All Hell Breaks Loose When Marjorie Taylor Greene Displays Shocking Alleged Pics From Hunter Records

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Mr lerer is not recorded Mr lerer votes no will the clerk please report to tally 1 let's go H how is uh Miss Norton recorded Miss Norton is not recorded M Norton vote Yes I assume yes M Norton votes yes how's Mr burett recorded Miss Norton votes yes Mr burett is not recorded Mr berett votes no and how is Miss Luna recorded Miss Luna is not recorded Miss Luna votes no and how is Mr mosit recorded Mr mosquit is not recorded I'm try I'm trying Mr moscowitz votes yes okay will the clerk please report to tally I Rec yes Mr chairman on this vote the eyes are 10 the Nays are 19 okay motion fails now the question is on the amendment offered by Mr Goldman does anyone else seek recognition will you go and yield chairman the chair recognizes Miss green uh Mr chairman I'd like to talk about the importance of Hunter Biden obeying his subpoena and uh some of the evidence that we had questions about to when we when we had arranged with Hunter Biden and his attorneys for him to come in uh then he evaded his subpoena there's serious evidence that needs to be discussed um that that has to do with many of the bank reports that we had read in the treasury um outlining very serious crimes that Hunter Biden uh had committed or hased edly committed and then we have evidence of that uh crimes of man act violation human trafficking these were in the bank reports and the American people deserve to know about it uh here's another excerpt from a a bankr chairman what what is talking about a victim in California hold on one moment Mr Green what state your point Mr Goldman what is uh the gentle lady just showing to the cameras this is her five minute on your Amendment well if it's the suspicious activity reports there was an agreement with the treasury Department that uh the committee would not disclose the information it's it's my understanding what she's uh showing has already been disclosed in the public long before we started this investigation so this is in the public domain yep yeah is that your representation is it a verbal representation it's in the public domain this is in the public domain uh I reclaimed my time uh victim one is a California resident uh currently employed with FSS management between June 2018 October 281 victim one Hunter Biden's victim was employed by a Wasco PC as evidence by her receipt of bi-weekly payroll remittances from aasco PC however during this same period of time viktim one also received large round dollar wires from aasco PC which referen new hire K wage 10K golf member and pay victim one received five wires totaling $445 in a four-month period between June 12th 2018 and October 2nd 2018 these are reports that are calling so-called uh employees of Hunter Biden and his Law Firm victims and here's evidence of Hunter Biden violating the man act this is trafficking women across state lines for prostitution uh this is an airplane ticket uh showing that it was and it was purchased by Hunter Biden uh for this victim where she flew from Los Angeles to Washington DC and then the next day flew uh back to Los Angeles the date is uh she flew in from Los Angeles on June 14th 2018 and was flown back to Los Angeles um the ver the following day and this is pictures that Hunter Biden had produced and uploaded to porn websites and it's marked out Point showing proof of man act violations um democrats should should not be offended by pictures that black out have I been recognized they should be offended trafficking Mr chairman State your point thank you kindly Mr chairman on July 26 I sent you a letter about the last time this happened when the general lady uh introduced uh before this committee without any notice to uh anyone uh nude photos pornographic uh images that were completely irrelevant to the purpose uh of the hearing itself and my question to you is are members allowed to Simply put up sensational istic veristic pornographic images if they're not relevant to the actual object of the legislative proceeding I want a parliamentary ruling on that Mr Askin that's probably part of the questioning for for Mr Biden violations of the man act Miss Green's LED on that issue no no this is these pictures have already been entered into the record so in other words you have accepted the idea that members can introduce irrelevant SE based how how is this irrelevant how does it relate to Joe Biden how how does it relate to uh we're not doing a criminal investigation of Hunter Biden point of order Mr chairman testified in the FBI doj uh IRS that they were told to stand down investigating various Crimes of the Biden family did Joe Biden tell them to stand who told the IRS the FBI and everyone else to stand down this is what we're investigating reclaiming my time reclaiming my time Mr chairman I I believe it's my time I'm reclaiming my time been I object I object to the use of this exhibit uh Mr chairman this is not a criminal investigation of the man act or prostitution or anything else it's completely irrelevant to a subpoena the validity of that subpoena uh and whether or not there's been compliance with that subpoena it's totally extraneous immaterial and irrelevant and someone should explain that to miss green if she doesn't understand let the chair rule you had a point of order the chair's evidence you objected we got that evidence that honor is a material witness in this investigation well does that mean you can put up pornographic pictures of other people that Hunter Biden has met in his life I mean come on like how far does that go it's not relevant to your motion you can ask him that in in the not relevant no honestly Mr chairman it's not relevant to your motion of whether or not he violated that subpoena how did those naked pictures have been Mr chair point of order this is not the Jerry Springer Show this is the United States House of Representatives let a things pornography it's appropriately censored evidence in an ongoing investigation yes okay it's appropriately censored evidence in an ongoing investigation Mr Mr I just pursuant to Clause six of rule 17 I object to the use of this exhibit is irrelevant