Of course, the world is looking forward to it , especially Zelensky , but for the people of Ukraine, is it possible to hope for peace? A total of 80 countries have signed it. Although we say plus one plus, because not all countries may send their heads of state, there are about 100 countries represented. According to reports, 10 countries including India and Saudi Arabia did not sign the demands raised in the Ukrainian peace summit communiqué. Turkey and Saudi Arabia even stated that they can only go after Russia participates. Make meaningful progress , otherwise the peace you signed will just be in vain. Therefore, this so-called family photo that unites the power of peace, this peace summit communiqué , is effective or has limited actual effect. It just expresses the atmosphere of this link. Of course, it is more important. How many people have to pay for Ukraine to continue fighting has highlighted many limitations , including the differences among countries in the Global South or the different opinions arising from the lack of signature of the BRICS countries. But is there any way to isolate Russia? The previous repeated containment and boycott of sanctions had no effect , and now of course it is difficult to see results. The Austrian Prime Minister said that according to the feeling of the Western stratosphere , it seems that without the participation of Asia, Africa, and South America, the West will not be able to achieve peace. There is no way to influence Russia. What they say is the truth, but Zelensky is very optimistic. He even said yesterday that he believes that peace will come from this day on. But what about China? In the past, he has always been criticized by Zelensky. The attitude of the United States is to provide weapons to support Russia, etc. However , according to foreign media reports, even the United States’ own support for Zelensky ’s Ukraine may be limited. Except for Biden himself who did not attend the meeting to send a deputy representative, He Jinli and even the meeting was still being held on the 16th. There are still various activities to be held. He Jinli has already left and has returned to the United States. She only stayed in Switzerland for a few hours before leaving. Reuters reported that this time the person representing the United States at the Sunday summit was the President of the United States on national security affairs. Assistant Sullivan was absent from the summit. Zelensky had been criticizing and blaming China for the past two days , but he seemed to have changed his mind. He said that he hoped that China could participate in dialogue and make suggestions. He said that he had never said that China was Enemy , he hopes that China will become a friend of Ukraine. In the past, we have compared each other. From June 2, we once said that China prevented other countries from participating in the peace summit. On the 13th, Xi Jinping promised not to sell the problem to Russia. The two sides can find dialogue. Now directly say that China is not an enemy. China can Help us , is it possible for the so-called summit to be isolated without Beijing and Moscow? Is it possible that Zelensky turned around? Kremlin spokesman Peskov said Putin did not rule out negotiations with Ukraine, but We need to ensure that if necessary, Zelensky said that we will talk tomorrow. But the question is, is there a way to talk now or what is Biden's instruction from the United States to bring peace? Biden did not go to the summit. Where did he go? He went to a fund-raising dinner to meet with many people. Artists and celebrities are standing together , but they are in panic again. Looking at this scene , Obama is standing next to him. When applause starts on the stage, everyone opens the curtain and observes. Most of the guests on the stage will wave and follow. The interaction in the audience , especially if you look at how much Obama is doing , but Biden is stunned again, so quickly, Obama leads him as if he is his old father and leads him away to where he should be on the stage, like this Of course, Trump will not take a good look at Biden's upcoming election. Trump directly gave sour remarks about the Ukraine peace agreement. Listening to what Trump said , it is still difficult for me to imagine that he and Biden are about to do it. There was a TV debate about this difference. There was a professor from Columbia University , and there was also a professor from Columbia University, Sacks. He also had some analysis and opinions. Let me hear what he thinks. Do you think that this sense of déjà vu means fighting until the last person is holding our weapons
? Let’s talk about the situation in Taiwan. Is this what Brother Liang said in the peace summit? Can it really bring about the dawn of peace? I don’t know if Zelensky’s children are staying in Ukraine. At least I know that Lai Qingde’s children are not in Taiwan. So you just unanimously said that you should ask him to return to the country , so I said that I like to advocate that it is best to stand to the last soldier. Your children are in Taiwan. This is a responsible performance, right? Zelensky, in fact, Ukraine wants to unilaterally Frankly speaking, you do not have the weight to lead the peace summit . The United States, Biden, will not come. Because China does not come , China feels that you are not two parties. How can we talk about it? Russia has not been invited, and mainland China has decided that he will not come. If China does not come, Biden will Not coming is a chain reaction because Zelensky invited 160 countries, but only 92 came. In the final joint statement, only 78 countries signed the Global South. We said that it was more important. He even made a special trip to Shangri-La in Singapore, hoping for Southeast Asia. The country can even sign Southeast Asian countries and refuse visas. Brazil has not come, so the Austrian Prime Minister made the most straightforward statement. He said that it feels like he has heard the echo from Europe because most of the people present are from European countries. What's the use of this? And he was originally yours. The top ten issues were later deleted into three issues. Even the words "Russia's invasion of Ukraine " were deleted. I really don't know what you want to do with this peace conference , but let me tell you that one situation that is very troublesome right now is that of Zelens. During this peace summit in Kyrgyzstan , Putin took action. Putin directly proposed Russia's peace plan. Frankly speaking, it was very strict. In fact, he wanted the existing four states to be based on the existing boundaries. And he said that this is called a peace plan , not a ceasefire , but a permanent peace plan. As long as you promise not to join NATO, be neutral and not develop nuclear weapons , we will get it done. Zelensky rejected it immediately. The problem is that after Putin, he also said that if You do not accept the bloody conflict that will follow, and you will be fully responsible . So frankly speaking, this is the same as an ultimatum in negotiations, right? This is a tragedy . If you continue to do this, you will end up in a situation that will never work. If Russia unilaterally issued an ultimatum , then If there is no peace summit with Russia in Ukraine , let’s talk about why you didn’t listen in the first place. China, Turkey, France, and Germany all want to be peacemakers. Why don’t they take this path? Frankly speaking, the United States doesn’t want you to go so far. The troublesome part about talking about this is whether Ukraine is ready to negotiate. So I think in the future Russia may use one move to incite Ukraine to negotiate and replace Zelensky. I think he may do this . Just go here and frankly speaking, this is not the same as the negotiations between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party . Just replace Chiang Kai-shek with Li Zongren, and it has a bit of this flavor . But of course this will cause chaos in the internal political situation in Ukraine, and the possibility of splitting is there, because some people will see this. How to fight as the fight continues, right? Teacher Lai just said it very well. Lai Qingde thinks that we will lose the first battle , so he prepares for urban battles and looks down on our army, right? Otherwise, how could Qing Qingde say that we must fight to the last soldier? He is We are preparing to fight the Ukrainian model and fight urban wars. Why do you think you will lose the first blow? So when Trump talked about these conversations , he said that Ukraine is actually very powerful. Zelensky leaves with a lot of money every time he comes . In fact, I'm afraid. Of course, I think Trump made it very clear that he came here to ask for money. However , the United States should have paid what Americans owe, but after November, they may not be able to get it. Is that so? But Americans have the obligation and responsibility to pay Ukraine because the Americans instigated Ukraine to fight the war in the first place , just like the Americans also instigated Taiwan independence to fight with the mainland. Fortunately, we are the vast majority in Taiwan. The people of Taiwan are smart, so we let the Democratic Progressive Party lose miserably. Nine-in-one also lost, and then the legislators also lost , and then the president was 40% fake democracy. How could a person without an absolute majority be the president? How could this be a democracy? Democracy must be an absolute majority. The absolute majority does not approve of him being president. But he became president. This is called fake democracy. No matter what, the people of Taiwan are too smart, so the United States tried to provoke a cross-strait war but failed. The leaders of the mainland are also too intelligent. I am smart , so I didn’t fall into the trap of the Americans , but I almost fell into it. At that time, the DPP was provoking the angry youth in Taiwan . The angry youth in mainland China were shouting and killing and wanted military reunification. Fortunately, they had it under control. The problem was that Ukraine fell. When Zelensky entered, polls were so low, and he wanted to be re-elected , he started a war with Russia. This fight is currently at a disadvantage . The peace summit said that if you withdraw all troops, then peace can be possible. You can't defeat them now. You are at a disadvantage. The Russians say where to withdraw their troops . Now this state is my territory, not yours. My only prerequisite now is whether it is the border now or the border of my traditional state. I can now give in to the current boundaries instead of the traditional boundaries. If your current boundaries are not accepted, I will ask for the traditional boundaries. Then we must continue to fight and expand them. I think this negotiation is out of reach. The problem now is this alliance. Isn’t it useful to say that 78 or 80 countries have signed the statement? Why does every resolution of the United Nations General Assembly say that the United States must lift comprehensive sanctions against Cuba ? Does the United States ignore it ? The United Nations General Assembly also does so. A resolution said that Israel and Kazakhstan should stop the war. Israel can no longer fight against Israel. Will the Americans ignore it? Not to mention that this kind of peace summit is not even at the level of the United Nations General Assembly. No one will listen to it. So the general sees all these strategies and wants peace. What does Zelensky rely on? The United States has been providing so-called military aid and various aid methods. However, the current war situation still seems to be very difficult. He has reached the strategic dead end we talked about and reached a strategic bottleneck . Unable to get out, he has become a lot of wishful thinking. The peace summit held in Switzerland is also wishful thinking. You don't have Russia. You have a peace summit. Don't talk about it. How can you open it? Make resolutions . The real target. The real core goal is Russia . Talk to Russia. You haven’t talked to Russia. All your country’s endorsements are useless. Your endorsement , but Russia continues to fight. It’s like this . Will other countries help Ukraine? Will Ukraine send troops? Ukraine will help Ukraine fight Russia . Other countries have no countries sending troops. What are you calling? Ukraine fought until the very end . It fought on its own land and so many people died. The entire generation has been cut off. There is no way. Their strategy is wrong and the direction is wrong. The main axis and target of the negotiations is Russia. He made a mistake in pursuing peace. No matter how much you do at the summit, it will still be of no use. What you have achieved is zero points. He has gone in the opposite direction. It is a pity that the other most important Zelensky