We want to thank Google’s Science Journal
App for supporting PBS Digital Studios. It’s the one part of us that we think of
as being synonymous with life. If it stops working, we die. It’s also the only part of us that we say
we can give to someone else. And if they break it, it’s the worst feeling
in the world. You can’t talk about either love or life
without talking about the heart, and the story of the muscle that’s pumping in your chest
right now is an epic saga that goes far back in deep time. In fact, it goes back at least 520 million
years, when an underwater landslide in ancient China buried a tiny arthropod called Fuxianhuia
protensa. Fuxianhuia was small, no bigger than one of
the credit cards in your wallet, with a segmented body, an impressive pair of mandibles, and
eyes on the ends of two stalks. It had the tools of a swift ocean predator,
which means it probably needed a lot of oxygen. And this may explain why Fuxianhuia is the
earliest animal known to have had a blood circulatory system, as well as an organ to
keep its blood moving: the first known traces of a very early heart. Now, the path that connects this ancient predator
to you isn’t a short, straight line. It’s long, with lots of side-tracks that
lead to other, more familiar organisms that also have hearts. It includes animals like slugs and snails. And insects and crustaceans. And the first vertebrates to walk on four
legs. It took hundreds of millions of years, and
countless different iterations of the same basic structure to lead to the heart that
you have today. So, yes: You’re right to think that your
heart is important and worth protecting. Because the story of its origin is an ancient
one, as old as animal life itself. In order to understand where hearts came from,
we have to go back to the earliest common ancestor of everything that has a heart. Now, we don’t have a fossil of that ancestor,
but we do have some proof of its existence: its genes. We, and everything else that has a heart,
carry some of the same genes that this organism had. Those genes are responsible for developing
blood vessels that can contract to push blood around. And over time, an incredibly diverse group
of animals has used this basic set of instructions to arrive at different solutions for circulating
blood. We can tease apart the history of the heart
by studying the genomes of living organisms that share these heart-making genes. And using that method known as the molecular
clock -- which combines what we know about genetic mutation rates with insights from
well-dated fossils -- it seems that the common ancestor of all animals with a heart lived
way back in the Neoproterozoic Era, between 600 million and 700 million years ago. But oddly enough, even though it gave rise
to all of the organisms that have hearts, this ancestor probably didn’t have a heart
of its own. So the genes that are used to form hearts
today are actually older than the heart itself! Instead of a heart, researchers believe that
this ancestor used blood vessels to push blood through its body. This type of system is called a peristaltic
pump, and it works kind of like your intestines do, with muscles gradually squeezing to move
material along. Annelid worms and the marine chordates known
as lancelets have both held on to this simple model of blood circulation. So scientists think this is probably what
our ancestor had -- the simplest version of a system that’s shared by all of its descendants. Now, over evolutionary time, practically every
animal that’s descended from that ancestor has added complexity to this basic system. And they did so independently, as natural
selection acted time and again on that peristaltic pump and the genes that make it possible. The circulatory systems in these animals often
became more complex, because they tended toward more active lifestyles. I mean, if you’re a worm, a peristaltic
pump works just fine. But for active predators and animals that
need to move quickly, that just wasn’t effective enough. To supply a more complex and more active body
with more oxygen, the solution for most animals was a heart. Now, not all animals today have what we’d
call a true heart. But some version of an organ for circulating
blood has evolved in at least three major groups -- the arthropods, the mollusks, and
us vertebrates. The arthropod version of a “heart” is
really a long, tube-like structure that runs the length of the animal’s body called a
dorsal vessel. Its job is to collect blood and propel it
in one direction: toward the head. It doesn’t look much like a heart, and not
all researchers are willing to call it one. But it performs a comparable function. And that dorsal vessel has been around for
a long time. We know that, because we’ve seen it in those
fossils of Fuxianhuia. In 2014, researchers studied a specimen that
was so well preserved that they could actually make out traces of its dorsal vessel. And the scientists were able to reconstruct
it, based on its similarities with the hearts of modern arthropods. So we know Fuxianhuia had this dorsal vessel,
but it’s not clear when this structure first evolved in arthropods - or if it evolved more
than once. There’s still a healthy debate among researchers
about when exactly different lineages gained or lost their blood-pumping organs. Because, different kinds of arthropods have
dorsal vessels that are really different from each other. And, some don't have any at all! So this makes it hard to say if these vessels
are a single, ancestral feature, or something that showed up on its own, convergently, many
times. Still, we do know that the earliest arthropods
go back not long before Fuxianhuia, to about 542 million years ago, at the verrry end of
the Ediacaran Period. So it’s safe to assume that their version
of a not-quite-heart is at least that old. And this same reasoning applies to mollusks. This group includes gastropods, like snails
and slugs; cephalopods, like squid and octopodes; and bivalves, like clams and mussels, among
many others. All of these animals have hearts, so it’s
likely that their common ancestor had a heart too. And the ancestor of all mollusks goes even
further back in the Ediacaran Period, to a fossil of a squishy little seafloor dweller
known as Kimberella. This animal is sometimes interpreted as a
mollusk. And if it is one, then the common ancestor
