The Lenin Plot: The Untold Story of America’s Midnight War Against Russia with Barnes Carr

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
National Archives Lenin Plot  November 19, 2020 Greetings from the National Archives. I am David   Ferriero Archivist of the United States and it is  my pleasure to welcome you to this book talk with   Barnes Carr, author of the Lenin Plot The untold  Story of America's Midnight War Against Russia.   Before we begin, I would like to tell you about  two upcoming programs you can view on our YouTube   channel. On Tuesday November 24th at 7:00 p.m.  Denise Kiernan will discuss her latest book We   Gather Together The book tells the story of Sarah  Josepha Hale who in the 19th century campaigned to   establish an annual day day of Thanksgiving. On  Monday November 30th at noon William Thomas III   will be here to talk about his book A Question of  Freedom, The Families who Challenged Slavery from   the Nation’s Founding to the Civil War. Thomas  brings us the story of the enslaved families in   Maryland who filed hundreds of suits for their  freedom between 1787 and 1861. in the lenin Plot   Barnes Carr relates the little-known story of  a US-backed plot to topple and replace Vladimir   Lenin as the leader of revolutionary Russia after  the bolshevik rise to power. Using records from   the National Archives and other institutions  Barnes Carr weaves the story of intrigue and   espionage during the last year of World War I when  the allied powers sought to bring Russia back into   the war against Germany. It's now my pleasure to  turn you over to our guest author Barnes Carr.   Barnes Carr was born in the Mississippi Delta  and has lived in New Orleans most of his life.   Carr started out as a reporter and photographer  covering civil rights stories for the New York   Herald Tribune, the Memphis Press Scimitar and  United Press International, later he worked as a   copy editor for the Washington Evening Star and  the New Orleans Statesman. A short story based   on his experiences in New Orleans during hurricane  Katrina received a William Faulkner gold medal for   fiction in 2013. In addition to the Lenin Plot  Barnes Carr is author of Operation Whisper which   details the espionage careers of Morris and Iona  Cohen, the first soviet spies to steal a complete   diagram of the first atomic bomb now let's hear  from Barnes Carr thank you for joining us today >> >>:  Thank you very much.   It's my pleasure now to introduce  my moderator. Professor Vin McCarthy   the principal lecturer in the school of arts  and media at Tee Side University in Yorkshire. Hope I pronounced that correctly. Vin lives  in Edinburgh and is a dedicated Scott. Proudly   a Scott. A Writer and researcher and consultant specializing  in biographies and the Cold War. He's followed a   dual career in higher education and broadcast  television producing programs in the arts,   education, entertainment and current affairs.  He taught television production and biographical   writing at the Universities of Bournemouth and  Tee Side. Most recently a ghost writer for   the privately commissioned memoirs of the imminent  Scottish engineer Tom Douglas. He contributes book reviews and obits to the   Herald and the Scotsman in Scotland. Best known  for Like Father Like Son. A Dynasty of Spies.   Which is the story, the biographical account of  the life of Willie Fisher. Also known as Rudolph   Abel. He was a very important control officer  for Morrison in New York. The book was published   as a paperback as Abel: The True Story of  the Spy They Traded for Gary Powers.   The books were based on an original  TV documentary that Vin did.   He's been praised by many reviewers including Mary  Kay Wilmers, editor of the London Review of Books.   And Borris Legusof, former press bureau chief of  the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service,   also spy novelist John LeCarre. Welcome Vin. >> >>: Hi. Thank you for that very long   introduction. I should point out I am not a  Scott. I am an Englishman who lives in Scotland.   And that is interesting In the context of your book because the tension  between English and the Scots come out in your  book. Thank you so much for all of  that. Talking about the Lenin Plot here   today. Noon your time, evening our time. What  began your interest in this Lenin story. It's   phenomenal. Your background earlier is  surprising. What got your interest going.  >> >>: I was a student a  senior at Tulane University   and I was in the library one afternoon and I  met a gentleman who had been in the first war,   World War I. And he told me he had lived in  Paris after the war and had known some Americans   including Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, and Ernest and Hadley Hemingway cruised with that crowd, and also met young American men who had   served in Russia in our war against Russia. I said  wait a minute, I never heard anything about that.   He said well, you are studying creative  writing aren't you. I said yes. He said well,   be creative. Do some research. Now back then the  internet had just come on and it wasn't very good.   It was good mostly for emails. So  I wasn't able to do research on the   internet. So I went to paper research.  Bound volumes in the library of the London Times,   a French news magazine and Current Affairs in  American news magazine at the time.
