The 25 Worst Muscle Cars Of The 1990s You've Never Seen Before

the 1990s witnessed the emergence of numerous modern car models and Advanced Technologies however alongside these advancements the market also saw the introduction of some of the worst car models according to many experts assessments do you know which models they are let's explore them right now the Jaguar xj220 was easily the most anticipated Supercar of the early 99s and one of the biggest disappointments it was first shown as a 1988 concept car with a 500 plus horsepower 6.2 L 48 valve V12 all-wheel drive and claimed a 0 to 60 time in 3.5 seconds this at a time when a 385 horsepower Ferrari to stosa and its 5.3 second 0 to 60 run were really hot stuff the Auto Show crowd went nuts so Jaguar announced a production version with a € 290,000 price tag and started taking deposits in 1992 Jaguar Finally Revealed the production xj220 except now the V12 is a v6 all-wheel drive gave way to rear drive and the price had ballooned to $470,000 with 542 horsepower and a 3.6 second 0 to 60 time the production xj220 delivered on the concept's performance pledges and by all accounts it was a pretty super superar but it wasn't the Supercar Jag promised depositors went to court to get out of their contracts and jaguar couldn't find enough customers to sell out the planned 350 unit production run the company gave up after building only 282 with the last xj220 reportedly selling for a third of the list price the Jaguar xj220 is a reflection of the design and business failure process of a renowned brand it serves as a classic example of a warning to other car manufacturers not to lose customer trust do you agree with this Viewpoint please comment [Music] below Chrysler introduced its jaw body Cloud cars in 1995 in the form of the sporty is Dodge Stratus and the upscale is Chrysler Cirrus the latter our 1995 car of the year but corporate etiquette dictated the need for a Plymouth version so what was left to do the answer the silly ridiculous designed by committee after way the hell too many martinis at lunch answerer was a value oriented model with cheap wheel covers a miserly bodyc color Grill and the smallest engine in the jaw lineup to its credit the breeze was roomy more than decent to drive and hella inexpensive but it was also pathetically parsimonious Basics like power windows and remote locking were high Lux options in the breeze verse while Posh extravagances like a V6 engine and aluminum wheels weren't even available one thing the breeze did accomplish was to make the case for the redundancy of Plymouth a stored brand that had been doing a thriving business selling Dodges with different grills and tailights perhaps if Chrysler had followed that formula with the breeze we might still be driving Plymouth today instead Chrysler killed off the breeze and its entire brand in 2001 the failure of the breeze also somewhat reflects the outdatedness of the Plymouth brand in the Chrysler's business strategy instead of Designing a unique car model simply rebagg aging Dodge means gradually eroding the meaning of plym existence a poor ratio of expectations to reality lands the Acura CL on this list Honda's luxury brand had established a tradition of great coups including the two-door Legend and vigor and of course the standard setting Integra Acura promised to raise the bar with the delicious CLX concept then dropped it on our feet with the production CL which came across as a thinly veiled Honda Accord Acura touted the CL as the first car from a foreign name plane to be designed engineered and built in the US but it seemed acur as Americans were kept on a short leash as we noted in 1996 review the CL was identical to the Accord and wheelbase suspension design height width track bore stroke horsepower and torque from the driver's seat we wrote it feels a great deal like a super luxury addition ACC cord Coupe unfortunately for Honda both of its Brands had cultivated a core of shrewd buyers who posed an unformidable question why by an accuracy L when you could get a functionally and to a great extent visually identical Honda Accord for 3/4 of the price the answer revealed itself in the cl's crummy sales the CL is a costly lesson for Acura about the importance of creating a truly distinctive product rather than simply mimicking other models within the same [Music] conglomerate given the thorough ass kicking Toyota gave Detroit in the car market we're sure American Auto execs must have been shaking at the prospect of a full-size Toyota pickup and shaking with laughter once they saw the T100 Toyota's Japanese execs their egos no doubt boyed by the success of the company's compact pickups Shrugged off the pleas of their us-based staff and dealers that the only way to go on a full-size pickup was to go big the home office was confident that a truck with an 8-ft bed and three across seating built in an easy to par size with the miserly V6 engine would Dazzle American buyers with its Japanese efficiency boy were they wrong instead the feeble style T100 looked like a 98lb weakling just waiting for the domestic full-size pickups to kick sand in its Grill Toyota tried adding an extended cab and a supercharger to no avail it wasn't until the company replaced the runy T100 with the larger V8 powered Tundra motor trend's 200000 truck of the year that buyers began to take the idea of a