The Death of Face Pulls (2009-2024)

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Jeff: It's the responsibility of those  that share the information with you,   not just to have it go in one side of the  brain and out the other and just regurgitate.   But to actually apply some science to it, and  that is something I think is sorely lacking,   let's just say in YouTube fitness as a whole. Okay, I got a quiz for you here today. It involves   this first clip. Jesse, go ahead and show him.  Okay, I want you to compare this exercise and what   you're seeing done here. We know it's a lat pull  down, but what specifically is being done here? If   you've watched any kind of YouTube fitness, likely  it's jumping out to you, you know exactly what   I'm talking about. But if not, watch the exercise  and evaluate. Now, if that wasn't helpful enough,   I will give you a hint. Go ahead and show this  one now. Okay. Do you recognize what's happening   now when he's doing it? Okay, again, it's not  necessarily the lat pull down, but it's actually   maybe how it's being performed. Okay, great.  Now the next part of this test is I want you to   compare that, and the muscle building benefits  specifically of what you just saw to this next   exercise. Jesse, go ahead and cue that up. Jesse: You got it.   Jeff: Now watch this exercise and again compare  it muscle building benefits to what you just   saw. Now if you don't recognize what this  is, then it means that you're not only not   watching enough YouTube fitness, but you're  certainly not watching enough Athlean-X and it   kind of breaks my heart, actually. Jesse: Aw, it's gonna to be okay, Jeff.   Jeff: I m just saying, it does. So, this is a  face pull, I'll give that part away. And it's   not just my favorite exercise. It's not going  to win just because I like it again. We're going   to pair these things objectively head-to-head.  Actually, you can see Jesses used the exercise   two to build up quite a nice upper back. Which one  do you think builds more muscle? All right. Now,   the reason for this question and why  we're pitting them head-to-head is   actually something I never thought I'd have  to do, except we get comments and questions,   and we got one. From who? Jesse: JoshuaTheGreat61291.   Jeff: Okay, what did he say? Jesse: He said, Jeff, I've been seeing   so many videos about long length partials  and how much more effective they are,   even when compared to full range of motion reps.  Which brings me to your beloved Face Pulls. I know   they are safe and everything, but they don't meet  the criteria for an effective long length partial   exercise. Therefore, should I find a new exercise  that I can apply long length partials to?   Jeff: Okay, so there's a lot to go through here.  Okay, first of all, long length partials was the   answer to the first thing that you saw there. A  long length partial being the partial repetition,   not full range of motion, that's being done with  usually heavy weights, good load at that top   extended portion of the range of motion with the  most stretched portion of the muscle during that   exercise. But I'll answer the question there.  Does the face pull first and foremost meet the   criteria for a good long length partial exercise?  It doesn't really. So, he's not incorrect in that.   When you have the beginning portion of a face  pull, some might say, well, you can be in a   long length of that, can't you? Not really,  because it requires heavy loads. You need   high tension with stretch to make the long length  partial effective. Because I could do, let's say,   a stretch exercise like a Seated Dumbbell Curl  with a pair of 3-pound pink dumbbells in my hands   all day long, and I'm not going to get the same  effect. You need the weight plus the stretch to   create the tension that makes those productive.  Now what does that sound like to you?   Jesse: Uh. Jeff: Anything? Something   not new. Eccentric training? Jesse: Oh yes.   Jeff: Right. In order to build muscle, we know  that eccentric overload is one of the three main   drivers of hypertrophy. So, the first thing that  grabs my attention is everyone wants to talk about   long length partials right now. But we've been  talking about them forever really and that is   they're a subset of eccentric training, a known  stimulus for growth. So, when research studies   come out, again, that claim, or even, let's say  prove in the study, long length partials create   more muscle gains than full range of motion. Long  length partials can produce more muscle gains than   the contracted portion of an exercise. Jesse: Okay.   Jeff: Long length partials can increase muscle  mass when compared to not using them 5 to 10%.   Jesse: Hmmm. Jeff: All right. And some   even create protocols and recommend protocols that  involve only the use of long length partials. And   they throw out the rest of the repetition. Jesse: So, no full range of motion reps.   