The Animated History of China | Part 1
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: undefined
Views: 1,405,314
Rating: 4.8247104 out of 5
Keywords: animated, history, china, chinese, mandarin, suibhne, animated history, chinese history, beijing, shanghai, hong kong, hong, kong, great wall, great wall of china, mongols, szechuan, sichuan, yellow river, xia dynasty, shang dynasty, sui dynasty, tang dynasty, song dynasty, jin dynasty, jinn dynasty, xiongnu, manchu, zhou dynasty, han dynasty, imperial china, qin dynasty, period of spring and autumn, qin shi huang, yu the great, yu the engineer, Marco Polo
Id: YP1qjTzxQNE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 10min 5sec (605 seconds)
Published: Tue Jun 19 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Hey what about the first 3000 years?!
In all seriousness, though, this was pretty cool. Chinese history is hard to tell in such a concise way since there are so many cool stories along the way.
Big fan of this guy's work, always glad to see more videos of Chinese history.
He cant really claim the Xiongnu as Mongolians when there is so little information on them. I read they might be Turkish people.
SONG Dynasty is writting as 宋,a minor error
but overall a decent video summery for Chinese history
too bad it skipped through the Romance of the Three Kingdom era, right after HAN Dynasty, which was the most fascinating era in ancient Chinese history (Three Kingdom, or "Dynasty Warrior" for some people lol)
One question that keeps bothering me, because I'm too out of my depth with regard to history is, is there actually anything sensical about China's claim to having a 5000-year history? Is there really anything interesting there, or does this claim just come from some narcissistic compulsion to be seen as special?
When I look at China's history, I just see the same type of thing that was happening everywhere on earth. Invasion, killing, periods of peace, land changing hands, civil wars, coups, blah blah blah, standard human fare. There are a bunch of interesting stories and a lot to be learned, but it is standard human chaos.
But I know that if you go back through history and just patiently insist at every moment that so-and-so was actually the entity we now know as "China", you can make "China" have a very long continuous history. But couldn't the same be done for anywhere else, like "England"? For example, I could say sure, at 7000BC, those people didn't call themselves "the English" or the land "England" or use the language known as "English" but they were basically English people, and the country was basically England.
I think most people would reject such a weird claim about England, but for some reason it seems widely accepted about China. Why? Marketing?
You can even build a wall across your country to keep out the barbarians, and then later, stuff on the other side of the wall becomes China. Anything that ever got taken over by somebody that wasn't "China" is actually still in "China", we just haven't taken it back yet. But anything that ever joined "China" is now in "China" forever. Even people of vastly different cultures, not just mutually unintelligible languages but also unrelated writing systems, vastly obviously different to the eye ethnicity, etc.
It looked from the video as if during some ancient period, "China" dipped down into Vietnam. So does China have a historical claim over Vietnam? Or is the real legitimate government of China actually in Vietnam?
Is "5000 years of history" similar to the way beekeepers will blow smoke on bees? A way to stoke Chinese narcissism and draw attention away from the CCP being sort of like a cross between a parasite and cancer?
awesome work;
Cute
Finally Suibhne decides to do something other than European or Middle Eastern history.
too inaccurate, so many outdated, disproved claims, so many theories -many with very little basis- stated as fact. very hard to watch.