ABC News Exclusive: Mary Trump Interview with Stephanopoulos | ABC News

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
>>> HELLO AND WELCOME TO ABC NEWS LIVE. WE'RE HEARING FOR THE FIRST TIME FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP'S NIECE SINCE THE PUBLICATION OF HER NEW MEMOIR, "TOO MUCH AND NEVER ENOUGH." I SAT DOWN AND SPOKE WITH HER ABOUT HER UNCLE, AND HER BELIEF THAT HE, QUOTE, UTTERLY INCAPABLE OF LEADING THIS COUNTRY AND WHY IT'S DANGEROUS IN HER VIEW TO ALLOW HIM TO DO SO. HERE'S MY CONVERSATION WITH MARY TRUMP. YOU'LL ONLY SEE THIS CUT OF THE INTERVIEW ABC NEWS LIVE. >> "TOO MUCH AND NEVER ENOUGH," EXPLAIN WHY YOU CHOSE THE TITLE? >> IN THINKING ABOUT MY FAMILY, IT APPLIES BECAUSE PEOPLE ASSOCIATE MONEY WITH HIM, UNDERSTANDABLY. FOR MY GRANDFATHER IN PARTICULAR, THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS HAVING ENOUGH MONEY. SO I WAS THINKING ABOUT WHAT THAT MEANT AND ALSO THINKING ABOUT THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND HIM AND HIS CHILDREN, I WAS VERY CURIOUS ABOUT THE FOUNDATIONAL ISSUES THAT DONALD AND HIS SIBLINGS LIVED THROUGH. AND I REALIZED WHEN REALLY CAREFULLY EXAMINING THE KIND OF CHILDHOODS THEY HAD, PARTICULARLY DONALD AND MY FATHER, THERE WAS THIS VERY REAL SENSE FOR DONALD WHAT HE WAS QUITE YOUNG THAT THERE JUST WASN'T ENOUGH LOVE, ATTENTION, SUPPORT. AND FOR MY FATHER WHO WAS QUITE A BIT OLDER, THERE WAS TOO MUCH ATTENTION. YOU KNOW, HE WAS THE HEIR APPARENT. MY GRANDFATHER FOCUSED ON HIM, WAS EXTRAORDINARILY HARD ON HIM. SO BECAUSE THERE WAS SUCH AN ODD DEGREE OF DIFFERENCE IN TERMS OF WHAT THE CHILDREN RECEIVED, AGAIN, PARTICULARLY THE TWO BROTHERS, FOR DONALD THERE COULD NEVER BE ENOUGH TO COMPENSATE FOR THE LOSS OF WHAT HE EXPERIENCED AS A CHILD, AND FOR MY FATHER, THERE WAS ALWAYS TOO MUCH OF THE WRONG THING. AND THAT IMPACTED EVERYBODY IN THE FAMILY. >> ALL BEGINS WITH YOUR GRANDFATHER. >> OH, ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY. >> YOU'RE SAYING HE'S A SOCIOPATH. >> YES. >> WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? >> HE HAD NO EMPATHY. HE WAS INCREDIBLY DRIVEN IN A WAY THAT TURNED OTHER PEOPLE, INCLUDING HIS CHILDREN, HIS WIFE, INTO PAWNS TO BE USED TO HIS OWN ENDS. IF SOMEBODY COULD BE OF SERVICE TO HIM, THEN HE WOULD USE THEM. IF THEY COULDN'T BE, HE EXCISED THEM. IN MY FATHER'S CASE, TRAGICALLY, HE WAS NOT OF USE. HE WAS THE WRONG PERSON. HE WAS THE WRONG SON. AND MY DAD NEVER RECOVERED FROM THAT. AND MY GRANDFATHER ESSENTIALLY NEEDED TO GET RID OF HIM. >> YOU SAY YOUR GRANDFATHER DESTROYED BOTH YOUR FATHER BECAUSE HE WASN'T THE PERSON YOUR GRANDFATHER WANTED HIM TO BE. DONALD TRUMP IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, YET YOU SAY THE GRANDFATHER DESTROYED HIM AS WELL? >> YES. HE WENT ABOUT IT DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE, UNFORTUNATELY, FOR DONALD, HE COULD BE OF USE TO MY GRANDFATHER. IT WASN'T AS SIMPLE AS THAT, OF COURSE. DONALD HAD MANY YEARS OF WATCHING MY FATHER BE THE WRONG ONE, BEHAVING DIFFERENTLY, NOT BEING ACCEPTED FOR WHO HE WAS. AND IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW WHO DONALD MIGHT HAVE BEEN UNDER DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES AND WITH DIFFERENT PARENTS. BUT CLEARLY HE LEARNED THE LESSON FROM WATCHING HIS ALMOST 8-YEAR-OLD BROTHER BE PUNISHED FOR BEING KIND, FOR BEING GENEROUS, FOR BEING SENSITIVE, FOR HAVING INTERESTS OUTSIDE OF WHAT MY GRANDFATHER THOUGHT WAS ACCEPTABLE. YOU KNOW, HE LOVED TO HANG OUT WITH HIS FRIENDS. HE LOVED TO BOAT AND FISH AND FLY. BY THE TIME HE GRADUATED FROM COLLEGE, HE HAD -- HIS PRIVATE AND HIS PROFESSIONAL PILOT'S LICENSE. >> HE WASN'T A KILLER. >> HE WAS NOT A KILLER. AND SHOCKINGLY, THAT WAS A BAD THING. AND DONALD LEARNED THAT LESSON AND HE ESSENTIALLY HAD TO SACRIFICE WHATEVER GOODNESS THERE MAY HAVE BEEN ONCE, WHATEVER CAPACITIES FOR EXPERIENCING THE FULL RANGE OF HUMAN EMOTION TO MY GRANDFATHER. AND ON THE SURFACE OF THINGS, YES, HE'S BEEN SUCCESSFUL. HOWEVER YOU WANT TO DEFINE THAT TERM, CERTAINLY IN MATERIAL TERMS AND IN TERMS OF HIS CURRENT POSITION, BUT AT WHAT COST? AND I WOULD SUGGEST IT WAS AT THE COST OF HIM AND SADLY NOW ALL OF US. >> WHO DID HE LEARN TO BECOME FOR HIS DAD? >> HE LEARNED TO BECOME THE KILLER. YOU MENTIONED THE MAN WHO NEEDS TO SUCCEED AT ALL COSTS, WHO RECOGNIZES THAT OTHER PEOPLE ARE EXPENDABLE, WHO DOES NOT NEED TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY, WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET ATTENTION, FINANCIAL REWARDS, AND TO WIN. >> YOU WRITE THAT HE KNOWS DEEP DOWN THAT HE IS NOTHING OF WHAT HE CLAIMS TO BE, HE KNOWS HE'S NEVER BEEN LOVED. DO HIS CHILDREN LOVE HIM? >> I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S TRUE. I DON'T KNOW MY COUSINS VERY WELL. THEY'RE MUCH YOUNG THAN I AM. AND I GUESS IT ALSO DEPENDS ON WHAT THAT MEANS. >> WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO YOU? >> TO ME, LOVE MEANS BEING CONNECTED TO ANOTHER HUMAN BEING IN A VERY DEEP WAY, BEING ABLE TO SHARE THINGS WITH THEM AND TRUST THEM. IN TERMS OF PARENT FOR A CHILD, IT MEANS SACRIFICING FOR THEM AND ACCEPTING THEM NO MATTER WHAT AND NEVER PUTTING THEM IN A POSITION TO LIE FOR YOU OR CHEAT FOR YOU OR TAKE FROM YOU. AND I DON'T KNOW THAT MOST PEOPLE IN MY FAMILY UNDERSTAND THAT. >> YOU PAINT THE PICTURE OF A FAMILY THAT IS, I GUESS IN YOUR WORDS, MALIGNANTLY DYSFUNCTIONAL. HOW SO? >> FROM VERY EARLY ON, THE KIDS WERE SEPARATED, NOT