And I was   able to get some leads. Got some pretty good  accounts of the fighting. But I wasn't able   to find any official records. And that required  a lot of research in libraries and archives and   individual historians I had met. And little by  little I put the story together. And in the last   two years I was lucky to finally acquire copies  of official cheka reports, investigations into the   shooting of Lenin and that was a big, big help. >> >>:   You were also working on the Cohen story  around the same time. Must have been very,   very busy on those fronts. >> >>: I was. Actually I started   research on both of them about the same  time. But I was able to finish the book on the Cohens first because I was able to get a copy of  their complete FBI file. I think it was  300 pages long. And page after page after page  they had the names and addresses of people who   had informed on them. A lot of information. So I was  able to contact people and track down information   using the FBI file. So I really got off to a  good start on Operation Whisper. I finished   it first. And then finished up the Lenin Plot. >> >>: Now the Lenin Plot certainly fascinating   book. And so much we could talk about. But  let's focus on the United States first.   The likes of Harper, Crane and the key man, I don't  know how you pronounce him Calamatiano. These guys seem to   have been in and from and around and studying  in the central states of the United States.   Is there anything significant about that. >> >>: I call them the Chicago group.   Samuel M Harper, the son of Dr. William Harper  the first President of University of Chicago.   Charles Richard Crane. A friend of  Dr. Harper. And Ambassador Robert McCormick  was from Chicago and and ...Calimantiano was at the University of Chicago. He was a  classmate of Sam Harper's. They graduated together.The nucleus of the original nonmilitary   spying in Russia. They were what the CIA calls  casuals. American citizens who were able to travel   and gather information and report back to the US  but were not official spies or paid informants.   They paid their own way. Called casuals. >> >>: So they were particularly interested   in Russia. That fascinates me. I once heard an  American, an English professor of Russian studies   in the UK saying of all his teachings the students  who understood Russian literature best   were students from the Midwestern states the United  States. The reason being it was in the middle of   a great land locked country. And they understood  the literature of Russia. So I wondered if there   was a link there to these guys in Chicago. >> >>: Chicago, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan,  Minnesota have always been a magnet for immigrants from Germany, Austria, Poland, the eastern  European countries . A lot of people  grew up speaking their home language   and learned English later on. During World War I  the Chicago Tribune came under a lot of criticism   for their supports for the Germans in the war. >> >>: A huge amount as I say a lot of things   here as you might expect. You talk about the Polar  Bear Association. Discovered very early on in your   studies. This old guy you met must  have mentioned them. What exactly was   the Polar Bear Association. >> >>: The Polar Bear Association is located in Michigan,   it's a big memorial and library and archives  for the Polar Bears, polar bears were the the   doughboys from Michigan and Wisconsin who went to  Russia to fight the Red Army. At that time they   didn't have that much, but their collections  have grown immensely since then. They lent me   some article and academic journals. But now they  have photographs and letters and diaries and all   sorts of things. A good research institution. >> >>: We are getting ahead of ourselves. How   did it all begin. It began because in the first  world war, there was a revolution in Russia   and one of the things the Russians wanted to do  was pull out of the war. It was killing thousands   upon thousands of Russians. It was not popular.  Wanted to get out of the war. But the western allies,   the French the British and the Americans were  concerned that the Germans would then be free   could exploit politically, commercially,  and economically Russia, so they had to take   some sort of action. Can you give us a bit of a  background of how that concern to start a Lenin   plot to get rid of Lenin came about. >> >>: Well, the Russian revolution, the second   Russian revolution occurred in February 1917. The  czar was forced to abdicate in a military coup by   his generals and the government was taken  over by the Russian provisional government.   They were under pressure from the western  allies to stay in the war. Because if Russia pulled out  of the war that would allow German divisions to move  from east to west to western front  which was the main battle ground of the war. The first  concern was military. The problem was,   as you say, the war was very unpopular  in Russia. A they had lost millions.   In those days, those big battles on the eastern  front, the casualties were not hundreds or   thousands. The casualties were millions, millions  of soldiers. There was a lot of war fatigue in Russia.   