Steve Martin on how to look at abstract art | MoMA BBC | THE WAY I SEE IT

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Steve Martin: Low on the right. Framer: Is that any better? Steve: Exactly the same as it was. Steve: Perfect! I think. Paul Kobrak: To start, could you introduce yourselves- Steve: Hi to a British audience? Steve: Okay, uh, let me think what would be a way to introduce myself to a… Hi, it’s Steve Martin. Paul: All the guests were asked to choose one work of art from the collection. You’ve chosen two. Steve: Yes. One painting is by Stanton Macdonald-Wright. They’re both American paintings, and this was done in 1917, and the one over here is done by Morgan Russell, done in 1922. Essentially minor things compared to everything else that hangs at MoMA. I thought, gee, those are, those are so, they’re like, lonely. And so I picked them. And these two artists, I believe, were both in Paris at the time. And they started working on this completely abstract system of painting. They called it Synchromism… Ann: Yes. Steve: Which is, “with color,” it means. And they come up with a fancy name for it. Ann: Right. Steve: As we all should. I don’t generally care about theories. They kind of get in the way of looking at the picture. But I think the result of working from a theory can be fantastic, but it also could be done maybe without the theory. but you don’t need to know the theory in order to appreciate the painting. I really like to look at it. And I can look at it a long time, because there’s a lot of different parts that succeed as a whole. I think of this as an intellectual painting, like a Léger, Ann: It’s the construction of the picture that he’s interested in, and that you’re interested in, right? Steve: I don’t know, but I think so. Sounds good! Ann: Sounds good. Ann: When I look at this picture, there’s a real sense of- Steve: Do you want to sing? Ann: Luckily not, but lots of motion, lots of rhythm. Steve: And there’s a lot of depth. I mean, the image goes way deep, it’s almost like, in the top there, it feels a little bit like sky. I don’t think he intended that. I hate to say this, but now I’m starting to see a landscape with mountains, sky, and water. I believe pictures reveal themselves over time. You can’t really get it in one lengthy look. You know, it’s great to be able to live with a painting or visit a painting in a museum, and go back and back and back. And the good ones really do keep on giving. It’s amazing. A picture is stationary, it’s immobile, and yet, it changes for you. But I’m just going to step back on this, because, my foot’s asleep. I just am now convinced, this is a landscape painting. This is a stream, these are jutting rocks, this is a mountaintop, that’s the sky, that’s sort of cloudy. Paul: Has it improved? Steve: Absolutely, for me. But now, I see almost like a narrative story. I mean, even the Morgan Russell is very voluminous, it’s a floating object in a way. Ann: Yeah, but I think if you came back on another day, you’d see something different too. Steve: Yeah, maybe. Ann: Right? That's - Steve: No I’m convinced. This is a landscape painting. Nothing will ever change my mind. I had always assumed this picture was one thing, and then sat here for an hour and looked at it, and it changed.
Info
Channel: The Museum of Modern Art
Views: 951,744
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: moma, museum of modern art, new york, art, artist, museum, contemporary, steve martin, comedian, comedians on modern art, abstract art, abstraction, the way i see it, bbc podcast, understanding modern art, i don't get modern art, art theories, synchromism, ann temkin
Id: ovyEMlNZlTE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 4min 2sec (242 seconds)
Published: Mon Dec 09 2019
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.