Apple vs The Paradox of Choice!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Marques Brownlee
Views: 1,763,813
Rating: 4.9369636 out of 5
Keywords: AirTags, AirTags vs, Tile, AirTags vs Tile, Apple vs, Apple vs congresss, congress, MKBHD, Apple antitrust
Id: qNAo0UdYF6g
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 45sec (945 seconds)
Published: Thu Apr 29 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I think Tile should double down in other form factors such as their Tile Slim, which offers something different to what the Airtags are doing with it being able to do be put into a wallet. Find specific niches.
Partner with Google and place the tile info on google maps. Thus turning every Android phone into a tile network. Like tile can literally play uno reverse on Apple.
Also they could via the app then show both networks overlayed. Thus they could beat Apple by having every Apple and every Android product as their network.
Tile if your seeing this comment. Hire me I'm an engineer lol.
Interesting ideas - In my opinion, this is something that a lot of companies end up doing over time. People have been saying that Apple copied this or that feature from jailbreak tweaks for years, and it's true - they find something that people like, that increases the user experience, and they add it. They do the same with AirTags, with flashlight apps, with f.lux.
This is far from unique to Apple though, and I want to make sure people know that. The idea of a "paradox of choice" in the sense that it's presented to Tile here, yes, is more unique - but the idea of "copying" an existing feature and making it easier to use? Not nearly.
Anyone remember a few years ago when everyone had a GPS mounted to their car dash? It was this novel invention, that no one needed maps, you could just mount this thing to your dash and it would tell you where to go. Revolutionary.
What did automakers do? They integrated it into vehicles! Now, without having to suction cup anything to your windshield or dash, there it was, telling you how to move around! Did this hurt the mobile GPS industry? Sure... but it was absolutely an innovation for customers, and when they could make the choice to use something built into their car or use something of equal monetary value they had to buy separately, the choice was obvious.
I don't blame Apple for doing what they do best - using their position as a shark to build themselves up in as many markets as they can. If we look to tech companies, they're notorious for this - Amazon started as a bookstore, then became a giant in hosting with AWS, then became the "band-aid" and "kleenex" of online shopping. "Just get it on Amazon" is nearly as synonymous to "buy it online" as "Just Google it" is to web search - these are things we hear not because Google or Amazon were the first to attempt what they do, nor will they be the last, but because they are popular and they give people what they want.
This is what Apple does - they make a product, it sells, and it works well. It gives people what they want. Are they anticompetitive? Maybe sometimes. Are they competitive? Definitely.
the problem with tile was always the fact that it needed to build the network from scratch and to conquer a new geographic area would mean they'd have to push hard in advertising to start building the network there.
I live in finland and while people in the tech business know of tile, very few have bothered with it as they know your average person doesn't know about the product and certainly doesn't have the app installed. with apple again the network was already in place and buying the product is a no-brainer if you need something like that.
It is surprising he goes over all these examples without mentioning that there is a term for Apple doing this to third-party companies: it has been dubbed “Sherlocking“ by those in the Apple press.
I think the case of Tile is more interesting than the others. Personally I think Tile built on the find my network could still encourage users to download the Tile app through the advantages it might offer, such as being able to use it if you switch from iPhone or having access to the network of android devices as well. Maybe introduce other features? Lean into customization/fashion accessory? As is, I’d agree that Tile cannot properly compete, but how much of that is Apple’s fault.
I feel like I understand why Tile and other developers are upset, but I don’t think this is something that could be solved. What kind of laws or regulations could they try to put on Apple? Are they going to tell Apple that they can’t innovate new technology to make better products than other companies?
I think things like f.lux and Watson were just destined to be natively implemented. It’s unrealistic for Apple to not implement those services into their own products. I personally feel like entire companies shouldn’t be completely based on ONE piece of software that (in my very uneducated developer knowledge) seems like it would take a week or a month to code.
I guess I’ll leave with the fact that I don’t understand how the government can regulate Apple’s own technological developments when it’s their products. I also have very limited knowledge on monopoly and duopoly rules and regulations, and I was 1 year old when the Microsoft antitrust was filed. So I am extremely open to learning both sides of the story here.
"Paradox of Choice" doesn't mean how MKB is using it here. It refers to people's inability to make a decision when presented with a huge variety options, versus only a few. The book of the same name that coined the phrase and described the phenomenon came out in 2004.
"Catch-22" would be a more appropriate literary reference.
If your entire business model is based on the use (and success) of someone else's product, I don't think you can complain when something changes that interfere's with that. It's a gamble to begin with.