The thing about legal notices is it, freedom of speech and expression dies, decoding dies, rationality dies, and it doesn't die so it's necessary to make a video. So, in the biggest motivational controversy in India between two big YouTubers, Sandeep Maheshwari
and Vivek Bindra, which is happening, now Vivek Bindra has replied to Sandeep Maheshwari. In the last video, we explained after taking the course, what we understand is happening. what are the five big issues. If you
haven't watched that video, watch it now. Now, Vivek Bindra has replied in a live stream, a 35-minute reply, almost half an hour. In that, he addresses 14 significant points, clarifications, and questions. I will talk about these 14 points, give my opinion, analyze, and provide a rational perspective on each statement, what is correct and what is incorrect, where Vivek Bindra is gaining marks, and where he is not understanding. Why am I talking about this? Now, let's talk about those 14 statements in this video. But before that, if you want to watch channels like this, understand information, and want to grasp logic after removing arguments from perspective, then you can subscribe to this channel. Along with subscribing, turn on notifications and before I go ahead, I must say, it's always a pleasure when both sides of the story are known when replies come from both sides. Now, there is a reply from Sandeep
Maheshwari and we also have a reply from Vivek Bindra. So, this video will not be biased at all because I will cover each point with logic. Logic never fails,
my friends. Perspectives and perceptions can fail, but not logic. And that's what we try to achieve in this video. Before we talk about the 14 points, I want to tell you that I want to help those who are struggling to grow their channel, try to create passive income, or build a revenue stream. During that time, they may not be able to create impactful videos. One reason for that is they don't put much effort into scripting. In scripting, we don't have a structure, so I want to provide you with this free template. because I want you to get help from it. How these scripts and videos are made impactful, how those scripts are structured, you will get everything from this template. So, you can download this free template today. This is
the last time I am offering this. Download it now. Vivek, I don't agree with you. 'Scam' means deceiving or tricking people for money, adapting practices that look like something else and in every case, scammers don't run away. They conduct themselves differently each time, they hold back themselves temporarily. They let matters cool down, not every scammer runs away. Bindra, you accused Sandeep Maheshwari of sending a legal notice, but this is a complete lie. He never said that; he stated in his post that you threatened him with a legal notice. In MLM (Multi-Level Marketing) and affiliate models, there is a difference. I completely agree with your point; MLM has multiple levels, like many scams. I will talk about them in the next video. Yes, I understand the difference between the affiliate model and the MLM model, and I don't think there is any problem with the affiliate model in affiliate marketing because if you like a product, recommend it, and someone buys it, you get a commission. It's something that Amazon does too. You asked who audits you. Big Foss is the internal audit. And KPMG conducts the regulatory statutory audit, which is a third-party audit. it tells a lot about your confidence and how you spend that much money. Hence, you can create a reputation for your brand. You also asked if Sandeep Maheshwari should be told about his auditor. Point taken. So you asked what's the problem with exorbitant costs. You have invested in your business, proven your products, and adopted technology, so you deserve to cost a charge. I think the problem is not with the business; the problem is with some people. Some people have a problem with misleading, some with the experience, and one more thing—if someone says something, you send legal notices. So, if Sandeep Maheshwari hadn't made this video, how we would have come to know about this? You asked Sandeep Maheshwari why he didn't invite you. You have done that now, which is good because what he did was not take your name. In fact, I say that for a long time, you should have maintained this transparency. You know, so many people complain inside. In fact, maybe you don't know that creators like us receive emails every day about bada business, but we don't talk about it because we don't want a notice of 5 crores like you gave two years ago. So, if Sandeep Maheshwari doesn't do this, then how does the matter come out, and how do you give this clarification? I would still be neutral on this. Yes, you're absolutely right that one shouldn't be a judge and shouldn't just hear one verdict; both sides of the story should be heard. You can present your side of the story on your own channel, which is fantastic, as it aligns with my request in the last video. I'm quite pleased that you've done that because it allows me to make this