Why is Slipstream GREAT but Dirty Air AWFUL?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Chain Bear
Views: 492,614
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: f1, formula 1, explained, how to, racing, how does, chainbear, chainbearf1, chain bear, chainbear f1, chain bear f1, aerodynamics, aero, dirty air, slipstream, overtaking
Id: nivswe7Zyuc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 10min 26sec (626 seconds)
Published: Thu Sep 30 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
really cool video TLDR;
behind another car on straights - good
behind another car at corners - bad
Chainbear is repeating the same big mistake you often hear about slipstream: that it would be caused by the wake of a car having "less air" than the other air.
What's really happening is that an F1 car is pushing the air forwards, in fact exactly as much as the air is pushing the car back. At top speed an F1 car is acting as a 1000 horsepower fan pushing and pulling air forward (also upwards but that's less important here). It shouldn't be a surprise that the air right in the wake of a car is following the car a bit (that's precisely what a wake is), probably a few tens of milometers per hour. A car following closely will therefore experience a little less headwind, reducing the drag it experiences, and the top speed increasing by almost as much as that effective tailwind it is experiencing.
If that doesn't feel natural you can change perspective to a wind tunnel with two cars behind each other. The second car experiences the same air density, but is slightly shielded from the wind by the car in front.
The density of air really doesn't change significantly in cases such as these. For air density to change significantly you need to approach the speed of sound, that's how fast air is able to rush into a lower density region.
Some basic sources:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipstream has it correctly, though not that clear.
youtu.be/13PlkHbj3SM by an ex F1 earodynamicist, he does use pressure as part of his explanation but notice that he never mentions "density". Saying that a car has a low pressure wake is just saying that it sucks air forward.
Chain bear is my favourite F1 YouTube channel by a mile. The animations are always on point and he makes good reasonable comments. Not a clickbaity chanel like several others.
Is it not the same thing? I always thought it was bad through the corners because of the loss of downforce for but good on the straights because of the loss of downforce.
Cool, I was wondering about this.
The thumbnail is actually enough to understand it.
Oh god that thumbnail. I can't be the only one
There's focus on next years cars no making dirty air. Does this mean they'll have less slipstream too?
Good as always.