>> Jesse: TEAM TRUMP HITTING BACK AT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATTEMPT TO MUSCLE WHAT HE CAN SAY IN PUBLIC BY THE 2020 ELECTION CASE. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WANTS TO PREVENT TRUMP FROM SHARING DETAILS ABOUT THEIR INVESTIGATION. BUT HIS LAWYERS SAY IT WOULD VIOLATE HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. IN A TRIAL ABOUT FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS THE GOVERNMENT SEEKS TO RESTRICT FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, IT DOES SO AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION'S PRIMARY POLITICAL OPPONENT DURING AN ELECTION SEASON WHICH THE ADMINISTRATION PROMINENT PARTY MEMBERS AND MEDIA ALLIES HAVE CAMPAIGNED ON THE INDICTMENT AND PROLIFERATED AS FALSE ALLEGATIONS. THE FORMER PRESIDENT RIPPING APART THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THIS WEEKEND, WATCH. >> WHENEVER MORE CORRUPTION IS EXPOSED, HIS HENCHMEN CHARGE ME WITH CRIMES -- I'M BEING INDICTED BECAUSE OF WHAT WE HAVE DONE AND I'M BEING INDICTED BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID OF ALL OF US BECAUSE WE HAVE A MOVEMENT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY. THOSE INDICTMENTS AREN'T WORTH THE PAPER THEY ARE WRITTEN ON. THEY TOOK AWAY FREE SPEECH. >> Jesse: AS THE DEMOCRATS IN THE MEDIA GO HARD ON TRUMP YOU CAN PROBABLY GUESS WHO'S GETTING A PASS. >> THIS FOCUS COME OF THIS OBSESSION ON HUNTER BIDEN IS A WHOPPER OF WHAT ABOUTISM. REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO DEFLECT, DIMINISH AND DEFEND DONALD TRUMP. >> THE REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN A LOT TO. >> KNOW THERE IS A LOT OF INFLUENCE IN WASHINGTON THAT'S BASED ON PEOPLE'S FAMILY CONNECTIONS. >> LAST NAMES MATTER A LOT. >> YOU ARE VERY CAUTIOUS ABOUT STARTING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS. >> THIS IS FRIVOLOUS, THIS IS A DIVERSIONARY TACTIC. >> Jesse: YOU'RE A LAWYER, IF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SAYS YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT THIS CASE FOR THE NEXT YEAR IN THE MIDDLE OF A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN, HOW IS THAT NOT ILLEGAL? >> Harold: WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL, YOU CAN'T STRIP THEM OF THE RIGHT TO SAY I'M INNOCENT OF THESE CHARGES AND HERE'S WHY I'M INNOCENT OF THESE CHARGES WORK OUT I WOULD IMAGINE THE COURT IS GOING TO ALLOW HIM TO BE ABLE TO GO OUT WHEREVER HE WANTS -- I DON'T ALWAYS AGREE WITH HIS LAWYERS I THINK -- BUT WHOEVER WROTE THAT WAS PRETTY GOOD BECAUSE HE MADE CLEAR, YOU CAN'T DENY AN AMERICAN THE OPPORTUNITY PARTICULARLY IF THE OTHER SIDE IS TALKING ABOUT IT AS WELL. WHAT I DISAGREE WITH HIS LAWYERS, IF FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP ATTACKS THE COURT OR THE PROSECUTOR AGAIN, HE SHOULD HAVE SOMETHING AROUND HIM ON THAT. BUT PROFESSING HIS INNOCENCE AND LAYING OUT THE FACTS AS HE KNOWS IT, LAYING OUT THE EVIDENCE AS HE'S GOING TO PRESENT IT ON HIS SIDE. >> WHAT DO YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAY ATTACK? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? >> IF YOU SAY THE JUDGES AND AN IDIOT, HE SAID THE PROSECUTION IS A HENCHMEN, THESE ARE THINGS THAT WILL INFLAME AND NOT SERVE ANYONE'S INTEREST. >> THAT HE SAY THE JUDGES AND IDIOTS? >> HE MAY HAVE. >> NOT ONLY ABOUT THIS JUDGE. >> I THINK YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SAY WHATEVER HE WANTS REGARDING THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE. >> Jesse: HE COULD SAY THE JUDGE IS A PARTNER AT HUNTER'S LAW FIRM THE SAME FIRM THAT DID THE DOSSIER AND HAS DONATED ABOUT $4300 TO BARACK OBAMA? YOU CAN SAY THAT SCUM YOU CAN'T SAY SHE'S AN IDIOT. >> I WOULD IMAGINE IF SOMEONE ACCUSED ME THINGS THEY ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF I WOULD SAY I DIDN'T DO THOSE I WON'T BE PERSONALIZING WITH THE JUDGE. HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO DO THAT. IF YOU WANT TO ATTACK YOUR CASE HE'S FULLY PROTECTED. >> WHAT IF IN DISCOVERY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HANDS THIS STUFF TO THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY AND SAID WE HAVE AGENTS CRAWLING ALL OVER JANUARY 6, TRUMP CAN'T SAY THAT DURING AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN? >> HE'S GOING TO SAY WHAT HE WANTS GIVEN HIS HISTORY I THINK YOU WILL NOT BE TAKING THINGS BACK WHEN HE'S TRYING TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT AND HAS THESE INDICTMENTS I'M NOT SURPRISED THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WOULD LIKE THEM TO SAY LESS. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY CREDIBILITY WHEN IT COMES TO THE REPEATED THINGS THEY TRIED TO BRING AGAINST HIM AND THEY ARE HOPING NOW THAT ONE OF THESE INDICTMENTS STICKS. ON THE JANUARY 6TH THING TO ANSWER THE QUESTION WHY HE WOULD GO AFTER THE PLAYERS INCLUDING THE JUDGE OR THE PROSECUTOR IT'S BECAUSE WE HAVE SEEN THAT SINCE HE ENTER THE POLITICAL ARENA IN 2015 AND 2016 THAT THE PEOPLE WHO WERE INVESTIGATING HIM HAD A POLITICAL MOTIVE. PETER STRUCT, LISA PAGE, THE FBI INVESTIGATING HIM SAYING HE COULD NEVER BE PRESIDENT, NOW YOU HAVE THIS JUDGE ON THE JANUARY 6TH CASE, SHE IS AN ACTIVIST. SHE HAS DONATED A LOT OF MONEY TO DEMOCRATS, VERY SYMPATHETIC TO THE BLM RIOTS WHILE SHE'S THROWING J6 BEHIND BARS LONGER THAN PROSECUTORS ASKED FOR. THAT IS CONTEXT TO UNDERSTAND WHY MY HE MIGHT HAVE COMMENTARY ON THAT. THIS IS THE DOUBLE STANDARD -- HUNTER BIDEN IS REWRITING HIS PLEA AGREEMENT TO. HE WAS ABLE TO PLEAD GUILTY WHEN HE WAS SUPPOSED TO PLEAD NOT GUILTY AND HE'S WORKING WITH DOJ TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S NEXT AFTER THEY SCREWED UP IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE AND GOT CAUGHT WITH HER BLANKET IMMUNITY STATEMENTS. WHILE TRUMP IS DEALING WITH ALL OF THIS, HUNTER BIDEN IS WORKING ON ANOTHER SWEETHEART DEAL THAT MAY FALL APART DEPENDING ON WHAT'S IN IT TO. >> Jesse: AND THE LAWYER FOR FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID THIS WEEKEND WE SHOULD HAVE CAMERAS IN THE COURT ROOM, THIS CAN'T BE A SECRET TRIAL RIGHT BEFORE AN ELECTION DAY. >> Dana: I HAVE HAD A LONG-STANDING PRINCIPLE, I AM AGAINST CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM, FALSE TO. ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL, THERE'S NEVER BEEN CAMERAS ALLOWED IN THE COURTROOM AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. I THINK IT ADDS TO CHAOS, CHICANERY, NONSENSE. >> Jesse: CHICANERY? US BEFORE YOU ASKED THE PRESS SECRETARY TO BILL CLINTON WHOSE NAME WAS MIKE McCURRY -- THANK YOU. >> Harold: DEMOCRAT TRIVIA RIGHT HERE. [LAUGHTER] US BEFORE HE WAS THE FIRST TO ALLOW CAMERAS IN THE BRIEFING ROOM, HOW DO YOU THINK THAT HAS GONE? YOU HAVE PEOPLE MAKING A MOCKERY OF IT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT SUPREME COURT DID DURING COVID WAS THEY ALLOWED FOR A BIT OF DURESS BUT IT SEEMED TO WORK OUT KIND OF OKAY, YOU COULD LISTEN TO THE AUDIO. >> I LIKE THAT AND IT MAKES YOU LISTEN. THE OTHER THING IS IT YOU ARE WATCHING IT AND YOU HAVE CABLE NEWS PUNDITS COMMENTING ON IT AND WATCHING, YOU MIGHT GET THE LEGAL NUANCES WRONG. I THINK CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM ARE NOT A GOOD IDEA FOR THE LONG RUN AND I WOULDN'T DO IT IN THIS CASE EITHER. >> Jesse: I WOULD DO AUDIO IN THIS CASE ONLY. GREG GUTFELD YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS GAG ORDER ATTEMPT OR WHATEVER THEY ARE CALLING IT. >> Greg: THEY WANT TO LIMIT TRUMP'S PUBLIC COMMENTS, IS THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF THE TRIAL? THEY ARE TRYING TO LIMIT HIS PUBLIC COMMENTS, MAYBE THEY SHOULD LIMIT HIS COMMENTS ABOUT THE COMMENTS THEY WANT TO LIMIT ABOUT THE COMMENTS. AS FOR NANCY PELOSI SAYING THIS IS A WASTE OF TIME, YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT A WASTE OF TIME WAS? THINK ABOUT THAT FIRST IMPEACHMENT FOR A PHONE CALL. IT WASN'T JUST A WASTE OF TIME IT WAS ABOUT WHEN THAT WASTE OF TIME TOOK PLACE. THAT WAS DURING THE HEARINGS FOR COVID, THAT WAS A PERIOD OF TIME WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT THAT INSTEAD WE WERE LOOKING AT THIS BECAUSE THE MEDIA FELT THAT FIGHTING TRUMP WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN FIGHTING THIS WEIRD AND STRANGE DISEASE THAT'S COMING OUT AND KILLING A BUNCH OF PEOPLE. NOW THEY LOWERED THE BAR, THEY GOT TO DRINK AT IT. THEY MISS THE GOOD OLD DAYS WHEN THERE WASN'T ANYBODY FIGHTING BACK, THE GOOD AND BAD PART ABOUT TRUMP'S THERE IS NO OFF SWITCH ARE GOING TO HAVE IT NO MATTER WHAT. >> CAN I MENTION ONE THING ABOUT THIS? IF DOJ IS GOING TO ASK FOR THIS PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE JUDGE IS GOING TO SAY YOU BETTER RESPOND TO THIS, SHE SHOULD ALSO ISSUE A WARNING TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THAT IF ANY OF THIS LEAKS, THERE SHOULD BE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PROSECUTION AS WELL. >> Jesse: 100%. AND THEY WILL BE LEAKING. >> Harold: JUST ONE THING ON THE JUDGES GIVING MONEY TO CAMPAIGNS, THAT HAPPENS ON BOTH SIDES. I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR IT DOESN'T. >> Katie: I'M NOT SAYING IT DOESN'T I'M SEEING THE CREDIBILITY >> Harold: A LOT OF JUDGES DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN. >> Dana: THE HISTORY OF THE DOJ DOES NOT BODE WELL FOR THE CONTEST. >> Jesse: IF HE DOES GET THE GAG ORDER HE WILL VIOLATE IT IMMEDIATELY AND HE WILL BEAR THE JUDGE TO DO SOMETHING. UP
