Is the entire universe a simulation? Is your world a virtual environment coded
by 1s and 0s? Is it a conscious computer game created by
supreme beings from another timeline? What if every person on Earth was no different
from a character in a movie, reading from a script you’ve never seen? As humans have explored virtual reality and
artificial intelligence, this conspiracy has grown in popularity. Leaders at the forefront of modern technology
have declared: it’s not just a possibility, it’s a likelihood. According to Elon Musk, there’s a billion
to one chance that humanity is not living inside a simulated universe. That means our world may not exist; but is
that scientifically possible? Could our entire universe exist within one
massive virtual space? Similar questions have plagued humanity for
thousands of years, long before the modern era. Many religions, from ancient pantheons to
monotheistic traditions, claim that a supreme being sculpted our universe from nothing. You won’t find the word “simulation”
in any religious books, but the concept is very similar—a great entity designed our
universe from scratch… But what if that deity was trying to deceive
us? In the 17th century, French philosopher Rene
Descartes discussed an all-powerful creator in his Meditations on First Philosophy. He imagined a deceptive deity, an evil demon,
who designed a false reality to deceive the people inside of it. Descartes’s demon was later refined into
a philosophical thought experiment called the Brain in a Vat. Say your brain is removed from your body and
placed into a vat of liquid. Inside that vat, your brain is connected to
a computer, which sends your nerve cells the same impulses they would experience inside
your body. From the perspective of your brain, how would
you know whether your experiences are real or simulated? Let’s compare this thought experiment to
a real-life scenario. Imagine, for a moment, you’ve stepped into
a virtual reality game. After slipping on your 3D glasses, your senses
sink into the dark and dusty halls of a creepy, old mansion. As you wander through its shadowy corridors,
your ears are prickled by the creaking of floorboards. Distant voices send chills down your spine,
and you experience a genuine sense of terror. It looks real. It sounds real. It may even feel real. But does that make it real? That’s a difficult question to answer. You’re suspending your disbelief, but only
temporarily. You haven’t mistaken that haunted mansion
for your real life. No matter how realistic it looks, you know,
in the back of your mind, that it is not real. Currently, designers can create interesting
3D spaces that fool our senses, but the illusion is easily broken. You know too much to confuse the real world
with a virtual one. If you know you can escape from a simulated
world, that realization influences your behavior. …Even if your emotions are genuine, they’re
not exactly real. Some scientists disagree with this idea. They claim that an escape path will not change
your behavior if the illusion is strong enough… Let’s go back to our haunted house. Imagine, as you’re walking down the halls,
a monster leaps out of the shadows. You get scared, and you take off your headset. You’ve escaped the virtual environment,
but how do you feel?... Your heart races in your chest. Your respiratory rate climbs higher. After coming back to reality, it takes your
brain a few moments to understand exactly what’s happening. Your brain was deceived by that fabricated
world. It wasn’t permanent, but, for a few minutes,
your sense of reality was broken. Could VR create
a permanent, deceptive experience? Could your brain forget which reality is which? Instead of viewing one space as real and the
other as fake, your brain may equate the two environments as distinct but equal realities. Let’s accelerate 500 years into the future. Now, virtual reality is a staple of modern
living. Clunky headsets have given way to sleek eyeglasses,
which effortlessly transform the world around you. With the press of a button, your reality jumps
from one realistic environment to another. At first, these sensory stimuli feel like
any other game; but what if virtual stimuli become integrated into our daily lives? People may forgo their real lives in favor
of a simulated existence…Knowledge is power, but your senses are ultimately fallible… They can be fooled, and they do make mistakes. A virtual universe could hypothetically merge
with our reality, and our brains may forget how to tell the difference. This timeline sounds a lot like science fiction,
doesn’t it? It is speculation, but the future of VR gives
our grand conspiracy a sturdy, conceptual backbone. But one outstanding hurdle remains: you can
still take your glasses off. At any point, you can flip a switch, power
down, and return to your real life. In this universe—the reality you’re inhabiting
right now—that’s not an option. Assuming our grand conspiracy theory is correct,
how can a simulated reality exist without our knowledge? For a simulation to be totally convincing,
it has to satisfy a set of objectives. First and foremost, it must be perceptually
spellbinding. The fake environment must completely deceive
the brain. If the brain does not believe your environment
is “real,” the simulation will be compromised immediately. There are two methods by which a simulated
reality could deceive the brain. Like the brain in a vat experiment, you could
separate the body and mind, immersing your consciousness into a false universe. Your body would stay in reality, while your
mind is unknowingly displaced into a simulated world. That’s one method, but there’s another
option. Your entire being—including your body and
your mind—could be created within the simulation. In this case, everything in the world—every
atom, every force, every natural law—would not exist in reality. Keeping these two methods in mind, is it possible
to create a simulated universe that completely deceives the brain? You could have entered into a simulation the
moment you were born. Once your life ends, you may wake up somewhere
with a pair of glasses on your face, slowly remembering what your real life was really
like. This explanation is interesting to think about,
but others are far more plausible. A better explanation comes from Nick Bostrom,
an Oxford philosopher. He says the history of humanity could be an
ancestral simulation run by a post-human species. In his famous essay, Bostrom laid out three
potential conclusions. According to Bostrom, one and only one of
these conclusions will prove true sometime in the distant future. First, humanity could go extinct before entering
a post-human state. If our species dies out, we stand no chance
of progressing into a post-human society. Therefore, the probability of fabricating
an artificial reality becomes approximately zero. In other words, we’re not living in a simulation. Let’s assume humans do survive long enough
to evolve into a post-human state. If that happens, post-humans may not be interested
in running ancestral simulations. It’s possible a post-human society will
disregard their past or simply abandon VR technology. If this were true, we can draw the same conclusion:
we’re not living in a simulation. What if humans do progress into a post-human
state and post-humans are interested in running ancestral simulations? …In that case, it’s very likely our present
universe is a simulation—one of thousands of similar timelines investigated by a superior
species. Our universe may be the only one where dinosaurs
were annihilated by a meteor strike. Or the universe where Mount Vesuvius erupted
over the city of Pompeii… If Bostrom’s simulation theory were true,
our reality is nothing but a small piece of a post-human experiment. This theory, like many others, makes a lot
of assumptions. It assumes that post-humans will, at some
point, create new realities and that we will populate those realities with conscious entities. But is this technological leap even possible? We don’t know for sure. Artificial intelligence is still a bit of
a mystery. If we can create a functioning AI, we could
place multiple artificial beings in a simulated environment. We could generate a fabricated universe that
could mimic the evolution of our own. No matter how convincing these arguments sound,
they’re educated guesses about the future of our reality. Harvard physicist Lisa Randall says there’s
no evidence to support any theory that we’re living in a simulation. At this stage in human evolution, we don’t
have the knowledge or the technology to know anything for sure. It’s like arguing for the existence of artificial
intelligence or independent consciousness. It’s a compelling concept. It transforms the way we think about life,
perception, and the state of our universe, but it will always be hypothetical until we
find some concrete proof. Let’s ignore all those plot holes for a
moment. Let’s assume that the entire universe is
one big simulation. Every sky-high building, every beautiful sunset,
every traffic jam… it’s all just a bundle of data. Could you ever wake up from that simulation? Is there a way out? Probably not. You’re stuck inside your simulated reality
the same way a character is stuck inside their fictional universe. If that character realized they were inside
a game, they couldn’t suddenly jump into the real world. They wouldn’t pop out of the screen and
suddenly live a normal life. Whether this universe is simulated or not,
your reality is likely the only one you will ever know.
