RACHEL: WELCOME BACK. AN EXPLOSIVE FBI DOCUMENT REVEALING SHOCKING DETAILS FROM AN INFORMANT WHO TIES JOE BIDEN TO A $10 MILLION BRIBERY SCHEME INVOLVING HUNTER WHO THEN SAT ON THE BOARD OF BURISMA. JOEY: THE INFORMANT CLAIMS HE WAS, QUOTE, COERCED INTO MAKING THE PAYOFF, DETAILING THE HEFTY COST, QUOTE, $5 MILLION TO ONE BIDEN AND $5 MILLION TO THE OTHER. PETE: HERE WITH MORE INSIGHT, FORMER FBI SPECIAL AGENT NICOLE PARKER IS HERE TO EXPLAIN. NICOLE, THANKS FOR BEING HERE. YOU'VE HAD A CHANCE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THIS 1023. THIS IS WHAT YOU DID, I MEAN, YOU UNDERSTAND THESE DOCUMENTS WAY DIFFERENT THAN A LAYPERSON WOULD READ THEM. WHAT DID YOU SEE THAT WE MIGHT MISSESOME. >> FIRST OF ALL IF, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING ME. FULL DISCLAIMER, I HAVE NEVER WORKED THIS INVESTIGATION. I REVIEWED THE DOCUMENT JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE DID ON OPEN SOURCE, AND AN FD-1023 IS A CONFIDENTIAL HUMAN SOURCE REPORTING DOCUMENT. AT THE FBI OUR WORK IS VERY IMPORTANT TO RELY ON HUMAN SOURCES. THEY PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT WE MAY NOT GET OTHERWISE. I WAS SURPRISED THAT THE 1023 EVER CAME OUT. I KNOW THAT IT WAS BECAUSE CONGRESS WAS PERSISTENT. THEY ARE REALLY HOLDING THE FBI DIRECTOR'S FEET TO THE FIRE ON THIS MATTER. THE 1023, IF YOU LOOK AT IT AS A NORMAL INDIVIDUAL, YOU READ LU IT, THERE IS SOME VERY EXPLOSIVE INFORMATION ON THERE. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THAT INFORMATION IS UNVERIFIED. YOU KNOW, THE LEFT-WING MEDIA CONTINUES TO SAY, OH, IT'S UNVERIFIED, BUT I DIDN'T HEAR THAT DURING THE STEELE DOSSIER. I DIDN'T HEAR A DISCLAIMER THEN, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO SOMETHING THAT IS IN RELATION TO HUNTER BIDEN, IT'S UNVERIFIED. THE OTHER IMPORTANT PIECE IS THIS IS UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION, IT WAS NEVER CLASSIFIED. BUT AS YOU LOOK THROUGH THE FORM, YOU KNOW, YOU SEE AT THE TOP THE DATE OF THE CONTACT. THAT'S THE DATE THAT THE AGENT HAD CONTACT WITH THE CONFIDENTIAL HUMAN SOURCE, THEN YOU SEE THE DATE OF THE REPORT. IF YOU NOTICE THE DATE OF THE CONTACT AND THE DATE OF THE REPORT, THEY MATCH. AS AN AGENT, YOU'RE EXTREMELY BUSY. FOR AN AGENT TO SAY THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, I NEED TO GET THIS REPORT DONE IMMEDIATELY, TO ME, THAT'S VERY INDICATIVE THAT THIS INFORMATION CAME ACROSS AS CREDIBLE TO THE AGENT THAT WAS TAKING IT IN, OBVIOUSLY. ALSO SOMETHING THAT I NOTICED ON IT, SERIALS. THE SERIAL NUMBER IS BASICALLY THE DOCUMENT NUMBER TO THE FILE, AND I NOTICED THAT THE SERIAL NUMBER IS REFERENCED SERIAL 7, YOU KNOW? THE BOTTOM, I BELIEVE, OF THE SECOND PAGE. YOU GO THROUGH THE DOCUMENT, AND YOU SEE NOW ANOTHER REFERENCE TO SERIAL, YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE IT WAS 212. LESS THAN ONE YEAR LATER. THAT MEANS THERE HAVE BEEN OVER 205, YOU KNOW, DOCUMENTS PUT TO THAT FILE IN BETWEEN THAT -- JOEY: BACK TO THIS, BACK TO THIE PROCESS A LITTLE BIT, AND I WANT TO GO BACK WITH, YOU BROUGHT UP THE STEELE DOSSIER. THAT'S KIND OF THE JUXTAPOSITION IF HERE. THESE ARE TWO DOCUMENTS THAT ARE UNVERIFIED ALLEGATIONS AND WITH THE STEELE DOSSIER IT LOOKS LIKE THE FBI DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH TO FIND ITS ORIGINS, OR IF THEY DID, THEY IGNORED IT. AND ON THIS DOCUMENT, IT LOOKS LIKE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO RESEARCH ANYTHING UNDER THE CONCERN THAT IT MAY BE REAL OR AT LEAST THAT'S THE ALLEGATION. DOES THAT SHOW A CONSISTENT PROBLEM WITH GETTING THIS INFORMATION AND NOT TAKING IT SERIOUSLY OR TAKING IT SERIOUSLY WITHOUT VERIFYING IT? >> YOU KNOW, IT IS. THIS IS PROBABLY WHY THE WHISTLEBLOWER CAME FORWARD, RIGHT? THE WHISTLEBLOWER KNOWS INFORMATION, AND THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY COMING FORWARD BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT IT'S BEING HANDLED APPROPRIATELY BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT THEY KNOW. THEY KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS CASE, THEY'RE COMING FORWARD, AND TO ME, IT INDICATES MAYBE THEY'RE SLOW-WALKING THIS CASE OR THE INVESTIGATION. RACHEL: YEAH. NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT. [LAUGHTER] PETE: REAL QUICK ON THOSE DOCUMENT NUMBERS, YOU'RE SAYING DOCUMENT 7, DOCUMENT 215, THAT MEANS -- THE NUMBERS ARE ASSIGNED TO CASES, YOU'RE SAYING THERE WOULD BE A LOT MORE THERE. >> NO, I'M SAYING, YOU KNOW, FOR ONE CASE FILE, EACH CASE HAS SERIALS. BETWEEN, IN LESS THAN A YEAR OVER 205 SERIALS WERE PUT TO THAT CASE. I CAN'T SAY THAT EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT IS IN RELATION TO THIS CASE, BUT IT DOES INDICATE THIS SOURCE IS VERY ACTIVE, AND THAT SHOWS A LOT. PRESIDENT OKAY. INTERESTING. NICOLE PARKER, YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. WE
