Vim's Built In Completion Awesome, And You Can Make It Better!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Gavin Freeborn
Views: 5,966
Rating: 4.9829059 out of 5
Keywords: coc, coc.nvim, youcompleteme, neovim, vim, nvim, lua, vimscript, viml
Id: NUr-VvaOEHQ
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 20min 54sec (1254 seconds)
Published: Sat Feb 13 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I'll be looking out for the second video on mucomplete. I've been looking for a way to get away from coc.vim and this looks like it has potential!
Can somebody reason with me on something?
I rely heavily on autocompletion. I consider myself a bad coder and my memory is that of a gold fish. I also can't write two sentences without a typo.
So my workflow is almost always write a few letters of whatever I want to write and then tab it to complete it. Even if I know exactly what I want to write, I'd still write something like
functio
and then tab to complete so that I have an immediate test of spellchecking.Having said that, even just thinking about having to press control x control whatever every time I do that makes my fingers hurt.
So, what gives? Why would anyone condition themselves to these emacs like shortcuts?
Great stuff! I have help-page reading to do! I never thought that I needed omnicomplete before, but I regularly use
<C-x><C-n>
and<C-x><C-l>
. Using<C-x><C-o>
for snippets is just SO clean. Got some learning to be before I can think of how to improve my workflow, but this will definitely fit into it. Thanks for sharing!Made a video focused on using and extending vim's builtin completion. Home all of you like it!
Very nice! I've been using 'youcompleteme', though I'll give mucomplete a whirl now.
see-oh-see (coc) not cock lol
cool vid thanks
I first read , "Vim's sth sth competition"
and I asked to myself, "what?" Does even vim has competition?
I had to read again :D