StarTalk Podcast: Cosmic Queries - Out There with Neil deGrasse Tyson

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
This is StarTalk, I'm your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson, your personal astrophysicist, and today's episode is Cosmic Queries - The Out There Edition. We're talking about not just astrophysics but the extremes of astrophysics - in space, time, and dimensions. While I have some expertise on that topic, I don't have all the expertise necessary to pull this off, so we called in my friend and colleague Janna Levin, Janna. - Neil, hey! - Okay, thank you for coming. - I love being here. - Not your first rodeo. - Yeah, not my first rodeo, but I haven't been in your office in a long time. - Okay, well, - It's fun to see it. - It's gotten messier. - Yeah. - Just so you know. - In kind of a good way, almost like a, I don't know, curatorial way. (laughing) - A curatorial way. - And helping me bring some levity to this topic is the one and only Harrison Greenbaum, Harrison. - How you doing? - Welcome. - I do think we need to get Marie Kondo up in here. - Oh really? (laughs) - To see which things spark joy. (all laugh) - It all sparks joy. - There's a conflagration of joy. - Get the hell out of my office. - Exactly. We'll barricade, we'll barricade it. (all laugh) - So you're a comedian and a magician. - Yes, absolutely. - That's crazy, dude, stay here, I don't want you to disappear. - Classic double threat. - And don't make my guest disappear today, right? - Absolutely. - Okay. - I use my powers for good, I'm a good witch. - [Neil] And so we'll find you at HarrisonGreenbaum.com. - Yeah absolutely. - Your tour schedule and everything. - And also maybe Comedy Central will book me if this is my website dot com. Which I did register. - Oh really. (all laughing) We all froze for a second. (laughs) It's a very long domain, for some reason it was available. - There was a real beat there. - Yeah (laughs) - So Janna, you're an expert on the large scale universe, on black holes, your recent book was Black Hole Blues, was that? - Yeah. You know you've said it better than anyone ever. I once got you to say the whole title which you might not remember was Black Hole Blues and Other Songs from Outer Space, and you did your best DJ voice, Neil. I can't... I don't even know if I have it recorded. - [Neil] Really. - Yeah. - Let me try it again. (Janna laughs) The Black Hole Blues , wait a minute, - [Janna] and Other Songs from Outer Space - And other songs from outer-- The Black Hole Blues and Other Songs from Outer Space (laughing) does that work for ya? - Really working for me. - You can put that on your ringtone. (laughs) - Exactly. - I'm a big fan of the blues in general so I was enchanted by the title. So Harrison, if you remember, this is also not your first rodeo, but you're not a regular on the show. For Cosmic Queries, we solicit questions from our fan base through all the social media channels and then some and you the co-host are the only one who's seen these questions. I haven't seen them, Janna hasn't seen them, and you're just gonna read them, and Janna and I will try to answer them, and if we can't answer it we'll just say, I'll say I don't know, she's not gonna say I don't know 'cause this is-- - Yeah I might just make some stuff up. (all laughing) - Make some stuff up. - Who's gonna call me out on it? - I will call your stuff out, maybe I'll call you out on it. - By then I'll be home. (laughing) - So Harrison, so what do you have for us? - Since you haven't seen these I could just be making these up. - That's true, too. - That would be hard though, I think. Yeah, yeah, alright. - Alright so we'll start with-- - We got goood people who listen in our stuff so. - The first question says how do you make Harrison a regular? (all laughing) I didn't know if that came from my mom. Definitely on the G. No, so here's a Patreon question, - [Neil] Patreon. - Yes. - Oh so you out of all those questions you went and found the Patreon question and put it first. - Absolutely, every time. - That is kissing ass, you realize this. - Gotta do it. - Okay. - Zachary Spradlen from Patreon, and thank you for supporting. The question is, given your vast knowledge of physics I'm sure they're talking to me, (Neil laughing) What are your thoughts on a holographic universe? Would 100% empirical evidence of a holographic universe change how you behave on a day-to-day basis? Imagine if we could access the universal holographic database. - [Neil and Janna] Ooh. - That's a good one. - That's like a three-parter. - Now Janna, I've tried to fully understand the holographic universe and I only kind of skimmed the surface of it so if you have a deeper, - It's pretty spectacular. - If you have a deeper sense of this I would totally wanna know. - Yeah, it's not something I specifically have worked on but I've paid very close attention to it in the hopes that one day I'll have a good enough idea to actually