Why Sitcoms Stopped Using Laugh Tracks - Cheddar Explains
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Cheddar
Views: 3,114,531
Rating: 4.8530221 out of 5
Keywords: Cheddar, laugh track, laugh tracks, laugh, sitcom, sitcoms, sitcom no laugh track, sitcom with no laugh track, comedy, without a laugh track, the laugh track, the office laugh track, friends no laugh track, friends without laugh track, with a laugh track, friends without a laugh track, no laugh track, big bang theory no laugh track, laff box, HBO, friends, big bang theory, seinfeld, cheddar explains, explainer
Id: VPShStd8p3Q
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 8min 57sec (537 seconds)
Published: Tue Apr 14 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I always find these discussions to be fascinating. I’m a gen x’er, so I grew up with shows with laugh tracks. My brain must have learned to filter them out, because I don’t even notice them until someone points them out. If I focus on them, they are annoying, but otherwise, I don’t hear them. For anyone who didn’t grow up with them, it must be maddening.
The actual answer to the question starts at 6:12. All before is history of laugh track
"Hey Sheldon, what would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?"
>audience nervously chuckles; a few scattered but stifled guffaws are heard. The anticipatory tension in the air is so thick that one could cut it with a knife.
"Screwed."
>audience barely remains silent as everybody struggles to hold in their laughter, sides silently splitting, their eyes bulging as their faces scrunch together in an effort to contain themselves. Several people, mostly women and children, simply pass out, falling forward in their seats. Some people move to help them, but they too pass out, incapable of both holding their laughter and helping their fellow man.
"There you go."
>audience explodes in a raucous cacophony of overpowering noise. Ears begin to bleed as the combined volume of their laughter and mirth breaks the sound barrier. Eventually sonic waves begin pouring forth from the audience as its members begin to cackle on in unison; those who passed out before have now risen and added their voices to the din. On stage, the actors catch the full brunt of the audience's veritable sound explosion. Those lucky enough to be center stage die quickly as their brains are scrambled; those unfortunate enough to be on the sides suffer slowly as their brains slowly melt, bleeding from every orifice. Eventually the audiences grows too loud and brings the studio crashing down upon their heads, silencing them forever.
The thing I feel like I see a lot of the younger generation missing about laugh tracks is the "social/theatrical element." Laugh tracks were not designed to make you think the jokes are funnier than they actually are. These shows aren't trying to tell you when to laugh. Seinfeld wasn't funnier than Curb Your Enthusiasm because it had a laugh track, and Larry David isn't better at writing jokes for CYE than he was for Seinfeld. If making jokes funnier is even a measurable effect of laugh tracks, it is a welcome, side-benefit. The real reason for laugh tracks (or live studio laughter) is partially tradition, and partially to infuse a theatrical element and tonal warmth to the show. Before TV, people went to the theater. The social element of the theater is what they were used to. TV producers, in an attempt to make the rather new and expensive small-format experience of TV more appealing and wholesome to families at home, found recorded laughter a welcome familiarity to TV-viewing audiences. TV audiences liked it. If they hadn't, it wouldn't have become the fixture of TV comedies that it ultimately became. On top of this, as many of the traditions of theater overlapped with TV production in its formative years (and there was much crossover between stage and screen), TV producers brought audiences into the studios, which they found to be a valuable element of feedback for the actors, directors, and writers, as well as a great advertising tool.
To put it briefly, the success of the "laugh track," and the relatively low-cost production of the "3-camera" sitcom in comparison to "single-camera" dramas, quickly solidified and traditionalized its use. Audiences grew accustomed to it, and the laugh track became more than just a recording of the live studio audience, or a simulation of theater. It became a kind of social cohesion--a subconscious glimpse or reminder that when you watched broadcast TV, you weren't watching it alone, you were watching simultaneously with thousands or even millions of other folks in your city, time-zone, or country, so many of your fellow countrymen, all huddled on their living room couches, enjoying the same piece of entertainment. It also became a genre signifier. Like the canted camera angles and harsh shadows of a noir, or the bright technicolor and brassy orchestras of a Hollywood musical, a "3-walled" set and a laugh track signaled a certain kind of comedy-- a tone, joke-type, and a rhythm.
The decline of the laugh track, in my opinion, is primarily the consequence of 2 prominent trends in TV: the rise of on-demand (a.k.a. Streaming or non-broadcast) content, and the radical reduction in cost of "single-camera" sitcoms relative to the stage-play-like "3-camera" sitcoms. With these shifts, TV audiences started becoming more and more accustomed to a rapidly expanding assortment of single-camera, laugh-track-less sitcoms while simultaneously losing their connection to the last remnant of "congregation" in TV: broadcast. The experience for TV audiences, in effect, has been the near-total severing of its relationship to the crowded theater. Laugh-tracks, where they remain, exist as a form of tradition or nostalgia.
I can save you 9 minutes by just telling you that it's because of The Simpsons.