PHYSICALLY, BUT EMOTIONALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY. THEY WERE NEVER ABLE TO REALLY COUNT ON EACH OTHER IN WAYS THAT MATTERED. THEY WERE IN COMPETITION WITH EACH OTHER FOR RESOURCES THAT FELT OVER TIME SCARCE, WHICH IS ABSURD. >> DONALD FIGURED OUT WHAT HIS FATHER WANTED? >> YES. >> HIS MOTHER, NOT SO MUCH. >> NO, NO. SHE WAS IN SOME WAYS VERY MUCH A CREATURE OF THAT GENERATION. THE GENDER DIVIDE IN MY FAMILY WAS STARK, EVEN FOR THE '40s AND '50s. SHE HAD VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH THE BOYS, ALMOST AS OF THE BOYS WERE MY GRANDFATHER'S PURVIEW AND THE GIRLS WERE HERS. I THINK FROM QUITE EARLY ON DONALD JUST DIDN'T EXPECT MUCH FROM HER. HE KNEW, I THINK, BY THE TIME HE WAS SENT TO NEW YORK MILITARY ACADEMY THAT SHE WASN'T GOING TO STAND UP FOR HIM. AFTER THAT VERY TRAGIC YEAR WHEN SHE WAS QUITE ILL AND INACCESSIBLE, HE WAS ONLY 2 1/2, I DON'T THINK THE RIFT WAS EVER REPAIRED. >> YOU DESCRIBE HER AS BEING MORE OR LESS AT HER WITS END WITH DONALD BEFORE HE WAS SENT TO THE MILITARY ACADEMY, HOW SO? >> HE DIDN'T LISTEN. HE DIDN'T RESPECT HER. I BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE OF THAT INITIAL RIFT, WHICH WASN'T HER FAULT, YOU KNOW, SHE WAS EXTRAORDINARILY ILL, SHE WAS IN AND OUT OF THE HOSPITAL FOR SIX TO 12 MONTHS. AND AFTER THAT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT SHE WAS ATTENDED TO PROPERLY. YOU KNOW, HER PHYSICAL WELL-BEING WAS PERHAPS ADDRESSED, BUT HER PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING WAS NOT. AND FOR WHATEVER REASON, SHE WAS NOT ABLE TO REPAIR WHAT THAT ABSENCE HAD BROUGHT. SO AS HE GREW OLDER, I THINK HE DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO RELATE TO HER, COULDN'T TRUST HER. AN EX-COMMUNICATION TO BOARDING SCHOOL WAS PROBABLY THE LAST SCHOOL. >> I INTERVIEW HIS MOTHER AND SHE SAID HE WAS A WARM, AND GENEROUS PERSON, IT WAS HIS FATHER WHO WAS THE HARD ONE. BUT GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2017, NOTICING WHAT'S ON THE DESK BEHIND THE PRESIDENT. >> YES. YEAH. IT WAS PRETTY STRIKING. TO BE HONEST, I DIDN'T NOTICE UNTIL I SAW THE PICTURE OF MY BROTHER HAD TAKEN OF ME WHILE I WAS SITTING BY THE DESK. THERE WAS MY GRANDFATHER RIGHT OVER MY SHOULDER. SO I, OF COURSE, HEARD THE CONVERSATION THAT DONALD HAD WITH MARY ANN, MAYBE YOU SHOULD GET A PICTURE OF MOM ON YOUR DESK AND HIS SAYING, OH, YEAH, SOMEBODY GET ME A PICTURE OF MOM. BUT IT WASN'T UNTIL I SAW THAT IMAGE OF MY GRANDFATHER HOVERING IN THE BACKGROUND THAT I REALIZED HOW STRIKING IT WAS THAT MY GRANDMOTHER WAS NOWHERE TO BE SEEN, NOT EVEN AN AFTERTHOUGHT REALLY. ALTHOUGH A PICTURE WAS GOTTEN AND I BELIEVE IT'S STILL THERE NOW. >> TELL ME ABOUT YOUR FATHER AT HIS BEST. >> UNFORTUNATELY, I CAN ONLY DO THAT THROUGH OTHER PEOPLE. BY THE TIME I WAS BORN, HE WAS QUITE ILL. >> ALCOHOL? >> YES,. WHICH, YOU KNOW, CAUSED ALL OTHER KINDS OF ILLNESSES TOO. AND BECAUSE MY FAMILY FOR REASONS THAT ARE RATHER COMPLICATED, WE'RE VERY INVESTED IN PORTRAYING MY FATHER AS A LOSER, SOMEBODY WHO DIDN'T TOE THE PARTY LINE, SOMEBODY WHO BETRAYED BY GRANDFATHER BY NOT GOING INTO THE BUSINESS, AND DOING THE ENTIRELY IRRESPONSIBLE THING OF BECOMING A PROFESSIONAL PILOT FOR TWA AT THE DAWN OF THE JET AGE. I, MUCH TO MY SHAME, DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT HE HAD ACCOMPLISHED. I WAS OFTEN ASHAMED OF HIM, NOT REALIZING THAT THAT HE HAD NO SUPPORT IN THE FAMILY AND WAS TREATED AS SOMEBODY WHO WAS DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR AND WASN'T WORTH INVESTING IN IN ANY WAY, EMOTIONALLY OR OTHERWISE. >> YOU WRITE DONALD FOLLOWING THE LEAD OF MY GRANDFATHER IN AN ACTION OF HIS SICKLES DESTROYED MY FATHER. >> YEAH. THAT WAS HARD TO WRITE, MUCH HARDER TO WITNESS PARTIALLY BECAUSE MY DAD AT HIS BEST, WHICH UNFORTUNATELY WAS IN THE '60s, THE EARLY '60s, WAS -- I MEAN, NOT THAT IT MATTERS, BUT HE WAS AN EXTRAORDINARILY HANDSOME MAN. BUT HE WAS ALSO CHARMING BUT IN A DEEP WAY, KIND, GENEROUS, FIERCELY LOYAL, AND BELOVED. I'VE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH HIS FRIENDS WHO HAVEN'T SEEN HIM SINCE COLLEGE OR EVEN BEFORE THAT, AND THEY REMEMBER HIM AS THE MOST WONDERFUL HUMAN BEING THEY EVER MET. THEY REMEMBER THE WONDERFUL TIMES THEY HAD TOGETHER. HE WOULD PUT THEM IN HIS CESSNA AND FLY THEM TO GO FISHING OUT EAST TO MONTAUK. IT'S EXTRAORDINARY TO HEAR ALMOST 50 YEARS LATER, 60 YEARS LATER WHAT AN INDELIBLE IMPRESSION THEY MADE UPON HIM AND HOW FONDLY THEY STILL REMEMBER HIM. >> YOU SAY THAT WAS A HARD SENTENCE TO WRITE. I LEFT OUT THE NEXT SENTENCE. >> OKAY. >> WHICH IS? >> I'M SORRY, I DON'T REMEMBER. >> I CAN'T LET HIM DESTROY MY COUNTRY. >> AH, YES. I SHOULD REMEMBER THAT. THAT SOUNDS PRETTY ARROGANT, SO LET ME EXPLAIN WHAT I MEAN. I FEEL AS I WRITE IN THE BOOK, THAT THERE ARE SO MANY PARALLELS BETWEEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH MY FAMILY OPERATED AND DID IN WHICH THIS COUNTRY IS NOW OPERATING. I SAW FIRSTHAND WHAT FOCUSING ON THE WRONG THINGS, ELEVATING THE WRONG PEOPLE CAN DO. YOU KNOW, THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE THAT CAN BE CREATED BY ALLOWING SOMEBODY TO LIVE THEIR LIVES WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY. AND IT IS STRIKING TO SEE THAT CONTINUING NOW ON A MUCH GRANDER SCALE. WHAT I WAS GETTING AT THERE IS THAT IF I CAN DO ANYTHING TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE AND TO TELL THE TRUTH, I NEED TO DO THAT