jump in the fray. So the way that-- - Just to be clear, so when you do your work, you're a theorist, and you're-- - [Janna] Very pen and paper, old fashioned. - Old fashioned, wow. - [Janna] Totally old fashioned, pen and paper. - So you're really cheap. (laughing) You're a not expensive scientist. - If you want to give me a grant, I can do my research. - Couple thousand dollars. - Seriously, lowest level in terms of equipment and supplies. - I think somebody'll buy you a Mac Book. I feel like somebody out there-- - At least an iPad. - Yeah. - And that's only to check my social media. - A very large iPhone, we can get this done. - We, you and I got this, we got this. So just so people know, you're a professor of astrophysics at Barnard College at Columbia University, which is right up the street here, which is great. - Right up the street, yeah. - Okay, so go on. - So-- - [Neil] The holographic universe. - So a hologram, the whole idea of a hologram is that you really have two-dimensional information but it creates the illusion of being three-dimensional. That's just what a hologram means. - Yeah 'cause when you look at it, like your credit card might have a holographic bird on it-- - [Janna] Right, but it's a two dimensional object. - My binder in middle school. - It works in two dimensions because it's flat. - It's flat, but it looks like a full three-volumed thing, okay, so the reason why these physicists coined it holographic is precisely because they're imagining that all of the information that is required to understand the universe can be encoded on just a surface as opposed to in the full space. So for a black hole this arose because if you look, a black hole doesn't physically have anything at its surface, but we imagine the event horizon as a surface, the region beyond which no information can escape. And the idea was that everything about the black hole that all the information a black hole could possibly contain is equivalent to the amount of information that can be packed on the surface and nothing more and you cannot, and they've proven this over many years, back since Hawking, you cannot have more information than the information you can pack on the surface. And the reason why this becomes-- - You're saying more information can't get into the black hole than can be stored on the surface of the event horizon. - Yes, that you can prove that the information content of the black hole scales like the surface area of the black hole, the event horizon, and not like the volume. And so the idea would be, well we could maybe make an object-- - He shook his head yeah, get that calculation. - I used to have those hologram stickers, of like, cats, does that get me anywhere close to understanding? - So you know it's one thing to kind of think about that but then it took really years before people like Leonard Susskind started saying, "Oh wait--" - Is he a physicist at Stanford? - He's a physicist at Stanford and just an incredibly creative thinker. - [Neil] Larry Susskind. - Yeah and great New Yorker from the Bronx. He was a-- - Bronx in the house - Yeah. - BX. - Bronx in the hologram. - I love Lenny's accent. - We brought him a hat up there I don't know if it shows up in the thing. - He's got that tough guy accent still. So he really started to think about this like let's say I try to have information that actually scales like the volume like so that would be a lot more information than you would think you could pack on the surface and you can prove that, well then you'd just make a black hole, and we know about black holes fundamentally that you cannot have more information in the black hole than you can put on the surface. - But what does it mean to put information on a surface that does not exist? - That's very subtle, so it's really the idea, there's two ways of saying it. One is to just say, oh, the information content of the black hole has been proven to scale like the area and then the string theorists started to think well maybe that physically means it's like there on the horizon, - [Neil] The event horizon. - The event horizon, that as something falls into the black hole, it might appear to the poor astronaut that thinks they're falling into the black hole that they have crossed the event horizon and met their fate in the interior but to us on the outside it may appear, and this is a string theory suggestion, that it's actually physically smeared on the outside, in the quantum string states that are permitted on the outside, and that it never gets inside. - So what about the fact that if I watched someone fall into a black hole, I see their time slow down? And at the event horizon it has stopped. - [Janna] Exactly. - So can we say that all this stops at the black hole as far as I can see? - I mean it certainly is driven by some of those early confusion about that. So it does seem, as far as we're concerned it never crosses. But to the astronaut themselves, - They just fall straight-- - they