On Tuesday, July 30th, NASA announced 19 different
partnerships with 13 different companies to use their expertise to help them develop space
technologies, from advanced communications systems to new methods of entry, descent and
landing. Instead of contracting out specific projects,
NASA will make its employees, facilities, hardware and software available to these companies,
for free. One of the most notable of these partnerships
will be with SpaceX and NASA’s Glenn and Marshall Centers to help advance the technology
of transferring propellant in orbit. In other words, NASA is going to help SpaceX
figure out how to refuel a spacecraft while it’s in space. And if they can figure this out, it could
completely change the way missions are launched and flown. Think about the way a modern rocket mission
is flown. The rocket is filled up with all the propellant
it’s going to need for its journey. The first stage, second stage, etc, each of
these contain propellant tanks filled with rocket fuel. These lower stages are discarded, and once
the upper stages get to orbit, the rest of the spacecraft has to complete its mission
with whatever propellant it has left on board. In fact, the Saturn V and the Space Launch
System are so enormous because they need to carry all this propellent, in all these different
tanks. NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft weighed less
than a tonne, but it required the largest Atlas rocket with 5 strap-on solid rocket
boosters to get the velocity it needed to make the journey to Pluto. There are many fascinating missions in the
planning stages, an orbital mission to Neptune, the LUVOIR space telescope, but these will
require the upgraded Block II version of the Space Launch System, capable of launching
130 tonnes into low Earth orbit. And we’ve been waiting a long time for the
first Space Launch System rocket to fly at all. Imaging going on a road trip, and needing
to fill your car with all the fuel you’ll need for the entire trip. It doesn’t make sense. You stop and refuel your car, that makes sense. Thanks to SpaceX, and its boosters that return
to Earth and land under their own propulsion, it’s clear that the future is reusable,
and that means that orbital refueling can become a reality. The SpaceX Starship, formerly known as the
BFR, will depend on orbital refueling to complete many of its missions. Once developed, the Starship will consist
of two stages. There’s the first stage, which is now called
the Super Heavy. This is the equivalent of the Falcon-9’s
first stage. This stage will be 63 meters long and 9 meters
in diameter. It’ll have a total mass of over 3,000 tonnes,
built out of stainless steel, with fuel tanks of liquid methane and oxygen. It’ll be powered by 35 Raptor engines, fueled
by methane. Everyday Astronaut has done a fascinating
video about the Raptor, and why it’ll be such a revolutionary engine, and I’ll put
a link to his video here. Just like the Falcon-9, the Super Heavy will
get the whole stack off the ground, detach from the upper stage and then return to Earth,
ideally landing on its launch pad again, ready for another flight. The upper stage Starship will be 55 meters
tall and have several different configurations. There’ll be a version that takes humans
to Mars or the Moon. And a cargo version that will launch satellites
into various orbits. And there will be a tanker version that does
nothing but carry tonnes propellant to orbit, to refuel Starships for their various missions. According to SpaceX, one, two and even five
of these tanker Starships could launch to orbit to completely refill a Starship’s
fuel tanks with more methane and oxygen. With one tankers’s worth of fuel, a Starship
could travel to the Moon, land on the surface, and then return to Earth. Completely fuel its propellant tanks with
5 refills, and you could carry hundreds of tonnes of people, equipment and supplies to
Mars, not to mention enormous interplanetary robotic spacecraft that could seriously explore
other worlds. These missions will depend on being able to
safely transfer fuels in the difficult environment of space. That’s why NASA’s help will be so valuable. For all the missions that have flown to space,
and the number of times that spacecraft have docked with each other, orbital refueling
isn’t much of a consideration. It’s most commonly done today with the Russian
Progress spacecraft which docks with and resupplies the International Space Station. This is based on technology the Russians developed
to keep their Mir space station refueled. Each Progress M1 Refueling Module has eight
propellant tanks on board, which can carry 1,740 kilograms of fuel and oxidizer. When it docks with the International Space
Station, the Progress transfers the fuel and oxidizer to the Space Station’s propulsion
system through fluid connectors in the docking ring. NASA has also gotten even more complicated,
testing out the equivalent of a full-service gas station in orbit. The Robotic Refueling Mission is a multi-phase
test carried out using the International Space Station as a platform to test out refueling
and satellite servicing methods. The RRM consists of a washing machine-sized
box with all hardware that would be used as part of a refueling procedure. The station’s robotic arm demonstrated that
it could act as an orbital service station attendant, peeling back protective thermal
blankets, unscrewing caps, turning valves, and transferring fluid. In other words, NASA has already tested out
many of the technologies that SpaceX would need to make their orbital refueling ideas
a reality. They’re providing all this hardware and
