AUGUST 11 OF 2016, 11 DAYS AFTER IT BEGAN. WHICH MAKES ME WONDER, ON AUGUST THE 6th, SO YOU HADN'T INTERVIEWED ANYONE. YOU'RE INVESTIGATING THIS ALLEGED RUSSIAN COLLUSION. YOU ORIGINATED THE INVESTIGATION. YOU'RE THE POINT OF CONTACT. YOU DRAFTED THE DOCUMENT. AND HERE YOU ARE BEFORE YOU'VE INTERVIEWED A SINGLE SOLITARY WITNESS SAYING F-TRUMP. THEN THAT SAME DAY YOUR COLLEAGUE, LISA PAGE WROTE, MAYBE YOU'RE MEANT TO PROTECT THE COUNTRY FROM THAT MENACE. AND YOU RESPONDED, I CAN PROTECT THE COUNTRY AT MANY LEVELS. WE'RE NOT EVEN A WEEK INTO AN INVESTIGATION THAT YOU ORIGINATED, APPROVED, WERE THE CONTACT FOR. YOU HADN'T INTERVIEWED A SINGLE SOLITARY SOLE UNTIL AUGUST 11 AND YOU'RE ALREADY PROMISING TO PROTECT THE COUNTRY FROM THAT MENACE, DONALD TRUMP. THEN, ON AUGUST THE 8th, YOU STILL HADN'T INTERVIEWED ANYONE. EIGHT DAYS INTO THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN INVESTIGATION AND YOU GOT ANOTHER TEXT FROM YOUR COLLEAGUE, LISA PAGE. TRUMP's NOT EVER GOING TO BECOME PRESIDENT, RIGHT? RIGHT? AND YOU REPLIED, NO. NO, HE'S NOT. WE'LL STOP IT. BY THE TIME YOU PROMISED TO STOP HIM FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT, ON AUGUST THE 8th, HOW MANY INTERVIEWS HAD YOU CONDUCTED? >> MR. GAUDY, TWO ANSWERS TO THAT. ONE, WITH REGARD TO HOW MANY INTERVIEWS HAD OR HAD NOT BEEN CONDUCTED, I HAVE BEEN DIRECTED BY COUNSEL FOR THE FBI NOT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION. SECOND, SIR, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO TAKE THOSE TEXTS IN THE CONTEXT OF HOW THEY WERE WRITTEN, AND WHAT THEY MEANT. >> AND SOMEONE MAY ASK YOU THAT QUESTION. BUT I DIDN'T. I ASKED YOU HOW MANY PEOPLE YOU INTERVIEWED BEFORE YOU WROTE IT. IF YOU WANT TO GET INTO CONTEXT, LET ONE OF MY OTHER COLLEAGUES DO THAT WITH YOU. HERE'S WHAT I WANT TO KNOW. WHO'S THE HE IN HE'S NOT. >> HE IS THEN CANDIDATE TRUMP. >> SO, WHEN YOU SAID NO, DONALD TRUMP'S NOT, IN CONNECTION WITH A QUESTION GOING TO BECOME PRESIDENT, WHAT'S THE "IT." >> THAT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN -- >> I'M ASKING. IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A DEBATE OVER A TWO-LETTER WORD WE'LL HAVE TO DO THAT SOME OTHER TIME. WHAT AND WHO DID YOU MEAN BY "IT." >> MR. GOWDY, AS I'VE STATED, THAT TEXT WAS WRITTEN LATE AT NIGHT IN SHORTHAND. >> I DON'T CARE WHEN WAS WRITTEN. LONG HAND, CUR SIVE. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT IT MEANT. >> IT WOULD BE HIS CANDIDACY FOR THE PRESIDENT. >> IT'S NO THE THAT TOUGH. >> AMERICAN POPULATION WOULD NOT VOTE HIM INTO OFFICE. >> WE HADN'T GOTTEN TO THE WILL YET. YOUR TESTIMONY IS THE WILL IS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. RIGHT? THAT'S YOUR TESTIMONY. WILL STOP IT. YOU WERE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. >> MY GOWDY, WHAT MY TESTIMONY IS AND WHAT I SAID DURING EXTENSIVE ASKING OF THIS QUESTION DURING MY PRIOR INTERVIEW IS I DON'T RECALL WRITING THAT TEXT. WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS THAT TEXT, IN NO WAY SUGGESTED THAT I OR THE FBI WOULD TAKE ANY ACTION TO INFLUENCE THE CANDIDACY -- >> AGENT STRZOK, THAT