Why Was Hungary Partitioned After WWI? | The Treaty of Trianon

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
The First World War was not a fun  time for multinational empires,   but in its aftermath, no country was  punished more harshly than Hungary: the Hungarian state lost 60% of its population and  70% of its land in the Treaty of Trianon in 1920. Why though was the relatively minor  power of Hungary singled out for   such drastic dismemberment? What  caused Hungary to be partitioned,   and looking back a century  later, was Trianon justified? Well, Hungary was dragged into WW1  (mostly) against its government's wishes. Under the Austro-Hungarian Empire,  Hungary operated autonomously   but shared Austria’s monarch and foreign policy. So, when the Austrian heir to the  throne Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, and Austria-Hungary issued its infamous  ultimatum to Serbia, beginning the war,   Hungary came along for the ride. The Hungarian Prime Minister  until 1917, István Tisza,   then became one of the war’s strongest supporters, seeing it as a fight for Hungary’s very survival. And he wasn’t entirely wrong,  from a certain point of view. Pre-war, less than half of the people within  Hungary’s borders were ethnic Hungarians. I’ll reiterate: over 50% of Hungary’s subjects   didn’t want to be Hungarian,  and the government knew it. They also knew that failure in the war,  and a breakdown of central authority,   would mean an unstoppable nationalist  outbreak among those minorities,   which is exactly what ended up happening. The Paris Peace Conference, where  Trianon was signed, was guided   (in theory) by the principle  of national self-determination: that different ethnicities should have their own  states in which they could govern themselves. Some shrinking of Hungary was inevitable, then,   from the moment it became clear that  they would not be at the victor’s table, but that principle of self-determination  wasn’t exactly applied perfectly. The three biggest concessions  (land ceded to Czechoslovakia,   Romania, and the Kingdom of  Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes) mostly did contain Slovaks,  Romanians, and South Slavs, but significant portions of their  populations were also ethnically Hungarian. And obviously, if Hungarians ruling over  minorities was a problem, then so would be   Hungarians, some 3 million in total, being  made minorities by other nationalities. Now, some spillover was just  not possible to eliminate: people don’t live in nice  clean boxes. In many cases,   Hungarians lived side-by-side with  Slovaks, or Romanians, or Serbs, so exactly what state some regions should've ended  up in was always going to be a matter for debate. Take Northern Transylvania as an example: full  of Hungarians but far away from Hungary proper.   There’s also the simple, undeniable  fact that Austria-Hungary lost WW1, and as a matter of standard practice,   countries that lose wars don’t tend  to be favoured over the winners. But that doesn’t really explain why so many  Hungarians were left outside of their country. First though, let’s be clear: on the whole,   Trianon and the treaty for Austria (both  named for French châteaux) did their job well. They put many millions of people who had  previously been under the Dual Monarchy   in their own countries. (Either old ones  that expanded, or totally new ones). To those nationalities, Trianon  wasn’t a harsh punishment at all;   it was an act of liberation that had come  after, in some cases, centuries of subjugation. On top of that, the Hungary that was left,   while it was smaller, kept the  core Hungarian territories; it was more of a Hungary for Hungarians, as they  made up the vast majority of the population there. So, the argument that suggests that Trianon  was a fundamentally flawed or unjust exercise   is only really true if you believe in the  righteousness of Hungarian empire-building. Still, the millions of excluded  Hungarians were a real fault in the plan,   and North Transylvania aside, most of  them lived in land directly adjacent to, and that could have easily remained a  part of, Hungary. So why didn’t they? Well, the situation on the ground  leading up to Trianon was messy. Hungary went from being a monarchy  linked to Austria, to a liberal republic,   then to a Soviet republic, then back  to a liberal republic, and finally   again to monarchy (though this time without  a monarch) in the course of just two years. In that chaos, a number of screw-ups  by the many Hungarian governments   saw Hungary lose considerably more  territory than they might've otherwise. Most notably, the first republican government  under Mihály Károlyi ordered the Hungarian army,   over a million men strong, to totally disarm, despite the fact that Hungary’s armistice with the  Entente only called for limited demobilisation; apparently, he was under the impression that  that would result in a fairer peace deal.   It did not, and vast swathes of Hungary’s  territory (more than just land inhabited   by non-Hungarians) were occupied by  the much smaller forces of Romania,   Czechoslovakia, and the Southern  Slavs with hardly a shot being fired. On the other hand, the complete  opposite plan failed as well:   when the Communist government briefly took over, it resisted any and all  territorial changes with force   (whether the land was inhabited  by ethnic Hungarians or not). In response, Romania invaded, occupied  Budapest, and forced the Communists out. It also really didn’t help  the Hungarians that their   main enemies were fiercely supported by France, and tacitly by Italy and Britain, both  on the field and at the peace conference. The great powers didn’t necessarily  have anything against Hungary per se,   but they (particularly France) were eager to let  the new Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes,   the new republic of Czechoslovakia, and  Romania have whatever they wanted from Hungary, so as to ensure their support in any future war  against Germany or the Soviet Union. As for why   those countries were even interested in land with  majority Hungarian populations: simple economics. The areas were generally more  urbanised, industrialised,   and productive than the surrounding countryside. Hungary would try to “revise” Trianon  with the help of the Germans during WW2. That didn’t end up working out for  them, but you can find out how Germany,   another defeated power, was carved up  after that war in the video to the left. And as always, I’ve been  James and I’ll see you there.
Info
Channel: Look Back History
Views: 76,952
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: why was hungary partitioned after ww1, what was the treaty of trianon, treaty of trianon, why did hungary shrink, ww1, first world war, partition of hungary, kingdom of hungary, why was trianon so harsh, trianon hungary, hungarian-romanian war, hungarian soviet republic, first hungarian republic, austria-hungary, fall of austria hungary, austro-hungarian empire, versailles, trianon, was trianon fair, czechoslovakia, romania, hungary, yugoslavia, hungary history, hungarian history
Id: IPlqDhEcbn4
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 6min 24sec (384 seconds)
Published: Mon Sep 19 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.