Why the Music in Les Misérables (2012) is Worse than you Thought
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: undefined
Views: 1,642,538
Rating: 4.684032 out of 5
Keywords: Les Misérables, Les Mis, Les Miz, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Russel Crowe, 25th anniversary, Tom Hooper, Cameron Mackintosh, Performing Live, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne, Samantha Barks, Recording on Set, Vocal Tech, Vocal Coach, Valjean, Javert, Fantine, Cosette, Marius, Eponine, Musical Theater, Stage Musical
Id: 1ikqU6G6Xgs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 38min 36sec (2316 seconds)
Published: Tue Jun 30 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I watched the whole 38 minutes and was just in awe of how much agreement I had. Imagine if they did a proper film for like the 40th anniversary. No stupid live singing, and an actual musical theatre heavy cast, rather than people that are good for the posters (Crowe, Hathaway etc)
The ultimate disrespect of the whole movie is them casting Hadley Fraser as a soldier that appeared for 2 minutes and then have Russell fucking Crowe sing as Javert.
I agreed with him so much. Jackman, Crowe and Hathaway are way more actor-like then they are musical like (even Jackman still has that "movie" acting trait). It's great to see Eddie go into it with basically no theatre experience, along with Samantha, Aaron and Amanda and slaying it. Heck, the ABC's all slayed it.
This was so interesting. I never liked the film because it didn’t “sound right”, and I never understood why.
I've watched this a few times and i gotta say that i actually agree with him for a lot of it. I still like how Anne Hathaway did I Dreamed a Dream, and i still think Russell Crowe sounds pretty good, but Hugh Jackman was never my favorite part of the movie, so for someone to give him some criticism instead of slapping it all on Russell Crowe was refreshing.
His Hathaway take is so terrible it nearly ruined the rest of the video for me.
A film requires a more convincing cry than a live performance, obviously. She had to actually cry, else it might as well have just been another filmed version of the musical.
Both are adaptions, acting like they have to be 1:1 is ridiculous. Obviously the film is going to lean more heavily towards acting.
And her gasps of air were obviously not intended to make the song more pleasing to hear.
No shit.
None of his complaints should be directed at Hathaway, this all falls under his first point of criticism, the live performance. Which I agree with.
Jean Valjean's role was tenor. And Hugh Jackman was a baritone. I loved les miserables, seen it several times in Chicago, Louisville, Nashville, and a student version that was done here at the University of Kentucky. I hated this version.
I found this guy's argument so frustrating, and I think the segment about Anne Hathaway is a good example of why. He points out that you can't really cry and also sing super well. This is may be true, but to interpret it as a criticism is to take for granted that it's more important for Fantine to sing well than for her to convincingly cry. The whole point of filming live is that Tom Hooper (and the others involved) believed that isn't true. You may disagree, but that doesn't make the performance bad. They just weren't trying to please you. There are already plenty of technically excellent renditions of Les Miserables, and there is no point in throwing another on the pile. The movie made the deliberate decision to sacrifice technical excellence for great acting performances. I happen to think this paid off. You may not, but I don't think that makes the decision categorically wrong.
tl;dr To criticize the music in the movie for its technical flaws that were deliberate creative decisions is to misunderstand what the movie was attempting to do. It was not trying to sound perfect.