strategic blindness was originally in 2022, when the incident broke out on February 24. We It can be seen that he did not mobilize for psychological defense. He only acted to hate Russia. That means he did not mobilize to defend himself against Russia. However, he did not mobilize for psychological defense. You must be cautious. The ideological and psychological armament was not done. You saw that the Azov Battalion was very powerful at that time. The Azov Battalion specialized in killing Russian people in Donbass, including Luhansk and Donetsk, and the result was that these people of Russian origin were killed. Azov Battalion, look at it, it's very similar to the original Boxer Rebellion. Once the Russian army came in, Azov Battalion disappeared and became like this. Wasn't Azov Battalion very good at fighting? Isn't it amazing that they killed 14,000 Russians in Donbas ? As soon as the Russian army came in, the Azov camp disappeared and turned into this situation. We can see many analogies in history. At that time, we can know that the ideological leader Zelensky was hating Russia and anti-Russia. The result is now at the end. I can’t stop thinking about it. The U.S. didn’t call for a stop. Ukraine ca n’t stop . So what should I do? And why are we fighting? He wants to recover these four states, Zaporizhzhya, Kherson, Luhansk, and Donetsk . He has no ability to do so. You see, he has been counterattacking for 2 years and still cannot recover an inch of land . So, What is he really fighting for? The direction of his original strategy was wrong . Is it possible for Biden, who is always lost on stage, to help end the war in Ukraine? The real worst people are really only the people of Ukraine. Take a break. We have more. Don't stray away from the topic . It's hard to distinguish between enemies and friends. For example, Australia once had a very tense relationship with China. But has the relationship changed now? Li Qiang, Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang, went to Australia for a visit. Australian Foreign Minister Huang Yingxian personally picked him up and took a look at the scene after he got off the plane. He was treated with great courtesy. Of course, after getting off the plane, a grand welcome ceremony by the Australian Parliament would begin immediately , and the following tense and thorny negotiation issues in the geopolitical and military confrontation areas would be kicked off, and more importantly, behind closed doors. There are also various issues of national interest to discuss in the meeting. It seems that the interaction between the two people is very good and treated with high standards. Li Qiang said that it has not been easy for China-Australia relations to get back on track after twists and turns in the past few years , so the important thing is to work together. What are you trying to do? Of course what Australia wants is to have better relations, including not blocking lobsters anymore. Then various business opportunities and cooperation will immediately arise. What China is doing is that Australia should be allowed to be included in the mainland's visa-free program. Both parties are the same regardless of tourism. There can be better cooperation in commercial import and export. Beijing will also provide Australia with two giant bears. Wangwang and Funi will continue panda diplomacy. Li Qiang will also visit major wine-producing areas , saying that wine and lobsters will be opened soon and the ban will be lifted. Important relationship . That’s why Australian Foreign Minister Huang Yingxian said that this trip is very important for the stability of China-Australia trade relations. We calculated and found out what proportion of Australian lobsters originally accounted for from 2018 to 2019. 94% was sold to China . The sanctions and the instability in the relationship immediately resulted in the loss of such a high order of 700 million Australian dollars , so it is very important to restore the lobster order. But let's take a look at some European companies in electric vehicles. European companies are very nervous and worried because of the increase in EU tariffs in Europe. For others, Private corporate car manufacturers are actually very worried , or in individual countries , traditional European car giants have also announced that they will give up independent production in Europe because they believe that production here will cause greater problems for affordable electric vehicles. It has faced an unprecedented challenge , and Germany is also very nervous because it has the most cooperation with mainland China in terms of import and export with its traditional petrol and electric vehicles . Therefore, Deputy Prime Minister Habeck will soon visit South Korea and China on June 19th, just to worry about what might happen. When China boycotts and attacks him, Germany will be severely hurt. Brother Liang, during Li Qiang’s visit to Australia , it seems that the relationship between the two sides is improving. I think it is mainly Australia because Australia is stuck between China and the United States. Mainland China is quite different. Agree , but I think mainland China has not made too optimistic expectations. For example, whether it will modify AUKUS, this is unlikely. To be honest, they may hope that New Zealand will not join AUKUS , but Australia is already in it. He is amazing. I will just talk to him and advise him. Is it necessary for Australia’s security plan to build the first island chain? You are so far away. Frankly speaking, this is unrealistic. In fact, there are people in the Australian Labor Party who have different ideas . Albanese is stuck now because the United States has strangled him. Otherwise, the former Labor Party member Ji Ting would have spoken publicly. He said that Australia's security issues should mainly be about the South Pacific and Indonesia. How can they be involved in the first island chain? How far is that distance? Do you know that it is 5,800 kilometers from mainland China to Australia? But if he wants to build a nuclear submarine, I don’t know where his nuclear submarine will go. If you build a nuclear submarine , you obviously have to cooperate with the layout of the United States . Otherwise, why would you build a nuclear submarine? Nuclear submarines have no distance. You are limited to long-range strikes , but what threat does China pose to Australia ? We are talking