Who Controls All of Our Money?

Video Statistics and Information

Captions Word Cloud
You are watching Coldfusion TV Welcome to another Coldfusion video I'm going to start this video off with a quote. Henry Ford once said: "It is well enough that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system for if they did I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." I quote this because it encapsulates the fact that the contents of this video may be unsettling compared to the videos that i normally make. I still feel compelled to make this video because I've been exploring the financial world for the last four years and it has definitely given me a more complete view of the world. I want to share some of what i've come across with you guys I'm also going to do a video about crypto-currencies like Bitcoin in the future and to understand why Bitcoin and other crypto-currencies may continue to rise, it's critical that you understand the contents of this video. I hope that you find this topic interesting and that it inspires you to do your own research afterwards. Now, with that said, let's begin. So who controls all of our money? It's a simple question! We all know that you and I don't control it. Our employees don't controll it. The companies that they work for don't control it. So who does? Where does it even come from in the first place? I'll give you a hint... Money does NOT come from the government It's a seemingly obvious question that's never asked or taught in schools for some reason. Unfortunately, most people's lives are basically dedicated to money. It's all people ever worry about or talk about. We go to school to learn basically how to go to university, to learn the skills to get a good job so that we can trade hours of our lives all for this thing called "money". So why wouldn't you want to know where money comes from and who issues it? Today, in this very special video, you're about to find out the answers to the question of "Who controls all of our money?" People today can tell something isn't quite right with our financial system, but they just can't put their finger on it. Some people think it's the failure of government, others think that it's the failure of the capitalism itself This video should clarify a few things. The year is 1694 andEngland had just suffered through 50 years of war. Exhausted, the English government needed loans to fund their political means. Brainchild of Scottish banker William Paterson, it was decided that a privately owned bank that could issue the money to the government out of thin air was to be the solution. This was the very first modern central banking system in the world. Central banking is more influential than laws, governments and politicians, but strangely not the focus of the general public. Fast forward to the early 20th century, and after two failed attempts a group of bankers wanted to put a central bank in the United States of America. It was December of 1910 and senator Nelson Aldrich boarded a private train car in New York with six others. The six were not to be spotted by any news reporters to avoid questions. Their destination: Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. The meeting went for nine days and from that they created the Federal Reserve System. This is all documented and a matter of public record. Some of them went on to write about the meetings in their personal biographies. Here is a quote from Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York February 9th 1935 in the Saturday Evening Post: "I was as secretive - indeed, as furtive - as any conspirator. Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted If it were to be exposed that our particular group had got together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever of passage by Congress. The six men that Nelson Aldrich brought together included the head of banks, branches of government such as the Treasury and some of the richest people on Earth at the time. To give you an idea of how rich they were in 1910 these six men represented a quarter of the world's worth. The bankers told the American public that the purpose of the system was to stabilize the economy and to stop the grip of the Wall Street banks over America. The problem was the guys that wrote the bill were the very same people they said they'd stop. If they succeeded, it would give a small group of men the ability to create money from nothing and loan it to the American government with interest. So why was it done in secret? Because the American people didn't want a central bank. Back then, unlike today, people knew what central banks were and understood them very well. Everywhere a central bank went, there would be wealth inequality, wild swings between economic booms and busts and after each bust, those in the top of society mysteriously came out richer, while everyone else got poorer. Europe was a running example of this at the time. The Federal Reserve was originally drafted as the 'Aldrich bill', but when it came into Congress, they recognized Senator Aldrich's name and smelled a rat. The bankers needed better cover. They decided to send two millionaire friends to carry the bill to quell the suspicions of Congress and renamed it "The Federal Reserve Act". Next in this textbook lesson of deceit the bankers set out to fool the American people through disinformation. In the newspapers of the day the bankers screamed and protested against the new Federal Reserve bill. "It would ruin the banks!" they exclaimed. The average person read the protesting articles of the bankers and thought to themselves: "If the bankers hate it, it must be good" and then they ended up unknowingly supporting a Trojan horse. The bankers also fooled Congress by putting clauses in the bill that limited their power only to remove them once the bill was passed. A double head fake of the public and Congress - was all it took. The bill was passed on December 23rd 1913 while most of Congress was out on holiday. And with that, a small group had complete monopoly over the issuing and creation of American money. Today the Federal Reserve is the most powerful entity in the United States and they're not ashamed to admit it either. Here is former Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan. What should be the proper relationship between the chairman of the Fed and a President of the United States? Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. What the relationships are don't frankly matter. In addition to this, it seems that the Fed can't even be touched by investigating parties. So I'm asking you if your agency has in fact, according to Bloomberg, extended nine trillion dollars in credit, which, by the way, works out to 30,000 dollars to every single man woman and child in this country. I'd like to know: if you're not responsible for investigating that, who is? We actually have responsibility for the Federal Reserve's programs and operations to conduct audits and investigations in that area. In terms of who's responsible for investigating ... Would you mind repeating the question one more time? Mr. Chairman my time is up, but I have to tell you honestly I am shocked to find out that nobody at the Federal Reserve, including Inspector General is keeping track of this. "So what does all of this have to do with me?" you might be asking. "I don't even live in the US" Well, two reasons. Number one: the central banking model from the Bank of England and the United States has now been put in all countries and even consolidated power in parts of Europe as the European Central Bank or ECB This unites separate countries under one economic policy. The only places in the world that don't have central banks are North Korea, Iran and Cuba. In 2000 this list suspiciously included Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. And number two: since the end of World War II, the US dollar has been the reserve currency of the world. This means that all central banks hold US dollars in their reserves. In other words all other currencies are backed by the US dollar. This directly links to your country to the Federal Reserve's monetary policy in America. More on this later. When the post- World War II monetary system, called the "Bretton Woods" system, was created, all US dollars were backed by and exchangeable for gold. A byproduct of this was that currencies used to be very stable in relation to each other. For that, all the countries, the exchange rates were fixed and year after year you could predict what prices were going to be. You could start a business elsewhere, you could calculate profits, business was much easier before floating exchange rates. Unfortunately, in 1971, due to a falling US dollar, international capital flows into gold and the funding of the Vietnam War, President Nixon took the US dollar off the gold standard. I have directed secretary Connally to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets. Now the dollar was floating and backed by nothing and has been ever since. So let's think a little: if the US dollar is backed by nothing but the world reserves are backed by the US dollar intrinsically since 1971, doesn't this mean that all currencies are now backed by nothing tangible, only trust in the American government? Well, this is correct! Money backed by nothing is known as "fiat currency". "Fiat" in Latin means "let it be done". In other words, the government says it is money, so it is. A consequence to having money backed by nothing is that whenever the Federal Reserve creates money it dilutes the currency supply of all other nations because their reserves are backed by the US dollar. All countries' reserves are worth less each time money is created. In the past few years the Federal Reserve has printed trillions of dollars and countries like Russia and China have noticed this. As a reaction to the money printing, these countries have been selling US dollar reserves and buying gold over the same period. "But wait a second!" Some of you clever thinkers out there may have asked yourselves: "If every currency on Earth is backed by nothing, how am i able to pay for things?" Well, as it turns out, the whole economic system today is running because it is backed by faith. Faith that you can exchange your unit of currency for goods or services. In a way, part of that faith comes from the fact that not many people actually know where money comes from. We're about to find that out in this video. A central bank is essentially the entity that manages a nation's money supply and it can loan money to the government with interest. In the United States and most other countries it works like this: When the government needs more money than they received from taxes they ask the Treasury Department for money. The Treasury then receives an IOU or bond from the government. The Treasury, through the banks, gives this IOU to the Federal Reserve. The Fed then writes a check for this IOU and hands it to the banks. At this exchange at the banks, money is created and it can be used to pay government bills. So hang on! Where does the Fed get the money to be able to write this check? They get this money from nowhere! They literally just invent it. Here's a quote from the Boston Federal Reserve: "When you or I write a check there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the check. But when the Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money". So, in essence, they're writing a check and creating money from an account that has no money in it. The money the Federal Reserve creates can be used as legal tender to buy things and eventually makes its way into the real economy. If you and I did that, we would go to jail for fraud, but they can do it because they invented the system. This is the same system used throughout the world today Another part of this money creation happens at the commercial bank side. Every time you take out a loan to buy a house, car or TV, banks create money out of nowhere to give you this loan and you still have to pay interest on it. And don't just believe me when I say that. Hear it for yourself from the horse's mouth, the people running the system, Graham Towers, former governor of the Central Bank of Canada states: "Each and every time a bank makes a loan, new credit is created. New deposits. Brand new money." Paul Tucker, deputy governor of the Bank of England: "Banks extend credit by simply increasing the borrowing customers' current account." So what they're basically saying is that each time the bank makes a loan, the bank doesn't use other people's deposited money and give it to you. It creates new money. In modern times this means typing digits into a computer. 97% of all money is digitally created like this. Only 3% is the physical cash and coins that we carry. Another crazy thing that commercial banks can do is lend out 10 times more money than they actually have in reserves. This is called fractional reserve lending. So who wrote this ridiculous system into law? For the United States, it was part of the Federal Reserve System drafted in 1913. And again, this is the same system used throughout the world. So what's the issue? Why should I even care? Well there's consequences. When more loans are given out more money is created and the rest of the money in circulation is worth less and less as the years go on. This is known as inflation. In a way, inflation is basically a tax that we all pay for the fraud of money printing. Easy money now in exchange for tax on our future generations. It's also why in 1950 a house used to cost $7,000 and a car $2000. Obviously, this is no longer the same today. Things will always keep getting more expensive as long as this system is in place. This was actually kind