full-size Toyota pickup seriously lack of Market understanding coupled with overconfidence LED Toyota to endure this shameful failure this serves as evidence for the necessity of truly listening to and thoroughly researching customer needs in each specific Market please comment one to let me know you're still watching my video it's hard to remember now what a big deal the Ford Taurus used to be and and we can thank the google-eyed freak that is the 1996 Taurus for that the original Taurus was a revolution and our Motor Trend Car of the Year when it first came out in 1986 futuristic modern and carefully built it was the first American sedan that could credibly compete against the seemingly Invincible Japanese Ford stuck to the same basic formula for the redesigned second generation Taurus and wisely so it became America's best-selling car for the entirety of its 4-year run still Ford was sensitive to the flak it took for that car derivative styling so for the third generation Taurus dearborn's designers changed things up the allnew 1996 Taurus had an oval-shaped headlights an oval-shaped Grill oval-shaped rear window and inside an oval-shaped Center stack loyal Taurus customers said oal my goodness you expect us to buy that ugly thing Ford held on to its bestseller status for one more year by dumping half of 96 tourist production on rental fleets but that was it the tourist lost its bestseller title in 1997 and never got it back this is a painful lesson about the importance of attractive exterior design and staying true to the design philosophy that had previously succeeded changing too much of what made the brand can lead to a disaster if not done with caution and market [Music] research mired in its old man image Cadillac needed a car to appeal to Young Sport Luxury buyers who would only consider Imports so it did the logical thing it brought in an import of its own specifically the range topping Omega mv6 from General Motors opal division in Germany perhaps GM figured that because Americans couldn't buy Opals the rear drive catara would seem exotic enough so they didn't bother with any visual changes and save the grill Americans be they caddy fans or not expected a certain presence from a Cadillac which the anonymously styled Omega lacked compounding the problem was the fact that the Opals were never designed to be luxury cars and the blue collar Omega had no hope of out posing upmarket German Brands like BMW and Mercedes the catara had strong performance in handling shops but it was completely devoid of luxury cache instead of attracting buyers who would never consider a Cadillac it gave those buyers one more reason not to consider a Cadillac the catara story does have a happy ending though its failure in the marketplace cemented the need for distinctly styled Cadillacs resulting in the spectacular 2003 Cadillac black CTS and its [Laughter] [Applause] successors conversion bands were a big deal in the mid 90s witnessed the fact that Ford's freshly redesigned Econoline Club Wagon won Motor Trends truck of the year title in 1992 so there was much excitement when Chrysler revealed a new Dodge van for 1994 until we realized that behind that new bulbous nose was exactly the same van Dodge had been selling since 1971 no wait that's not entirely Fair the dashboard was from the van's previous refresh which happened 16 years earlier in 1978 even Chevrolet's van also a 1971 design but one that GM remember to update once in a while felt more modern than the new Dodges fuel injected Magnum engines made the Rams van quick but nothing could hide their Stone Age Origins and third world build quality after 9 years of Soo sales to we can now only assume were the stringiest of Fleet managers the Ram van was mercifully if briefly replaced by a Dodge branded version of dur Sprinter this is a painful lesson about not underestimating the development of new products and undervaluing customers instead of making a complete redesign effort Dodge dug in its own grave and buried its Van Line after Decades of success the video is long enough that you'll need to grab some more water so go ahead and do that now back in the 1980s sa was a runaway success in the US vying with Volvo and BMW as the yepy car of choice so of course General Motors had a kickoff the 1990s by buying Saab and ruining it the first Serious Sign of trouble was the new 4 94900 the primary problem being that what was once saab's most quirky and original car now shared its platform with opal's sales rep special the Vectra oh sure the new 900 had plenty of sbish cues like the distinctive hatchback profile and the ignition key slot between the seats there were even some new Innovations like a fighter jet inspired night panel which darkened all gauges save the speedo for distraction-free night driving but Saab was known for its originality and the new 900 made it painfully obvious that the brand had been absorbed into the corporate Borg even sailes who had never said the words opal Vectra let alone drive one could sense the car's innate lack of sbish the Swedish company's Spirit was mortally wounded and it wasn't long before the whole brand was history this is a lesson in the necessities of preserving the identity and core values of a brand after being acquired the uniformity of mistakes along with the loss of individual Spirit quickly LED Saab into Decline and ultimately to its