sail right through. So it's literally suggesting, like quantum complementarity created this whole, there are two things that seem incompatible that can exist at the same time. It's literally suggesting that the astronaut both falls in and does not. - And is smeared on the surface. - And is smeared on the surface, but there's no single person in the universe who would be able to experience both things, so no single person has a contradiction. Woo, I say it's-- - When you talk about encoding information on the surface do you mean like the way like there's a California tattoo on Adam Levine? (Janna and Neil laughing) Where we know he's from, California? - He's only tattoos on the surface, it just-- - That's all he is, there's nothing inside. - It looks like a three-dimensional body but it's really just skin tattoos. - Okay. - So tell me something, if I think people freeze at the surface, then they're not living out their lives, we're living out our lives, how could we be in the, every hologram I've seen, it's a frozen image, it's not, or it repeats in some trivial way. - So that's what we would see, we would see them freeze. - But I'm not frozen, so how can I be a hologram? - So oh, I see what you're talking, so it would be-- - Wait, wait, I don't think I'm frozen. (Janna and Harrison laughing) - So you-- - It's like the end of the Mary Tyler Moore opening credits where she like freezes with the hat? - Oh she freezes there when she flips up her hat. - Right, is that what we're talking about? - Actually, how old are you? (laughing) - I have no age. - You're just a fan of Mary Tyler Moore. - Yeah. - She was off the air since - We're at the edge of a black hole so my life is just - Since 1872 that show's been off the air I just want you to know. - So I would say the idea that holograms are frozen is just a technology problem. You certainly could make a hologram that was updating the information on the surface and therefore moving in time so it doesn't have to be frozen to be a hologram but it does have to be two-dimensional and nonetheless appear three-dimensional. - Why can't we be a three-dimensional hologram of a four-dimensional space? That's good, huh? - Um, well, that's not bad-- - That was very good. - Not bad, Neil. - If a hologram is one dimension less. - Yes, it could be the case that there's definitely-- - And are we four dimensions? - Well because - Three spaces in one time? - Yeah, so there... - [Neil] Don't go back on us on that one. - I'm not goin' back on you on that one but there is some confusion about that time dimension but you know, - [Neil] Whether it behaves as a space dimension. - It clearly does to some extent - Whether it is a full-blooded space dimension. - But to some extent it doesn't because I can turn left and right - in space - but I can't, in space, - I don't think my car has that setting (Janna and Neil laughing) but I can't go forward and backward in time, right? So I can't do both directions in time. - You have mobility in space coordinates and not in your time. - And I can see things in both directions. I can see something to the right, and I can see something to the left. I can see something in the past, whereas all light travels to the universe and gets to me, but I can not see something from the future. - So we are prisoners of the present, forever trapped between a past we cannot access and a future we cannot see. (Janna laughs) - Neil, you're such a poet. - I think that's the new opening to the Twilight Zone. (all laughing) - [Janna] Cue the music. - Okay so that's cool, so if we, so let's get back to the question, if we know. - [Janna] This one question could keep us busy the whole time. - A hundred percent, if we are a hundred percent sure that we are a hologram, should we behave any differently? And who are we a hologram to? - Yeah so this is-- - On whose black hole surface are we? - Right so then well so people have a harder time understanding holography in the cosmological context moving away from the black hole but the idea is that a black hole is the terrain on which we learn fundamental thinking, so we should use the lessons that we can only learn there, the evidence that only exists there, to understand the whole universe. - As a cue, as proxy. - Right so then we turn around and we say oh, the universe is expanding so rapidly we have a cosmic horizon. - [Neil] We do. - We do, there is a region beyond which we cannot see as long as the universe expands at this pace and the light can never get to us, race though it might, 'cause the expansion of the universe will exceed it. - So we are analogous cosmologically to a black hole. We're inside it's event horizon. - Yeah it's like an inverted one and we're inside the event horizon, and there's stuff beyond it that will never know about us and we'll never know about them and so can we make a holography of that and then yes, can I make a holography of just you and I? But you see we have so much less information than