IS A FANTASTIC ANSWER TO A QUESTION NOBODY ASKED. >> MR. GOWDY. >> MY QUESTION TO YOU -- CHAIRMAN, CAN THE WITNESS BE PERMITTED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION POSED? >>. >> WE LOOK FORWARD TO THAT. >> SO YOUR TESTIMONY -- >> HIS TIME HAS EXPIRED, MR. CHAIRMAN. TWO AND A HALF MINUTES. >> IT'S GOING TO BE TOUGH FOR ME TO GET THROUGH IT IF I KEEP GETTING INTERRUPTED. YOUR TESTIMONY A COUPLE WEEKS AGO WAS THE WE MEANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHICH I FOUND CONFUSING BECAUSE ON NOVEMBER THE 7th, WHICH IS THE DAY BEFORE THE ELECTION, YOU SAID THIS, YOU WERE CONCERNED THAT THOSE SAME AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT YOU WERE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF MIGHT ACTUALLY ELECT DONALD TRUMP PRESIDENT, SO YOU SAID OMG, THIS IS F-ING TERRIFYING. I THINK WE KNOW WHAT F-ING MEANS. I'M PRETTY SURE WE HAVE OMG DOWN TOO. WHAT WAS TERRIFYING ABOUT THOSE SAME AMERICAN PEOPLE YOU TRUSTED TO STOP HIM IN AUGUST, NOT STOPPING HIM IN NOVEMBER? WHAT WAS TO TERRIFYING ABOUT IN A? >> MR. GOWDY I DO NOT HAVE A COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT. WE HAVE NOT BEEN. >> IT'S NOT THE TRANSCRIPT. IT'S YOUR TEXT. >> MR. GOWDY, WHAT I WOULD SAY IS ONE I WAS NOT REFERRING TO THE AMERICAN ELECTORATE AT ALL. I RESPECT IN THEIR DECISIONS AND RIGHT TO VOTE IS ABSOLUTELY A CORNERSTONE OF OUR DEMOCRACY. SO AT NO TIME DID I INSULT OR CALL INTO QUESTION THE JUDGMENT OR THE POWER OF THE AMERICAN ELECTORATE. WHAT I WAS EXPRESSING IN THAT TEXT IS MY PERSONAL BELIEF, AND MY PERSONAL SENSE OF HOW I SAW AND WHAT I BELIEVED IN THE POTENTIAL UPCOMING ADMINISTRATION. >> THAT'S WHAT I FIND SO CONFOUNDING BECAUSE IN AUGUST YOU BLAMED THE WE ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CHKTS THAT THEY WOULD STOP IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT IT TO BE YOU AND LISA PAGE. >> MR. CHAIRMAN -- FIVE MINUTES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. WE HAVE INDULGED THIS HARASSMENT NINE MINUTES. >> THE CHAIR -- >> THIS JUDICIARY AND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. >> THE -- THE CHAIR IN AGREEMENT WITH THE RANKING MEMBERS OF BOTH COMMITTEES AGREED THERE WILL BE LIBERALITY. >> WHAT I FIND -- >> CHAIRMAN WE EXPECT THAT LIBERALITY ON EVERY ONE OF OUR QUESTIONS. >> WHAT I FIND CONFOUNDING, AGENT STRZOK IS YOU WERE COUNTING ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THAT WAS THE WE YOU REFERENCED IN AUGUST WHEN YOU SAID WE'LL STOP IT. BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DIDN'T STOP IT. HE ACTUALLY WON. SO THEN WE GO TO MARCH OF 2017. AND YOU'RE ALREADY TALKING LONGINGLY ABOUT HIM RESIGNING. AND THEN WE GO TO THE DAY THAT SPECIAL COUNSEL MUELLER -- WELL, BEFORE WE GO TO THAT, THAT'S MARCH OF 2017. MARCH OF 2016, YOU WROTE GOD, HILLARY SHOULD ONE 100 MILLION TO ZERO. I WOULD ASSUME FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE CLINTON? >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> M MARCH OF 2016 WEREN'T YOU INVESTIGATING HER FOR POTENTIALLY MISHANDLING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. >> YES. >> HAD