demise when the time came to replace its much-loved CRX Honda wanted a cash in on one of the successes of Mazda's MX5 Miata convertible so the company tried to design a replacement that combine the traits of both cars imagine a device that combined the attributes of a drinking glass and a detective novel and you get the idea of what a bad idea this was the Civic del Soul's Target top couldn't put the wind in your hair like the Miata while the extra weight and low grip tires meant it couldn't dance like the CRX and with its tiny trunk barely large enough for the manual removable roof panel the Del also lacked its predecessor's legendary practicality sales were dire so in '94 Honda tried luring buyers with 160 h power engine from the JDM crxs that didn't work Honda decided the problem was the Civic moniker so they shortened the name to Dell soul that definitely didn't work sales continued to Tumble and in 1997 Honda killed the Dell Soul just like the Dell Soul tried to kill the crx's Legacy happy ending Honda kicked off the New Millennium with a proper Miata competitor and it was awesome the failure of the Dell soul is evidence of the necessity to create Vehicles consistent with its design philosophy and brand rather than trying to pursue too many different goals Honda had to learn this valuable lesson to successfully reintroduce itself with the S2000 a car truly worthy of inheriting the CRX [Music] Legacy it's easy to Heap dung upon the first generation Cavalier but the truth is it was an Innovative and economical car when introduced in 1982 by 1994 however it was was rather ancient and sad unfortunately someone at Chevrolet misread the design brief for its replacement and instead of making a new Cavalier that was Innovative and economical Chevy made a new Cavalier that was ancient and sad although vaguely attractive in Coupe form the new cavaliere was awkward as a sedan and insufficiently engineered as a convertible the driving experience was predictably miserable with noisy engines and mushy handling it felt as if the Cavalier had completely ignored the near takeoff of the compact segment by Japanese cars and few buyers outside the confines of Michigan took the Cavaliers seriously as a competitor to the Honda Civic or the Toyota Corolla Chevrolet followed tradition by building the second gen cavaliere for a decade with minimal changes and by the time of its 2005 mercy killing it was best known for its abysmal crash test scores no doubt eyeing the success of fellow South Korean automakers Hyundai and Kia deu decided to bash its way into the US market with not one but three oddly named cars the sub compact lenos Compact nuir and midsize Leganza an oddball mashup of opal and Holden GM Australian Parts their cheap prices were reflected in their cheap plastic cabins which all had the ambience of a bus station bathroom still this wasn't a problem considering the target market instead of traditional dealerships de's plan was to have college students fog them to other college students buying with no money no credit and disastrous finances which made them just like de wo most of the cars were sold to the sales reps themselves who later sued deu when they discovered that their massive employee discounts had been reported to the irs's taxable income the experiment was terminated abruptly when deu conglomerates collapsed into bankruptcy GM bought deu Motors assets and the Nuria and Leganza went on to torment buyers well into the 2000s as the Suzuki Reno Forenza and Verona this is a painful lesson about the lack of preparation and Market understanding when deciding to launch a series of new car models de wo is a classic example of this industry mistake if you enjoyed this video don't forget to support us by sharing it Oldsmobile paced the 1988 indd 500 with a slick looking cutless rag top of which 50 were built for sale then promptly recalled to the factory and destroyed a few were hidden away and survived GM cited vague certification issues which may explain why when the 199 version appeared it had sprouted a tremendous basket handle right smack in the middle of the car what was that for structural rigidity definitely not as anyone who has driven one of these floppy drop tops could attest we've always thought that the bar was to give the junkyard workers a convenient way to pick up the car and drop it into the crusher but according to GM the hoop provided anchor points for the door latches and the passive seat belts because adding an airbag would have cost too much at the cutless convertibles press preview GM told motor Tron the car would soon get an airbag that would make the hoop go away instead after 6 years of lousy sales the whole car went away this is evidence of the danger of investing in car design without thoroughness and making subjective decisions based on budget constraints which is something to avoid in fact poor design was a major factor in the disastrous failure of the cutless convertible it seems rather ironic that Japanese companies could literally reshape what Americans wanted from their cars yet creating a vehicle that could compete with Chrysler's Blockbuster minivans was a seemingly simple task that continued to elude them witness the Previa an egg-shaped odity that came to the market and immediately alienated most wouldbe buyers with its high price and Pregnant guppy style those who did make it as far as