of OK because wages grew in relation to inflation until about 2008. Why this stopped happening is a story for another day. So things are already pretty crazy, but they get even crazier. The more you look into it, the stranger things become. So remember we were talking about how central banks and commercial banks can create money out of nothing This procedure actually does create something. It creates debt. Let me explain: When you take out a loan, it's written down as an asset in the bank as a negative form, kind of like a negative value of money, or otherwise known as "debt". Under this system, debt is actually money. And again, don't just listen to me. Marriner Eccles, former Governor of the Federal Reserve states: "If there are no debts in our money system, there wouldn't be any money." So, in essence, instead of gold being the backbone of our economy, it is now debt. The system we're under now is sometimes referred to as "the debt based monetary system". It requires that debt always grows. Countries and people must become deeper in debt so that there's more money in the system, because, remember, debt is money. If people and governments stopped borrowing money and paper clones, the debt doesn't grow, the money supply shrinks and the system falters. It truly is bizarre, but we all live in this system each and every day. The Federal Reserve and other central banks control money by adjusting its supply and how much it costs to borrow money, otherwise known as the interest rate. With these tools and as a consequence of human group psychology, central banks create booms and busts in the economy at will and also to stall and derail an economy by messing with it. Let's take a quick case study. In the year 2000, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan cut interest rates to 1%. He did this to try and fight off the recession from the dot-com bubble and encourage people to borrow money. When interest rates are low, if you're borrowing money you save a whole lot on repaying mortgages. Since the 1% interest rate hadn't been seen at the time since the 1950s it was a pretty good deal. Greenspan's idea was that he could create a wealth effect. People would start to buy houses, the prices would go up and the people would feel wealthier and spend more money in the economy and stimulated. Greenspan's sure succeeded in getting people to borrow money to buy houses. But they borrowed too much and the results was the 2008 housing bubble. This is a prime example of what can go wrong when central banks mess with an economy. Yes, corrupt bankers have a lot to answer for on their role in the 2008 crisis. But the Fed has a far bigger long-term impact. Even crazier things are happening in Japan. Their central bank is buying so many stocks that they were the number one buyer of Japanese stocks in 2016 so they have part ownership of companies with money that they created from nothing. So, in essence, it is the central banks that control our economy and the central and commercial banking system together that control all of our money. The difference is central banks can create money at will while commercial banks need loans to create money. To give you an idea of people's views of central banking when people actually knew what central banks were, here's a couple of examples. In 1881 then, President of the United States, James Garfield states: "Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate." Benjamin Franklin, in his autobiography, stated that the prime reason for the American War of Independence was a battle over who actually controlled and issued the money of the new colonies. Moving on to more modern times, Nobel prize-winning economist Milton Friedman states: "The Federal Reserve definitely caused The Great Depression by contracting the amount of currency in circulation by one third from 1929 to 1933." So, with all this being said, some would argue that central banks are not inherently a bad thing. They just need to be part of the government and not privately-owned. The government should be able to issue its own money for the benefit of the people and shouldn't have to pay a massive interest on its own debt. This was tried at least once in the United States by President Lincoln. He stated this: "The government should create, issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity." Abraham Lincoln then issued his own government money. It was called "the greenback". No further comments on that story. So I think we'll end the video there. There's so much more that I could cover about what central banking decisions led to what revolutions around the world. Pretty much when you look at it, all revolutions and all wars, when you dig through everything, it all boils down to money. I could also have talked about the new global movement of those who are rejecting the debt based economic system. People are starting to move their currency into gold, silver and crypto-currencies like Bitcoin. So there is a light at the end of the tunnel. That's a whole nother story for another day. Anyways, if you've watched the whole way through this video, congratulations! You're one of the few who have found out the hidden truths about who controls all of our money. I think I've only met about four people in real life that have been aware of the debt-based economic system. It's strangely unknown, but it's as true as anything. I haven't showed you all the quotes of the bankers and the former heads of the Federal Reserve telling you from their own mouths how the system actually works. If this is your first time hearing all of this, I encourage you, as I said before, to do your own research and then you'll start to see the bigger picture and the world today will make a whole lot more sense. If you want some good starting resources, I recommend Mike Maloney's "Hidden Secrets of Money" series. It's here on YouTube and I'll leave a link below. Mike is a very knowledgeable guy and I've had some great long conversations with him about the economy. If you're into reading and you want to know more about the history of the Federal Reserve, I recommend the book by G. Edward Griffin, "The Creature From Jekyll Island". So anyway, I think I'll stop talking now. Thanks for watching this video! It's a been too go go(?) You've been watching ColdFusion. Feel free to subscribe to this channel if you're new. This isn't the stuff I normally make, but I think you'll like the other stuff anyway. I really hope you learned something from this video and I'll see you again soon for the next video. Cheers guys, have a good one!
Channel: ColdFusion
Views: 2,907,198
Rating: 4.866209 out of 5
Keywords: Coldfusion, TV, Dagogo, Altraide, Technology, Apple, Google, Samsung, Facebook, Tesla
Id: mQUhJTxK5mA
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 21min 33sec (1293 seconds)
Published: Sun Jun 11 2017
Reddit Comments