about military matters . Of course, if it is political, sometimes you will catch some spies, etc. All countries have it. We are talking about military matters. In fact Ji Ting publicly said that what Australia should buy should be short- and medium-range in the surrounding areas, such as destroyers, cruisers, which are more practical, and patrol boats , which are probably in line with his idea of security. But because of the common ground between the United States and Australia Defense treaties , I think in fact, frankly speaking , what remains from World War II is that the United States and the former Soviet Union are in competition. There are many mutual defense treaties around the world. The situation laid out is too far away for many countries . In fact, this is how Australia and New Zealand were included in the mutual defense treaty between the United States, Australia and New Zealand. That is, the expansion against the former Soviet Union has now been changed to the expansion against China. But the former Soviet Union may be true. Does mainland China have a military layout like the former Soviet Union? So frankly speaking, if Australia cannot figure out this problem , its development with mainland China will have certain limits. It is not easy to say how good you want to be. But I think Australia has already He has done quite well. For example, he is willing to let BYD come in because I just had an Australian netizen tell me today that Australia has tariff-free for all imported cars. I almost fainted after hearing this. There is no tariff because our country imposes tariffs on goods. The tax of 57% is too exaggerated , so he said that it is very cheap to buy Chinese cars over there . He just thinks that this is the means of transportation that you use every day , and then he opens up the import. So he has done it to a certain extent , so between China and Australia It’s easy to talk about economics and trade , but military cooperation is the most sensitive part. I don’t think mainland China wants military cooperation with Australia. It just wants to say that Australia does not need to choose sides between China and the United States, at least to maintain a certain degree of cooperation between China and the United States. For balance, you can rely on the United States , but don't be hostile to China. I think this is the bottom line for mainland China , which means that you can rely on the United States. You can join many American organizations. But if some American organizations want to confront mainland China and suppress China , China has nothing to do. I accept you as long as you don't go too far. I think mainland China understands the blood relationship or cultural relationship between Australia and the Anglo-Saxon race , but it does not mean that it is acceptable, but
it is highly economically beneficial. Complementarity , and mainland China is actually increasing Australia and New Zealand 's economic dependence on mainland China. This is not bad for mainland China. Why , because mainland China has many products that are originally purchased from abroad, whether it is lobster or red wine. Of course, mainland China I have it myself , but the market is big enough , so I also need to come in. If more of these bulk materials and agricultural products come in, the mainland will have better conditions to negotiate with the United States, Brazil, other countries, and even Russia. Therefore, there will be better conditions . It was originally a complement to each other. But if today Australia or New Zealand has no dependence on mainland China's economy , then your influence on them will basically be small. Why is mainland China so influential now ? It's because Australia's red wine depends on China. Lobster relies on China's iron ore, relies on China's coal mine, relies on China. In fact , a large part of all aspects of your business depends on China. When you are hostile to mainland China, mainland China starts to impose sanctions . So I think mainland China is now going to increase in size. I think your sense of dependence on me is valid. Obviously, we have seen that at least the prime ministers of the two countries have signed it. In other words, for business, sightseeing and tourism in mainland China, Australia and mainland China are currently visa-free. However, the visa required for multiple visas from mainland China to Australia is 3 to 5 years , but a single visa means multiple entry and exit for 3 to 5 years. This is actually very helpful for Australia's sightseeing and tourism, and scientific and technological cooperation is about to begin again. It is what the United States least wants to see, but if we can talk about it, I think this is a step forward. As for Germany, I think Habeck, the German Deputy Prime Minister, has been hostile to mainland China since he took office until now, and he is anti-China and anti-China. In 2022, when he first came to power, he advocated formulating a document on mainland China. This document was to reduce dependence on mainland China. In fact, it was de-risking and decoupling. This was his original strategy. So when Xiao When I went to China for a visit, he didn’t even accompany me. He is such a person , but why is he in such a hurry to go to China now? Why is such a person in such a hurry to go to mainland China for the first time to lead a delegation ? This represents Why is Germany's economy failing? If China attacks you again, Germany will never be able to govern again. You, the minister , and the party will not be able to govern again, because the countermeasures of mainland China are currently only targeting pork and cheese. They are not worried about the automobile industry. Mainland China is the general . Australia is Australia's largest exporter. 