a test drive had other unpleasant surprises awaiting While most minivans had V6 power the Previa was powered by a hopeless overtax 4- cylinder engine we timed an all-wheel drive 1990 Previa all track to 60 mph in an excruciating 13.6 seconds and EPA fuel economy estimates were barely out of the High Teens the previous mid-engine platform had no room for a six-cylinder engine so Toyota added a supercharger which only succeeded in making the previous slightly quicker and significantly noisier it took Toyota the better part of a decade to figure out that the only way to compete with the Chrysler bands was to clone them which it did with the 1998 Sienna this is a rare example of Toyota's failure to align with the Practical needs of customers by designing something too different from mainstream Trends creativity that doesn't meet the market expectations can lead to a heavy price for the brand it wasn't just Toyota that got tripped up in its efforts to build a decent minivan Honda got it wrong as well a conservative company Honda waited a full decade before going up against Chrysler's unassignable bands time you'd think the company would have used to thoroughly assess failed attempts like the aforementioned Previa weird and slow the Nissan Quest too small in the Mazda MPV just plain wrong nope Honda repeated many of its competitor's mistakes and made a few of its own most notably aeing the side door is so beloved by parents in favor of traditional hinge doors worse yet this undersized odity arrived just before Chrysler released a bigger and better version of its minivan which proceeded to to outsell the Honda Odyssey by a ratio of roughly 25 to1 Honda fogs some to Isuzu rebagg as the Oasis and in return Honda got the poorly built Rodeo to sell as the Honda Passport it's difficult to determine which company got the worst end of that deal if the Odyssey did anything well it was proving that those who thought Honda could do no wrong were wrong The Odyssey disaster shattered the notion of Honda's Perfection proving that even long-standing Brands can make serious mistakes if they don't listen to the market this is a valuable lesson about not being complacent and always observing and learning from competitors to understand how lousy the 200SX SE was you have to know how awesome its predecessor the 1991 to 94 Sentra SE was every car magazine including us raved about that 140 horsepower 2400b under the radar missile in 1995 Nissan replaced the two-door Sentra with a swoopy but land 200SX and we waited eagerly for the SE version only to wish we'd never seen it the Sentra se's independent rear end was gone replaced by a cheaper tourism beam and although the powertrain was a carryover the 200SX extra weight and bulk slowed the 0 to 60 time by almost a half a second the suspension was softened in the name of the two most dreaded words in the automotive business increased compliance and although motor trend's instrumented testing showed that the 200SX SE to have skidpad and slalom numbers Superior to those of the predecessor the magic that made the Sentra SE so endearing was gone why is the brilliant Centra SE not more fondly remembered probably because the 200SX SE was terrible enough to ruin the SE moniker for good the failure of the 200SX SE led to the destruction of The Proud Legacy of the SE Line This is a classic example of the consequences of lack of investment Innovation and complacency in designing a new car from a previously successful model [Music] Saturn wasn't just one of the worst cars of the 1990s it was the worst car company brainchild of call me Roger Smith now remembered as the worst CEO in General Motors history the Saturn division advertised itself as a different kind of car company unfortunately its first product the 1991 Ser series wasn't a different kind of car despite unique powertrains and Engineering it felt no different than GM's other front-wheel drive heaps of that era noisy unrefined indifferently engineered and Mead to drive with build quality that was better than typical for GM but still not up to Honda Toyota standards Saturn's Innovative and expensive plastic body panels were supposed to enable frequent styling changes but that never happened because there was no money left to change the styling Saturn's all new cars factories dealerships and Workforce drain GM's corporate coffers of some $5 billion dooming not only the s but most of General Motors product lines to a decade of mediocracy GM's ambition to create a new Automotive brand has failed the marketing strategy of being different did not accompany genuinely Superior Products coupled with inefficient financial management resulted in Saturn and many other GM vehicle lines becoming mediocre for a long period of time America's success in Operation Desert Storm turned soldiers into rock stars leading to popular demand for AM General to build the civilian version of its military Ary High Mobility multi-purpose wheel vehicle but Hummer H1 buyers soon discovered why the military offers such good benefits to make up for the misery of driving around in a Humvee despite being as wide as the Panama Canal the H1 offered next to no passenger space primarily because its hapless arents had to share the cabin with the engine the engine was GM's utterly wretched 6.2 L naturally aspirated diesel which made up for its stupendous lack of Power with an overe exuberance