YOU INTERVIEWED HER YET? >> NO. HAD YOU INTERVIEWED OTHER WITNESSES. >> I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK THE -- >> IF SHE HAD SAID SOMETHING INCRIMINATING IN YOUR INTERVIEW THAT TOOK PLACE MONTHS LATER, WOULD SHE HAVE WON 100 MILLION TO ZERO THEN? >> LIKELY NOT, NO. >> WHY WHY WOULDN'T YOU WAIT UNTIL THE INVESTIGATION WAS OVER BEFORE YOU HAVE HER THE NOMINEE AND WINNING A GENERAL ELECTION AGAINST AN OPPONENT THAT HADN'T EVEN BEEN NAMED WHY ET? 100 MILLION TO ZERO, AGENT STRZOK? THAT'S HOW BAD SHE SHOULD WIN? >> MR. GOWDY, THOSE PERSONAL EXPRESSIONS OF MY OBSERVING THE POLITICAL PROCESS HAD NO BEARING ON MY ACTIONS OF ANY INVESTIGATION TO INCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION OF SECRETARY CLINTON. >> YOU COULDN'T THINK -- >> OR ANYBODY ELSE. >> YOU COULDN'T THINK OF A SINGLE PERSON THAT WOULD NOT VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT. 100 MILLION TO ZERO. >> THAT WAS CLEARLY HYPERBOLE. >> LET'S SAY IT WAS -- 100 MILLION DIVIDED BY 10 I'M PRETTY SURE 10 MILLION. ZERO DIVIDED BY 10 IS STILL ZERO. YOU COULDN'T THINK OF A SINGLE SOLITARY PERSON THAT WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR HER FOR PRESIDENT BEFORE YOU INTERVIEWED HER AND WHILE YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BE INVESTIGATING HER. >> CONGRESSMAN, CLEARLY THAT'S NOT THE TRUTH. CLEARLY I COULD ENVISION MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WHO WERE LIKELY AND DID VOTE. >> WELL YOU WROTE IT. >> MY POINT -- >> DID YOU WRITE THAT? >> I DID WRITE THAT, SIR. >> WERE YOU UNDER DURESS. >> POLITICAL EXPRESSION. >> WERE YOU UNDER DURESS? >> ASKED AND ANSWERED OVER AND OVER. >> THE GENTLEMEN FROM SOUTH CAROLINA CONTROLS THE TIME. >> WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO ONE OTHER TIME PERIOD. MAY 17, 2017. BOB MUELLER IS APPOINTED. YOUR FRIEND JIM COMEY'S BEEN FIRED. ALREADY LEAKED THE MEMOS TO HIS LAW PROFESSOR FRIEND AND MUELLER IS SPECIAL COUNSEL. DO YOU REMEMBER HOW LONG IS TOOK FOR YOU TO START TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT AFTER BOB MUELLER WAS APPOINTED? >> I DON'T, SIR. >> ONE DAY. ONE DAY. AND YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT. AND FOR ANYONE WHO MAY HAVE MISSED IT THE DAY AFTER HIS APPOINTMENT, AGENT STRZOK, YOU DID IT AGAIN. FIVE DAYS LATER. NOW, HOW MANY INTERVIEWS HAD YOU DONE AS PART OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL TEAM WITHIN THE FIRST FIVE DAYS. >> SAME ANSWER AS BEFORE. I CAN'T GET INTO DETAILS. >> RIGHT AND THE ANSWER IS ALSO THE SAME. ZERO. NO INTERVIEWS HAD BEEN DONE. >> I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S TRUE OR NOT. >> NO INTERVIEWS HAD BEEN DONE. BY AUGUST THE 8, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT STOPPING HIM AND HOW TERRIFYING IT WOULD BE FOR HIM TO WIN, AND HOW YOU CAN PROTECT THE COUNTRY, AND NO INTERVIEWS HAD BEEN DONE BEFORE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT. NO WONDER BOB MUELLER KICKED YOU OFF OF THE INVESTIGATION, AGENT STRZOK. MY QUESTION IS, IF YOU WERE KICKED OFF WHEN HE READ THE TEXT, SHOULDN'T YOU HAVE