have taken it's becoming really to break it back you know and if they are the way that allegations have been denied categorically it's also a matter that is completely Buffy okay there's not you know it took the PC a pure free thing which is the very famous matter there was some payment made that there's no doubt about it PC appear fully interpreted the payment wrongly he said that those payments were made as inducement for people to vote for the Vodafone deal but the payments came after the Vodafone deal and number two when the NPP gave his pal metric candidates monies the first one came around September we were told at that meeting that a second tranche who come on this date and the second tranche came at that time the the candidates work the pol metric candidate of which I was one we are giving ten thousand cities by our party in two tranches 5,000 5,000 adopt and the city was roughly $1 was it so it was the 5,000 equivalent to $5,000 I was compared monies that a party contributed to the members of Palin and indeed those members of parliament who were not contesting did not get that money what they paid in dollars or cities feed in cities but I'm saying to you that the interpretation it was bribed could not hold because those members of parliament who were not parliamentary candidates who are lost primaries or had withdrawn like I'd like them then an aquifer those and all of those who were stepping out of Parliament because we are contesting for presidential and so did not get that man chose me for parliamentary candidates back you say that what in that case you could see a certain linkage that yes monies were paid that the petitioner was bribe was completely wrong but in this case some people say monies I've been paid they are the people were supposed to paid money said no we haven't that maybe let's not recover the substance but look at the proceed the process as has began and from what no not just suggests it does that's that's really serious that particularly if the outcome is that it is true then it means they accuser and the accused will all be guilty that's serious well I'm unable to appreciate and trust on that know you think that I really don't yeah you say it's bright money but you took it and you know you knew it was ready regular so if the accused is found guilty you equally be guilty because in bribery its Bagheera and the ticker well if I had a era got very well the impression I got from him won the submission on radio gold was I was the following day the rumors began to circulate that the money they had received was bright that's why they sent it back it means that and I'm just being fair to even raise that pointing receipt he didn't know it was a bribe oh that's what he was saying no not come here says he he would have known because that is a regular that is Bassem other practices nobody does the point I'm trying to make a play aright it means that whoever was keep assuming because I have a difficulty with the whole thing i jus mean that somebody was indeed give him money it means the person didn't tell him that this money is too in fluence you to do mister ajikko a favor yeah now so how was it yes okay so I read difficulty but you see we as journalists will be too low source of things by different people publicly and privately the expert has to be transmission bears or a tepee I'm unable to do that there are cowards I'm not ready to be a transmission belt for cows who engage in whispering campaign explain that we journalists then we'll give it a certain stamp of authenticity and put it out there just like that no if indeed monies came and you know the money where the money came from have the courage to go to the committee and spill the beans talking to you and asking you to come speak I'm not only journalist who was contacted also so people you know this is the money came he came to this with this man protein this this and they expect us to help them in their room or mood ring why should I do a thing like that so far but just a quick one on the economy I seen and he has to be very clear that wise it can be this is the letter P see appear for you roots to go don't penny if you permit me just put it in right contest you see this is pieces payment or $5,000 each NPP Member of Parliament shortly after Parliament had given approval for the attempts on conditions of the seal agreement of the Ghana telecoms Limited and listen to appearances it has come to my notice from a reliable source in the minority in Parliament that the NPP members of parliament were members of parliament when Parliament on 14th August voted in favor of the sale of GT where each given five thousand dollars shortly after by majority vote Parliament give approval for determine conditions of so and so then he says the man could have been given this is why he said giving to any of the following three categories of members of parliament II Majority Caucus including non MPP members of parliament as has been the practice from the time immemorial be npp members of parliament who are contesting the 2008 elections and who did not abstain themselves from parliamentary deliberations as a financial support for them India campaign or see only MPP members of parliament who were present and voted in favor of the sale of Ghana telecoms as they are rewarding fulfillment of a promise inducement now you see that he himself was no categorical gift recognizes if the set payment was made based on categories a and B above then I am entitled to my if however it was based on C then one can rightly see there was a reward for or wrought inducement to those who voted irrespective of the fact that national interest was subordinated so the Maru was making allegations I did not have anything of evidentiary value he was also speculating based on for missing from the minority incidentally Niki's he went to their vodafone review committee if you recall gift same testimony the committee said look we don't have the jurisdiction to proceed any further but you also didn't bring us anything but this is just to put on record shouldn't people get up why I refer to the peace agreement is that in that instance there was an event and then he put an interpretation i've only reinforced this one the people