expertise for free as part of this new agreement. In turns out, United Launch Alliance has been
pushing for this idea for a while with a system that would enable orbital refueling at a huge
scale, and we’ll get to that in a second, but first I’d like to thank: John Richards
Isaac Carroll James Miller
Kevin Arbutha And the rest of our 798 patrons for their
generous support. They contribute so that you can see these
videos, and we can make them freely available to anyone who wants to learn about space. Join our community at patreon.com/universetoday
and get in on the action. In 2010, Frank Zegler and Bernard Kutter from
United Launch Alliance presented their ambitious plans to develop an orbital propellant depot
at the AIAA Space 2010 conference in Anaheim California. According to their calculations, 70% of the
mass that actually makes it to low-Earth orbit is simply propellant. Unlike the complex hardware for keeping humans
alive, deploying robots or powering a spacecraft, we’re talking about pressure vessels containing
rocket fuel. This is the simplest cargo that could be carried
to orbit, and should be a commodity at this point. The problem is that the technology hasn’t
been developed to receive, store and then provide these propellants to other spacecraft
when they need them. According to Zegler and Kutter, the thinking
had been that these orbital depots would need to be enormous, International Space Station-scale
structures built by many launches and assembled in space by robots or astronauts. But they proposed that depots could actually
be much smaller. The key is to use them. Keep the fuel flowing. The total capacity of a refueling depot might
be 120 tonnes of propellant, but it could provide over 300 tonnes to various missions
over the course of a year. A low-Earth orbit fuel depot would be helpful. An even better place might be the Earth-Moon
L2 Lagrange point. This is a region of stability located about
60,000 kilometers beyond the Moon. From this point, it only takes a little bit
of fuel to completely escape Earth orbit. In order to travel to Mars from low Earth
orbit, spacecraft need to acquire a change in velocity of 4.3 km/s. But to go from the L2 point, they’d only
about 1 km/s. This means dramatically less propellant. More hardware, people and cargo can be carried
to the Red Planet. Imagine a mission where a rocket blasts off
from Earth, and then the upper stage flies to the Earth-Moon L2 Lagrange point. It refuels at the supply depot and now has
the propellant it needs to carry a huge payload to Mars. No massive new rockets required. There are challenges, of course. Liquid hydrogen and oxygen need to be kept
at incredibly cold temperatures, or they’ll evaporate because of the heat from the Sun
and Earth. But block the light of the Sun with a sunshade,
and you can reduce those boil-off rates to essentially zero. United Launch Alliance proposed the Advanced
Common Evolved Stage, or ACES based on technology developed a few years earlier by Boeing and
Lockheed Martin. Each ACES upper stage would contain twice
the propellant of a traditional Centaur upper stage booster - 41 metric tonnes of fuel. And a stretched version would have 73 tonnes
on board. The fuel depot itself would consist of two
of these upper stages mated together, with a sunshield to protect it from the heat of
the Sun. Then bulk propellant could be launched to
the depot in 26 tonne increments, filling it up and providing the fuel storage for future
missions. ULA proposed a test for the ACES system in
2011 that would have cost less than $100 million, but political issues snared up the program,
delaying any further development. I’m going to provide a link to a fascinating
story from Eric Berger at Ars Technica that shows some of the political machinations that
went on behind the scenes, delaying the development of the ACES system. Which is too bad, because it’s clearly the
future. It’s only now that SpaceX is seriously considering
orbital refueling, and this technology could have been a decade ahead. In a recent interview with Ars Technica, ULA
president Tory Bruno said that the development of ACES is still on the roadmap, but it’ll
happen after their next generation Vulcan rocket flies. So that’ll be years. Orbital refueling is going to be the future. Heavy launch vehicles like the Saturn V and
Space Launch System are complicated and expensive. It makes a lot more sense to settle on smaller,
more reusable spacecraft, and then use space-based refueling to take them where they want to
go. The technology has been tested on a small
scale, but it’s clearly time to take things to the next level. As we expand out into the Solar System, it
makes sense to build up the infrastructure to support our exploration. Into the future, we can expect to see fuel
depots scattered across the Solar System, ready to provide propellant for missions traveling
from world to world. What do you think? Does it make more sense to refuel rockets
in orbit? Let me know your thoughts in the comments. Once a week I gather up all my space news
into a single email newsletter and send it out. It’s got pictures, brief highlights about
the story, and links so you can find out more. Go to universetoday.com/newsletter to sign
up. Did you know that all of my videos are also
available in a handy audio podcast format, so you can have the latest episodes as well
as special bonus material like interviews with me show up right on your audio device. Go to universetoday.com/audio, or search for
Universe Today on iTunes, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. I’ll put a link in the shownotes. And finally, here’s a playlist.