KICKED OFF WHEN YOU WROTE THEM? >> NOT AT ALL. >> IT WASN'T THE DISCOVERY OF YOUR TEXT, MR. STRZOK, IT WAS THE EXISTENCE OF YOUR BIAS THAT GOT YOU KICKED OFF. >> NO, MR. GAUD GOWDY, IT WASN'T. I DO NOT STR BIAS. MY PERSONAL -- >> WHY DID YOU GET KICKED OFF. >> MR. GOWDY, MY UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON AN UNDERSTANDING OF THOSE TEXTS AND THE PERCEPTION THEY MIGHT CREATE. >> HANG ON A SECOND, AGENT STRZOK. YOU'RE SAYING IT WAS THE PERCEPTION THAT 13 DEMOCRATS ON THE SPECIAL COUNSEL PROBE INCLUDING ONE WHO WENT TO WHAT HE HOPED WAS A VICTORY PARTY. THAT'S A PERCEPTION. THEY WEREN'T KICKED OFF. YOU WERE. >> MR. GOWDY, I CANNOT SPEAK TO SPECIAL COUNSEL -- >> HOW LONG DID YOU TALK TO HIM? WHEN HE LET YOU GO? >> WITNESS ANSWER THE QUESTION. >> AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY -- >> MY REX IS IT WAS A SHORT MEETING SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 15 TO 30 MINUTES, PROBABLY AROUND 15. >> YOUR TESTIMONY IS BOB MUELLER DID NOT KICK YOU OFF BECAUSE OF THE CONTENT OF YOUR TEXT, HE KICKED YOU OFF BECAUSE OF SOME APPEARANCE HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT? >> MY TESTIMONY, WHAT YOU ASKED AND WHAT I RESPONDED TO WAS THAT HE KICKED ME OFF BECAUSE OF MY BIAS. I'M STATING TO YOU IT IS NOT MY UNDERSTANDING HE KICKED ME OFF BECAUSE OF ANY BIAS. IT WAS DONE BASED ON THE APPEARANCE. IF YOU WANT TO REPRESENT WHAT YOU SAID ACCURATELY I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION BUT I DON'T APPRECIATE WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY SAID BEING CHANGED. >> I DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT YOU -- I WORK -- >> THE CHAIR RECOGNIZES THE GENTLEMAN FROM MARYLAND, MR. CUMMINGS. >> MR. CHAIRMAN -- ANSWER THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU PROMISED HIM HE WOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ANSWER? WE ENDURED 15 MINUTES OF BADGERING OF THE WITNESS. CAN HE BE ALLOWED TO ANSWER? >> THE GENTLEMAN WILL SUSPEND. WITNESS AT ANY TIME IS CAN FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ANY MEMBER'S QUESTION IF THE TIME HAS BEEN -- ENDED. >> YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO GIVE HIM THAT OPPORTUNITY AT THE END. >> I AM GIVING HIM THAT OPPORTUNITY. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, MAY I RESPOND TO? >> YES YOU MAY. >> SIR, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT YOU UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT IN WHICH THE TEXTS WERE MADE. IN TERMS OF THE TEXTS THAT WE WILL STOP IT. YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT THAT WAS WRITTEN LATE AT NIGHT, OFF-THE-CUFF AND IT WAS IN RESPONSE TO A SEAR ARIES OF EVENTS THAT INCLUDED THEN CANDIDATE TRUMP INSULTING THE IMMIGRANT FAMILY OF A FALLEN WAR HERO, AND MY PRESUMPTION BASED ON THAT HORRIBLE DISGUSTING BEHAVIOR THAT THE AMERICAN POPULATION WOULD NOT ELECT SOMEONE DEMONSTRATING THAT BEHAVIOR TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. IT WAS IN NO WAY UNEQUIVOCALLY ANY SUGGESTION THAT ME, THE FBI, WOULD TAKE ANY ACTION WHATSOEVER TO IMPROPERLY IMPACT THE ELECTORAL PROCESS FOR ANY CANDIDATE. I TAKE GREAT OFFENSE AND GREAT DISGREEMGT TO YOUR ASSERTION TO WHAT THAT WAS OR WASN'T. AS FOR THE 100 MILLION TO ONE THAT WAS CLEARLY MADE IN JEST. