>> Kayleigh: RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND FREE SPEECH WINNING OUT, A JUDGE REINSTATED A TEACHER PLACED ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE BECAUSE HE OPPOSED THE TRANSGENDER POLICY. THE TEACHER, TELLING THE SCHOOL BOARD MEETING LAST MONTH, THAT THEY'RE GOING PREFERRED PRONOUNS BECAUSE IT'S AGAINST HIS RELIGION. HE DOUBLED DOWN IN AN INTERVIEW WITH FOX JUST YESTERDAY. >> I LOVE ALL OF MY STUDENTS, BUT I WOULD NEVER LIE TO THEM. I'M A TEACHER, BUT I SERVE GOD FIRST. I WILL NOT CONFIRM THAT A BIOLOGICAL BOY CAN BE A GIRL, IT'S AGAINST MY RELIGION, IT'S ABUSE AND IT'S SINNING AGAINST OUR GOD. >> Kayleigh: THAT IS HIS FIRMLY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEF, BUT THAT'S A FIREBALL OFFENSE IN A PUBLIC SCHOOL? >> Tomi: AGAIN, I UNDERSTAND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND THIS IS ALSO A COMPLEX AND DIFFICULT ISSUE. I'M ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVES WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO, IF YOU WANT TO BE IN THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY, DO WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. ON THE OTHER SIDE YOU HAVE TO RESPECT PEOPLE WHO DON'T FALL IN LINE, THAT DON'T SUCCUMB TO THAT THINKING AND DON'T HAVE A PLACE IN THEIR HEART OR MIND. THIS CANCELER CULTURE IS SO ONE-SIDED AND THAT'S THE PART, THE DOUBLE STANDARD IS SO INFURIATING. FOLKS AND TEACHERS CAN SAY WHATEVER THEY WANT ABOUT BLACK LIVES MATTER, RADICAL RACE THEORY, BUT THEN YOU HAVE SOMEONE WHO SAYS, IT'S AGAINST MY RELIGION TO REFER TO YOUNG PEOPLE WITH THEIR PREFERRED PRONOUNS AND ALL THE SUDDEN HE'S THROWN UNDER THE BUS. PEOPLE WANT A LITTLE BIT OF CONSISTENCY WHEN IT COMES TO EDUCATION AND YOUNG PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY. >> THE SCHOOL IS SAYING IT'S NOT HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEF THAT MOTHER SAYING HE CAUSED A DISRUPTION, BUT THE JUDGE WASN'T BUYING THAT. >> IT WAS A VICTORY FOR THE CONSTITUTION, A VICTORY FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT. LET ME BE VERY CLEAR HERE. THERE IS NO EQUIVALENT OF CANCEL CULTURE WITH THE CONSTITUTION. THIS TEACHER WHO I'M VERY PROUD OF, THEY ARTICULATED WORDS THAT WERE PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND HIS RELIGIOUS RIGHTS! AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IS GOING TO SAY HE CREATED A DISRUPTION? THE COURT DIDN'T BUY THAT. THEY'RE MAKING THE FALSE ASSUMPTION THAT THERE POLICY HAS THE SAME LEVEL OF ENFORCEMENT AS OUR CONSTITUTION. IT'S NOT EVEN CLOSE! YOU KNOW IT MAKES ME HAPPY? IT WILL DETER OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS WHO WANT TO IMPOSE CANCEL CULTURE ON OTHER TEACHERS. THIS WAS A MAJOR VICTORY FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND OUR CONSTITUTION WHICH IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. >> Kayleigh: I LOVE HOW YOU SAID THAT, THE CONSTITUTION WILL WIN OUT OVER CANCELER CULTURE. THIS RESTRAINING ORDER, DECEMBES FURTHER ACTION, HE COULD STILL LOSE HIS JOB! >> UNTIL ANOTHER ORDER PRECEDES IT, IT EITHER REQUIRES ACTION OR STOPS IT AND WHEN THE ISSUE IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, THE JUDGE GOES THROUGH AN ANALYSIS THAT INCLUDES WHETHER THE PETITIONER IS LIKELY TO SUCCEED, WHETHER IT'S IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT THE ACTION CONTINUES OR DOESN'T, AND WHETHER THAT DECISION, THE ISSUE THAT CIRCLING AROUND, WHETHER IT IMPEDES THE CONSTITUTION. THE JUDGE FOUND IN HIS FAVOR ON ALL THREE. HE SAID THIS ORDER WILL EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31ST, SO I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT HE WILL NOT LOSE HIS JOB BECAUSE THE INJUNCTION WILL BE REINSTATED, IT COMES DOWN TO THAT 11TH HOUR. >> Kayleigh: HARRIS, I WANT YOU TO PUT A BUTTON ON THIS SPIRIT EMILY, WHAT IS THE STATUS OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY WITH THE NEW COURTS AND THE NEW TRUMP JUDGES WE HAVE. >> Emily: THANKFULLY THIS IS A CAUSE FOR HOPE, BUT ON THE BASIS OF FREE EXERCISE WE SEE A WHOLE HOST OF DECISIONS COMING OUT OF CIRCUITS THAT REINFORCE IT AND PUSH BACK ON GOVERNMENT ENCROACHMENT. EVERYTHING FROM LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR WHERE RELIGIOUS EMPLOYERS DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE THEIR HEALTH INSURANCE AND CONTRACEPTION, THEY DON'T HAVE TO HIRE RELIGIOUS TEACHERS THAT DON'T HOLD IT TO THEIR FAITH. WE HAVE RESOUNDING REPEATED KNOCKING BACK AGAINST GOVERNMENT AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHEN THERE IS LOCKDOWN POLICIES, SECULAR ACTIVITIES, AND YET PEOPLE COULDN'T WORSHIP INSIDE. AGAIN AND AGAIN THE SUPREME COURT STRUCK THAT DOWN, AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS WHO STOOD AGAINST THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT CLOSING THE SCHOOLS AND TRYING TO SAY, YOU CAN HAVE YOUR RELIGIOUS CEREMONIES AND LESSONS ON THE SIDE. THE JUDGE SAID, YOU CANNOT SEVER RELIGIOUS LEARNING. THERE RESOUNDING VICTORY. FINAL POINT, THE DISTRICT "DIDN'T HAVE AN ARGUMENT AGAINST THE SCRUTINY. THE GOVERNMENT KNOWS WHAT IT'S ENCROACHING." >> Kayleigh: A SLEW OF VICTORIES. YOUR THOUGHT? >> WHAT I WOULD HOPE IS IF WE ARE GOING TO PUT NEW WORDS INTO THE VERNACULAR AND MAKE EVERYBODY ELSE LIVE BY THEM AND CANCEL THOSE, THEY FIND THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN THOSE WORDS, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO READY OUR CHILDREN FOR WHAT IS NEXT. LET'S GIVE OUR FIRST NAME AND LET'S GET TO KNOW EACH OTHER BASED ON WHO WE ARE RATHER THAN WHAT WE ARE. AND THERE WON'T BE SO MUCH CONFUSION. WHAT AN EYE-OPENING REVELATION. THE WORD OF GOD, WHICH IS WHAT HE IS SAYING, WHICH EXISTS WITH FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE CONSTITUTION. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IS MAKING THE DECISION THAT THE WORD OF GOD IS NOT MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE WORD OF MAN. WE NEED TO HAVE A BROADER CONVERSATION ABOUT THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF I WANT