BECAUSE I DON'T BELIEVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAD THE ENTIRE TRUTH FOUR YEARS AGO. >> WHY DIDN'T YOU WRITE THE BOOK FOUR YEARS AGO? >> I THOUGHT LONG AND HARD ABOUT SAYING SOMETHING. I HAD -- A BOOK WASN'T IN MY HEAD AT THAT TIME, AND HONESTLY, IT TOOK ME A WHILE TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, TO TAKE THE ELECTION -- HIS PART IN IT SERIOUSLY. SO EVEN IF I HAD THOUGHT OF WRITING A BOOK, THERE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN TIME, BUT I DID THINK OF SPEAKING OUT, KNOWING THAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN QUITE RISKY TO DO. AND THEN I REALIZED THERE LITERALLY WAS NOTHING I COULD SAY AT THE TIME. NOTHING STUCK. YOU KNOW, HE INSULTED A GOLD STAR FAMILY. HE CALLED UPON PEOPLE AT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION TO COME UP WITH A DEFENSE AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON. BY THE TIME THE "ACCESS HOLLYWOOD" TAPE ROLLED AROUND, I KNEW IF I SAID ANYTHING, I WOULD HAVE BEEN PAINTED AS A DISGRUNTLED, DISINHERITED NIECE WHO JUST WANTED HER 15 MINUTES, WHICH OBVIOUSLY BEING SAID ABOUT ME NOW, BUT IT WOULDN'T HAVE MADE -- >> THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE WHITE HOUSE SAYS. THEY SAY IT'S THE A BOOK OF FALSEHOODS, BASICALLY YOU'RE LYING FOR MONEY. >> IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE THAT THEY WOULD SAY THAT. PROJECTION IS A POWERFUL THING. BUT IF I HAD WANTED MONEY OR REVENGE, I WOULD HAVE DONE THIS TEN YEARS AGO WHEN IT WAS INFINITELILY SAFER, AND HE WAS STILL A PUBLIC FIGURE, BUT NEITHER ONE OF THOSE THINGS INTERESTED ME. I WAS LIVING MY LIFE. I WAS BEYOND -- WELL, BEYOND WHAT HAD HAPPENED 20 YEARS AGO WITH MY FAMILY. AND IT WOULD HAVE SERVED NO PURPOSE OTHER THAN GETTING REVENGE OR MAYBE MAKING SOME MONEY. >> WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THE PEOPLE WHO SAY AMERICAN KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING WHEN THEY ELECTED DONALD TRUMP, HE'S KIND OF AN OPEN BOOK? WHAT DON'T THEY KNOW? >> YEAH, I DON'T THINK THAT'S AT ALL TRUE BECAUSE OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK, I DON'T THINK PEOPLE REALLY QUITE UNDERSTOOD THE TRUTH BEHIND HIS BUSINESS RECORD AND HIS FINANCIAL FAILURES, WHICH ARE SERIAL. BEYOND THAT, IT WAS SUCH A COMPLEX ELECTION. THERE WAS SO MUCH GOING ON THAT I DON'T THINK THE CHOICES WERE THAT PEOPLE HAD TO MAKE WERE NECESSARILY BASED ON AN HONEST APPRAISAL. THERE WAS SO MUCH INTERFERENCE FROM SO MANY DIFFERENT SOURCES. AND THE OTHER THING THAT I THINK IS REALLY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE AND THEN I CERTAINLY DIDN'T REALIZE BEFORE 2016 WAS JUST HOW ENABLED HE WOULD BE, WHICH MAYBE I SHOULD'VE SEEN COMING. >> IT'S ONE OF THE THINGS YOU WRITE ABOUT. YOU SAY BASICALLY HE WAS ENABLED INSTITUTIONALIZED IS YOUR WORD. WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT? >> AS I SAY, THERE'S A THROUGHLINE FROM THE HOUSE TO TRUMP MANAGEMENT, WHICH WAS MY GRANDFATHER'S COMPANY IN BROOKLYN TO THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION, WHICH MY GRANDFATHER HELPED DONALD SET UP IN MANHATTAN TO THE WHITE HOUSE. AND THOSE ARE ALL SITUATIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH DONALD HAS ALWAYS BEEN PROTECTED AND CONTINUES TO BE PROTECTED FROM HIS INADEQUACIES, HIS INCOMPETENCE, HIS LACK OF KNOWLEDGE, FROM HIS FAILURES. AND HE'S ALWAYS HAD SUPPORT OF MORE POWERFUL PEOPLE. HE'S ALWAYS HAD PEOPLE PROTECTING HIM FROM HIS MISTAKES OR FROM PEOPLE WHO WOULD TRY TO HOLD HIM TO ACCOUNT, AND HE'S ALWAYS BEEN AMPLY FINANCED. SO AS I ALSO WRITE, HOW DO WE GAGE THIS MAN'S ABILITY TO FUNCTION IN THE REAL WORLD, AND THAT TO ME IS QUITE TERRIFYING. >> YOU'RE A TRAINED CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST. >> YES, >> YOU'VE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT HE'S A NARCISSIST? >> I EXPLICITLY AVOID DIAGNOSING HIM. >> DO YOU HAVE ANY QUALMS AS A PSYCHOLOGISTS LAYING OUT THE POSSIBLE THINGS THAT HE COULD BE SUFFERING FROM? >> NO. I THINK IT'S USEFUL, ESPECIALLY SINCE SO MANY OTHER PEOPLE HAVE DONE IT. I THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO ADDRESS THAT SINCE IT HAS BEEN SUCH AN IMPORTANT ISSUE, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE GOLDWATER RULE VERSUS THE DUTY TO WARN THAT PSYCHOLOGISTS AND PSYCHIATRISTS HAVE BEEN GRAPPLING WITH, SO I WANTED TO ADDRESS THAT WITHOUT EXPLICITLY SAYING THIS IS HIS DIAGNOSIS. HE'S NOT MY PATIENT, HE'S NEVER BEEN MY PATIENT. I DO, HOWEVER, HAVE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ABOUT HIM THAT NOBODY ELSE HAS HAD, SO IT WAS A LOT EASIER FOR ME TO PUT THE DIAGNOSES THAT ARE OUT THERE IN CONTEXT OF HIS DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY. >> BOIL IT DOWN. WHAT'S THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT THING YOU THINK THE COUNTRY NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR UNCLE? >> HE'S UTTERLY INCAPABLE OF LEADING THIS COUNTRY, AND IT'S DANGEROUS TO ALLOW HIM TO DO SO. >> BASED ON WHAT YOU SEE NOW OR WHAT YOU SAW THEN? >> BASED ON WHAT I'VE SEEN MY ENTIRE ADULT LIFE. >> TALK ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOUR FATHER AND HIS YOUNGER BROTHER. >> MY DAD WAS VERY PATIENT WITH DONALD. >> HE WAS ABOUT EIGHT YEARS OLDER. >> ABOUT, SEVEN OR EIGHT. SO IT'S A VERY BIG GAP. THEY WERE IN PRACTICALLY DIFFERENT GENERATIONS. THEY DIDN'T TRAVEL IN THE SAME CIRCLES. BUT MY DAD, WHEN THEY WERE YOUNGER, INCLUDED HIM WHEN HE COULD. YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY WHEN DONALD WAS SORT OF AT LOOSE ENDS WHEN HE WAS AT FORDHAM AND LIVING AT THE HOUSE. DAD WOULD ASK HIS FRIENDS TO INVITE HIM TO DINNER PARTIES OR TAKE HIM OUT ON THE BOOT WITH HIS FRATERNITY BROTHERS FISHING WHEN DONALD WAS MUCH YOUNGER. BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEY -- THEY WEREN'T CLOSE. AND I THINK AS SOON AS IT BECAME CLEAR MY FATHER WAS NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE WITH TRUMP MANAGEMENT, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE EARLY '60s, I THINK DONALD SAW AN OPENING. AND I WANT TO MAKE SOMETHING CLEAR. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO ME. IT'S NOT THAT MY DAD WASN'T GOOD AT IT OR HAD NO INTEREST IN SUCCEEDING MY GRANDFATHER IN HIS COMPANY. HE HAD EVERY INTENTION OF BEING THE NEXT IN LINE AND WORKING HARD TO MAKE SURE THAT HE WAS SUCCESSFUL IN HIS FATHER'S BUSINESS. MY GRANDFATHER DIDN'T GIVE HIM A CHANCE AND MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR MY DAD TO SUCCEED, AND HE WAS SO MISERABLE THAT HE FINALLY REALIZED THAT, YOU KNOW, HE WASN'T GOING TO BE GIVEN RESPONSIBILITY, HE WASN'T GOING TO BE GIVEN RESPECT, SO WHY STAY? AND THAT'S WHAT HE OPTED TO APPLY TO TWA, WHICH HE DID, WHO ACCEPTED HIM RIGHT OFF THE BAT. AND MOVED HIM TO BOSTON AND HE FLEW THE LOGAN-LAX ROUTE, WHICH WAS A BIG DEAL AT THE TIME. BUT BECAUSE THAT WAS CONSIDERED A BETRAYAL, IT DIDN'T LAST. >> A BETRAYAL BY YOUR GRANDFATHER, PRESIDENT TRUMP WASN'T A FAN OF IT EITHER. HE SAYS NOW, AND HE HAS SAID FOR THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS THAT HE REGRETS THE PRESSURE HE PUT ON YOUR FATHER. >> HE SHOULD, BUT HE ALSO ALSO FOLLOWING HIS DAD'S SCRIPT. SO DONALD WAS -- JUST GRADUATED FROM HIGH SCHOOL, SO I CAN'T FAULT HIM NECESSARILY FOR DOING WHAT HIS FATHER ASKED HIM TO DO. IT WAS TERRIBLE TO HAVE PUT ANYMORE IN THAT POSITION, CERTAINLY. WHAT ISN'T OKAY IS THE REVISIONIST HISTORY THAT FREDDY WAS BAD AT IT AND, YOU KNOW, WE SHOULD'VE -- WE SHOULD HAVE LET HIM, AS IF DONALD HAD ANY POWER OVER WHAT MY DAD DID, HE SHOULD HAVE LET HIM DO WHAT HE WANTED TO DO, WHICH AGAIN AT THE TIME THEY CONSIDERED BEING A GLORIFIED BUS DRIVER. AND ALSO THE WAY MY DAD IS PRESENTED, I DON'T THINK THAT I'VE EVER HEARD DONALD TALK ABOUT MY DAD AS A PILOT, AS A MEMBER OF THE AIR FORCE NATIONAL GUARD, OR ANY OF THAT. IT'S MORE AS SOMEBODY WHO COULDN'T HACK IT IN THE FAMILY AND LOST HIS WAY. >> YOUR FATHER ONCE DUMPED A PLATE OF MASHED POTATOES ON DONALD'S HEAD? >> YEAH, THAT'S ONE OF OUR FAVORITE FAMILY STORIES. THEY WERE REALLY YOUNG KIDS AND I THINK DONALD WAS MAYBE 7. ONE OF HIS FAVORITE THINGS TO DO WAS TORMENT MY UNCLE ROB, WHO WAS A COUPLE YEARS YOUNGER. MY GRANDMOTHER WAS COOKING DINNER AND GETTING THE TABLE READY, AND DONALD WAS JUST BEING MERCILESS AND MARY ANN AND MY DAD COULDN'T GET HIM TO STOP. AND FINALLY MY DAD HAD NO OTHER OPTION BUT TO PICK UP A BOWL OF MASHED POTATOES AND JUST DUMP IT ON HIS LITTLE BROTHER'S HEAD. AND IT ENDED THE FIGHT, BUT I THINK IT ALSO STARTED SOMETHING BECAUSE DONALD WAS HUMILIATED BY IT, AS EVIDENCED BY THE WAY HE REACTS TO THIS STORY NOW. HE HAS NO SENSE OF HUMOR ABOUT IT WHATSOEVER. >> IT CAME UP WHEN YOU WERE AT THE WHITE HOUSE IN APRIL 2017? >> YES, YES. >> WHO BROUGHT IT UP? >> MY AUNT MARY ANN, YEAH. WE KNOW THAT HE DOESN'T LIKE THE STORY, SO I THINK IT WAS A BIT OF A DIG. IT'S ALSO A WAY TO REMEMBER MY DAD IN A WAY THAT'S NOT CHARGED BECAUSE ALL OF US EXCEPT DONALD THINK IT'S FUNNY AND SWEET, BUT HE DID NOT -- HE DOES NOT LIKE THAT STORY. >> ELECTION NIGHT 2016, I THINK YOU TWEETED OUT WORST NIGHT OF MY LIFE? >> ONE OF THEM, YEAH. >> ONE OF THE WORST NIGHTS OF MY LIFE. THEN WHY GO TO THE WHITE HOUSE IN APRIL 2017? >> FAMILIES ARE VERY COMPLICATED. I HAD BEEN ON THE OUTSIDE OF THIS FAMILY FOR A REALLY LONG TIME. AND AFTER MY COUSIN IVANKA'S WEDDING, FOR REASONS I DON'T UNDERSTAND, I WAS INVITED TO, MY AUNT MARY ANN AND I STARTED TALKING. AND WE DEVELOPED A RELATIONSHIP WHICH WE HAD NEVER HAD BEFORE, QUITE HONESTLY. AND IT MATTERS TO ME, YOU KNOW? IT WAS THE FIRST TIME I HAD FELT PART OF THE FAMILY SINCE I WAS A KID. AND SOMEHOW IT WAS VERY EASY FOR ME TO PUT ASIDE ALL OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED PREVIOUS TO THAT. AND I ENJOYED HER COMPANY. SHE'S FUNNY. SHE'S SMART. AND IT JUST -- WHEN I GOT INVITED TO HER BIRTHDAY PARTY, I FELT THAT I SHOULD GO. >> THIS IS A HARD QUESTION, BUT I'M GOING TO ASK IT ANYWAY. IS WRITING THE BOOK AN EXTENSION OF THE DYSFUNCTION OF THE FAMILY? >> PROBABLY. YOU KNOW, I DIDN'T WRITE IT AS A FORM OF THERAPY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IN FACT, I WOULD HAVE PREFERRED NOT TO WRITE IT. IT WAS QUITE DIFFICULT. AND I SOMETIMES FEEL I WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF NOT KNOWING SOME OF THE THINGS I NOW KNOW. BUT YEAH, THE BOOK IS ABSOLUTELY BORN OF THE FAMILY DYSFUNCTION. YOU KNOW, NOBODY CAN ESCAPE THAT. YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY MY GENERATION WAS LESS AFFECTED THAN MY FATHER'S, BUT WE'VE BEEN AFFECTED AND I'M NOT GOING TO SPEAK FOR ANYBODY ELSE IN MY GENERATION. BUT IT HASN'T BEEN EASY AND IT'S AN INTERESTING QUESTION AND I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT, IT IS IN PART. >> YOUR BROTHER'S NOT HAPPY WITH THE BOOK. >> I BELIEVE THAT MY BROTHER IS ENTITLED TO HIS PRIVACY AND HIS OPINION, AND I AM COMPLETELY SUPPORTIVE OF WHATEVER