What German Soldiers thought about Allied Soldiers -- World War 2

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Ach! What did German soldiers think about American, Canadian and British soldiers in World War II? From German POW interrogations, documents and translated mail, we can get some ideas of what German soldiers thought of their Western enemies. Some may say -- Well, who cares what some Nazi thought about Allied soldiers? The answer is that we can find out a lot about what Allied soldiers were really like from former enemies, not just what they wrote home to their sweethearts. No doubt, some Germans had incorrect impressions, which were influenced by Goebbel's propaganda and mistaken Nazi views. We need to be careful not to take everything they said as the gospel truth. But there was a very real German admiration  for “the well-known American humanity.” This assisted the Americans in a interesting way: When the German soldier was in a bad position,   he knew that American soldiers  treated their POWs well. This was an inducement to surrender  and not fight to the death,   regardless of his orders to the contrary. Germans were amazed at the material  superiority of the Americans. Where the British would have five  howitzers, the Americans would bring twelve. Americans overcame opposition with an  abundance of weaponry and technology. After the war was over, a running  theme from some German POWs was   that the Americans didn't really  win with strategy or tactics, but they overpowered the resource poor German  soldiers with their abundance of ships,   tanks, ammunition fired, etc. The German Tiger tank was a superior  weapon to the American Sherman, however, there were never enough of them to  take on the swarms of Shermans attacking. After the Germans destroyed a host of Shermans, the next day they would be  replaced and in the front line. A case in point: A shaken German veteran of the Eastern Front told   his comrades that the barrage that  the Americans had just fired on them   was way worse than anything the Soviets had ever  done. That's an amazing statement, because the   Soviets generally had severe preparatory  artillery barrages as a matter of course. American soldiers were seen as enthusiastic  amateurs with an extreme unapologetic,   unadulterated combat aggression. One major  difference between the Americans and their   European Allies, the Germans noticed,  was how they reacted to a German attack. The other allies would immediately  return fire and edge their way forward   to a more favorable position. Americans  would immediately return fire, however,   and also bring a punishing rain of artillery or  air power on top of whatever they were fighting,   and move on to the counterattack  as soon as the rain of death ended. Germans didn't believe that the average  American infantryman or tanker was   particularly skilled compared to  British or German counterparts,   but that Americans more than compensated  for it with their sheer aggression. The common German soldier was annoyed that  American infantry declined to “fight fairly”   and relied heavily on artillery  and airpower to soften resistance. The Germans were impressed by the  America's logistical system of supply.   In Italy, one captured German soldier told his  interrogator that American tactics were bad.   He said that American tanks would roll over  their foxholes and then the infantry would   come along an hour later, which the Germans  would stop with machine gun fire. The German   stated that they counted on the Americans to  make these mistakes. By the end of the war,   American infantry and tank cooperation had greatly  improved and this was an American lesson learned. Germans also found that the net  webbing on the American helmet   helped them see the silhouette  from a great distance in daylight. Americans were bolder than the cautious  British, but did not charge recklessly,   nor did they push relentlessly forward,  taking huge casualties in the process. The holding attack was a standard US Army  doctrine for all units, regardless of size. It was designed to take advantage of  the American superiority in logistics,   artillery, and close air  support to reduce casualties. It was very successful. When a US division encountered the enemy,   one of its three regiments would engage  the enemy to hold them in position. Then airpower and time-on-target  artillery barrages would hammer   the enemy while the other two regiments would  make a single or double envelopment maneuver. They would repeat this action  over and over again when possible. Germans noticed that American soldiers  always seemed to be chewing bubble gum   and many found this slightly humorous. German soldiers hated fighting Canadian soldiers  in house to house close-quarters fighting because   they felt Canadians were barbaric and enjoyed  fighting with bayonets and wounding superficially. German soldiers believed that British soldiers  were competent, professional, but a bit slow. They felt British forces tended to only  attack with absolutely overwhelming force. Germans respected the average  British soldier's individual skill,   but viewed British commanders as overly cautious. They also hated fighting the British  in a static war or a holding battle. There were good reasons why the British  held back in battle the way they did. Because many of the British officers were veterans  of World War I and were sensitive to slaughter   coupled with the fact that Great Britain was  running low on replacements after years of war. This made them very cautious and they  wanted to "make the machines do the work". While he was in North Africa,  Field Marshal Erwin Rommel   felt the British were better  soldiers than the Americans. He based this on his experiences in the early  battles. Rommel always complimented British   soldiers and pilots. However, the British  he faced had been in the fight for over two   years before the Americans had even declared war  (on Japan). US soldiers were green and learning   on the job. At first, they didn't always take  the advice of their British brothers-in-arms.   After the Battle of Kasserine Pass, the  American high command rid themselves of   cowardly officers, which was  a step in the right direction. Rommel praised U.S. equipment giving  the British the edge in North Africa, "British experience has been put  to good use in American equipment". He especially liked the American half track.  It's not known if Rommel later changed his   mind after the United States soldiers  kicked his comrades out of Normandy. What every German POW, whether in  British, Canadian or American hands,   thought was, "Well, at least  I'm not in Russian hands!" If you liked the video you just watched, then you  may like these two other videos from EmersusTech.
Info
Channel: EmersusTech
Views: 1,267,339
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: EmersusTech, Emersus, Emersus Tech, Emergus4Christ, US Military, U.S. Military, Military, History, Military Numbers, Military Knowledge, Knowledge, U.S. Army, US Army, Services, Service, Basic Training, Basic, Soldier, US soldier, Army soldier, Marksman, Sharpshooter, Expert, Range, War, World War II, Military History Visualized, Military History, Visualized, Strategy, Tactics, TIK, World War, tank tactics, MHV, Mark Felton, Allied soldiers, British, Canadian, Canadien, Opinion, WWII
Id: _69AThNKKM0
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 8min 9sec (489 seconds)
Published: Tue Feb 22 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.