some groups say there was anything there are groups there was no event so the focus should be on what the committee is doing right these good that it is in the public domain to be honest with it's very very important that it has been broadcast and telecast live for all of us to see we just have one day so we still very on LEDs yet to do a serious analysis but few things have come up I took you later so my concerns last st and i really real forced them here i'm surprised that some members and in this case perhaps is fair to mention the name mr. block wa yes took to Facebook to make a case before signing a letter to the committee's for him to be given opportunity I'm surprised at that the or not have happened regardless of the fact that his his name was mentioned as having been the one who confessed I all this was an equalization oppression and I think that a member of parliament ought to have disciplined himself and waited for his opportunity if you read the letter that he routes the law is lawyers route apparently he received an earlier letter indicating that the would he should stand by yeah all of them received an earlier letter informing them that they should be ready yes then to add the committee's meet the proceedings the chairman also indicated that those who think they have any input to make members of the committee could submit memoranda upon which if they study you can be invited so there was not a cruiser for me to anybody who had anything to see and of course from for me in terms of even the principles of natural justice there was no way we're going to have that thing completed without people like a block where Sohini court in my colleague opinion wasn't good be possible what do you make about the issue of contradiction that was raised that he wants to speak to because but you say loosen ha Delia said yeah that was mahogany said this was cooked up and then at the committee he says it was affiliated well I'm not even too sure if they're contradiction you are bringing up this is correct when I do Djoser we should really said so not but for me the substantive thing is they see and when they were presented that's 27 January 2017 when they were dealing with they were representing the second report of the appointments committee and you remember you realize I drew a was who recollected this thing that he made that statement on the floor of the house see this is what he said this is mr. speaker with your permission I move that the report be so amended Mr Speaker I also wish to observe that indeed out of this meeting has come some other revelations and confessions as the news that is going around that I've received money for members of the committee was created to play a level ground that the majority had called the president corrupt so corruption must be shared among both sides of the house there was laughter that confession has come and it has come tempest to some extent because some of us were extremely bullish now knowing the source and where it comes from we'll find a way to deal with it says that entire members of the committee will continue to enjoy the confidence of the ganyan populace for me the only difference here between what he said at a committee and a society mentioned him but this was put on the floor of the house read into the records and captured by hands an uncontested uncontested object the attendance lists those who had Parliament ID it includes those members who today are be mentioned or who are part of delegations look you go to the 31st January hands up the day they set up the committee he repeated the same thing okay he repeated it let me read that one too he says mr. speaker at this juncture I insisted he was talking of the meet India had to look at the consensus or majority voting and he says Mr Speaker this junta I insisted that the committee had to do with allegations of bribery attributed to honorable Mahama are the minority members engine ISM until to me to take it easy it was at that time that a member said that because honorable Erica called their president at honorable Idaho Paul dear President Mohammad a corrupt resident that they were also spreading the corruption allegation to cover all we loved about it thinking that in the it indeed would end day again this is a repetition on 31st January 2017 on the floor of the house read into hands at this time he saying the minority members didn't mention him yes but it went uncontested I have a difficulty will and my brother that said serious statement now he's gone public the committee his machine the name of course is brought in some personality is that this should have been contested two occasions I think in one of the comments that he made which is being referred to now is that coat in the Conclave after they have shown that day minority were satisfied that were willing to withdraw dia objecting and agree for their report to be amended that horrible or siphonophore and what she could be passed by consensus we were going to leave and I said no there was this allegation already in the public domain and honorable Erica is a one alleged to have made that allegation so we should discuss that after the meeting all the minority members said was that this is a speaker cool down cool down cool down and I said how can i cool down this allegation is already in the public domain and it was at that point that Acadia to a block WA said because I Jack who said our president Mohamed was corrupt we were spreading the crushing allegation then this is what is what he said at immunity yes at the committee and then you got the committee there's another comment I'll look for it which he is quoted to have refer to a Yaga as the one saying that this was cooked up an issue no that's an issue that should be interrogated at committee right but you cry when i block my things up right I am saying that this thing you just read that is the tech time he says shoot okay the third one being this time mentioning the name okay at the committee level that drew got the committee casings on the floor of the house yeah yeah that really needs a name and it went uncontested nah my last point is this Mirada see it worries me if at the end of the day they clearly wanted petition the speaker would it be eventually