So Karinski was head of the provisional government and wanted to  stay on the war at the side of the allies. At   the same time, a shadow government was formed by  Lenin and the Bolsheviks. Called the Petrograd Soviet. Lenin had   cut a deal with Germany. Germany provided  Lenin and Bolsheviks millions of German marks   to in attempt to raise a military  coup and get Russia out of the war.   That was a pay back. Lenin was going to get  Russia out of the war to pay back the money that   he had received from Germany. So in October 17,  October 1917 the Bolsheviks seized the government.   Now they call it the Bolsheviks revolution, or  the great October revolution, or the great October   socialist revolution and all that. But it wasn't  a true revolution. A true revolution is a general   uprising of the population. As Trotsky said, the seizure of the government by Lenin and the Bolsheviks was a small effort by a few   hundred red guards. It was a military coup. Trotsky also  used the word Putsch. Which is German for coup-de-tat.   Lenin announced immediately he was going to take  Russia out of the war and that alarmed the allies.   And they decided they've got to get rid of Lenin. >> >>: To start with, they did as a form of   espionage. British spies and the United  States spies. And this is where Calimatiano comes   in because he is already over there as working  in business. So how did those, I guess espionage plots or   beginning of the Lenin plot happen? >> >>: Well, it began in 1917,   late 1917. Secretary of State Robert Lansing   used his office as a bully pulpit  to demand that something be done about the Bolsheviks. They were murdering thousands of their  own people. So there was a humanitarian element   besides the military element. He arranged  for consul at that time Dewit Clinton Pool   in Moscow to travel down to the dawn  Cossack country and interview Cossack generals   on the possibility of conducting a coup against the Bolsheviks. Well,  it didn't work. They were too confused and   jealous of one another, a lot of animosity. That was the early phase  of the Lenin plot. And the early plan was for   United States to send war aid to France and  Britain and they would launder the money   to finance the Cossack coup. Giving  money to the Cossacks was illegal because they were not   an established government. President  Wilson, said, this has, quote this has my entire approval.   So the original plot was Lansing, Wilson and Pool.  Calimantiano was in Russia at that time. He was a Russian-American. A graduate of Indiana and University of Chicago. A Russian  American businessman working for the Moscow   Trade Association selling farm implements from  the Case Corporation in Wisconsin. But after the   Germans blockaded Russia, he was unable to sell  many more farm machinery. He had to get a job.  He had a new wife and son. He had been working as a casual for the state  department for some time. So in January of 1918   DeWitt Clinton Pool hired him, Calimantiano, as a translator.  And from there as is things got worse under the Bolsheviks Pool   assigned him to organize a network of spies.  These are mostly Russians and Latvians.   They reported to Calamontiano, he reported to  Pool. Pool reported to the French and British   and to American Ambassador David Francis.  It was a fairly large extensive plot.  >> >>: I have got my eye on  the clock here as well Barnes.   It's a fascinating book. It's a corking read.  So much detail and so dramatic and exciting.   When I was reading it it had a feel of  contemporariness about it. It felt topical. I think that's partly   to do with your being a journalist. It almost  reads like current investigative journalism. Can   you say a little bit about the writing of it and what you felt you brought to the telling of not   only this story, but this range of stories. >> >>: Well, initially I was going to write   a biography of Calimontiano and Dewitt Clinton  Pool. And that is what I did. But as my research progressed,   I found all sorts of interesting things  that had been covered up over the years.   And at that point it became an investigative  project. You are correct there.   Early on I showed a sample chapter of the book  to an editor at Random House. He was one of the   top editors. He said he liked the idea. He said  I should write it using a journalistic style.   He said don't write it in an academic style. And  don't write it in an old 19 century Russian style.   Nobody will read it. He said use a contemporary  style using contemporary language. Which I did.   And I also employed literary techniques such as  a sense of time and place and mood and tone. But   the important thing is he said you are going  to write narrative history. Teddy Roosevelt   was one of the pioneers in narrative history  and Shelby Foote I think was the gold standard.   He wrote the two volume set for the American Civil War. In  narrative history you don't just tell facts and   figures like the phone book. The phone book can be  very informative, but it's not very interesting.   So in narrative history you tell a story.  You create scenes. You have your characters.   And their dialogue. It's told as a story. And you  employ methods of curiosity. What happened next.  >> >>: Well, I have to say it really  worked. >> >>: Well, thanks.
