The (Mildly Chaotic) Making of a Victorian Petticoat

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
(gentle music) - [Narrator] In my endeavor to construct a Worth-like gown for the elusive 1890s ball that has now time traveled into 2021, I will be needing a petticoat. Not the trash cotton muslin one with the overlocked hem, elastic waistband and otherwise unfinished seams that I made when I was 16; no. A real, proper, grown Up Victorian petticoat out of silk taffeta, with pin tucks and lace insertion and stupid hook and eye closures. This video is the third in the 1890s gown series, which has kindly been sponsored by Skillshare, but more on that anon. For a basic pattern, I consulted our good friend Agnes Walker, a free digitized copy of her book, "Manual of Needlework and Cutting Out" which can be found in the description box below. You may recognise this from the combinations project I did last year. Referencing the diagram in Agnes Walker for pattern shapes, I proceeded to design the petticoat according to contemporary examples listed on the Met Museum's online collection; this informed me where would be logical to put lace, frills, pin tucks, etc. If you watched the first part in this video series, in which I venture out to purchase the materials for this project, you'll know that I found these two beautiful laces at Mokuba that I intended to put to on a petticoat; so I'm incorporating these into the design. Let me just say: having the right lace for Victorian underthings is crucial. If I hadn't found these laces that were just the right quality and design, properly reminiscent of actual 19th century lace I would not have bothered to make this petticoat. On a project like this, the lace, however small, should be the biggest investment. I have just traced off the petticoat pattern from this. I've only gone down to about the knee so I've made them 24 inches long which is still a little bit longer than they need to be, I was just measuring from my waist to my knee, but of course did not accommodate for this little four-inch yoke that goes on at the waistband which is this bit here so it's a bit long and I know that and that's good because I have some room to play with whatever height this pretty, frilly, floofy bit will be. So this strip here is going to be one and a half times- wait, is that math? It's going to be double, and OK. So whatever the length of this finished hem here, of this knee-length petticoat bit, it will be that plus another one plus one half of that. That will be the length of this, this will get gathered onto this to make a little floof layer and then there will be some pin tucks, there will be this insertion going in there and then this edging lace will sit on the edge. So I have enough of this, I don't have enough of this. I'm going to start just by cutting out these upper bits of the white silk taffeta that I have to make this petticoat out of and start getting these seamed together. I'm going to worry about this later once I have this together and I want to get this fitted and all nice and done and put together and then we'll start messing with this because this is where the finicky and expensive stuff starts to happen so I want to make sure all of this works, all of the proportions are correct, before we get into this. This silk taffeta was not purchased during my project shopping escapade back in ye olden days before the plague, but instead was ordered from Burnley & Trowbridge who, thankfully, were still shipping as normal. In an effort to avoid poking unnecessary holes into the taffeta, which is prone to show holes, I'm weighting rather than pinning the pattern pieces for tracing, with the trusty assistance of sundry household objects. Once the pieces are cut out, I can go ahead and pin together my skirt panels, and begin stitching. "Authentic Victorian Dressmaking Techniques", a reprint of a 1905 sewing manual, instructs that while smaller undergarments are frequently made by hand, quote "the amount of work necessary to make night-dresses "and petticoats inclines one toward the machine method." So I shall be constructing the main seams for this petticoat on my appropriately 1891 machine. I should also note that there is a placket at the centre back opening, which gets stitched round three sides, leaving the long side to be attached to the skirt opening. The yoke piece is likewise stitched around three sides, with the bottom edge left open for attaching to the skirt part. The skirt seams are French seamed. Once again, "Victorian Dressmaking Techniques" gives us the instruction that, quote "No raw edges of material are left at the seams "in this class of work", unquote. Likely because undergarments, which were worn next or closer to the skin, were frequently washed and thus needed to be strong. Quote, "Every seam is either a French seam or is felled. "The French seam is used "at what may be called the regular seams", unquote, that is to say, the main long seams of a garment. That curved or upper seam of the yoke is clipped so that the curve turns smoothly, then it's flipped inside out and pressed flat. I can then pin just that inside layer of the placket to the eight-inch opening left in the centre back of the petticoat seam, with right sides together, which will allow it to open and close. In retrospect, I didn't actually need to stitch and turn that top edge of the placket either it could have just been left raw to line up with the raw edge of the skirt waist and in fact I did end up cutting this off later. To finish both the placket and skirt raw edges on the inside of the petticoat, I turned under the raw edge of the placket and felled this down with tiny stitches. The Victorians were real hype about tiny, almost invisible stitches, so using some fine silk thread, I'm endeavoring to make my stitches as small as possible. The other side of the petticoat opening is just finished off by hand with a quick felled hem. No, I still don't understand the physics of French seams and ended up with my pencil marks on the outside instead of the inside and for some