did any case if you read the hand side carefully that was know exactly what triggered the setting up of the committee you were yes and then the doctor you wanted our guys conduct to be referred to the privileges committee of course Aruna drew sue in making a submission also recall recall defined that the three gentlemen had petitioned the speaker so at this was at the back of their mind I see you internet petition the speaker meaning that you were bringing the matter within the framework of Parliament I do see how you then battle your case on Facebook or in the media okay then I don't see why the expert was sent back to the sender quote-unquote okay I don't get it you want to petition the speaker you one day issue dealt with but the experts you returned it quick ooh that three people put a petition together to the speaker for the purposes of this vehicle to prove then in the end you have a committee being set up and is set up at the instance of the chairman who stands accused rather than the petition that had been taken by those who are making the allegation that's Parliament the chairman and I believe you mean to say who's yours yeah he made a statement on the floor of the house it was more or less notifying the speaker that I intend to take legal action and he's you've had some problems with him I mean he explained it but the view is that to serve notice if you have to serve a member of parliament you need the explicit permission of the speaker so he's analyzing it from that angle I don't want to go into those details but he made a statement talking about all these things when he finished doctor you also made a statement he was calling for an IRS conduct to be referred to the committee of privileges for breach of privilege the two of them made these statements the speaker's view I mean Araneta haruna intrusive and osechi mesa made contributions to the effect that look referring this matter to the privileges committee may not be the best in these circumstances because the chairman is the even though he can recuse himself for the vice chair stone with India framework sue let's have go under order one night one so by the trend if you read the hand side the complainant Cottam who was the chairman okay thing that is being accessed that how do you do that when a petition was pending but the petition was not brought to the floor this day it was overtaken by the Germans statement as well as doc I use statement so so was it irregular no for the speaker to have said well this matter you are referring to I have received a petition from the three honourable members here so since you have raised it and as a petition let's deal with it this way remember that the committee says that you eyes is not a complainant he is a witness of the committee in general terms when everybody is a witness that's how it is in terms of the investigative for everybody attending is a witness but we all know if you read is the genesis then you can begin to point whose statement trigger what I think that's the one you see complain because they could have good really not meaning it in exactitude interval exactitude right yeah that's it I don't think it's a fatal injury what right is all of them are going to have the ID mm-hmm for all of us to see oh me too that's the most essential yes look look what do you make of the process and what are your expectations they gentleman who wrote to Suraj petition in charge Suraj as indicated replied to him and said that we are sorry for now we are unable to get into the matter wait and see what Parliament does and he's disappointed because he feels that Parliament will not do a good job there are many who have that suspicion till in which a cane was being out to dance naked to prove whether indeed he meets condition president who inherits the truth what happens now the condition is that you should not be circumcised oh so they came dances indicate it has found that he circumcised it means to do what role isn't it if it he is not circumcised it means means he meets the conditions and so here he can be candid but then you have lowered his esteem I like him that what is happening Parliament Parliament is dancing making to what effect at the heart of what is unfolding is the issue of Professional Conduct ethics but also at the core is criminality bribery so a prima facie case is established and what nest what consequences would there be if it is established as somebody bright and the person is now a minister are you just going to remove him from office or would there be criminal action ever it is proven that somebody has sucked head right and the person is a member of parliament what is the consequence well I add myself what are we trying to achieve really with this unfolding drama and I'm yet to be convinced by any response so far the the consequences if you read from what happens in the House of Commons and a parliamentary practices based on all of this thing in fact the the literature that almost all our parliamentarians are expected to be reading to to to be abreast with a with the house what goes on in the house is the asking me right yeah it says that the implications include that you could even be suspended it could be expelled and above all you could be remitted for criminal prosecution show so they are yeah rather very dire dire consequences ahead so we wait to see the outcome and once Parliament comes up with his findings and I like the fact that this has been done in the public leg and so there would not be any attempt to kind of hide any information we all become a part of the jewelry in terms of comments we pass and all that I hope nobody will be held and you sound like you belong to the skeptics I guess I do how they wanted to do it in camera people said no it should be public and they have they have yielded to that does not suggest to you that they really intend to do something really good sincerely I would have preferred an independent inquiry into this effect okay yes Monsieur a very difficult one because I think that it speaks to a credibility issue and it it had not only those who have been named now it had a process and institution any heads a governance process of democracy one that we all want to promote I think that it even