>> >>: Now   well the book works, but actually the plot didn't work. It was a   disaster. And really something I  guess most the British and Americans   hang their heads in shame about. Could you say  a little bit about it is before the western   troops arrive how the plot began to fall apart. >> >>: Well, it was on shaky ground from the  very beginning. I am not going to go into too  much. Save something for the reader. But the spies   Clinton Pool seemed fairly competent.   Calimontiano makes some serious trade craft errors. One of which was carrying his code book and list of agents   inside his walking cane which the Cheka got ahold  of. Also some of the other spies like Sydney   Riley. Sydney Riley was one of the very strange  characters in this story. Sydney was a Russian adventurer. 
He went to Russia for the SIS. The secret  service. But he immediately started making trade   craft errors. He arrived in Russia and was arrested  and he had, and they found a coded message   under a cork in is aspirin bottle. He also  made the mistake of leaving his name and address   on his calling card when he went to see an allied  agent in Petrograd. The Cheka was all over him. And they are all over Bruce Lockhart. He was   a special representative of the foreign office.  His assignment was to go over and take a look at   what was going on and report back to London. But  in time in late summer he got involved in the plot   against Lenin. He made mistakes too. One point  he gave a signed letter of transit to Latvian agent   who was going to plan to travel to the north  to Arc Angel to give information to the allies.   Well, the Latvian was a double agent for the  Cheka. So he immediately went back to Moscow   gave this letter to Rezinsky and Jacob Peters the Cheka chiefs.. So  they were onto Lockhart pretty early too.  >> >>: It was error after error.
>> >>:  One thing after another.
>> >>: Yeah.   And on the British side Sydney Riley and Bruce Lockhart’s son wrote a book,   which actually when came a TV series in the  United Kingdom. He wasn't an ace spy. He was a con man.   And they all made really unfortunate friendships,  let alone try to find agents. But anyway,   again looking at the time here. Eventually became  Polar Bears, it became a shooting war. The Brits   and the Americans and the Italians and the French landed troops mainly through Arc Angel and in the   north. Again, another catalog of errors. >> >>: Yes. From the very beginning the   invasion force was too small to do anything effective.  But Versailles allied headquarters wanted Murmansk and Arc Angel  seized to protect allied stores there from  the Germans who were next door in Finland.   Most of the enlisted men were French and American.  Most of the officers were British. Well, as soon   as the American and French soldiers arrived  in north Russia, they immediately found out   the British wanted to fight an all-out war against  the red army in opposition to Wilson's orders. So   the British officers early on were very  antagonistic towards the Americans and French. The   British officers were rejects, mental and physical  rejects from the western front. Called crocks.   They arrived with 40 thousand cases of scotch  whiskey and drank their way through the invasion   and their incompetence caused many battlefield deaths.  And Wilson heard about this and got on line to the British Prime Minister and said we have to do something. He  said it's already been done. So the   British commander was sacked and replaced by  general Edmond Ironside. A decorated veteran   on the western front. He was very popular with the  soldiers. He rode out to the various fronts with   warm clothing, food, medical supplies. Talked  to the men as if they were all comrades.   Gave them rest leaves. He really saved the invasion force  from being totally annihilated by the red army.  >> >>: As a Brit I felt quite ashamed at various points seeing  how the British Army behaved at that point , you know, holding onto supplies of food, medical supplies.  Also I wonder, of course the United States troops   coming from, is it the Custer Academy.  Quite young and fresh. British were   exhausted and these officers, you are  absolutely right, were rejected from   fighting on the western front. >> >>:   Yes. That was another point of contention.  The British officers didn't want to  be there. They wanted to be in England  where it was warm. And they saw the Russian   invasion as a side show. That was one point of  resentment. 
