Why Jurassic Park Looks Better Than Its Sequels
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Films&Stuff
Views: 4,213,683
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Jurassic Park Review, Jurassic Park Video Essay, Jurassic Park Analysis, Why Jurassic Park Looks Better Than It's Sequels, Jurassic Park CGI
Id: BKALxKbjOaE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 8min 33sec (513 seconds)
Published: Wed Aug 14 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Brilliantly put!
Yeah, Spielberg knows what heβs doing. Jurassic Park is the blockbuster by which all other blockbusters must be judged. Amazing to think that he was simultaneously making this and Schindlers at the same time.
What a cool analysis, I wanna watch Jurassic Park now!
Any one got more recommendations for videos on cinematography like this? I absolutely love watching analysis of visual story telling that's explained in this way.
There are some bits of misinformation in this video. First what he refers to as CinemaScope is just in fact anamorphic shooting. CinemaScope is a specific type of anamorphic shooting that was popular in the 50s and 60s, and is not really used anymore except by some pastiche filmmakers like Tarintino.
Also, he says that spielbergs flat (1.85: 1, spherical) aspect gives more vertical space compared to the scope (anamorphic) aspect. While there is some procedural truth to this itβs not technically true. Instead a scope (anamorphic) frame gives more horizontal space than a flat aspect. For instance, if you take two 40mm lenses, one anamorphic and one spherical, both frames would have the same top and bottom edges but the anamorphic lens would capture further left and right than the spherical lens. I hope that makes sense.
So while his point about the flat image allowing for a more vertical emphasis is true, his technical reason behind it is a bit off. Otherwise, good video
Subbed!
Some really great insight. It seems like this kind of thing should be communicated to the director and dp of the sequels. It goes to show what a young medium it is, that it isnβt.
Or because we have Sam Jackson in it.