RELATIONSHIP HE HAS WITH MY FAMILY AND WHATEVER CHOICES HE MAKES. IT'S NONE OF MY BUSINESS. THIS IS ENTIRELY MY DOING. I DIDN'T CONSULT ANYBODY. IN MY FAMILY NOBODY KNEW IT WAS HAPPENING. YOU KNOW, I DIDN'T FEEL THAT I NEEDED TO ASK PERMISSION BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, BUT I DIDN'T WANT TO IMPLICATE ANYBODY, YOU KNOW? THIS IS MY RESPONSIBILITY AND I BELIEVE VERY STRONGLY THAT IT'S MY OBLIGATION. BUT IF OTHER PEOPLE DON'T FEEL THAT WAY, I COMPLETELY RESPECT THAT. >> YOU DO HAVE ONE POTENTIALLY EXPLOSIVE ALLEGATION IN THE BOOK, AT LEAST ONE, AND YOU WRITE THAT WHEN THE PRESIDENT WAS TRYING TO TRANSFER FROM FORDHAM TO PENN, HE HAD SOMEONE ELSE, A MAN NAMED JOE SHAPIRO TAKE HIS S.A.T.S? >> YES. >> THIS WAS 1964. HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT? >> I'VE BEEN TOLD THIS BY PEOPLE IN MY FAMILY. I AM ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENT THAT IT'S TRUE. I'M HAPPY FINALLY TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK ABOUT IT. I ALSO KNOW THAT IT WAS NOT THE JOE SHAPIRO PEOPLE HAVE BEEN FOCUSING ON WHO JUST HAPPENED TO BE AT U PENN WHEN DONALD WAS WHO HAPPENED TO BE IN NEW YORK ALONG I GUESS WITH MANY, MANY OTHER JOE SHAPIROS AROUND THAT TIME. BUT I STAND BY IT, ABSOLUTELY. >> TO BE CLEAR, IT'S NOT PAM SHRIVER, THE WIDOW OF JOE SHAPIRO. SHE'S COME OUT PUBLICLY. >> YES, AND I FEEL TERRIBLE THAT SHE'S BEEN SUBJECTED TO THIS. HONESTLY I WISH I WOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING SOONER. I'M HAPPY TO NOW. AND I ABSOLUTELY STAND BY THE STORY. I THINK THE ONLY PEOPLE OTHER THAN ME WHO CAN ADDRESS IT ARE OTHER PEOPLE IN MY FAMILY, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING THEIR RESPONSE TO THAT QUESTION. >> HOW DO YOU KNOW IT'S TRUE? >> I TRUST MY SOURCES. >> IS JOE SHAPIRO STILL ALIVE? >> THAT I DON'T KNOW. I HAVE NO IDEA. >> HAVE YOU EVER MET JOE SHAPIRO? >> I HAVE NOT. >> SO YOU BELIEVE IN YOUR SOURCES? >> UH-HUH. >> HOW DO YOUR SOURCES KNOW? >> THEY WERE ALIVE AT THE TIME, SO THEY HAVE FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS. >> AND YOU BELIEVE OTHER MEMBERS OF YOUR FAMILY ALSO KNOW THIS IS TRUE? >> YES. >> AND DONALD TRUMP KNOWS IT'S TRUE? >> YES. >> WHITE HOUSE SAYS IT'S AN ABSURD FALSEHOOD. >> OF COURSE THEY WOULD. BUT THE WHITE HOUSE ISN'T DONALD, AND IT -- THE PRESS SECRETARY FOR THE WHITE HOUSE DOES NOT REPRESENT MY AUNTS AND OTHER UNCLE. >> CAN YOU PROVE IT'S TRUE? >> CAN I PROVE? NO, BECAUSE I'M COUNTING ON PEOPLE I TRUST WHO TOLD ME THIS STORY. SO IN TERMS OF DOCUMENTATION, NO, I CAN'T PROVE IT, BUT I CAN CERTAINLY SAY WITH 100% CERTAINTY THAT I WAS TOLD THIS STORY BY A SOURCE VERY CLOSE TO DONALD. >> YOU DO WRITE THAT HE ONCE HAD A SPARK OF KINDNESS. >> YEAH. I THINK HE DID. THE EVIDENCE FOR IT IS SLIM. IN ALL SERIOUSNESS, WHAT'S TRAGIC ABOUT IT TO ME IS THAT I THINK HE HAD THOSE IMPULSES, BUT THEY HAD BEEN SO PERVERTED BY MY GRANDFATHER. THEY HAD BEEN SO PERVERTED BY THE EXAMPLE OF MY GRANDFATHER HAD MADE OF MY FATHER, THAT HE DIDN'T QUITE KNOW HOW TO DO IT. SO WHEN DONALD WAS TRYING GENUINELY TO BE KIND, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE SUPERFICIAL ARE CHARM HE USES TO DRAW PEOPLE IN INITIALLY. I'M TALKING ABOUT REALLY WANTING TO CONNECT OR BE THERE IN SOME WAY. HE JUST CAN'T DO IT. OR HE COULDN'T. HONESTLY, I DON'T THINK THAT'S EVEN AN ISSUE ANYMORE. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DECADES AGO. AND I BELIEVE -- AND I WRITE ABOUT THIS, THE VERY EARLY STUFF, THAT ONE OF THE UNFORGIVABLE THINGS MY GRANDFATHER DID TO DONALD WAS HE SEVERELY RESTRICTED THE RANGE OF HUMAN EMOTION THAT WAS ACCESSIBLE TO HIM, WHICH MAKES IT -- >> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? >> IT MEANS THAT CERTAIN FEELINGS WERE NOT ALLOWED. >> LIKE? >> SADNESS. KINDNESS ISN'T A FEELING, SO FEELINGS, IMPULSES, THE IMPULSE TO BE KIND, THE IMPULSE TO BE GENEROUS. FOR THE BOYS, I'M SPEAKING OF THE BOYS NOW, PARTICULARLY DONALD AND MY DAD. THOSE THINGS THAT MY GRANDFATHER FOUND SUPERFLUOUS, A STUPID WASTE OF TIME, WERE RUTHLESSLY PUNISHED AND MY DAD COULDN'T CHANGE WHO HE WAS. SO HE JUST WAS DISMANTLED OVER TIME. DONALD TRIED HIS VERY BEST NOT TO BE DESTROYED IN THE WAY MY DAD WAS DESTROYED, SO HE ENDED UP WITH A VERY NARROW RANGE IN WHICH HE COULD SAFELY OPERATE AS A HUMAN BEING. AND IT'S MADE IT EXTRAORDINARILY DIFFICULT FOR HIM TO LIVE IN THE WORLD. AS I SAID EARLIER, HE'S NEVER REALLY HAD TO. SO IT'S CREATED THIS QUITE DANGEROUS SITUATION. >> THE HARDEST SCENES TO ME TO READ IN THE BOOK ARE THE WAY THE FAMILY -- I SHOULD SAY THE MEN IN THE FAMILY -- DEAL WITH WEAKNESS, SICKNESS, DEATH. STARTING OUT WITH FRED SR. WHEN HIS WIFE IS ILL. >> YEAH. YES. GRANDFATHER WASN'T ADHERENT TO NORMAN VINCENT PEEL'S DOCTRINE. IT CERTAINLY DIDN'T BEGIN WITH HIM. MY GRANDFATHER HAD ALWAYS BEEN THE KIND OF PERSON WHO COULD NOT DEAL WITH NEGATIVITY. >> YOU CALL IT TOXIC POSITIVITY. >> YES, BECAUSE IT ALLOWED ROOM FOR NOTHING ELSE. AND THERE WERE TIMES IN OUR LIVES WHEN WE ARE LEGITIMATELY DISTRESSED. WE'RE LEGITIMATELY SAD, WE'RE LEGITIMATELY IN PAIN, AND TO BE PREVENTED FROM BEING ABLE TO FEEL THOSE FEELINGS HONESTLY AND OPENLY IS A FORM OF TORTURE. YOU KNOW, MY GRANDMOTHER, WHO WAS SICK OFTEN AND BROKE BONES MORE TIMES THAN I CAN COUNTED BECAUSE OF HER OSTEOPROSES, SHE WAS IN AGONY MOST OF THE TIME. SHE WOULD BE IN THERAPY AND JUST MOVING WAS EXTRAORDINARILY PAINFUL FOR HER, AND MY GRANDFATHER COULD NOT TOLERATE IT. IT