Also they didn't like the British   and French soldiers. These were young  men, fresh, energetic ready to go. And   the officers just didn't want to deal with that. >> >>: You can see in your book the beginnings   of the end of the British empire  the British world power beginning   to weaken. Let's talk about the United States  because you mention Dewit Pool. He was dealt a bad hand.   Wasn't much he could do. But I was fascinated  when he was called before congressional   committee he sounded almost like last week. >> >>: His testimony before Congress was   very reminiscent what we hear year after year  from intelligence officials called to congress.   They don't know anything, they didn't  see anything, they didn't hear anything.   Totally innocent. One lie after another. >> >>: And the other thing I see in the book   is the beginnings of the 20th century United  States intelligence services. How do you see   the development of the FBI and the CIA  growing out of the mistakes from that period.  >> >>: Well, at that time we didn't have  an FBI or CIA or NSA. Most intelligence   was naval intelligence, army intelligence  and state department intelligence. But they   weren't that efficient. The state department had a habit of sending in reports on the model of light bulbs used in Italian ships.   So Lansing created the Bureau of Secret  Intelligence BSI. Off the books, off the grid   private agency. No congressional oversight, no  money from Congress. All reports coming in from   the state department from Calimontiano, Pool and Francis  they went to the BSI. The BSI decoded and   deciphered them and wrote reports for Lansing and  Wilson. A true beginning of modern intelligence   service. The FBI was based on the Bureau of Intelligence,   an investigative agency. They didn't have  the power of arrest. They had to get local   police officials to make arrests. But after  this starting in 1920s there was a rise of socialism   and communism and anarchism in western nations  and that really prompted the western nations to   clean up their intelligence and  counterintelligence programs and get on with it.  >> >>: And also interestingly a lot of the young  diplomats who feel like cut their teeth in this   crisis of 1918. Actually emerge again as older  and more mature diplomats. When FDR comes to power   and they become his ambassadors and consuls in Russia. >> >>: Right. One of those was William Bullet,   assistant to secretary of state Lansing. He was pro-Bolshevik. And  he went over and made some reports to Lansing   which were very pro-soviet. And the press  called him a quote, red over easy, end quote.   And his reports were finally rejected by  the state department and he quit in protest.   Now FDR appointed him ambassador to  Russia in the 1930s. But to William, to   Bullet’s benefit he later wised up  became a very ardent anticommunist.   Pool himself became an officer with the OSS  during World War II. He was in charge of   aliens, kind of an alien investigative  agency at the OSS. He went to meetings of   aliens, legal aliens in the United  States try to pick up information.  >> >>: Now that is absolutely,  hang on. Messages on the screen.   Why were they called the white Russians? >> >>: I don't call them the white Russians   because white Russian suggests they  were monarchists. And most of these   people, these Cossack generals and officers and  men who had served in the imperial army had no   intention of going back to Czarism. They wanted  either a constitutional monarchy like Britain,   a pure parliamentary democracy like France or  a federalist system like the United States. The  term white Russian there's several  explanations. The one I like is that   during the French revolution the monarch,  the monarchy had a white flag with gold fleur-de-leigh on it. And the   revolutionaries had a red flag. Lenin picked up  the red flag as a symbol of the Bolsheviks And people started calling the anti-Bolsheviks- whites. But they weren't really monarchist.  There were some, I'm sure, but most were not. >> >>: And also there were lots of different   groupings. What staggers me about this story is the socialist revolutionists  who in many ways were more violent   and ambitious than the Cheka and the Bolsheviks. >> >>: The socialist revolutionaries were the largest   revolutionary party in Russia. Many, many times larger than the Bolsheviks. The SRs are the Bolsheviks main enemy followed by   the anarchists and the Cossacks. The SRs believed in  individual assassinations. They didn't believe in   taking over by mass revolution. Mass revolutions  cause thousands and millions of deaths. Their   strategy was to assassinate certain high  government officials at certain points in history.   Thereby setting off a coup. Much more violent. >> >>: Yeah. Of course the Cheka, the NKBD, the KGB survived, arguably survives to this very day. >> >>: That's right. The Cheka is very much   admired by Putin after the fall of communism in  Russia. The big statute of Durshenzy was removed.   But Putin quietly returned  the statute to headquarters.  >> >>: Everything is linked.
>> >>:  It goes around and around.