31% of it is sold to mainland China. We look at selling Southeast Asia. The 10 countries in Southeast Asia only buy 11% from Australia. The market of the 10 countries in Southeast Asia is 1/2 of the market in mainland China. Mainland China is 3 times the size of the 10 countries. Do you think Australia wants its beef, lobsters, red wine, minerals, and natural gas ? So of course mainland China has two major advantages in this place. The first is geographical advantage. It’s 5,500 kilometers away from mainland China. Look, Australia is 12,000 kilometers away from the United States, which is twice as far away from Europe. If you go around the Indian Ocean , if you want to take the Suez Canal , it’s still more than 10,000 kilometers away from Europe. Paying and paying is time-consuming and time-consuming, and these agricultural products take time . If they have been transported on the ship for a long time, the beef will not be fresh. We are talking about lobsters, which are not fresh in mainland China recently. So we see why. We should pay attention to the Chinese mainland market because of the convenient location. The third thing we can know is that the number of Chinese is gradually increasing. Now there are about 1.4 million Chinese in Australia and 50,000 in Taiwan. The overseas Chinese and Taiwanese we are talking about are slowly moving there in Australia and mainland China. After I immigrated , my influence became greater. His Chamber of Commerce Co., Ltd. is the one we talked about. All these guilds are from mainland China. The Chinese have become influential there and have had commercial contacts with mainland China . So we see that the market has great transportation and convenient transportation. The Chinese now account for about 6% in Australia and are slowly increasing. Do you think the market is right for them ? Mainland China , so we can see that from these three perspectives, the market in Mainland China will become bigger and bigger because we have a population of 1.4 billion , and everyone’s income has increased. Do you think everyone can afford to eat lobster , which they could n’t afford 20 years ago? Now that we can afford it, it happens that 90% of Australia's lobsters in the world are sold to mainland China. Are you optimistic about the market in mainland China and go to that place to consume and sell for foreign trade ? So we can see that Australia will never ignore the vast market of mainland China for 15 consecutive years. Mainland China has been Australia's largest trading partner. If it is cut off, it will have a huge impact. In this case, it will have to market one agricultural product and another. For raw materials, whether it is iron ore or coal, you have to find a market. Mainland China is the best market and the best market for business operations. So it is like this. So we can see that the military and the United States are the same thing , but trade is always the same. There is no way to throw away mainland China because everyone has to do a lot of things from an economic perspective. Without the economic aspect, people can't live. You also have the defense budget AUKUS. We talked about the eight nuclear-powered attack submarines . If you want money, you still have to make money. To make money, to find trading partners, trade partners should be found in mainland China. So we can look at this because of the geographical relationship, the economic ties between mainland China and Australia, exchanges and exchanges , and We say that business cannot be lost in this aspect . Our first introduction is Guo Zhengliang , a doctor of political science from Yale . Brother, everyone is safe. International politics expert, Mr. Lai Yueqian, host, good audience friends, hello everyone, former deputy commander of the Air Force, General Zhang Yanting, host, hello everyone, cross-strait. Is it possible for the issue to bloom now , or is it possible for the flowers to fall? Is there a war or war? In fact, the people in Taiwan actually have various feelings about President Lai’s statement and don’t know what to do about this civilized minister. He is in charge of the important national defense fortress of our country . But Gu Lixiong seemed a little at a loss when he shouted the salute in front of the official school. Looking at the scene , you can see that everyone was probably at a loss during this salute. It is positioned with the majesty and dignity that a minister should have. When everyone shouts a salute, what are his actions? Let’s take a look at where to put it. Look at the left and right. Look at it and put it back. Put it down and put it back again. This is our minister. Of course, he You may not be very familiar with military etiquette , but could it be that we are at a loss when it comes to public opinion? I wonder if President Lai’s various somewhat contradictory statements can really protect Taiwan’s security? On the Huangpu Campus Anniversary In fact, we also discussed a lot of remarks yesterday , especially Ma Ying-jeou's statement to attack the criticism of capitulationism. He talked about reaffirming that the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China are not affiliated with each other. Of course, Gu Lixiong was here. When answering questions from the Legislative Yuan, they said that what Lai Ching-te meant was that only those who accept capitulationism would say that the first battle is the end of the battle. So the implication is that we cannot accept his simplified thinking. So , was Tsai Ing-wen's national defense report in the past a capitulationism? Because this is A report from the National Defense Policy Research Institute during President Tsai’s term said that it was actually the mainland military ’s strategic goal of winning the war , so it did not accept that the first battle would be the end of the war. What should we do? Ma Ban criticized him. This is called what our people need. Is the president avoiding war rather than provoking war ? Are these actions now provoking war? So what should Taiwan do? Should we imitate the so-called Australian army and recruit non-citizens to join the army as a mercenary system ? Foreigners, let’s join our army. This is from Opinions related to the suggestions given by the American columnist to Taiwan can be discussed. Gu Lixiong responded , but this part needs to be discussed in the long term and there are legal sources. Lawyers have to come to legislate and wait for the legislation to be completed. I don’t know how long it will take , but I can’t control the officers and soldiers or the morale of the officers and soldiers . Whether this can be improved is the key point . For example, a 24-year-old soldier serving on the Navy's Ming Chuan suddenly jumped into the sea in the middle of the night. He didn't want to be a patrol officer, but he didn't want to be a soldier. He traveled all the way from Keelung Port to Heping Island . It is estimated that I swam about 700 meters to the shore and then went to the security guard of the nearby Taiwan Shipping Company for help. I was very tired and had to run away at