The Neuroscience of Addiction - with Marc Lewis
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Royal Institution
Views: 327,573
Rating: 4.8360109 out of 5
Keywords: Ri, Royal Institution, Neuroscience, addiction, science, lecture, talk, marc lewis, drugs, alcohol
Id: aOSD9rTVuWc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 60min 48sec (3648 seconds)
Published: Sat Dec 10 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I mean, it really depends on how you want to define a disease. Some people are predisposed to compulsive behavior; does that make compulsive behavior a disease? I don't know, maybe not-- but it's important to note that not everyone has an equal playing field. The personality and pathological behavior that you've come to cultivate through a life-time probably also plays a large part.
There are issues with the disease model, yes, but a main benefit is that treating it as a disease allows for the allotment of significant governmental research funds to be allocated to the study of it much like other diseases.
For any recovering people browsing this I wanna throw out my two cents. Some studies are saying post acute withdrawal symptoms can last months or even years. Some suggested brain chemistry can be permanently altered. 6 years after addiction my interest in things was low, and I wasnโt sad or not entertained, but I was never content. Very neurotic. High anxiety. Low motivation to make social connections. Just get into long down times that would last a few months regularly.
Stumbled across a random study that changed my life years later. I started taking supplements, mostly GABA and Theanine that made me feel like a human being again - and this was 6 years after being clean. I think from experience the damage we do to our brains chemistry in making dopamine is understated in addiction research. This probably causes a lot of relapses.
My dentist prescribed me 3 refills of percs. Got hooked on one of the bottles for a good month. Half way through the bottle I decided to check side affects and realised that I need to just say no. I decided to not get those other refills. I did finish the rest of the bottle. I can see how you can get caught up in that shit. Also I had no clue your dentist can prescribe those type of drugs. Not to mention all the refills.
I think the topic deserves debate. It is shortsighted to shut down either side- both have merits. See the south park episode from a few seasons ago. It had some valid points, and perhaps some not so valid ones.
Some treatment involves monitoring behavior, and suggests it is not a disease but a problem with personal control - 'you are the one that got yourself into it, only you can get yourself out of it by being mindful of your behavior.
Then there is the other treatment, like AA for example. 'You have a horrible disease and are completely powerless to control it.'
I come from a line of behaviorists, and we likely all say it is a disease, but perhaps an alternate definition that does not mesh well with other diseases.
I think AA offers abstinence Only, and I think that's not right for everyone- when you fall off the wagon, you fall hard cause you have little experience with self control. It's different for different people though. Some people should really never ever touch the sauce.
Edit:
A lot of people ITT are thinking that those critical of AA recommend people should not go there. No one has said that, I hope.
My attitude is "thank God we have AA, but a different free treatment program would almost certainly serve addicts much better". I am very critical of AA as I have lost many friends and family to addiction. If you are in AA, please, please keep going, or replace it with an appropriate social support program.
Enjoyed listening to his opinions and jokes, although he surely did make it seem like they were only his opinions and based on his first person experiences. Surely got me to agree, but I think there's this other side we are completely forgetting. Like some studies. Google addiction is like a disease.
TLDW...someone please?
As a recovering addict in NA with 5 1/2 years clean, I couldnโt agree more with him. Heโs right on the mark with the majority of this. The problem is, where do people like me go who are aware of the major flaws in the disease model, but have no other place to turn to. I wish his solution was a little more in depth. I agree focusing on your future and setting goals is imperative to staying clean. I myself have gone back to school and will be graduating with my bachelors in 3 days and will attend grad school this fall for my masters. A lot of me staying clean has been my ability to stay laser focused on my long term goals. I constantly see โin the rooms of recoveryโ people who wholeheartedly believe they are powerless and that only god can remove their defects through prayer, and they stay stuck in the same place in life and eventually relapse. The good thing about NA/AA is the ability to get around like minded individuals and receive that identification we so desperately need to feel not alone. There is no other outlet for people like us where we can go and share our crazy thoughts and everyone there understand exactly what youโre talking about and then listen to their experience on how they got through it. Itโs such a complex issue and we are very far off from finding a resolution, but I do know that it needs to be founded in psychology and not in โGodโ.
Type 2 diabetes is a disease brought on by eating too much sugar. Diabetics did that to themselves, and they need their medicine to make them function. Substitute the word diabetes with addiction. Thatโs the most common comparison made when going through rehab. Addiction is a disease and only people who donโt understand it claim that itโs not one