hits the name of being a Ghanian you know because then it's in the news Kenyans have had this issue I'll call when the British Parliament had the issue of they spending money on rabid oxen you know improper expenditure this one is also another one of an individual let me say human error type situation if it's okay because there's a lot of he-said he-said and and so forth and as nanaka me I said there are two strong positions there's no middle ground the credibility issue here for the parliamentary approval committee the chairman himself is being put on the hot seats as it way I I want to say that it's a difficult one and I wish it hadn't happened at all by it has happened I want to say that what about all the other members of the committee I was listening to Malik and I was wondering have we spoken or has the committee that has newly been set up there Joe Gatti committee spoken to the other minority members on the approval committee and would they be doing so because it looks like they are limiting its any our doors are open to anybody who the memorandum or who want to write and also even on the majority side who are on that committee we have a number of some of them who are now even ministers now mr. Bhatia Kaku is a fine professional perfect pick for his position I mean there is no doubt about that he has the qualification the experience which is even more important and it's going to be unfortunate if things go the the negative way if things go the the positive will which is that nothing really happened as nanak Emir has said then somebody light or a group of people lied now those people are also people that we look up to in Parliament representing serious constituencies so whichever way this falls out it's not going to be pretty it's going to be very disheartening for all of us I think at this point he goes art play strongly because everybody wants to prove that they did not lie and everybody's trying to protect their reputation and so forth and I I want to agree with dr. Mantell that perhaps it should have been an independent assessments as its way rather than have Parliament's judging its own because we all know that at the end of the day every group tries to protect their own and even though it's camera perhaps is just a show and you see that point you're making of the skepticism and dr. Mann say ow a senior lawyer sends me a message and he says that let no man be scooting a legal maximum let no man be a judge in his own course or case Coates now that's a legal magazine very very fundamental access to the justice system then he quotes another one that justice must not just be done but must be manifestly seen to be done unquote the he says plays the facts of this matter on to these two legal principles and conclude whether the truth and nothing but the truth will come out of this it comes out can we handle it other people who should go to burn are how should you we are going to feel very bad about what that truth will be and I liked what you said my leak about the fact that perhaps Joe wisest you call him never mentioned Mohammed our guest name even on the floor and nobody contested in the way in Parliament however I think in other places he has mentioned homeira guest name and has all mesh also mentioned honorable a black Weasley it makes us who are just listening wonder is he sure who said it at all or was it even said at all so we hope that out of all of this there will be some clarity again used to use the word clarity a second time who said what because if it is really about brownie points or scoring points then that's another big shame because it should not be the case in the first place the NDC government was not more corrupt than any other corrupt come in fact they were not corrupt service has been proven and I don't think that the NPP government's is also coming with a goal to become corrupt I want to believe that everyone is going to try and do their best so trying to say we are equalizing I'm not sure that that is a good thing right now it's not about presidents or parties equalizing it's about individuals some who are even lawyers who have created a situation that now makes us all have a big question mark about their processes and who they are and what they are doing there but we pray and hope that when the truth comes out it will be something that we can handle yes we buy that bit of your comments that some who I mean lawyers that fact that they are lawyers and ladee they have they have grounds to believe that this was bribe money they shouldn't talk about it publicly no but if we are going to expose it now you a member of parliament and this is a breach of any parliamentary things yes it's the speaker fest okay you a member because it means unless you were to go to the police I guarantee that if they did not go public this would have gotten the the leverage nice receiver is also about both sides having that foreknowledge and yet having to deal with this waiting no to the police if they do you want Palomita class Candice questioning asking that question is you know also coming could be are already dispersed there the sundeck swayed back to the sender no I mean the others the others how do we know that okay let's not pre and them when they appear maybe they have they have they have ocular evidences of the of the evidence maybe they took photographs maybe they took videos maybe maybe they have something like that honorable nanaka me I said that may also be another thing that in Ghana we have the issue of when you give money to induce and when you give money to son there's always been that situation right and in all practices because somehow is our custom that when something is done whether the person was competent or not they still go and do and thank you or something and I'm not talking about just Parliament right generally right is it possible that this money came out too early and it was supposed to come out at the time of it thank you even so should parliamentary members be thanked for doing their own world and we will hear him of course repeat what he has already said that he did no such thing he put his life on the line and in fact I I think as far as I know he's suing this one says thanks to Kaku become for demystifying the