IMPINGED ON THIS IDEA HE HAD THAT EVERYTHING HAD TO BE GREAT AT ALL TIMES. AND THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO SUFFERED FOR THAT WERE THE PEOPLE WHO WERE ACTUALLY IN PAIN. FIRST MY GRANDMOTHER, THEN MY DAD, AND THEN ANYBODY ELSE IN THE FAMILY WHO SHOWED THE WEAKNESS OF BEING HUMAN. >> YOUR FATHER GOT VERY ILL, DEATHLY ILL, AND YOU GET A PHONE CALL FROM YOUR GRANDFATHER. >> YEAH. THAT WAS -- THAT'S THE KIND OF EXPERIENCE THAT'S SHAPED AS MUCH BY WHAT HAPPENED AFTER AS IT IS IN THE MOMENT. AND I REMEMBER THAT CONVERSATION VERBATIM. IT WAS SO STRIKING AT THE TIME, BUT ALSO GIVEN WHAT I NOW KNOW WAS THE TRUTH WHILE I WAS HAVING THAT CONVERSATION, I'VE NEVER -- I WILL NEVER FORGET IT. I HAD BEEN TOLD TO CALL HOME. I DIDN'T KNOW WHY. MY MOTHER WASN'T HOME, SO I WAS TOLD TO CALL MY GRANDPARENTS IN THAT EVENT. WHEN MY GRANDFATHER GOT ON THE PHONE, HE SAID YOUR DAD'S SICK. IS IT SERIOUS? HE'S IN THE HOSPITAL, BUT IT'S NOT SERIOUS. OKAY. BUT, YOU KNOW, WHY AM I CALLING YOU AT 10:00 ON A SATURDAY NIGHT IF IT'S NOT SERIOUS. I WAS THINKING TO MYSELF. SO I SAID, WELL, IS IT HIS HEART, BECAUSE HE HAD HAD OPEN HEART SURGERY THREE YEARS EARLIER AT THE AGE OF 39. AND HE SAID, YES, IT'S HIS HEART, AND I SAID THEN IT IS SERIOUS. YES, IT'S SERIOUS, BUT DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. CALL YOUR MOTHER IN THE MORNING. AND AS I FOUND OUT TWO MINUTES LATER WHEN I CALLED MY MOTHER TO FIND OUT WHAT'S GOING ON, MY FATHER HAD DIED TWO HOURS EARLIER. >> MORE OR LESS ALONE. >> COMPLETELY ALONE. OBVIOUSLY WITH STRANGERS SURROUNDING HIM, BUT NO FAMILY. >> YOU WRITE THAT HIS BROTHER WENT TO THE MOVIES. >> YEAH. THAT SHOCKED EVEN ME WHEN I HEARD ABOUT IT. YOU KNOW, IT WAS BAD ENOUGH. IT WAS PROBABLY WORSE, HONESTLY, THAT MY DAD'S PARENTS JUST SAT IN THE LIBRARY IN THE HOUSE WAITING FOR A PHONE CALL. I WILL NEVER KNOW WHY THEY DIDN'T GO TO THE HOSPITAL TO BE WITH THEIR SON WHO WAS CLEARLY DYING. SO MAYBE IT ISN'T SURPRISING THAT DONALD DIDN'T THINK HE NEEDED TO BE THERE. MAYBE THAT WOULD HAVE LOOKED BAD TO HIS FATHER. AND MAYBE SITTING AROUND WAITING FOR THE PHONE CALL WAS TOO BURDENSOME. I DON'T KNOW. BUT, YOU KNOW, I'VE OFTEN WONDERED WHAT MOVIE DID HE GO TO SEE THAT SEEMED MORE COMPELLING THAN SITTING WITH HIS DYING BROTHER. BUT I'LL NEVER KNOW. >> FOR MANY YEARS AFTER YOUR FATHER DIED, YOU WERE TAKEN CARE OF BY THE TRUMP FAMILY? >> UH-HUH. >> AND THEN FRED TRUMP DIES AND YOU HAVE THE IMPASSE, WHICH YOU'RE STILL DEALING WITH THE CONSEQUENCES TODAY. >> YEAH. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY SOMETHING. YOU SAY TAKEN CARE OF. THE SENSE IN WHICH THAT'S TRUE IS NO DIFFERENT FROM THE THE SENSE IN WHICH IT'S TRUE FOR ANYBODY ELSE IN MY FAMILY. MY DAD HAD TRUST FUNDS, WHICH MY BROTHER AND I INHERITED WHEN MY FATHER DIED. WE HAD THE SAME HEALTH INSURANCE THROUGH MY GRANDFATHER'S COMPANY THAT EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE FAMILY HAD. IT WASN'T AS IF, YOU KNOW, WE WERE GETTING HANDOUTS. WE HAD THE SAME EXACT ARRANGEMENTS EVERYBODY ELSE HAD WITH THE DIFFERENCE THAT OUR FATHER WAS NO LONGER ALIVE AND -- NOT THAT I KNEW IT AT THE TIME, BUT WE HAD NO FURTHER EXPECTATIONS FROM MY GRANDFATHER. DIDN'T FIND OUT UNTIL QUITE A BIT LATER. SO IT'S INTERESTING TO ME THAT THEY HAVE THIS VERY SELF-SERVING DOUBLE STANDARD WHEN IT COMES TO DESCRIBING WHAT I'VE RECEIVED BECAUSE OF MY GRANDFATHER'S WEALTH AND BECAUSE MY FATHER DIED WHEN I WAS 16 AND THEIR OWN CIRCUMSTANCES. >> BUT THE DISPUTE WAS BASICALLY YOU AND YOUR BROTHER BELIEVED THAT YOU DESERVED YOUR FATHER'S SHARE OF THE FAMILY. >> THAT'S ACTUALLY NOT ENTIRELY ACCURATE BECAUSE THE LAWSUIT WAS -- WAS LESS ABOUT MY GRANDFATHER'S ESTATE THAN IT WAS ABOUT A PARTNERSHIP BUYOUT. I DON'T KNOW AT THE TIME I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PUT IT IN THOSE TERMS, BUT THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT IT WAS. SO THAT'S WHERE THE PROBLEMS AROSE. >> AND THE DISPUTE GOT UGLY. YOUR BROTHER HAS A SON WHO HAD HEALTH ISSUES, AND AT ONE POINT THEY THREATENED TO CUT OFF HIS HEALTH INSURANCE? >> THEY DID CUT OFF OUR HEALTH INSURANCE. >> WHERE DID IT GO FROM THERE? >> WE HAD TO SUE THEM TO HAVE THE HEALTH INSURANCE REINSTATED. IT NEVER WAS. I DO BELIEVE, THOUGH, SOME ACCOMMODATIONS WERE MADE FOR MY NEPHEW, THANKFULLY. BUT THAT WAS MY LAST INVOLVEMENT IN ANY WAY WITH THE FAMILY. >> WHEN IT WAS ALL SETTLED, WHEN THE LAWSUIT WAS DONE, DID YOU THINK IT WAS A FAIR SETTLEMENT? >> NO, BUT I DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO UNDERSTAND IN WHAT WAY IT WASN'T FAIR. AND AT THE TIME, AGAIN, IT'S A VERY LONG TIME AGO. I WAS VERY CLOSE WITH MY GRANDMOTHER. SO A LOT OF IT FOR ME WAS WRAPPED UP IN THE -- QUITE HONESTLY, DEVASTATION I FELT WHEN SHE LET US GO SO EASILY BECAUSE OF MONEY. SO THAT WAS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT TO ME THAN THE OTHER SIDE OF IT. AND IT CERTAINLY MADE THE DEALING WITH THE MONEY ISSUES HARDER BECAUSE -- >> BUT IT WAS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY, WASN'T IT? >> I'M A TRUMP, YOU KNOW? EVERYTHING'S ABOUT MONEY IN THIS FAMILY. BUT I'M ALSO DIFFERENT FROM THEM. AND FOR ME, WHAT I UNDERSTOOD AND ONE OF THE REASONS IT WAS SO DEVASTATING WAS THAT MONEY STOOD IN FOR EVERYTHING ELSE. IT WAS LITERALLY THE ONLY CURRENCY THE FAMILY TRAFFICKED IN. SO I KNEW THAT IT WAS ALSO ABOUT LOVE. AND TO BE DISINHERITED, TO BE SHUT OUT ENTIRELY FROM THE WEALTHY OF THE FAMILY WAS TO BE TOLD QUITE