of noise though to be fair it fought an exuberant battle trying to outshout the H1s moaning Drive Line and roaring tires AM General tried to address the noise problem by fitting a gas engine Chevy's venerable 5.7 L V8 which only succeeded in making the painfully slow H1 even slower when GM bought the Hummer brand it figured out that the best way to sell Hummers to civilians was to spin them from civilian Vehicles like the Suburban and Tahoe hence the runaway success of the H2 the Hummer H1 is a prime example of repurposing military vehicles for Civ million use without necessary improvements its cumbersome size weak engine and noisy operation made the H1 an impractical choice for everyday users somehow BMW's American organization got into its corporate head that it needed to capture as young upand cominging customers at an even younger age so it imported the three- series compact as its entry-level model hitting the self-imposed $20,000 Target price about 36,000 in 2022 meant using a small 1.8 8 L engine and ditching the e46s multi-link rear suspension for the old e30s trailing arms and if you think this sounds like a bad idea you should drive the car the 318 TI couldn't even keep up with the Dodge Neon not the SRT4 but the ordinary neon which was more than a second quicker to 60 and cost half as much handling was fine one of the few expectations of the 318 TI met but the ride felt as if the front and rear suspension came from completely different cars because they did the silly styling same wheelbase as the three sedan with a body shortened by 9 in apparently with a sawall did no favors it took four years and a pitiful 25,000 sales for BMW to realize that a slow ugly ill- riding car did nothing for its brand image no matter how cheap the pricing the BMW 318 TI demonstrates that cutting cost in using old Parts is not a sound strategy this car lost the BMW brand image and failed in terms of sales [Applause] the Monte Carlo had a two decade run as the car of choice for gas station casanovas before quietly being laid to rest in 1988 7 years later Chevrolet destroyed the dead Monte Carlo's dignity by attaching its storied moniker to this rolling travesty which was actually the two-door version of the new second generation Lumina the problem was that that the Monte Carlos were known for their distinctive style but the 1995 version literally had none it was the epitome of the anonymous wield blob from Maine to Oregon grown men with mullets threw down their halfs smoked Winston in disgust and burst into tears even the supposedly sporty z34 version managed to bleach out any personality that might have carried over from its predecessor the passably credible Lumina z34 liberally slathered with appalling mediocracy that was the Hallmark of the mid90s general motor the Monte Carlo literally had no redeeming features Beyond its ability to impart seats with motion amazingly Chevrolet made no effort to address the Monte Carlos anamin until replacing it with a new version for Y2K a car that was as ugly as ugly could be but at least had some personality the 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is an example of Reviving an old name plate without thoroughly researching the core values of the vehicle line the uninspired design and average quality made this model a disappointment Ford decided it needed a competitor for the MX5 Miata but instead of working with Mazda a company that Ford partially owned Dearborn cobbled together this wheel mishap from Parts spins all over the world the car was based on the Australian Market Ford laser which ironically was a reskinned Mazda 323 hatchback the Capri was poorly assembled in Australia and despite being marketed to young women sold at old man brand Lincoln Mercury dealerships rather than follow what they knew about such Vehicles Ford exec went shoulder deep into customer clinics which convinced them that the most important attributes in a convertible sports car were comfort and practicality that explains why unlike the Miata the Capri had front-wheel drive and a vdal back seat which we described in our June 1990 issue as a parcel shelf inspired by the Spanish Inquisition it also explains why unlike the Miata no one bought the Capri we've always thought the car's name was misspelled move the r between the C and the A and you get a much more suitable moniker the 1994 Capri is a testament to the lack of market research and misguided product Direction instead of leveraging the advantages of its partner Mazda Ford created a hybrid product that failed to meet customer [Music] needs Volkswagen having given American its first minivan in the form of the famed transporter probably figured it knew a thing or two about how to compete against Chrysler's all-conquering minivan Volkswagen was wrong the EuroVan was a little more than a glossed over commercial truck and as a minivan it was too big too heavy and way the hell too slow its 2.5 L 5 cylinder engine mustered a mere 109 horsepower and 140 lb feet of torque and given the deadly combination of steep hill and stiff headwind it felt like it might lose the battle to keep the nearly two-ton EuroVan moving granted VW had no problem selling slow Vans to stoned hippies in the 1960s but now that Mi generation had traded their weed and tie dyes for kids in IAS they demanded something better sales were so dismal that VW pulled the Euro van