extraneous sensationalistic veristic uh and totally antithetical to the leg ative purposes of this Committee in this house this is not the Jerry Springer Show yeld back chair recognizes Mr Bigs for a point of order we're still your your clock stopped M green yeah my my point of order is and I appeal the ruling of the chair if that was a ruling Mr chairman did you rule on it because I I appeal you're ruling so I was recognized for my point of order and I get it he wants to have an appeal so but I'm trying to keep this in order as much as we can Mr chairman it my my question is to you is now the objection based on relevance going to be uh encountered here and constrain what can be presented in this committee and the reason I asked that is because there is virtually nothing a comment I made in the Press about had it was totally tangential to this that they just tried to get in all of that becomes irrelevant is if that's the case then the entire Democrat testimony that we've heard today should be stricken as being irrelevant no I think you're Irrelevant in pornograph we're g to have a ruling Mr so miss green is attempting to enter this into the record unit consent Mr raskins has objected OB objected uh and we're going to vote on it just like we voted on the last Amendment they defend all women don't they except women hun the the ruling is the point of order will not be recognized and Miss green is in order if if you want to object well yeah I I object Mr chairman you have the authority to bring to the Full House under rule 17 whether or not pornographic material should be entered without a clear show relevance and I would ask you to bring that to the floor of the house let let the members of the House decide whether that's the new standard whether the Mr standard is be standard for the whole house the Quorum is within discretion of the chair we've overruled your objection okay and I appeal that you appeal the ruling of the chair yes I do I would like to we're going to vote on that we're going to vote on the pornography may I finish all right Mr Mr goar you're recognized I move to table the motion okay motion to table the motion that uh of Mr raskins this motion is not debatable as many as are in favor of tabling signify by saying I I all those oppose signify by saying no no in the opinion of the chair the yays and the motion the yay have it and the motion to table is agreed to the committee will now resume Mr chairman I I would move for a recorded vote I mean if that were a book she would censor it but she wants to advertise it the House Representatives is ordered a recorded vote is ordered if we're going courtroom speaking objections don't work Chief the clerk will call the rooll uh you CL call the roll if you vote Yes you table the motion so clerk call the rooll Mr Jordan Mr Turner Mr gosar Mr gosar votes yes Miss Fox yes Miss Fox votes yes Mr growman yes Mr growman votes yes Mr Cloud Mr Cloud votes yes Mr Palmer Mr Palmer votes I Mr Higgins I Mr Higgins votes I Mr sessions Mr sessions votes I Mr BS Mr Bigs votes I miss mace Mr lerer Mr lerer votes I Mr Fallon I Mr Fallon votes I Mr Donalds Mr Donald's votes yes Mr Perry Mr Perry votes I Mr Timmons I Mr Timmons votes I Mr burett I Mr burett votes I miss green I miss green votes I miss mlan I miss mlan votes I miss bobbert Mr Fry Mr Fry votes I miss Luna Miss Luna votes I Mr Langworthy Mr burles Mr Burleson votes I Mr Waltz Mr Waltz votes I Mr Raskin no Mr Rasin votes no Miss Norton no Miss Norton votes no Mr Lynch no Mr Lynch votes no Mr Connelly Mr Connelly votes no Mr Krishna Mory Mr kna no Mr cona votes no Mr M Miss acasio Cortez Miss Porter no Miss Porter votes no Miss bush Miss Bush votes no Mr Gomez Miss Brown Miss Danbury Mr Garcia Mr Garcia votes no Mr Frost Mr Frost votes no Mr casar Miss Lee Miss Lee votes no Mr casar votes no Miss Crockett no Miss Crockett votes no Miss Mr Goldman Mr Goldman votes nay Mr moscowitz Mr moscowitz votes no Miss Talib Miss Talib votes no Mr chairman chairman votes yes Mr chairman votes yes will the clerk please report the tally okay Mr chairman on this vote the Nays are 15 the eyes are 21 the Y have it and the motion to table is agreed to the committee will now resume consideration of the Goldman Amendment Miss green has two minutes remaining thank you Mr chairman um and again this this information is extremely important because Hunter B Hunter Biden refused to obey his subpoena and we are holding him in contempt of congress for doing so this is important evidence of human trafficking man act violations that that we had questions for the president's son about and there's evidence I'd like to show the evidence of payments these are payments made from Hunter Biden and his Law Firm to so-called assistance he's were not assistants these are prostitutes that he was trafficking and I think these victims are important and just because our Democrat colleagues don't like the evidence does it mean that it's not relevant and for for I'm I'm especially offended by the women on this committee that don't care about these women's rights they're victims of Hunter Biden here's another excerpt from Bank reports talking about victims These Are banks and these banks are identifying these women as victims victim two they e talking about victim 2 victim one each appear to be in the adult entertainment industry and are receiving payments from Hunter and a Wasco PC it is unclear what relationship hunter or a Wasco PC have with these individuals and based on public media it appears possible the payments may be Associated to prostitution or adult entertainment services victim to is a New York resident and employed as freelance per internet research she is a social media influencer an adult Entertainer she received six quick pays for $6,250 from Hunter between 329 2018 and 1120 2018 this is clear evidence Mr chairman these are important questions we have for the president's son pertaining to man Act viol time thank you Mr chairman
Info
Channel: Forbes Breaking News
Views: 2,557,949
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: FXyyXQHp3Es
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 18min 1sec (1081 seconds)
Published: Wed Jan 10 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.