night. Of course, I still got caught even if I ran like this. Or maybe it was a 17-year-old boy who was stabbing an army soldier. This concept is When the army went to this shrimp fishing ground to kill and kill each other, etc. , then the safety of the officers and soldiers is a very important resource for the country . The discipline and psychological feelings of the officers and soldiers are of course more important, so Gu Lixiong's method seems to be a profitable method. The cancellation of safety returns for officers and soldiers seems to make it easy for them to take a vacation without having to tie their hands and feet. But if there is an accident or situation outside , is there a way to control it? Then Xu Qiaoxin broke the news and said that since Gu Lixiong canceled After the issue of safety reports for officers and soldiers on vacation, there are policies and countermeasures. They naturally use LINE voting to make safety reports. The middle-level officers changed the method because they have to know whether the soldiers have gone swimming or whether the soldiers have been outside. There was a conflict with someone and something went wrong. They must control it. He said because he asked Gu Lixiong how to deal with this. If he changed the approach , it would still be the same as taking a vacation and paying him back. Because this is a matter that needs to be managed within the military. How does it decide the United States? What is the attitude of the United States? The Taiwan Strait Unmanned Hell Project was reported by a think tank last time. It was reported by the US media. At that time, we focused on discussing drones. So drones are going to turn the Taiwan Strait all over the Taiwan Strait into a hell-like situation where no one can enter and no weapons can enter. But according to the latest public account of the Global Times , the Privy Council issued a document on the 10th saying not only... no It's just a drone. According to this, the Pentagon has learned from the experience of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, both in the air and at sea. In particular, it is planning to build thousands of unmanned attack boats at sea. Attack boats like this can be driven autonomously. On-site use of various environments , especially the Taiwan Strait. This report also specifically talks about this hellscape. Various combinations of air and cruise missiles plus speedboats can destroy the People's Liberation Army 's amphibious landing on Taiwan. However, this analysis believes that the US military wants to make the Taiwan Strait If a hellish scene really occurs, the key is whether there is any way to achieve mass production of these ships or various drones . This is a question mark. In addition, there is a report in the Financial Times. From the beginning when we saw this report, I felt that the source You may have to be suspicious first and not believe it all because this report quoted people familiar with the matter who revealed that Xi Jinping talked about the United States’ attempt to incite China to attack Taiwan when he met with Von der Leyen last year. Xi Jinping told Von der Leyen at that time: The United States is trying to trick the Communist army into invading Taiwan , but it will not be fooled or fall into the trap. This matter will be asked to the EU. The EU has denied this private conversation and will not make any statement or statement. But is it possible that Xi Jinping will say this? We all need to observe first. Is this another type of external propaganda and internal propaganda? We don’t know , but there has been another collision accident in the South China Sea between China and the Philippines. The so-called collision is an accusation from the mainland. It was released on the WeChat official account of the China Coast Guard. We saw the footage yesterday of the accusation that the Philippine supply ship was going to get close to the coast guard ship from the mainland. Then when it collided with the coast guard ship, he shouted, "Come on, hit me." Fortunately , there is video evidence of collisions like this . The ownership of responsibilities can be very clear , but the application submitted by the Philippines to the United Nations is to extend its sovereignty to a wider 350 nautical miles . Whether the United Nations will approve it is of course everyone is paying attention , but since the implementation of the boarding inspection regulations of the Coast Guard Act on the 15th, the most When boarding, inspecting and detaining foreigners who are suspected of violating immigration control and entering their waters, they can be detained for up to 60 days and have various powers to detain without trial. Now it is really difficult to say whether the South China Sea will be affected by such conflicts. There will be a more dangerous risk of conflict. Brother Liang, when we see the current atmosphere including Gu Lixiong or Xi Jinping’s talk, the key point is whether our military can hold it or not. How is morale because of that first battle? That is, the final battle is the National Defense Research Institute of our Ministry of National Defense in 2020. He conducted a study on mainland strategic thinking , so he said that the mainland certainly hopes to end the war in the shortest time, that is, the first battle and the decisive battle will be the end of the war. To put it simply, it is He said that he would gain an advantage in a short period of time and it would be difficult for you to reverse it , so even if you have external forces to come in to support , such as the United States, it would be too late. Ma Ying-jeou quoted that this cross-strait war is the first and final battle, which means that Ma Ying-jeou agrees with the mainland. Strategic thinking, our research results here also believe that this is the case, so Ma Ying-jeou believes that you should not expect the US military to come in and save you before it is too late, so the conclusion is to avoid war. This is the complete statement . Lai Qingde now wants to twist it into saying that you You think that the opponent is the first and final battle , so you don’t dare to fight , so you surrender directly. I don’t know how he derived this logic . In fact, I can honestly say that there was no problem with his speech at Whampoa Military Academy. He mentioned the continuity of history. This is one of the few things the DPP did to talk about the Republic of