3 Scientists, 3 Awful Arguments for God
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Genetically Modified Skeptic
Views: 202,581
Rating: 4.8861432 out of 5
Keywords: atheism, atheist, agnostic, skeptic, skepticism, genetically modified skeptic, scientists believe in god, does god exist, science proven god, science proves the bible, religious vs science, does science disprove god, john lennox, francis collins, Christianity, religious scientists, apologetics, fine tuning argument, problem of evil, prove god exists, bad arguments for god, awful arguments, believe in God in 5 minutes
Id: 79J1fzRgoR8
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 14min 30sec (870 seconds)
Published: Sat Sep 22 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I know this. I know that. Therefore; this = that.
The king of the hill clip was good. But I couldn’t even make it through the first guy’s half baked argument. It was an embarrassing exercise in intellectual dishonesty.
I'm sure John Lennox is a brilliant mathematician, he must be to teach at Oxford. But he's a blithering idiot when he starts into his apologetics.
That third guy, Collins, wrote an amusing book in which he described his Trinitarian Christian epiphany one morning when out camping and he saw a frozen waterfall with a three-part cascade. He also made what he claimed was a Bayesian argument for God that told me only that he didn't understand at all how Bayesian reasoning works. He may be a good project administrator for big science (his greatest claim to fame is the human genome project), but I don't see any "brilliance." I don't know him or his other work, but on the strength of his popular book, I would want to carefully check him on questions of experimental design if I was working with him.