The Surprising Truth About Note-taking During Lectures

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
I don't think you should take notes during  lectures. The rest of this video explains why. I   first became skeptical of the value of note-taking  during lectures when i was doing some research on   different forms of note-taking. I came across  a lot of sentences like this one: "Students are   wise to take notes, as those who take and review  lecture notes tend to have higher achievement than   those who do not." What made me skeptical? Well,  the first part of the sentence is a causal claim,   but the last part of the sentence is presenting  correlational evidence. Taking notes during   lectures is generally perceived to be good  practice and if you want to be a good student   you tend to do the things that people tell you  to do to be a good student. But to know whether   taking notes during lectures actually  helps you, you have to test the idea.   That's when i came across sentences like this one:  "In prior research, performance outcomes have not   been consistently higher for long-hand note takers  than for those who just listened to the lecture"   and, you know, did not take any notes. And that  started me going down this rabbit hole of research   on note-taking. But to understand what I  found, we have to understand why note-taking   might be helpful for learning in the first place.  Note-taking during a lecture is supposed to help   you learn in two different ways. The first way is  called encoding. Physically writing down what you   heard is supposed to help you remember what it  is you heard. Evidence for the effectiveness of   encoding is a bit mixed, but it probably does help  you remember at least a little bit, just not as   much as alternative methods. The second way that  taking notes during lectures is supposed to help   you learn is by reviewing your notes later. So  that's what's called storage. You have a kind of   source that you can go back to, to reread again.  The same kind of story here: rereading your notes   is better than doing nothing, but it's probably  not as good as alternative methods. However,   there is a competing theory about note-taking  during lectures and that has to do with attention.   While you are writing down what the lecturer just  said, the lecturer is continuing to speak. During   that time, your attention is split so you have to  pay attention to what you're writing and, ideally,   under the encoding hypothesis, you are summarizing  and interpreting what the lecturer is saying.   But at the same time you also have to  be listening for the new information   that is being said. Generally speaking, splitting  your attention this way is a bad idea. It's a bad   idea in almost any context and the consequence is  that learning suffers. Okay so that is an argument   against the idea of taking notes during lectures,  but there's also an alternative approach. And the   alternative approach is to leverage something that  we know is pretty effective at long-term learning   and deepening your understanding and that is  called free recall. Free recall is not anything   crazy or exciting. You just take a blank sheet of  paper out or anything that you can write on and   you try to remember everything that you heard and  you try to, maybe organize a little bit of it as   you recall. So, in a way, it's kind of like taking  notes after a lecture or after you read something.   This kind of free recall is effective in lots  of different contexts and it's effective just   on its own without doing anything else. But it's  particularly effective when you can see what was   missed - when you can correct yourself in a way.  So what does the research really say about all of   these claims? One, and this is something that  everyone agrees on, verbatim notes are very   bad. If you think about it for a second verbatim  notes actually do not correspond with any of these   theories. From the attention side, if you're  taking verbatim notes that means you have to   write a ton and you're essentially transcribing  while the person is talking. So you have to be   writing extremely fast for that to even get down  the notes - you've got to be missing something.   So it's bad from the attention point of view. What  about encoding? Encoding is about interpreting and   understanding and synthesizing what's being said  so if you're writing verbatim notes you're not   doing that. So it doesn't really help you there.  And finally storage is kind of the same deal.   If you are going back to reread your notes, you  certainly don't want to read a transcript of what   was said. You want to read kind of a summary of  what was said or main points or even diagrams. So   verbatim notes are bad with a possible exception  of taking notes on a laptop where there are some   research findings that say maybe it's not so bad  on a laptop and probably this has to do with how   fast your typing speed is. If your typing speed  is very fast, writing verbatim notes probably   doesn't hurt you as much. There's a bunch of  other differences between taking notes on a   laptop and taking notes by hand, but i'm not going  to get into those here. The second big finding,   and this is going to come as no surprise to you  whatsoever, is that if you take notes on the   things that are actually tested on, you do better  on those tests. Whether this supports the encoding   hypothesis or not is a little unclear because when  you take notes on something that the teacher said,   you thought it was important. And you paid  attention to that thing. So is it the case   that you paid attention to it that was important?  Or was it the case that you wrote it down that was   important? Well, probably a little bit of both,  but if you pay attention to the right stuff,   you end up doing well and if you paid attention  to the wrong stuff - whether you wrote that down   or not, you probably are not going to do as well.  The third thing, and this is the big one, is that   taking notes during lectures doesn't really confer  any extra advantages beyond taking notes after   lectures or doing what I called earlier a free  recall session after the lecture. In controlled   research, taking notes during the lecture doesn't  even beat taking no notes and doing no review   whatsoever. In this study, for example, the  no notes group did just as well as any of the   groups using any of the other note-taking  methods on immediate tests. Now we know   that in delayed tests free recall approaches  (or sometimes called self-testing approaches)   beat re-reading by a lot and this increases  the longer the delay that you take. In all the   studies I read, I did not see a single study  where taking notes during the lectures beat   free recall on a delayed test. They either turn  out to be the same or free recall does better.   Listen to this Youtuber explain his method: "You  need to preview the lecture. You need to look up   words that you don't understand. You need to look  up general concepts that you don't understand.   You really need to get to grips with that  before the lecture begins. You don't want to be   struggling with things or googling words during  a lecture. You want to do that beforehand, so   that you can focus on what the lecturer is saying.  That is my number one tip. So what I will do is,   I will sit down after the lecture - no  notes, nothing open - and I'll get a nice   a4 piece of card and I will recreate what I  learned from that lecture. And I will then add   to those lecture notes or to that kind of active  recall card with the annotations and the slides   that I have. He's got it exactly right. Prepare  for the lecture, take just minimal notes during   the lecture, and then do free recall after  the lecture. Taking notes during lectures   might have made sense in a different era if the  only source of information is coming from that   teacher in that one moment and you have no other  way of accessing what that information might be.   Maybe it does make some sense to take notes  even recognizing that while you are taking notes   you're probably also missing some of the other  information from the lecture. But in today's age,   a lot of lecture-based courses are on widely  accessible topics so a lot of lectures are   recorded. You can go back to a recording, you  can look at a lecture transcript. In some cases,   you obviously have your textbook or maybe  a friend's notes to compare with or lecture   outline notes that someone else has created or  pretty much all of the internet to figure out   what you may have missed in this particular  lecture. Keep in mind, that by taking notes   during the lecture you're almost guaranteeing  that you are going to miss something. If you   want to find out more about free recall i have a  video about that right here. See you next time.
Info
Channel: Benjamin Keep, PhD, JD
Views: 257,153
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: lecture note taking, taking notes during class, taking notes during lecture, note taking, how to take notes, how to take notes effectively in class, free recall, verbatim note taking, longhand note taking, laptop note taking, note taking tips
Id: cRQqH18wJgw
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 8min 47sec (527 seconds)
Published: Wed Sep 21 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.