myth surrounding this parliamentary bribery saga you were missed welcome back teacher that's from Danny could you then this month our song Tashi says I can see some MPs losing their seats at the end of this enquiry okay he sauce that skeptical about what will come out of it then four ratios a mantra the last time I butchered your name by saying a man quoi he who rushes oke who rushes a man crack a man-crush says that it should be made clear that Joe Weis has denied categorically but he ever made reference to yoga with regards to the bribery allegation being cooked up thank you then Francis dancer says that he is citizen Francis of the MPP Koko's on facebook he says thanks to the honorable speaker for setting up a committee to investigate the bribery allegation if it turns out to be false which i believe it is on a boy alga must be impeached he just want to blemish the heart and reputation of the Honorable Jocko then cuejoe who sue Mediacom Paco jr. says please tell Kakaako there is no word like manuera T the way he pronounces minority thank you for that and he says we love you yeah Marvin says that the comity cetera by Parliament to investigate the bribery allegations level against honorable bocce a Jack Cohen or Abuja rise by Mohammed Arika I started on the wrong foot in why will the committee in their first meeting instead instead of calling muhammara who made the said allegation to come and prove will rather call on honorable you're wise to be the first witness God of mercy yeah must yeah Marvin inquest Minton yeah the explanation that has come forth is that what you're saying is normally the traditional basic fundamental procedural way to go about it you put the accuser in fest and then when the accuser finishes the accused will now continue sometimes they may not be even necessary because you hear the accuser and what they have to say if it's not substantial you throw them out but the explanation is that they are now doing this crook on the instance or at the instance of your eyes so like cuckoo Berkeley explained it is your wife who is caught on quote the complainant Sosa's since he is not a complainant he must speak fast so does explanation that is coming for you then okay you too you have a problem with Coco Bacchus pronunciation of minority that is how me doing Mohammed Mohammed and Gaudreau and Haruna Borges Sully who says four against one the media cabal is working okay I think she that should have seen this first you must have a good time for your messages chief our photo says let's all stand by our principles god bless Ghana then assume aunt and rich Eunice says good morning Ennis yeah we know you are sending from Baku so you say that tell our politicians to patch the loopholes in public finance instead of chasing a paltry 9 percent of 100% fund the money's misappropriated through create loot and share corruption tax evasion etc should transform our education sector the problems in this country are not about lack of funds it is about called eruption nama today says this bribery scandal will end one week one side is lying therefore guilty of a crime I am not particularly bothered by this side Radha and concerned with what happens after after someone or some people who lose their seats a coin here a Maxwell says that I don't know what the appearance of Auriga and his friends will bring more than the truth and nothing else the truth they say is like a okay so it's like a flute is like a that's what you wanted to say it will float on water if you try to sink it okay by all means it will come up chakra Solomon says that using the Heritage Fund to finance the free SHS policy is the best investment for future generation Farooq and tamale says that the Heritage Fund opposed by NPP to be used to fund free SHS MPP party of men bereft of ideas create your own front and stop plagiarizing ideas by others others okay thanks for those messages and once again you are notified that Bank of Africa has opened a new branch our head office on the first floor of block ay and B of the Octagon building close to the methane pick hotel that ultra modding head office branch complements the Bogota Airport city or a square tessina moi across central branches that were added to the Bank of Africa family 2016 visit any of their 26 branches across the country to experience the excellent customer service in a comfortable and serene and the ants feather directions and other inquiries please contact Bank of Africa through 332 2 4 9 6 9 0 what do you enjoy most on Facebook is it the hilarious videos the pictures comments messenger or simply staying in touch with your friends you can enjoy all of this for free for free with MT and free after one pay only for the first five minutes of your call on MT and free after one and enjoy free Facebook for the rest of the day dial star 3 1 5 hash to sign up now terms and conditions apply MTN everywhere you go a cap compost fertilizer will cut this poor seasonal yields that you have suffered and the post-harvest losses that you have suffered as well a cup compost fertilizer is organic pure organic materials a cup compost fertilizer it's available in all leading agro inputs delays and distributors across the country so look for them white sample agencies they give you the latest technologically advanced trendy and durable yet affordable stone coated roofing tiles look for them at number 65 Debbie Avenue on the Children's Hospital Road adjacent energized building arena or their sales of his branch at always a barrier Accra worse and this where we take a break when we return we now look at the very last bits of the introduction I gave to you I said we will check if 4.6 billion ganna series of the money we don't have is going into a needless duplication interoperable whatever they call it is difficult to even smashing projects it's project coming up and being led by the Bank of Ghana and [Music]

Channel: JoyNews

Views: 13,588

Rating: 4.125 out of 5

Keywords: Ghana Political Issues, ghana Politics, Matters Arising in Ghana, NPP, CPP, PPP, National Budget, Chieftancy, Ghanaian lawyers, Economy, Constitution, Election, campaign, youtube, joy news, newsfile

Id: nzc9xt9nAqw

Length: 53min 34sec (3214 seconds)

Published: Sat Feb 18 2017