Jeff: None because they don't see the benefit  there. So, if I looked at that lat pull down   again, a full range of motion repetition would  bring that bar all the way down to my chest and   all the way back up. Now, the eccentric portion of  that repetition is the entire raising of the bar   back to the top. When I have heavy loads, they're  under tension in an elongating muscle, most up   here when it's fully stretched, but in elongating  muscle I have that increased eccentric load. The   partials are going to hang out at that top portion  where you're most elongated and most stretched,   which will drive the most tension theoretically  to the muscle. So, it should come as no surprise   that these are effective and that they actually  work for building muscle. I'm not arguing that,   I use them in my own training. Jesse: Mm-hmm.   Jeff: Okay. But I think that we have to stop  falling in love with research when it comes   out and considering it to be the end all,  be all. Because there's more to, let's say,   a Face Pull that we're comparing it to that  does not do a good job of having tension in   that position. By the way, the load using a  Face Pull is always going to be very low.   Jesse: Mm-hmm. Jeff: 30 pounds, 60 pounds,   whatever it is on your stack there. And when  you have your arms out in front of you here, the   tension through the muscles that you're ultimately  going to work is at its lowest. It peaks when   the arms are perpendicular to that cable. It's  going to be lowest when they're parallel. So,   it does not meet the criteria for being a great  long length partial exercise. But should we do   it? That's the question. Well, I think the bigger  question we have to ask right away, though, is   there something else that's happening here? Maybe  it's less magical than you think. Because a lot   of the use of long length partials, especially in  the case of Sam Sulick, is that they're occurring   at the end of sets after the person has already  reached concentric muscle failure. And failure   is a big concept here. Jesse: Right.   Jeff: In other words, are you training with a  higher intensity because you're now employing long   length partials? So, you go through all of your  full range of motion repetitions and you're only   using partials, not because you decided I'm going  to use partials from the beginning of my set,   but you're doing them out of necessity because  you cannot move the weight any further because   of the fatigue through any additional range  of motion. There's a big difference there.   And that requires that you've already failed  concentrically, and you're forced to have to   use these partials in the extended range. When we talk about the gains of 5 to 10%,   I think we need to make sure that we're also  looking at that with the right frame of mind.   Is 5 to 10% gains in muscle size, or really in  any lab setting, is it a significant amount of   increase? Yes, it is. Again, in a laboratory  setting, that is. But when we look at the   application of that in the real world, you may  not be as excited about it as it might seem.   Let's say we're going to measure strength, okay,  a 10% increase in strength over the course of a   study. Take a 250-pound bench press that goes up  to 275 by the time you're done, 10% increase.   Jesse: Yeah, that s big. Jesse: It's pretty big, right,   especially if that was your max. That's pretty  big. But now when we measure muscle size or   hypertrophy, we've got a couple ways we can do  that. But let's do it by the circumference of   the muscle you trained. You're training your  biceps in the study. You're gaining what? How   much in 12 weeks? Let's say it's two inches. Two  inches on your arms from 15 inches to 17inches, or   from 15 inches with additional 10% to 17.2 inches.  That's it. 2.2 versus 2. And if you gained an inch   on your arms, it's one inch versus 1.1 inch. And if you're if you're giving up the alternative   options and you're seeking out, like our  questioner is, only exercises that can allow you   to perform long length partials. Are you missing  a much bigger picture here? And that's where I   want to go back to the Face Pull. Because this  Face Pull is traditionally a corrective exercise.   But I don't want you to look at it as just a  corrective exercise. In other words, diminish   its value versus a sexier, Heavy Lat Pull Down, it  can't possibly be a muscle builder. Yes, it can,   because this Face Pull, while a damn good muscle  builder in its own right, believe it or not--   Jesse: Yeah. Jeff: --again, you go back and look at   some of your growth and development there. Jesse: Yeah.   Jeff: Right. It has this other effect too; it  amplifies your performance on the big lifts by   filling in those weak links in the kinetic  chain on the bigger compound exercises. You   wind up getting a higher sum total output on the  big compound exercise because you've addressed   the weak link. So, these are not just corrective  exercises, they're stage setters for much bigger   performances on your big lifts. Jesse: Yeah.   Jeff: And again, all you got to do is look at  Jesse here. How much did you weigh when you did   your 560-pound deadlift? Jesse: 163 at best.   Jeff: And that's a massive deadlift for  someone at his size. How does he do it,   is it something magical? No. He is a disciple here  of Athlean-X and he's been doing Face Pulls for a   hell of a long time. Jesse: It's true.   