reason, shifted the placement of the placket a bit for no reason, but shh, it's underwear. Insert pointless quip about nobody but the entire internet ever getting to seeing it. OK, so here we are so far, the seams of the petticoat are all stitched together, they are French seamed and pressed and ready to go as well as the waistband is all prepped and ready to go. This petticoat is obviously meant to have some gathering at the waistband. I have measured up this yoke bit to my own waist and figured out how wide the overlap needs to be so it'll just be like this. I will attach the skirt all around here up to here but not from here to here because this will cross over and just sort of lay like that, I don't know if you can understand right now but you shall see very anon. So what I'm going to do is I'm going to match up center front and center front seam obviously, center front of the skirt to center front of this waistband. I think I only want about three and half to four inches of gathering at the back so I will pin it up flat all around there and then the last two inches on each side I will leave free so that I can run a gathering thread through the top of this and then gather it up to fit into this waistband. That's my plan for now. To gather the two halves of the centre back into the remaining yoke bit, I'm running a gathering thread into the skirt edge by hand: Victorians were likewise exceedingly passionate about gathers: if you recall from my combinations video, these were preferred to be as fine, delicate and neat as possible, and instructions for running gathering threads into fabric in Bertha Banner's "Household Sewing with Home Dressmaking" instruct to take up two threads while passing over four. That is correct: two individual threads of the material are taken onto the needle, while four are passed over. Pro tip: do not try to do this by candle light. Pardon the lack of pressing going on here but here's where we are so far. I'm quite happy with how this waistband is working out and then the rest of the skirt part. So what I have to do now is I just have to even up this bottom hemline thing so that I can go ahead and put that little flounce on. I'm just trying to figure out now how high I want that to be. So herein is where we start to do a little bit of riffing. Making stuff up and just adding floof and decoration and fun bits. I'm going to cut a little ruffle that will probably be actually coincidentally the length of the skirt that I have on right now. That will be all silk taffeta and then I will add that additional little, what, three inch edging lace to the hem so it will be ultimately just probably to the tops of my feet. Obviously you don't want your petticoat to stick out from underneath your dress, however I did read in "Authentic Victorian Dressmaking Techniques" how they specified that evening gowns should not absolutely under any circumstances lift up off the feet, so the length of the gown will be quite long so I probably will have to go a little bit long with this petticoat just so that it gives that bottom edge enough floof. Before that happens though, I haven't actually finished the yoke edge; so I'm just trimming the seam allowance at the edge where it's sewn to the skirt, then, just like the placket, am turning under the yoke edge and felling it down to the skirt with tiny felling stitches. Then I marked an even line all round the hem at the point I'd pinned up during the fitting, and chopped off the excess width. The hem is then hemmed by machine. Since this edge will be folded under and will effectively just become the seam allowance when the flounce gets stitched on, I wasn't worried about putting a fine hand-stitched hem on this and I'm sure the Victorians wouldn't be so worried about that either. OK, so we are now ready to get started on this flounce. I've gone ahead and I have worked out some math. I need one foot, 12 inches, of, well, fabric length plus the additional ruffle bit at the hem. I have subtracted the bit that's going to be the insertion lace here which is four and a half inches wide which means I need three and five eighths, two three and five eighths long, wide- oh my god- two three and five eighths inch wide strips to go on either side of the lace, plus an additional inch so four and five eighths which I'm actually just going to round down to four and a half inch strips because I'm going to put two little quarter inch pin tucks. I have done the math and done it again and done it again to make sure that I have accommodated enough extra width to allow for the pin tucks and still have the strips be the correct width when they're finished. This also means I have probably done it incorrectly no matter how many times I do it it's always incorrect so I shall I keep you updated on that. So basically what I'm going to be doing now is cutting out times two 175 inch long strips. That's four and three quarter yards because what I want the actual hem on the petticoat right now is currently 70 inches all around the hem and I want the ruffle, in order to get it to be ruffly to be one and half times that width so I added an additional 70 inches plus 35 inches which comes to four and three quarter yards. I have more than four and three quarter yards of this hem lace. I do not, however, have four and three quarter yards of the insertion lace, I only have about two and three quarters. So what I've done is I have gone ahead and I have messaged my friends at East Coast Trimming which by the way friends, have acquired all of the Mokuba stock just so that you know we can all now rest in peace, East Coast Trimming which was tied with Mokuba for my favorite trimming shop and now I mean, by default claims that title in and of itself. So in theory that have all of the ex-Mokuba stock however I cannot remember if I just bought the entire bolt of this. I'm pretty sure that I did and I'm not sure if they have another colorway, I think they may have had a slightly more white version of it which I would accept but anyway that's all still to come. I think I'm just going to go ahead and