Accent Expert Breaks Down 4 Amazing Things About Languages | WIRED
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: WIRED
Views: 1,645,460
Rating: 4.9767895 out of 5
Keywords: accents, erik singer accents, erik singer, accent expert, wired accent expert, accent expert wired, language, dialect coach, dialect coach erik singer, erik singer dialect coach, dialect coach erik singer wired, erik singer wired, accents erik singer, human language, facts about language, language facts, dialect, laguages, languages, different accents, wired accent videos, wired accent video, accent expert languages, erik singer languages, amazing language, wired
Id: 5aXmNle560k
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 6min 57sec (417 seconds)
Published: Mon Sep 23 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
It's a shame they don't make these videos longer from. They get some really interesting people, but the videos are so short that there's barely any real content in them.
Just a (very) cursory overview of a few concepts by Wired and Erik Singer, different from their other videos where he discusses actors' accents in various roles.
Wow, the youtube video that briefly appears on clicks is one of the first linguistics related videos I remember watching on youtube,
Xhosa Lesson 2. How to say "click" sounds by Khayav:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31zzMb3U0iY
love this dude
This is very interesting, but I can't get over how much the host looks like he could be Glenn Howerton's older brother.
I really appreciate him making the point that number of sounds doesn't correlate to anything about the culture a language comes from, complexity of thought in that language etc., especially given this is for a mainstream audience. It's such a common misconception when people learn that languages have different numbers of sounds - though for some reason, the people who want to claim that languages with fewer sounds are "inferior" don't usually consider click languages the pinnacle of human linguistic achievement. I wonder why...
I don't understand why he keeps referring to the bunched (molar) R as the American R. I'm pretty sure both bunched and apical R are found on both sides of the pond.
How do they know what words sounded like hundreds of years ago?
I love this dude.
Quick question though, isn't it a bit too simplistic to say that "we don't know" why language changes? I get the point that he's trying to make: Language change always happens, and it's usually arbitrary, and it's hard to predict or explain.
But there are plenty of theories and explanations for specific instances of language change, are there not? One of the most obvious ones that comes to mind are loan words - you can expect the lexis of a language to change when a language influences another one, for example due to invasions and occupations (looking at you, England). Plus, aren't plenty of linguists already trying to predict which features of a language might change in the near future?