This is on the front page twice. It better be good.

Edit: And it's not. This is more bankphobia drivel. The video is actually presented well and for the most part does accurately describe the banking system, however the rest is loaded language bullshit. "Our money", "If you or I did that we'd be jailed", "ridiculous system", etc.

It's a video that preys on ignorance. Most of this information should have been learned in middle school civics classes, specifically about how money is based on faith, some in high school econ, and the deepest it goes is freshman macroeconomics courses.

Yep this is how the system works. And no it's not crazy. Did you notice which countries DID NOT have central banks? Not exactly the most esteemed group. Banks provide liquidity. They have for thousands of years. They provide funds at an economic level. All great endeavors have been funded by debt, public or private. No one just has billions and trillions of dollars of cash laying around to build roads or skyscrapers or cell networks. It's all done through banking.

The gold standard was abandoned for good reason. There is simply not enough gold in the world to represent the amount of growth that took place in the latter half of the 20th century. All of that growth can be directly attributed to the amount of debt and money supply created by the banks lending on the fractional reserve system.

No, the CENTRAL bank did not cause the 2008 crisis directly. Do you notice that the video mentions interest rates in 2001 and then jumps all the way to 2008 as if nothing else happened? The 2008 recession was a perfect storm featuring a lot of factors. Most of it was caused by the government and private banks, not the Federal Reserve. The Fed is not without blame though. They did trigger the house of cards to fall down with clumsy manipulation of interest rates in 2006 and 2007. But it was really a tinder box waiting to ignite. At some point it would have crashed with or without Fed intervention.

Further to this point, the Fed is not responsible for inequality directly either. The responsibility for that lies on the government and completely abandoning FISCAL policy in favor of monetary policy. We have only the government to blame for that, not the Federal Reserve for continuing to do their job which is only half of the equation. Does only monetary policy lead to inequality? Yes, but you are supposed to have redistributive and infrastructure investment from the fiscal side (aka Congress) to counteract this. The United States has not practiced fiscal policy in over 30 years. You can't blame the Fed for that.

Most egregiously, the video makes the statement that the central bank should be controlled by the federal government. This is absolutely incorrect. The federal government can barely handle fiscal policy without being corrupted, much less fiscal AND monetary policy. It is absurd. Here is a graph of why central bank independence is important. Monetary policy is very important to a stable currency. The government cannot always be counted on to be efficient. Example, the last 30 years in America.