>> >>:   Back to the United States again. The role of Woodrow Wilson, he was a sick man   towards the end of this. Yet he was a peacemaker.  Yet involved in this really very underhand   war. What is your, what do you think is  the reputation of Wilson that remains now?  >> >>: Well, a lot of disagreement over  Wilson's legacy. He is remembered for his   promoting the league of nations. >> >>: Yes.  >> >>: He is remembered for  getting us through World War I.   But Wilson was a passivist when he went in. His  second term he ran as I will keep us out of war.   And that's a criticism that he allowed himself to  be drawn into a European war. European wars were   not very popular in America at that time,  most Americans figured that is their problem,   let them deal with it. So I like Wilson. I  think his legacy holds up over the years.   He made a lot of mistakes, but all Presidents do. >> >>: I see his health is being the issue there.  day. work >> >>: Oh, yeah.   He had high blood pressure. >>  >>: Strokes.
>> >>: Strokes.   He had, he couldn't work all day. He would work a few hours and rest,   then a few hours and rest. He was a sick man. >> >>: And of course most of the other leaders who   working with him in Versailles weren't as fully aware of that  as we are now historically. Seems to be the big   mistake of Versailles was reparations against Germany because  that effectively led to the Second World War.  >> >>: Exactly. The reparations were I think unreasonable.  >> >>: Yeah. >> >>: And that accounted for the rise of Hitler.   He wanted to restore the German pride  and Mussolini and World War II in   affect was just a continuation of World War I. >> >>: Two other things. One is wars always end   in a mess. But the argument that runs through  your book, and not everyone would accept this,   you effectively say the cold war begins in 1918. >> >>: Exactly.
>> >>: In 1945.
>> >>: Exactly.   If you can define a cold war  as an attempt by one country or countries working against one another to defeat one another militarily, politically, economically, culturally without a formal declaration of war then it began in 1917   with our undeclared war against Russia. The Russians have  never, never forgotten that. They still teach that  in intelligence schools that the west is out to destroy the Russian state.  And to me that was the true beginning of the cold war.   There was a respite during World War II when we fought with  the Russians against the axis powers, but that   was just a situation of strange bed fellows. >> >>: My enemy's enemy is my friend.  >> >>: The spying has been going on  between Russia and the United States   since 1917. It hasn't stopped. The cold war did  not end. A Russian retired, Russia KGB officer   told me it hasn't ended, it has just changed forms.  Now computer surveillance, hacking, fake news,   fake intelligence reports. Just changed the form. >> >>: Right. We need to pull things together now.   It's been an absolute delight to talk to you.  Utterly fascinated about both of your books   Operation Whisper and the Lenin Plot. What's next? >> >>: Thank you for helping me with   Operation Whisper. Your information on the  control officers in New York was invaluable.  >> >>: But come on, what next. Is there  another book coming from Barnes Carr.  >> >>: I have written two novels which my agent  has in London he is circulating. One is called   Appointment in Moscow. Spy novel set in  revolutionary Russia. The other one is   more contemporary. Set in Washington, involves  the newly elected President of the United States   poisoning her husband on inaugural night in order  to cover up a dirty trick of hers that resulted   in the death of her primary opponent in the  campaign. Called Potomac Fever. Old timers   in Washington will know what that means. >> >>: I really look forward to reading   those Barnes. And also reading your book given me  some ideas as to what I may go on to next. I am a   biographer and some of those stories need to be told. All stories need to be told.   You were about to say. >> >>: There are all sorts of characters involved   on Lenin plot from all these nations who would  be worthy of biographies or nonfiction books.   The French angle has not been exploited that well  in the west in England and the United States. That   would be a good place to start in France. >> >>: Let’s hope we can start traveling   again soon. >> >>: I hope so.   I appreciate your helping me out on this and on  the book and on today's show. And my thanks to Doug   Swanson at the National Archives. And all the  people at the National Archives who helped me   in this book. I have a list. They were in the  acknowledgment section of the book. They were   very, very patient with me and very, very helpful. >> >>: Here,   here.
>> >>: Thank you, Vin. >>  >>: Thank you.
>> >>: And Doug.
Info
Channel: US National Archives
Views: 2,508
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: M4sV56aMG4Y
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 53min 25sec (3205 seconds)
Published: Thu Nov 19 2020
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.