EXPLICITLY THAT YOU DON'T COUNT AND YOU ARE NOT LOVED. >> PART OF THE SETTLEMENT WAS A NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. >> UH-HUH. >> WHY DO YOU FEEL TODAY THAT IT'S NOT NECESSARY TO ABIDE BY THAT? >> THERE ARE A FEW REASONS. ONE, SOME OF THOSE REASONS ARE TECHNICAL. AND I'M NOT A LAWYER, SO I DON'T WANT TO GO INTO TOO MUCH OF THAT. >> YOUR LAWYERS MADE THOSE ARGUMENTS. >> THEY DID AND THEY DID BRILLIANT. THEY'RE STORED. TED ABOUT YOU TROSS, ANNIE CHAMPION, THEY'RE EXTRAORDINARY HUMAN BEINGS AND ATTORNEYS. BUT THE TECHNICAL STUFF ASIDE, I DIDN'T FEEL THAT THE NDA MATTER ONE WAY OR THE OTHER BECAUSE WHAT I HAVE TO SAY IS TOO IMPORTANT, AND WHETHER I HAD TO PUBLISH THIS BOOK ON MY OWN OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES OF A COURT BATTLE, I DIDN'T CARE. >> 2017, A FEW MONTHS AFTER YOUR AUNT'S BIRTHDAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE, YOU START GETTING CALLS FROM "THE NEW YORK TIMES." DESCRIBE THAT. >> ACTUALLY, IT STARTED WITH A KNOCK ON MY DOOR. SO THERE WAS NO EASING IN WITH PHONE CALLS. YEAH, SUZANNE CRAIG, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER EXTRAORDINAIRE KNOCKED ON MY DOOR, I BELIEVE IT WAS JUNE OF 2017. AND TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO REWRITE THE HISTORY OF MY FAMILY'S FINANCES, AND SHE BELIEVED THAT I COULD HELP THEM. >> DID SHE KNOW OR WAS SHE FISHING? >> I DON'T KNOW, ACTUALLY. EITHER WAY, SHE WAS SPOT ON. BUT I DIDN'T KNOW. I DIDN'T KNOW IT AT THE TIME. I DIDN'T REMEMBER THAT I HAD ANYTHING IN MY POSSESSION. I PUT IT AS FAR BEHIND ME AS I COULD, AND I SAID TO HER, I'M SORRY, I DON'T SPEAK TO REPORTERS. BUT I TOOK HER BUSINESS CARD ANYWAY, AND THEN SHE STARTED WRITING LETTERS AND CALLED ON OCCASION. AND IT WASN'T UNTIL I GOT TRAPPED IN MY HOUSE BECAUSE I FRACTURED MY FIFTH METATARSAL AND WAS STUKD ON THE COUCH FOR FOUR MONTHS THAT I STARTED THINKING ABOUT HER LETTERS, WHICH SEEMED INCREASINGLY COMPELLING AND CALLED HER. >> WHAT WAS THE PITCH? >> THE PITCH WAS THAT I HAD IN MY POSSESSION, BECAUSE OF THE LAWSUIT, DOCUMENTS THAT THEY BELIEVED COULD HELP THEM UNCOVER CERTAIN FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETIES. AND, YOU KNOW, FINALLY I GUESS AT SOME POINT I THOUGHT WHY NOT? YOU KNOW? IF I CAN HELP -- I KNEW THAT MY SPEAKING OUT WASN'T GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE CERTAINLY THEN, BUT IF THERE'S ANYTHING I CAN DO TO HELP, I DID NOT LIKE WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN THE COUNTRY. I DID NOT LIKE THE WAY THINGS WERE GOING. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PICK UP A LAST STRAW, BUT JUST THE UNRAVELING, YOU KNOW, THE DESTRUCTION OF INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY, FROM THE MUSLIM BAN ON DOWN TO THE KIDNAPPING AND INCARCERATION OF CHILDREN AT THE BORDER. IT WAS UNBEARABLE. AND IT WASN'T JUST DONALD. AS I SAID EARLIER, IT WAS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WILLING TO ENABLE THIS. SO I SAID, ALL RIGHT, AND I WENT TO THE OFFICE OF MY THEN-ATTORNEY AND TOOK A WHILE. IT DIDN'T JUST HAPPEN IN ONE DAY, BUT EVENTUALLY I GOT 19 BOXES FULL OF DOCUMENTS, DROVE THEM TO MY HOUSE AND HANDED THEM OVER AND THE REST IS HISTORY. ONE OF THE, IF NOT THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY PIECE OF JOURNALISM I'VE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE. >> AS A REPORTER, I CAN'T IMAGINE -- OR DESCRIBE IT, WHETHER I CAN IMAGINE IT OR NOT THEIR REACTION WHEN YOU BROUGHT THE 19 BOXES OF TAX DOCUMENTS. >> WE WERE REALLY HAPPY. IT WAS -- YEAH. IT WAS AMAZING. THEY WERE -- WE WERE ECSTATIC BECAUSE IT FINALLY FELT REAL. AND THEY HAD BEEN WORKING ON THIS STORY FOR MONTHS. >> BUT YOU DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT WAS IN THE DOCUMENTS, REALLY? >> NO, I HAD NO IDEA. BUT THEY SEEMED TO THINK THAT IT WAS EXTREMELY VALUABLE. AND I KNEW THAT THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING. >> A YEAR LATER, PULITZER PRIZE, AND IT DESCRIBES A LOT OF THINGS, THAT DONALD TRUMP'S DAD WAS FAR WEALTHIER THAN PEOPLE KNEW, FAR MORE THAN YOU AND YOUR LAWYERS KNEW WHEN WILL WILL WAS BEING FOUGHT OVER, THAT DONALD TRUMP WAS FAR LESS WEALTHY THAN PEOPLE KNEW, BUT FOR HIS GRANDFATHER. AND ALSO RAISED THE QUESTION THAT PERHAPS SOME OF IT WAS DONE IN A WAY THAT COULD CONSTITUTE TAX FRAUD. WHAT ABOUT THAT SURPRISED YOU? >> HONESTLY NONE OF THAT SURPRISED ME. WHAT DID SURPRISE ME WAS THE LENGTH THEY ALLEGEDLY WENT TO, THE FORMATION OF ALL COUNTY, WHICH WAS SIMPLY A SHELL CORPORATION DESIGNED TO SIPHON MONEY AWAY FROM MY GRANDFATHER'S VERY VALUABLE AND SUCCESSFUL COMPANY SO THAT THAT MONEY COULD SORT OF BE DISAPPEARED AND THE MONEY LEFT TO PAY TAXES ON WAS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS. SO THAT AMAZED ME. >> PART OF THE REASON YOU DIDN'T PUT UP A BIGGER FIGHT WAS YOUR LAWYER BELIEVED THE ENTIRE ESTATE WAS $30 MILLION. >> RIGHT. >> WHAT WAS IT? >> IT WAS ALMOST $1 BILLION. SO $970 MILLION MORE. >> WERE YOU SURPRISED AT HOW LITTLE POLITICAL IMPACT THOSE REVELATIONS SEEMED TO HAVE? >> I WAS. YOU KNOW, A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE RIGHTLY EFF FSUSIVE AND GRATEFUL FOR THE BRILLIANT WORK AND THE STARTLING REVELATIONS THAT SHOULD'VE MATTERED. BUT HOW MANY TIMES HAVE WE SEEN THIS PLAY OUT? THIS IS ONE THING THAT I GRAPPLE WITH TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. FOR MOST OF US, OUR MISTAKES ARE CUMULATIVE, YOU KNOW? OR OUR TRANSGRESSIONS ARE