use this anyway because they're not in the store everyday they're only in like maybe once a week I think. It's probably not going to be in on time for this video to be released so what I will do is I'll probably baste an extra little bit until I can acquire either some more of this lace or something very similar at least in width to replace in the back. (dramatic music) At this point I realised that I was unnecessarily succumbing to mundanity, which like, don't you hate when that happens? But never fear, for this is a challenge quickly remedied with any nearby shears of destiny to liven up the cutting experience. And by liven up I don't even know because these are severely not meant to be fabric shears so cutting silk with these is not necessarily the most efficient experience but it can be done and therefore it will be done. So I ended up cutting out these 4.5 inch strips from selvedge to selvedge on the material, so there were no raw edges to worry about; I think the width of my silk was about 45 inches but in any case, I ended up connecting three strips per half of the flounce, so cutting six strips in total, and stitching those together into two complete circles containing three strips each. If that makes sense. Then I'm then once again putting machine hems on two sides of one strip, but only one side of the other; the top edge of the top flounce will again be the seam allowance of the edge connected to the skirt, and the two edges connecting the insertion lace will have the lace stitched over them, so the stitching doesn't have to be pretty; the hem edge at the bottom of the lower flounce, however, will be seen, so I want to do that nicely by hand later. For the pin tucks, I'm marking the lines all round each flounce: the first one on the upper flounce, or the flounce with two hems, half an inch up from the bottom, then additional half inches up from there. The bottom flounce, or the one with only the one single hemmed edge, gets the marks round from the top edge down, since the tucks will sit on either side closest to the insertion lace. The bottom flounce, or the one with only the single hemmed edge, gets the marks round from the top edge down since the tucks will sit on either side closest to the insertion lace. These lines are then pinned together so that each pair meets, forming two quarter inch folds sitting just next to each other. Whilst pinning, I was careful to hold the flounces in their upright positions, so that I can make sure to stitch with what will become the outward edge facing upwards on the machine so it'll look nicer and the bobbin side of the stitching, which sometimes doesn't tend to look as nice, will be folded underneath the tuck when it's pressed down. Yeah, there is a surprising amount of math and geometrical logic involved in petticoat making. This stuff is kind of no joke. The tucks are then pressed downwards, and before I can proceed onto the lace, I just want to get that final edge of the lower flounce hemmed off. I'm doing this, as mentioned previously, by hand: and if you'll once again recall from the combinations video, this is done in the opposite direction from felling stitches in the previous centuries: that is, with the stitching done towards the body, or from right to left, rather than away from the body. This seems like a small and unnecessary positional change, but it actually causes the stitches to slant in the opposite direction in this century than they did previously so it can actually make quite a significant aesthetic difference. While I was originally taught to fell the earlier way or away from the body I've actually come to adapt to this new way just as easily and can use both methods interchangeably now. And now for the pretty bits! The hem lace is also whipped on by hand; I've just folded over the upper portion of blank net, and am felling that folded edge into place, catching only the turned up edge on the hem of the fabric but not puncturing through to the right side. This extra bit of net is then trimmed up to the edge of the flounce hem once stitching is complete. Now it is finally time to unite our two flounce pieces by stitching the bit of insertion lace between each strip. This is, obviously, done by hand with a tiny running back stitch, which took approximately four millennia, so whilst we pass the time I shall take this opportunity to tell you about Skillshare, who have been most wondrously sponsoring this 1890s gown project. Skillshare, if you don't already know, is an online learning community with thousands of online classes geared towards creative people, and has been systematically becoming most familiar company to me during this time of plague as I use my time at home to learn stuff. Most recently I've been taking Video Essentials: Using Lenses & Lighting to Convey Emotion by Oren Soffer because if you know me, you know I am HYPE for learning all the things about cinematic storytelling, I.e., making myself better at and just generally more excited about my job. This course covered some of the things, lighting and lenses, that I admittedly still don't know a whole lot about, so it was supremely valuable to me and I hope, in future, to you! If you wish to join me on these learning adventures, Skillshare is giving away two free months of premium membership to the first 1000 people who click the link in the description box to help you explore your creativity. After that, it is only around $10/month. (grand music) So the flounces are now all ready to go. They're all stitched together. One thing that I should have done previously and that I have actually just done is I've gone through and I've just starched the laces just with a bit of modern spray starch which obviously is not historically accurate, what I should have done is I should have starched the strips of lace before I sewed them in. But as you can see if we pick this up, the silk taffeta is much stiffer and has a lot more body to it than this lace so we would have a very strange hanging situation if we had stiff, crumply, stiff, crumply. So I just gone through and given the lace