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IS ACTUALLY THEIR RIGHT. THAT IS WHAT MAKES OUR DEMOCRACY SUCH A VIE GRANT PROCESS IT IS. BUT TO SUGGEST WE CAN PARSE DOWN THE WORDS OF SHORT HAND LIKE THEY'RE A CONTRACT FOR A CAR IS SIMPLY NOT CONSISTENT WITH MY OR MOST PEOPLE'S USE OF TEXT MESSAGING. I CAN ASSURE YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, AT NO TIME IN ANY OF THESE TEXTS DID THOSE PERSONAL BELIEFS EVER ENTER INTO THE REALM OF ANY ACTION I TOOK. FURTHERMORE, THIS ISN'T JUST ME SITTING HERE TELLING YOU YOU DON'T HAVE TO TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. AT EVERY STEP, AT EVERY INVESTIGATIVE DECISION THERE ARE MULTIPLE LAYERS OF PEOPLE ABOVE ME AND MULTIPLE LAYERS OF PEOPLE BELOW ME. AGENTS AND ANALYSTS. ALL OF WHOM WERE INVOLVED IN THESE DECISIONS. THEY WOULD NOT TOLERATE ANY IMPROPER BEHAVIOR IN ME ANY MORE THAN I WOULD TOLERATE IN THEM. THAT IS WHO WE ARE. SUGGESTION THAT I IN SOME DARK CHAMBER WOULD SOMEHOW CAST ASIDE ALL OF THESE PROCEDURES AND SAFE GUARDS IS ASTOUNDING. PROPOSITION THAT IS GOING ON AND MIGHT OCCUR IN THE FBI DEEPLY CORRODES WHAT THE FBI IS AND IS DEEPLY DESTRUCTIVE. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I HAVE A MOTION. I HAVE A RULE 11 MOTION. CLAUSE 2. I MOVE TO SUBPOENA STEVE BANNON. HE WAS A WITNESS IN THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION. HE WAS UNDER SUBPOENA AND REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. >> GENTLEMAN'S NOT RECOGNIZED. CHAIR RECOGNIZES -- THE GENTLEMAN FROM MARYLAND. >> MR. CHAIRMAN -- >> A MOTION IS ALWAYS IN ORDER, MR. CHAIRMAN. RULE 11. CLAUSE 2. >> I YIELD FOR ONE MINUTE. >> I MOVE TO SUBPOENA STEVE BANNON IN OUR HOUSE INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION HE WAS UNDER SUBPOENA AND REFUSED A NUMBER OF TIMES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS OF MR. GOWDY. HE APPEARS TO HAVE A SINCERE INTEREST IN GETTING TO THE BOMB OF WHAT HAPPENED. AND SO I MOVE UNDER RULE 11 TO BRING MR. BAN NON TO THIS COMPUTETY AND ALSO M CHAIRMAN IS MR. RECEIPT OF DEVIN NUNES'S LETTER RECOMMENDING THEY CONTINUE ON THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDED WITNESS. I MOVE NOW FOR CONSIDERATION FOR MR. BANNON TO BE SUBPOENAED. IF HE REFUSED CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS OCCUR. >> MR. CHAIR -- I OBJECT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION THAT IS BEING MADE. >> THE -- >> YIELD BACK TO MR. CUMMINGS. BUT THE MOTION HAS TO BE HEARD IMMEDIATELY UNDER RULE 11 CLAUSE 2. >> GENTLEMAN WILL SUSPEND. >> MOTION IS NOT JERMAINE AND THE GENTLEMEN FROM MARYLAND -- >> MOVE TO TABLE THE RULING OF THE CHAIR. MOVE TO OVER RULE THE RULING OF THE CHAIR. >> MR. CHAIRMAN. >> MOTION MADE TO TABLE. APPEAL OF THE RULING OF THE CHAIR. ALTHOSE IN FAVOR OF TABLING THE APPEAL, RESPOND BY SAYING AYE? THOSE OPPOSED, NO. AYE's HAVE IT. >> I ASK FOR A RECORDED VOTE. >> MR. CHAIRMAN RMGT POINT OF PARL