Now this may come as a surprise to you after reading all that, but I believe Alan Greenspan is the worst thing to happen to America in the last 50 years, but do you know that reason he was so bad for us? It was not because he was Reserve Chairman. He had little power in that office to actually influence things. It was because he became such a public figure, a revered powerful politician in all but name, and he had the ear of both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. Ironically, it was not the government that controlled the Federal Reserve, but vice versa. He convinced Bill Clinton to abandon fiscal policy initiatives in favor of monetary policy. He was greedy and power hungry. He was a devout follower of Ayn Rand and he wanted to influence more than just the banking system. He began the corruption that lead us to the crisis we have today. The Reserve Chairman should be an unassuming man. A man that spends time crunching the numbers of the economy and deciding on pushing the reserve rate a couple basis points in the appropriate direction. He should never be a man who is so revered that every Joe Schmoe knows his name and worships him. If anything, he should be hated. It's just another one of those ironic checks and balances things that proper governance requires.

Finally, I want to say that the author does allude to the primary problem with our current system near the end of the video but pretty much abandons it immediately. A debt-based economy requires constant growth. Any regression leads to nasty credit crunches, recessions, and in the worst case, depressions. The thing is, there is absolutely no reason to assume that the global economy won't continue to grow. Do we really believe that this is the peak for humanity? That technology, society, and wealth aren't going to continue to progress? No. Things will start moving again. We are in a deleveraging cycle after a strong golden age, but eventually some day, we will move forward again and things will get better. The economy will grow and we will need debt to fund investment in all the new infrastructure and technology to go along with that growth and raising the standard of living for everyone.

If you read all that and still want more, here is Ray Dalio explaining how debt and the economy work without all the loaded language.

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 236 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/Rookwood πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

Is it the Jews? It's always the Jews. Or the lizard people. Maybe the Freemasons?

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 41 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/nate-x πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

To anyone interested in a reliable source to dispell myths from reality - the Bank of England has produced this research paper:


Here's the the Executive Brief from the research paper:

  • This article explains how the majority of money in the modern economy is created by commercial banks making loans.
  • Money creation in practice differs from some popular misconceptions β€” banks do not act simply as intermediaries, lending out deposits that savers place with them, and nor do they β€˜multiply up’ central bank money to create new loans and deposits.
  • The amount of money created in the economy ultimately depends on the monetary policy of the central bank. In normal times, this is carried out by setting interest rates. The central bank can also affect the amount of money directly through purchasing assets or β€˜quantitative easing’.


Money creation is indeed different than what most people think - but it's also far more nuanced than the sensationalized videos such as this suggest. As others on this post have commented - the main problem with the current system is not that some evil private corporation control money creation - it is that a debt based economy requires constant growth - which cannot be sustained - especially with the decline in energy ROI.


For those concerned - The Bank of England was nationalized in 1947 and is not private in any way, it's basically another government department (as in most countries btw; though in the US it's true that the Fed is privately owned).

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 3 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/rnev64 πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

Can anyone knowledgeable rebut?

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 10 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/bkozuma πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 12 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

the rothschiles the illuminatti the lizard people and the red hot chili peppers

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 12 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/ironman82 πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 12 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

Sometimes I have a problem when narrators State personal opinions as facts. Maybe his statements are backed by facts but they weren't well presented. And I caught a few things that were off in the way that he stated them. I'm interested in learning more and I accept that I am ignorant to the relationship between big central banks and the US government so I did still find it interesting.

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 4 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/Shortneckbuzzard πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

It's all just 'faith'. If everyone agrees, that makes it real. If we all agree that gold is tge standard, then it is- same with the value of bitcoin or diamonds or whatever we agree on. The true currency is time. We trade our time for numbers, vapor ware.

NPR Planet Money Here's an interesting and relevant story of how Brazil regained (increased the value) of its currency simply by tricking the population into thinking that it had value.

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 2 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/leaky_eddie πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

This is a terrible video (I refuse to call it a documentary since it's more punditry than anything else). Partly because it uses loaded and dishonest language but primarily because of its complete disregard of financial realities. It educates no one and only seed unfounded hatred.

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 2 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/TheCaspica πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies

We do, we do Who keeps the metric system down ?

πŸ‘οΈŽ︎ 2 πŸ‘€οΈŽ︎ u/FrodoSwaggins64 πŸ“…οΈŽ︎ Jun 13 2017 πŸ—«︎ replies
Related Videos
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.