China before 1945. Although he left out the anti-Japanese part , it was behind him that he started to distinguish between ourselves and the enemy. So I think Sister Li Yanqiu is right. She said it about two weeks ago. She said that if we elected a fighting cock and he was not the president , he would go back to his true nature. She said that anyone who does not fight for the Republic of China is a fake Huangpu. This is insinuating that everyone knows it. Then she said that the first battle is the last battle. You are capitulationists, I tell you. The Kuomintang should keep this in mind. On the surface, they are attacking the soldiers who went to Guangzhou to participate in the centenary of Whampoa on the mainland. They say they are fake Whampoa. Then they say Ma Ying-jeou insinuated that he is capitulationism. I tell you this. Two smear labels will soon be attached to the Kuomintang. He has already called for war and is preparing to engage in a democratic civil war. This is the editorial of Feng Media today saying that Lai Qingde is preparing for a democratic civil war at Whampoa Military Academy and is preparing to destroy the Kuomintang. It is said that you are just producing those fake Huangpu because you are capitulationists . Think about whether this 1450 green media will be used immediately. Even the president is in such a solemn place as the centenary anniversary of Huangpu Military Academy. You are still distinguishing between ourselves and the enemy , and it is in Internally, what kind of president are you ? No wonder there are people like Shen Boyang and Wang Yichuan. Shen Boyang is your nominee. He is practicing McCarthyism without dividing the divisions. He has distinguished six types of people to do domestic surveillance. Wang Yichuan is monitoring the masses of his opponents. So your entire layout is the Lai Qingde line, the cockfighting line, the democratic civil war line. Isn’t that clear enough? Which president would engage in internal struggle in the speech at Whampoa Military Academy? I really can’t imagine how there could be such a president. Let me tell you. Would Chen Shui- bian, Tsai Ing-wen, and Lee Teng-hui do this kind of thing? You are the only one who is thinking about struggle all day long. Why is it that because 40% of the votes have become a shadow in his heart, he cannot get out, causing internal injuries to him? So his single-minded focus is to break through 50% in 2026 and 2028. This is his only goal , so in order to do this, he must fight and engage in democratic civil war. I guarantee you that the next step will be that Ke Wenzhe will be prosecuted and then continue to encircle and suppress Huang Guochang. Then he will describe the Kuomintang as fake Huangpu capitulationism. This is the line of Lai Qingde of the DPP. Will it become a 100% vote rate? Professor Lai, do you think that the Financial Times report, because we don’t know whether it is true or not , means that Xi Jinping will say such things when he meets Von der Leyen ? This quote was from the Financial Times and Von der Leyen’s office immediately They denied it and said they would not violate diplomatic etiquette. The speeches of the two leaders were leaked, but the Financial Times quoted not just one person but two or more people with knowledge of the matter because he quoted this and said what his opinion was about another person. Now, when the President of the European Commission is about to be elected, how come the Financial Times suddenly quoted an unnamed person and said this? Generally speaking, this kind of speech should be held accountable , and the mainstream media throughout Europe are reporting on it, including anti-China hatred. The hated French Broadcasting Corporation is also reporting , so many media are quoting this report. What does this mean? The editor-in-chief must also have seen the background of the person they interviewed. I believe that person’s background should be They participated in this meeting , so they released it. What we want to ask is why von der Leyen released this message at this time . She released this message when she was about to be re-elected. This means that she has emphasized that in fact, Biden wants to It triggered a war between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait , so Biden is someone who says one thing and does another. And she has begun to distance herself a little bit from Biden. That means she hopes that European people and European leaders will believe in her. She will use the European Union She will no longer give priority to the interests of the United States at the expense of the interests of the Europeans. I think this is a very subtle mobilization of political power because she wants to be re-elected . The Secretary-General of NATO has already flown to NATO. The Secretary-General of the United States was originally the one with the most influential decision-making power. However, because she was strongly opposed by Macron and Xiaozi, she now wants to stay in her current position for another five years and one year each. The monthly interest is hundreds of thousands and she is very happy. So she wants to continue to have this position. What should she do if she runs to Europe ? Xiaozi also warned her that if you run to the far right, our German tickets will not be given to you. So you can see that they are here. This game of power has already appeared , but one thing she told the people of Taiwan is indeed that the United States wants to provoke a war between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The mainland has not been fooled . The problem lies in who in Taiwan was encouraging the war and the hatred between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Is there anyone in the mainland who is advocating for the military unification of Taiwan as soon as possible ? I think everyone should understand this part. So you can see that the attitude of the mainland leaders is that we will not be fooled, we will not fall into the trap, and we will not jump into the trap set by the United States. This is why Cui Tiankai specifically emphasized at the Asia Society in January this year that the Chinese will not jump into the Americans. He did not mention them by name , but everyone knows that what he was talking about was the trap designed by the Americans. I think this is very clear, but I will add Let’s take a look at what Liangliang said about Lai Qingde. If Ma Ying-jeou is a capitulationist and I say Lai Qingde is a defeatist, you lost the first battle. So what’s the problem with your first battle being a decisive battle ? So in your first battle, you think you will lose to the end , so the Taiwan military is equal to If you lose the first battle and you can't win, you will have to engage in street fighting. How many Taiwanese people will you die in the end ? Then you still can't win. Like Ukraine, how many Ukrainians have died and they still can't win. Lai Qingde, and the Ukrainians still can't win to this day. People are still dying , so of course this first battle will not be the final battle. What does he want? Is he going to fight until there is only one soldier left? Because there has been such a situation in the military push before , asking his son to come back first,