MENTRY INQUIRY. >> ON THE VOTE TO TABLE OR FOR THAT MATTER ON THE VOTE TO REPEAL THE RULING OF CHAIR. TAKE SEPARATE VOTES OF THE KPOO COMMITTEES OR ONE VOTE? >> MY ARE R UNDER STANDING WAS YOU WERE SATISFIED WITH ONE ROLE CALL VOTE? AND GO THROUGH EACH COMMITTEE IN ORDER. THEN TAKE THE CUMULATIVE VOTE AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF BOTH COMMITTEES. >> I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT POINT. >> MR. CHAIRMAN I HAD ASKED FOR A RECORDED VOTE. >> RECORDED VOTE HAS BEEN REQUESTED AN CLERK WILL CALL THE ROLL. QUESTION IS ON THE MOTION TO TABLE. APPEAL OF THE RULING THE CHAIR, THE CLERKING FOR THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WILL COMMENCE. >> MR. GOOD LATD. >> MR. SMITH? MR. SMITH VOTES AYE. >> ISA, MR. KING? MR. KING VOTES AYE. MR. JORDAN? MR. JORDAN VOTES YES. MR. -- MR. MA -- FROM GOWDY? >> PASS. >> MR. LABRADOR? MR. COLLINS? >> MR. -- DE -- FWL BUCK? >> MR. RAT CLIFF? -- MR. GATES? MR. GATES VOTES AYE. MR. JOHNSON OF LOUISIANA. MR. BIGS. MR. -- MR. NADLER? MR. NADLER VOTES NO. MISS JACKSON LEE? MR. COHN? IS. >> -- JOHNSON OF GEORGIA. NO. MR. DEUTSCH? MR. DEUTSCH VOTES NO. MR. GUTIERREZ? MISS BASS? MR. RICHMOND? VOTES NO. MR. JEFFREYS? MR. CICILLINE? >> NO. >> MR. CICILLINE VOTES NO. >> SWALWELL. >> NO. >> MR. -- MISS DEMMINGS. >> THE CLERK OF THE OVERSIGHT GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE WILL CALL THE ROLL. >> MR. GAUDY? >> PASS. >> MR. GOWDY PASSES. MR. DONE CAN? MR. DUNCAN VOTES AYE. >> MR. ISA VOTES AYE. >> JORDAN. MR. SANFORD. AYE. >> MR. >> MS. FOX. MR. MASSEY. MR. MEADOWS. MR. MEADOWS VOTES AYE. MR. DESAN TIS. MR. ROSS. MR. WALKER? MR. WALKER VOTES AYE. MR. BLUM. MR. BLUM. MR. RUSSELL. MR. RUSSELL VOTES AYE. MR. -- MR. PALMER. MR. COMBER. >> YES. >> MR. MITCHELL. MR. GIANFORTE. VOTES YES. >> MR. CUMMINGS. MR. CUMMINGS? MR. CUMMINGS VOTES NO. MS. -- MAZ MALONEY. MRS. -- MR. CLAY. MR. LYNCH. MR. LYNCH VOTES NO. MR. COOPER. MR. COOPER VOTES NO. MR. CONNELLY. MR. CONNELLY VOTES NAY. MS. KELLY VOTES NAY. MS. LAWRENCE VOTES NAY. MS. WATSON COLEMAN. MR. RAS KIN. MR. GOMEZ. MR. WELCH. MR. WELCH VOTES NO. MR. -- MR. >> MR. CHAIR, HOW IS MR. GOWDY RECORDED? >> MR. GOWDY PASSED. >> THE CLERK WILL CALL THE ROLL -- OF MEMBERS WHO HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECORDED. >> MR. ISA VOTES YES. MR. GOWDY. MR. BUCK. MR. BUCK VOTES AYE. MISS BASS. MR. JEFFREYS. >> I'VE BEEN ASKED BY THE MINORITY AND THE MAJORITY COUNSEL TO ADVISE MEMBERS THAT THEIR VOTES WILL ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE. IF THEY'RE ON BOTH COMMITTEES, AND THE CLERK OF THE OVERSIGHT -- >> MR. CHAIRMAN, POINT OF ORDER. ON WHAT BASIS WOULD THAT RULE BE, SINCE EACH COMMITTEE IS VOTING SEPARATELY ON THAT? >> PROCEDURALLY WE HAVE AGREED TO ONE UNIFIED VOTE. CLERK OF THE OVERSIGHT GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE WILL CALL THE ROLL OF THOSE MEMBERS WHO HAVE NOT VOTED. >> MR. GOWDY. MS. FOX. MR. HURD, MR. MITCHELL. MR. CLAY. MR. GOMEZ. >> JUST RESPONDED. >> THE GENTLEMAN FROM MISSOURI. VOTES NO. >> MR. CLAY VOTES NO. >> THE CLERK WILL REPORT. >> THE CLERK