of mollusks, and its ancestral heart, has to be at least as old as it and the other
earliest fossil mollusks. And that’s at least 550 million years old. Now, unlike arthropods, mollusks have hearts
with multiple chambers. Generally, one or more chambers collect oxygenated
blood from the gills. These are called auricles. Then they feed the oxygen-rich blood into
another chamber, called a ventricle, which pumps the blood out to the rest of the body. And the more complex the mollusk, the more
complex its heart is. For example, in addition to a central chambered
heart, most cephalopods like cuttlefish, octopodes, and squid have two extra branchial hearts
that pump blood to their gills. Three hearts might seem like a lot, but they
may have played a key role in helping some cephalopods develop a more active lifestyle. Now it’s our time! We vertebrates have also evolved more complex
hearts, but we followed a different path than the mollusks. Molecular clock studies suggest that some
of the genes responsible for creating heart muscle were evolving in vertebrates, and our
closest relatives, from about 540 million to 570 million years ago. Meanwhile, the genes that create the specialized
tissue that lines our blood vessels, known as endothelium, date back between 510 million
to 540 million years ago. So it seems likely that, by the end of the
Ediacaran Period, the vertebrate circulatory system was also well on its way. The earliest fossil we have of a vertebrate
heart belongs to a fish called Rhacolepis, and it has two chambers, as all fish hearts
do. But Rhacolepis lived only about 115 million
years ago. So while it’s the earliest physical evidence
we have, it’s much too recent to tell us much about the early evolutionary path our
hearts have taken. The hearts of our earliest vertebrate ancestors
probably were kind of like that found in Rhacolepis, in that it likely had two chambers: an atrium
to collect blood, and a ventricle to push it back out to the body. And we think that because that’s how the
hearts of vertebrates, including yours, start out during embryonic development. All vertebrate hearts develop according to
a common pattern: In the embryo, a blood vessel twists in on itself to create two chambers,
and then develops depending on what kind of organism it is and what other kinds of genetic
instructions it has. But the fact that every vertebrate develops
a heart in this same way suggests that a two-chambered plan is shared among us all. And again, vertebrate hearts became more sophisticated,
as the animals themselves became more complex and more active. Amphibians, for example, first appear in the
fossil record around 360 million years ago, and today, most of them have two atria, one
for collecting oxygenated blood and one for collecting deoxygenated blood, as well as
a single ventricle. But some of the more basal, or primitive,
living amphibians have chambers that aren’t totally separated, sort of like they have
two and a half chambers. So their common ancestor probably didn’t
have three well-defined chambers, either, and instead, that came later. Mammals, meanwhile, have four chambers, and
although our shared mammalian ancestor appeared somewhere around 200 million years ago, it’s
not totally clear when we acquired our four-chambered heart. In the mammalian heart, the right atrium and
ventricle collect deoxygenated blood and send it to the lungs, and the left atrium and ventricle
collect the oxygenated blood from the lungs and send it out to the body. So, arthropods, mollusks and vertebrates all
separately acquired some version of a heart within the same general stretch of geologic
time, in the Late Ediacaran Period and the early Cambrian. But even though all of these hearts look quite
different, they’re all just variations on a theme -- derived from the same basic set
of genetic instructions that dates back to that common ancestor that lived more than
600 million years ago. And believe it or not, we can even track the
evolution of those individual, ancient genes that make our hearts possible. In 1993, a researcher in Michigan found that
the dorsal vessel in fruit flies develops with the help of a gene known as tinman. Y’know. Like from the Wizard of Oz. Because without a tinman gene, the flies don’t
have a heart? This gene instructs developing tissues to
differentiate into various kinds of cardiac cells. And later studies found that we vertebrates
have our own equivalent of the tinman gene. And It turns out that our gene is similar
enough to tinman, that researchers believe they both evolved from a single, earlier gene
that was present in that common ancestor that lived more than 600 million years ago. In humans, this gene is given the less-punny
name of Nkx2-5, and just like in fruit flies, it instructs the developing tissue that it’s
expressed in, to generate the many different kinds of cells that make a heart. So, even though the dorsal vessel of a fly
and the heart that’s beating in your chest right now don’t seem to have a lot in common,
we have our 600-million-year-old ancestor to thank for the genes that make both of them. Over vast stretches of geologic time, natural
selection has acted on this genetic legacy over and over, as animals became more complex. The result is the variety of systems that
we find today, in fruit flies, and cuttlefish, and you -- as well as in Fuxianhuia, a humble
arthropod from the distant past. Like every other part of you, your heart is
as complex as the story behind it. So, the next time you give you heart away
to someone, be sure that they know that your gift is more than a half-billion years in
the making. Thanks to Google for supporting PBS Digital
Studios. Their mobile app, Science Journal, lets you
take notes and measure scientific phenomena such as light, sound, and motion using your
phone, tablet, or Chromebook. You can find activity ideas and additional
information on their website at g.co/ScienceJournal or check out the link in the description below. And extra big thanks to our current Eontologists,
Jake Hart, Jon Ivy, John Davison Ng and STEVE! If you’d like to join them and our other
patrons in supporting what we do here, then go to patreon.com/eons and make your pledge! Now, what do you want to learn about? Leave us a comment, and don’t forget to
go to youtube.com/eons and subscribe.
Just to clarify, at 1:03, is that a mastodonsaurus?