and his grandson will come back soon , so for the military In terms of morale, how can it be good? And what are the help, policies, and methods in these talks of the civilized minister? I think that the first and final battle is to expect the enemy to be lenient. Because mainland China has this kind of fighting style , how can we break it? How do we recruit and dismantle in this way? Do we have to train with the enemy's knowledge ? We should be like this. Since he has the first battle and the last battle, this is also what our National Defense Research Institute researched in 2018 and 2020. This is what the National Defense Research Institute came out of. Then do we need to be lenient with the enemy, discipline ourselves with strictness, and train our troops with the enemy 's situation? Otherwise, I saw that our Tamsui River drove straight into the sea and patrolled the Tamsui Port. The harbor patrol didn't even notice you. You have to be with the enemy's situation , otherwise there will be no first and last battle at all . It’s basically coming . In the future , will there be taxis in the air? We call this parachute, and it’s a powered parachute. Our officers and soldiers have good water skills
, right? It looks like this, isn’t it? We should be like this. We don’t even have coastal defense. We don’t have air defense. We lost flyers on the outer islands. During the Dragon Boat Festival, we almost lost rice dumplings. The Mashan Coast is the best sentry in the world. It’s very clear. Did we train with the enemy’s situation? If we didn’t train with the enemy’s situation, wouldn’t it? The first battle is the final battle. There is no first battle at all , because when you come in , you eat your iron balls and leave. Is this what it looks like? We have to look at ourselves like this. I don’t think we should ask the CCP whether we are ready or not. Is it good for us to build an army and prepare for war? I think we need to do two things first. The first is Lai Qingde. He is the president of the Democratic Progressive Party. He should come out and apologize first, right? He looks down on the national army . They say that soldiers are rice bugs. The DPP says that soldiers are rice bugs. He is the chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party. Now that he is the commander-in-chief, he should come out and apologize , saying that soldiers are definitely not rice bugs. He should say this because he is the chairman. The Democratic Progressive Party says that soldiers are rice bugs . Why don't you come out? You are the party chairman. Why don't you come out and speak? You are the commander-in-chief and the commander-in-chief must serve the national army. He came out to speak and said that the national army is definitely not a worm. Those who join the army are all good men and they are all people who are determined to serve the country. If you want to do this, if you don’t do this , who will come here ? Second,
I think the exit mechanism should be solved first because Exit mechanism. Every year , 4,500 people come here to volunteer and all of them withdraw and leave. If you are like this, where will the combat power of the national army go ? After all, it has been hard to accumulate. If you leave , you will not recruit enough. 150,000 people are short of 70,000. 5,000 people , because our full strength is 225,000 people, you only have more than 150,000 people, you are short of 70,000 people, you have so many exit mechanisms , you have to recruit more people , so you see, there are so many problems recently, what happened in the first half of this year We haven’t fought yet, and we just talked about jumping into the sea and swimming, so we went to Heping Island. There are so many questions. Is the unmanned hell plan useful? If there are not enough people, use drones and unmanned ships. I think this drone plan is just in case. The CCP uses electromagnetic pulse bombs. What should you do? Use graphite bombs, because graphite bombs are designed to target drones. We have to think of the saying that one thing can defeat one thing. Today, there are unmanned submarines and unmanned ships, which can be unmanned. But the problem is that China uses electromagnetic pulse bombs. When it comes to war , disrupt it completely . Not all investments are gone. We need to prepare in many aspects to build an army and prepare for war. We need to think in many ways and think a lot. We must make settings based on the worst situation and then set the strictest requirements for ourselves. Training can only create combat effectiveness. If not, we now feel that it is just like what the host just said . Brother Liang also said that we are fighting internally and are not united. How about externally? I think the president should come out to unite and stop doing it. What he said about internal fighting is wrong... that is, what you said is wrong. You should come out to unite and not engage in internal fighting with the outside world. We have been engaging in internal fighting for the sake of elections and votes, and we have fought against each other. Isn’t this what our country is all about? Have you all been killed by internal strife? The president has come out and stood on the commanding heights to unite us all and have a good talk. This is a meeting in the country. Let's have a good talk. We will provide high opinions and then form national policies , and then the country will progress. In theory, this is the case, but there is internal strife and external strife. If everyone fights , the minister will ask the officers and soldiers to take a break and come back soon.