Jeff: And he's got definitely very well developed  upper back muscles. And he's got that from doing   his Face Pulls. But I think beyond that it led to  a much bigger deadlift which led to more muscle   size. So, ask yourself this question; when you  look at those studies that compare, let's say,   even the same person doing a leg extension, one  leg with partials and the other leg without,   yes, you're comparing the partials versus someone  who's not using partials, but are you comparing   the partials to someone who maybe just focused  on progressive overload and heavy squatting?   Because the strength focus could have produced  greater than 5 to 10% gains in muscle size?   Jesse: It s true. Jeff: Right? There's more   than one way to skin a cat. And I think when we  start to fall in love with the research and we get   excited about it, which we should, but we start  to say, Hey, everything else goes out the window,   including your Face Pulls Jeff, because I need  something that does long length partials you're   diminishing the other benefits that you get. This Face Pull allows you to do much more than   that. There's some downstream benefits that  come from this and at the end of the day,   maybe at the end of a year, you're far surpassing  whatever 5 to 10% increase you were getting from   long length partials. Again, I'm not saying long  length partials don't work. I'm not saying that.   I'm saying you have to make sure you compare  it and broaden up your picture here. The other   thing I would say is are there other benefits to  using full range of motion. And it's very clear   there are. I actually made a whole video where  some have shown they have the same increased   flexibility levels by just performing all of their  weight exercises in the gym through a full range   of motion. In other words, negating the need  to stretch. Now, I don't fully advocate that   because I think some people develop tightness that  need specific stretching. But just as an overall   concept, there have been studies that show that.  So, you can't just say, hey, long length partials   and focus so far in on just hypertrophy when the  bigger picture, meaning your overall athleticism.   I mean, for me it's impossible to really separate  all these things, but your overall athleticism,   your strength. And maybe you aren't really so  focused on your strength, but I can tell you   right now you better damn well should be. Because as you get older, it's one of the   biggest predictors of your function throughout  the rest of your life and your mortality risk.   The stronger you are, the better you're going to  be, and the healthier you're going to maintain   your health throughout life, so your longevity  improves. How about explosiveness? Is that of any   value to you? So why are we only looking at one  element, why is it always about just hypertrophy?   I mean I love a good pump; I love a good muscle  gain, but it's really about more than that. And   trying to evaluate exercises solely based on  this one aspect is going to definitely leave   major holes in your training, and some of you  are likely not going to be happy with. And when   you realize that in the case of your 5 to 10%  increase, your 2-inch increase in the size of   your arms versus the potential 2.2in increase  in the size of your arms, it's just a wakeup   call to how myopic it might be to be looking at  your training through that one single lens.   So, to answer our friends question here, what  exercise should you do instead? You shouldn't. You   should still do the Face Pull. You should still do  partial repetitions. You should still do eccentric   overload. You should still focus on strength.  You should still maximize your flexibility. You   need to do it all. And I'm sorry if you're  looking for a shortcut around that answer.   But all of these things are important, and all  play a major part. In terms of the studies guys,   it's the responsibility of those that share the  information with you, not just to have it go in   one side of the brain and out the other and just  regurgitate, but to actually apply some science   to it. And that is something I think is sorely  lacking, let's just say in YouTube fitness as   a whole. Make sure that you understand what  you can do with this information so you can   make it better and take it a step further. If you're looking to take your programing and   your training a step further, then guys,  head over to Athleanx.com. We have full   programs and supplements available to  you. If you found this video helpful,   make sure you share it with someone else you think  might too. Also click Subscribe, turn on your   Notifications so you never miss a video when we  put one out. All right guys, see you soon.
Info
Channel: ATHLEAN-X™
Views: 491,610
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: face pull, face pulls, facepull, facepulls, lat pulldown, lat pulldowns, partial reps, long length partials, long length partial reps, lengthened partials, partial reps vs full reps, partial reps for muscle growth, partial reps for hypertrophy, partial reps for strength, how to do partial reps, how to do lengthened partials, how to build muscle, build muscle, how to gain muscle, muscle growth, best exercises to build muscle, workout to build muscle, athlean x, jeff cavaliere
Id: CDDsaGAzScc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 12min 45sec (765 seconds)
Published: Thu Apr 04 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.