THE TRUTH: PRO V1 Refurbished Balls (£20) Vs PRO V1 Balls (£42)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Rick Shiels Golf
Views: 1,084,713
Rating: 4.9321098 out of 5
Keywords: Golf, Golf Tips, Golf Advice, How to play better golf, Rick Shiels PGA, Rick Shiels golf, review club lesson, Golf lessons, Manchester, Rick Shiels PGA Golf Coach, Online golf, facebook golf, twitter golf, rickshielspga, rickshielsgolf, tiger, woods, Rory Mcilroy, Stop slicing, stop hooking, how to play golf, reduce handicap, become a better golfer, Golf balls, Titleist, Callaway, Taylor Made, Ping, refurbished pro v1 vs new, pro v1, pro v1 refurbished review
Id: moCxvAlViQo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 13min 27sec (807 seconds)
Published: Wed May 29 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Really haven’t been a fan of his “test” videos lately, and they come across as a bit irresponsible in terms of his platform as an expert. The “sandblast and repaint” refurbishment does not produce a quality product, and even though he opened a set of 2017 Pro Vs, there’s not guarantee every ball was, and even then, not every recycling company has the same standards.
I had a similar issue when he did the “does shaft really matter?” Test and came to an answer of “Not really” when he hit 1 driver with just different flexes in the same shaft.
I feel like he should know all of these things, but decided to make lowest common denominator content and confirm misconceptions.
I watched this and I have some questions on why Rick did this review the way he did. Doing an on course review like this has its merits, but he spent an awful lot of time going over subjective things like sound and feel (which is good info, though not the most useful). I would really have liked to have seen some GCQuad data along with this on-course review and am not sure why he didn't do that. I don't really see the point in doing a "longest drive" on course where you A) aren't measuring strike and B) aren't accounting for bounce and roll. Some meaningful data on launch and spin and how they differ on wedges, irons and driver is important. Maybe not shot-to-shot, but certainly worth knowing if there are any trends that may matter over time.
The durability is a very big point and I don't think he hit it home enough. Most of what you're paying for in a ProV1 is the cover and how it reacts with the other layers. The reason Tour balls are more costly is mostly that the urethane covers are far more expensive to make than a surlyn/ionomer cover (obviously marketing too but they are more expensive to make). It's a big deal that that isn't the same cover from the factory and their quality control isn't the same as Titleist's.
He also cut 3 of them open and I think that was just luck of the draw. I don't think you can assume that they were all the 2017 version (with the 2019 markings). It's really luck of the draw and you don't know from ball to ball what version it is (or even if it's a V or an X) and that can be a big issue for some people. To be honest, if you're thinking "well I can't really tell the difference at my skill level anyway I may as well save some money" then I'd say go with Cut or Vice or Snell for a few bucks more and at least get some consistency in the product, more durability, and at least know what you're getting.
James Robinson did a video yesterday as well but God knows what he was using, didn't even look like a proper golf ball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3FH_Z1n_ts
Rick's testing and logic is on a similar level to Taylormade marketing.
It appeals to a certain type of person.
The TXG guys are miles past anyone else in the serious golf YouTube sphere.