CUMULATIVE. SO WHEN THERE'S A RECKONING, THE SUM TOTAL OF WHAT WE'VE DONE IS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. THAT DOES NOT SEEM TO EXIST IN DONALD'S UNIVERSE. THIS HORRIBLE THING HAPPENS AND THEN THIS HORRIBLE THING HAPPENS, SO WE FORGET ABOUT THE FIRST HORRIBLE THING. SO THEY JUST REPLACE EACH OTHER. >> BUT FOR YOU, THE POLITICAL HAD BECOME PERSONAL, AND THE PERSONAL BECAME POLITICAL, AND YOU WRITE I HAD TO TAKE DONALD DOWN. >> YES. MAYBE A BIT OF AN OVERSTATEMENT THERE IN THE SENSE THAT I DIDN'T EVER THINK THAT THERE WAS ANY ONE THING I OR ANYBODY ELSE COULD DO. BUT CERTAINLY IN THAT MOMENT THAT I'M DESCRIBING, I FELT THAT I NEEDED TO DO ANYTHING I COULD, NOT JUST TO STOP THIS, BUT ALSO TO MAKE UP FOR THE FACT THAT I HADN'T DONE ANYTHING IN THE PAST. THAT WEIGHED ON ME, EVEN THOUGH I KNEW THAT IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE, YOU KNOW, IF THIS ALMOST 14,000 WORD ARTICLE DIDN'T HAVE THE KIND OF IMPACT IT SHOULD HAVE HAD BY ALL RIGHTS, THEN NOTHING I WOULD HAVE SAID NECESSARILY WOULD HAVE MATTERED. BUT I DEFINITELY FELT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NEEDING TO DO SOMETHING. >> WHAT DO YOU WANT TO HAPPEN NOW? >> THIS COUNTRY IS ON A PRECIPICE, AND WE HAVE A DECISION TO MAKE IN THE NOT-TOO-DISTANT FUTURE ABOUT WHO WE WANT TO BE AND WHERE WE WANT TO GO AS A COUNTRY. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO PROCESS JUST HOW MANY AWFUL THINGS ARE GOING ON SIMULTANEOUSLY ON A DAILY BASIS. AND PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW. PEOPLE NEED AS MUCH INFORMATION AS IS AVAILABLE IN ORDER TO MAKE A DECISION THAT MAKES SENSE FOR OUR FUTURE. AS A COUNTRY, AS AMERICANS, AS CITIZENS OF THE WORLD, SO TO SPEAK. >> "THE NEW YORK TIMES" REVIEW OF YOUR BOOK CONCLUDES, SAYING IT'S BEEN WRITTEN FROM PAIN AND DESIGNED TO HURT. FAIR CRITIQUE? >> NO. WRITTEN FROM PAIN, ABSOLUTELY. HURTING WASN'T MY -- IT WASN'T A GOAL. IT WASN'T AN INTENTION. IF TELLING THE TRUTH, IF TELLING THE STORIES AS I WERE THEM AS THEY WERE TOLD TO ME CAUSES PAIN, THEN THE PEOPLE WHO PARTICIPATED IN THEM NEED TO LOOK TO THEMSELVES. >> APRIL 2017, I'M GOING TO END WHERE I BEGAN. >> SURE. >> YOU SEE THE PRESIDENT IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND YOU TELL HIM, DON'T LET THEM GET YOU DOWN. DO YOU MEAN THAT? >> I DID. ACTUALLY. THAT WAS FOUR MONTHS IN. HE ALREADY SEEMED VERY STRAINED BY THE PRESSURES. YOU KNOW, HE'D NEVER BEEN IN A SITUATION BEFORE WHERE HE WASN'T ENTIRELY PROTECTED FROM CRITICISM OR ACCOUNTABILITY OR THINGS LIKE THAT. AND I JUST REMEMBER THINKING, HE SEEMS TIRED. HE SEEMS LIKE THIS IS NOT WHAT HE SIGNED UP FOR IF HE EVEN KNOWS WHAT HE SIGNED UP FOR. AND I THOUGHT HIS RESPONSE WAS ACTUALLY MORE ENLIGHTENING THAN MY STATEMENT. AND HE SAID THEY WON'T GET ME. AND SO FAR, LOOKS LIKE HE'S RIGHT. >> IF YOU'RE IN THE OVAL OFFICE TODAY, WHAT WOULD YOU SAY TO HIM? >> RESIGN. >> THANK YOU. >> I'M GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, THANKS FOR JOINING US ON THIS SPECIAL EDITION OF ABC NEWS LIVE. >> SHERIFF'S OFFICE! >> WE MARCH TOGETHER. >> THE MOST POWERFUL STORIES OF OUR TIME, ANYTIME. "NIGHTLINE." >>> YOUR MOM SAID, "COMB YOUR HAIR." YOUR DAD TOLD YOU, "SMARTEN UP." YOUR DOG IS JUDGING YOU RIGHT NOW. AND YOUR BEST FRIEND JUST CALLED YOU CRAZY. WE ALL NEED SOMEONE WHO'LL PULL NO PUNCHES AND GIVE IT TO US STRAIGHT. NOW, IMAGINE GETTING YOUR NEWS LIKE THAT. NO BULL, NO SPIN, JUST GIVE IT TO ME STRAIGHT. STRAIGHTFORWARD NEWS, STRAIGHT TO THE HEART OF THE STORY. ABC NEWS, STRAIGHTFORWARD. >>> THE AMERICANS HERE ON THE >>> NOW, WITH SO MUCH ON THE LINE, ABC NEWS, AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE NEWS, IS RIGHT THERE FOR YOU LIVE ON HULU WITH STORIES OF STRENGTH, STORIES OF HOPE, BECAUSE NOW WHEN IT MATTERS MOST -- >> HULU HAS LIVE NEWS. >> HULU HAS LIVE NEWS. >> HULU HAS LIVE NEWS, AND THAT NEWS IS ABC NEWS. >> "ABC NEWS LIVE" ON HULU. >> "ABC NEWS LIVE" ON HULU. >> WATCH THE NEWS YOU NEED. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR STREAMING WITH US. >> STREAMING TO ALL HULU SUBSCRIBERS RIGHT NOW. >>> ABC NEWS, STRAIGHTFORWARD. >>> I GET KNOCKED DOWN, BUT I GET UP AGAIN, BANKSY SPREADING HIS UNIQUE MESSAGE IN A LONDON TUBE, TAKING TO THE TRAINS. >>> RECORD-BREAKING RISE OF CASES. TEXAS AND ARIZONA WITH A STAGGERING NUMBER OF INFECTIONS TONIGHT . A FIELD HOSPITAL NOW BEING SET UP AT THE CONVENTION CENTER IN AUSTIN. THE LATEST MAJOR CITIES TO ANNOUNCE SCHOOLS WILL BE OPENING ONLINE ONLY. >>> OHIO NOW EXPECTED TO ROLL BACK ITS REOPENING PLANS. THE NEW REPORTING FROM THE FRONT LINES. HUNDREDS OF HEALTH CARE WORKERS DYING ACROSS THE U.S. AFTER BEING EXPOSED TO THE VIRUS. WE'LL HAVE AN UP CLOSE LOOK. >>> PUSHING BACK. DR. ANTHONY FAUCI CALLS THE ATTACKS ON HIM FROM MEMBERS OF THE PRESIDENT'S TEAM, QUOTE, BIZARRE. ONE
Info
Channel: ABC News
Views: 6,928,502
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: mary trump, abc news exclusive, president trump, new book, explosive, first time, george Stephanopoulos, abc news live, p_cmsid=2494279, p_vid=news-71811828, watch, mary trump full interview, trump niece, donald trump, family, trump niece book, 2020, ABC News, interview, politics, 2020 presidential election, book release, book review, too much and never enough
Id: rp_Ew98D4OM
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 58min 13sec (3493 seconds)
Published: Thu Jul 16 2020
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.