just after one year the Euro van returned in 1999 with six-cylinder power but buyers were no more receptive compared to other minivans even lousy efforts like the aforementioned Previa and first gen Odyssey the Euro Van's pitiful sales numbers looked like a rounding error the Volkswagen EuroVan is an example of the necessity to conduct market research and Design products suitable for the segment based on a commercial vehicle platform and featuring a weak engine the EuroVan became cumbersome and less appealing compared to other minivan options in the market the Mazda designed Kia built Ford Festiva was a runaway success in the late 1980s and early 1990s so when the time came for a replacement Ford Kia figured that they knew what they were doing instead of going back to Mazda these two unlikely Partners took it upon themselves to Cobble together a bigger and more bulous car using the same mechanical bits the resulting Aspire drove as if it had been designed by firste engineer students the unassisted steering was slow and heavy grip was lousy body roll was outright comical and refinement was non-existent and this was just at City speeds which was about all the festivas carryover 1.3 l engine could muster for the bigger heavier a Spire its interior was just as dire as that of a chief rival the externally dismal geom Metro but the Geo delivered better fuel economy and was brace yourselves for the three words we never thought we'd use to describe a Metro better to drive a quick test drive of the Aspire convinced most wouldbe buyers that they could aspire to something better like taking the bus the Ford Aspire is an example of complacency following success and a lack of market research instead of building upon the strengths of its predecessor the Ford Aspire focused on size while overlooking crucial factors such as performance convenience and fuel efficiency this made the Aspire a less attractive Choice compared to its segment Rivals this entry may seem unfair as we've already roasted the dastardly Yugo hatchback on our list of the worst cars of the 1980s but it seems that the introduction of the new 4 1990 Yugo convertible those evil gen I at Zastava found ways to make the awful Yugo even more miserable for us greedy capitalist pigs instead of the simple manual top you'd expect on America's cheapest convertible $8,990 you go fitted a complex electr hydraulic mechanism one more thing to break on a car famous for breaking and although hard top yugos were finally fitted with fuel injection in 1990 the Cabrio made do with the old emissions choked and impossible to tune feedback carburetor why because F you American Sun worshippers if the goal of the Yugo designs was to prove that hardtop Yugo wasn't the sturdiest car ever made well mission accomplished American buyers having been once bitten by the Yugo took home fewer than 100 of these drop top disasters before the Yugo organization imploded in 1992 oh and if you're wondering why the geom Metro convertible isn't on this list it's because compared to the Yugo that rolling Calamity is practically a Bentley the Yugo Cabrio is an example of misguided Improvement instead of addressing the shortcomings of the Yugo hatch back the installation of a complex electrocon convertible top and retaining the old engine made the Yugo Cabrio a disaster and a commercial failure more than a quarter Century has elapsed since we first scratched our heads trying to figure out what the hell or why the hell the Suzuki X90 was and we've even yet to receive a passively plausible suggestion based on the popular Suzuki Sidekick the underpowered X90 had optional four-wheel drive but its passenger car tires and ankle high ground clearance rendered it useless on anything more severe than a well tended lawn the X90 was also devoid of utility having no back seat and a miserly trunk with barely enough room for the removable t-tops yep that's right this car of the 9s had the roof of the 7s so it wasn't even a passable convertible the exterior design looked like it was penned by a 4-year-old while the cheap plastic Dash inside clashed with a crayle of vomit upholstery Suzuki polluted every car magazine including RS with Hyper annoying X90 ads featuring ey zapping red and yellow Spirals and a headline that shouted what are you staring at to which we shouted back a stupid pointless SUV that no one will buy and we were right Suzuki moved just 7,000 examples of this exercise in futility over a three-year model run which by the way was precisely 3 years too long no question in a decade that gave us plenty of bad cars the Suzuki X90 is absolutely the worst car of the 1990s the Suzuki X90 is a product of misguided Direction its peculiar design limited features and cheap materials rendered it impractical and unappealing to the market the X90 serves as evidence of Suzuki's failure in both design and product position which car did you find most disappointing on this list please let us know your opinion in the comment section see you in the next video [Music]

Channel: Q Muscle Cars

Views: 30,990

Keywords: muscle cars, muscle car, classic muscle cars, classic cars, fastest cars, expensive cars, rarest muscle cars, american muscle cars, vintage cars, exotic cars cars, cars, 25 worst muscle cars cars of the 1990s, #qmusclecars, q muscle cars

Id: bp6s7iVe00o

Length: 34min 12sec (2052 seconds)

Published: Sat Apr 06 2024