discussion completely unbiased and talk with full rationale about the fourteen points I'm explaining today. In fact, it seems like you've thoroughly watched my last video because of the words I used, whether it's about the money-back guarantee or the complaint process, you addressed them in your reply. However, you didn't explicitly explain some aspects. I would prefer if you could share details about how the feedback loop works, how the complaint process is functioning, and elaborate on your escalation model. Discussing the three-tiered full escalation model and how it was implemented is crucial because introducing a process and implementing it are two different things. It's not that what's being sold is wrong. Why are you buying, and what are you buying for? Do you have any responsibility when you buy a product? You don't see what's for you or not; are you buying in excitement or with a well-thought-out decision? It's your responsibility; it's your accountability. He also mentioned that in June, they stopped sending courses due to some selling issues. Closing it doesn't mean it can't come back. He repeatedly talked about timing, but it doesn't necessarily mean you've done something. When the complaint process is open, it can be discussed. Because your students or affiliates, if they come and their complaints are not resolved, you said a four-step escalation model. You also provided email addresses. So, if you think that in June, it was closed, and all complaints are resolved, but were all your complaints are resolved and no complaints were open, if yes then it is okay. If any open complaint is not resolved, then it's not okay. You said, "On the email address, tell me how many complaints come. If complaints come, then they should be discussed. If there are no complaints, then it means that you have resolved all the complaints and this matter should not be brought forward at this time. It's clear and simple. Now, let me see how many people are putting this email address. Put mine too; I also want to see how many complaints are coming and whether Vivek Bindra resolves them. You know, you talk about technology, talk about the dashboard, and give a tracking dashboard and the status of all complaints, which escalation level they are standing on right now. How much time you are taking on average and what is the peak, what is the skew, what is the outlier? Can you give me that information? You showed Sonu's video. He was excited. He cracked the first sale, but his overall experience has been bad, and that's what he's speaking about. It's not that you showed that video, so everything is fine. He was happy then. He was happy, but now he's not, and he is not a happy customer. And I think you're answerable to your unhappy customers. And probably, with these email addresses you shared, things will improve. And you're saying sorry, and you're saying that you will correct things, and you're trying to make improvements. Great, you're not a god; all good, that shows that you want to be humble from here on, and I hope Vivek, I want to say in the behavior of the whole community, please stop sending legal notices. Take feedback, especially from creator communities. Get into a dialogue with people. You know, stop just meeting celebrities. Try to talk to creators also. You will get a different perspective about what YouTube really needs. We all in the YouTube Community should walk together so that we can create a difference at least in the Indian YouTube community, that is what my vision is, if you share that vision, I invite you to my Bekhauf Baatcheet podcast. I believe whatever points I have made sense, great. If you think I made sense, great. Otherwise, let's have an open debate and dive further. I'm 100% sure that should give more to see and more to offer to the audience which deserves to hear more. If you want Vivek Bindra in our podcast, put it in the comments. Like and share this video as much as possible if you want this video to reach a larger audience so that this message, this decode reaches people. Because it's essential. Just as many people, in my opinion, I want to see so many people affected. All of the people deserve to see the maturity. They deserve to see that you guys are solving it with humility by leaving your egos, getting into a conversation, and making course corrections in the future. Setting an example. Who is a leader? A leader is someone who sets an example, he is worthy of guidance, who shows that he is not a child, who admits his mistakes and moves forward. I want to say, that if motivation is needed every day, that's wrong. Have a clear and well-defined. A Goal that gives you motivation every day and makes you wake up every day in the morning. I would like to know which and what topics are spread around you, which you want me to decode. I want to talk about if you liked this content, then like it, definitely leave a comment, and definitely share it. Subscribe if you haven't done it yet because here we keep bringing such bekhauf-opinions. This is Peepoye, I am Akassh, and now nothing will be hidden anymore.