a bit of a starch just to hold it out a bit. As you can also see, I did not have nearly enough lace. I think I'm about two yards short on this so what I've done is I've just temporarily basted a strip of muslin into this just to hold everything into place but I am praying to the Mokuba gods that this lace still exists somewhere and that I can actually go and find some more once lockdown is no longer a thing. So I'm being optimistic. This is just going to remain like this until that happens which probably won't be in this video because we're just in lockdown for the foreseeable future. So the next step of course is to go ahead and start putting our gathering threads into the top here so that we can go ahead and get the flounce onto the bottom of the petticoat. OK, I'm going to endeavor to explain this, probably poorly because I cannot get far away enough probably to actually show you what I'm talking about. So the ruffle strip flounce thing- oh it's so pretty!- it's now finished basically. And what it is, it's comprised of, as you have seen, it's three lengths of taffeta, lace, lace, stitched together so there are three in the round there are three lengths. I have gone ahead and I have divided them up into each third into two so that basically it's divided seam-pin and that's the halfway point and then seam so that this whole round is divided into six parts and I've gone through and I have divided up the circumference of the hem into six parts. That way I can get the gathers relatively even on here. So I will be gathering each of these parts down into this length, just in an effort to even out my gathers a little bit. A thing I failed to explain with the earlier gathering step is the importance of stroking gathers, or basically just pulling them straight and laying each fold nice and even after scrunching up the fabric. Once again, the Victorians were sticklers for neat gathering so I'm endeavoring to make these gathers behave as much as possible as I pin the flounce to the rest of the petticoat. Now, normally I would stitch these gathers on by hand for ultimate delicacy, but we are getting to the point where we are on a very historically inaccurate deadline with this project and I can't spare the extra day to do that, so the next best option is to stitch it down by machine. This didn't turn out as detrimentally as I thought it would but I think I still do prefer to stitch gathers on by hand, since you have so much more control over getting them down evenly and don't have to worry about the machine foot accidentally nudging your hard-stroked gathering. And now for the single worst part of sewing ever, the incontestable bane of my existence, the most agonising punishment I wouldn't wish upon mine worst enemy: closures. I don't know why I detest sewing in closures so hard but ok confession time: 99% of the things I make pin shut one because I actually like things to be adjustable and that actually isn't historically inaccurate but two because I severely cannot be bothered to sew in closures any time ever. Think you've seen me sew closures into things in the past? Think again, my friend, the internet is lies and it only takes two seconds to get a two-second clip of what it would hypothetically look like to sew in a closure into a skirt. Not that I've done that. But if there's any time good to practice good respectable behaviour, it is most certainly during a global plague in which none of us have actually bothered to get dressed for two months, so the least we can do is give ourselves the illusion of respectability by sewing some hooks and eyes into our petticoats. Ok, to be fair, at least this thing didn't have sleeves. Oh! And guess what? Nearly two months later, friends, eyelets have finally arrived. That's right, the eyelets I ordered to finish off the bust bodice at the start of lockdown. Which means that, although my lack of insertion lace means I can't finish the petticoat during this video, I can at least finish the bust bodice for you now. I have a sinking suspicion that this is going to be the running theme of this project: perhaps I'll get the insertion lace in time to finish that for the gown video, which in turn I won't be able to finish because the silk flower suppliers who I've found to make the silk flowers to go with the shoulders of the gown is currently also in lockdown! Hurrah! Anyway, with the unexpected completion of the bust bodice and good-enough completion of the petticoat, herein we have the final result. I weirdly had a lot of fun with this project, I tend to find Victorian underwear projects supremely enjoyable in general. Then again, who doesn't enjoy projects that include fine, delicate hand work with pretty, lacy materials? Admittedly, of all the projects I completed last year, I have to say that the combinations were probably my favourite; and while this petticoat didn't take the entire month and a quarter of work that those took to complete, it was still an enjoyable process nonetheless. I'm so glad I ended up having the bit of extra time to make this petticoat, which I'm sure will make a significant difference in recreating the 1890s skirt shape I'm after for the final gown; had the ball gone on as scheduled in May, I definitely would not have had time to finish this, so, uh, silk taffeta linings to plaguey situations, I guess? Anyway, stay tuned next month for the final installment in this series, in which I shall be constructing the ball gown itself. Until then, anon, friends! (happy music)
Info
Channel: Bernadette Banner
Views: 765,935
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: petticoat, victorian petticoat, historical sewing, historical clothes, historical costume, historical costume making, victorian clothes, victorian costume, sewing victorian clothes, victorian underwear, historical fashion, sewing historical clothes, sewing vlog, sew with me, skillshare, bernadette banner
Id: UWrIu0dNx5E
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 25min 8sec (1508 seconds)
Published: Fri Jun 12 2020
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.