Why making energy from dirt might save the world | Rusty Towell | TEDxACU
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: TEDx Talks
Views: 232,900
Rating: 4.7057796 out of 5
Keywords: TEDxTalks, English, United States, Science (hard), Energy, Physics, Poverty
Id: jDqCpfVwdP4
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 19min 37sec (1177 seconds)
Published: Mon May 11 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I hope thorium lives up to its promise, but it sounds like snake oil in this presentation. Fusion is going to make electricity too cheap to meter. Hype Loop can be built for less than the cost of a two-rut dirt road. Thorium is going to save the world because people in India burn cow dung. They all sound about the same to me.
Wind is cheaper than nuclear, in terms of levelized cost of electricity from new generating capacity. He's not saying anything that's going to change that. If thorium had been ready to go, off-the-shelf, as a cheaper source of electricity than coal, for the past sixty years, I think some country's utility would have built them.
Disposing of waste heat from electric generation is a cost, when the source of the heat going into the turbine is coal, or uranium, or natural gas, or oil. Yet we're supposed to believe that if we change the hot side of the turbine from coal to thorium, that would turn the waste heat from waste into benefit. Bogus.
Thorium is an abundant fuel, at reasonable cost. This page cites an estimate of six million tons of thorium recoverable at a cost of $80/kg. In the TED talk, he makes it sound as though we'll be getting thorium out of ordinary dirt, for free. The same page characterizes molten salt reactors thus: "These reactors are still at the design stage but are likely to be very well suited for using thorium as a fuel." The TED talk makes it sound as though the technology was fully developed in the 1950s, and just not used because it wouldn't make nuclear bombs.
Coal doesn't make nuclear bombs either. He doesn't explain why that made us stop building thorium nuclear plants but didn't make us stop building coal-burning ones. I'll go with the non-TED explanation that molten-salt reactors, and thorium power in general, never got the R&D done. So we don't really know how much they'll cost, or how well they'll work, until we do the R&D.
Ah, lovely thoriβ Sees TEDx Oh.
Well it's still an interesting talk.
Anybody know about fission byproducts from thorium, and disposal methods? Duh, I quoted Polyanna Reddit to some random nuclear engineer and he said this is a huge problem. Ideas?
I'm still pissed the THTR-300 was shut down.
This TEDx talk is about 20 minutes long, but worth taking the time to watch in my opinion.
Reddit: what are your thoughts on thorium as an energy source? I hadn't heard much about it before seeing this video, but now I'm intrigued.