the maximum we could pack on us, that that's why we haven't tested whether or not we're holographic animals. You see, holography requires a more sophisticated thing than just, like printed words in a book, which is not holographic, but it's way less than the maximum amount of information that you can pack. And the hologram is an example of packing a lot more, right? So if you made a human being that was packing the maximum amount of information that they possibly could, they would turn into a black hole. (laughs) - [Harrison] Or they'd have a really full backpack. - Yeah, so holography doesn't say you can't have things with less information that are just not, you know, as extraordinary. It just says that's the maximum that we can have and so it's all an illusion, we really are two-dimensional. - You're flippin' me out a little bit here, so let me just say, and I'm an astrophysicist right? - Right. - So why did you all of a sudden without anybody's permission in this conversation equate matter with information? 'Cause when I think of matter, the concentration of matter, as a star guy, I study stars, you pack in the matter, and you get a black hole. Now you're saying you're gonna pack information. You get a information black hole. I mean is that the same thing? - I think that the shift that I'm feeling, and that I'm learning from other people as well is that matter is just information. So what does it mean to say, an electron is matter? What we mean is it has a certain charge, it has a certain span, - property. - It has a certain number of quantum properties, and those quantum properties qualify as information. - And it completely defines what the thing is. - And it completely, there's no such thing as an electron that's a little bit heavier, or a little bit lighter, spins a little faster or a little slower, has a little more charge or a little less charge, there's no such thing. - Every electron is identical to every other electron. - Yeah, identical. There's literally no history to it - It's like all the Kardashians. (all laughing) - Which one is that one? - Yeah the only thing that I need to know is its position in space. (Neil laughing) - Exactly. - So the idea there is that the electron is simply the collection of information about it and that is its identity and so then we start to think, well what else does it mean to be physically real is just that list of quantum properties. - [Neil] Wow. - So I think that the shift is to say, look it's just math and information. And we gotta stop thinkin' so concrete you know, feelin'. - Like physically. - Like, we know that this is an illusion. I can't put my hand through your leg even though we both know it's mostly empty space, both parts. - We are mostly empty frickin' space. - Yeah, voids, two voids. - That's the secret to one of my tricks, I won't tell you which one. - 'Cause you're also a magician, right. - [Harrison] It's all quantum. - There's a famous comment, I'm gonna paraphrase it and it might be apocryphal but it's great anyway, Rutherford, was it Rutherford who discovered that the atom was empty? I think it was Rutherford. - Yeah I mean wasn't he doing the nuclear stuff? - He did the gold foil experiments. So what you do is you get a really thin gold foil, like aluminum foil, this is gold foil, hammer it really thin. - That's what I've seen Trump wraps all his sandwiches in. - I was gonna say, aah! - Trump gilded everything. So then you hang it there and you fire particles at it and you ask, how often does a particle hit a gold atom and how often does it pass through? 'Cause you make it really, really thin, and it turns out most particles pass right through the foil. - [Janna] No damage done. - No damage done, not deflected, nothing. And he concluded that most of atoms are completely empty space, and he's rumored, the next morning, after having contemplated this, that he was afraid to step onto the floor getting out of his bed - For fear of falling in? - For fear he might fall through the floor. 'Cause he alone on earth knew how empty matter actually is. - I figured that out by looking at Republican heads. (all laughing) They're very empty. - Reading their Tweets. - Yeah exactly. - So in astrophysics there's something called a degenerate state, which is not a statement about its moral fiber, but-- - I was gonna say most comedians are in a degenerate state. - Degenerate state has to do with whether two atoms or particles can occupy the same state at the same time, the same configuration. And electrons, two identical electrons cannot be in the same place at the same time, they have to be separated. And so there's a pressure because they will not, there's a limit to how close you can get them. And now based on how you describe it I'm thinking if you do that you're putting too much information in one place. - Ooh that's an interesting idea, look at you Neil. So the Pauli exclusion principle would be caused by - An information-- - An information limit. - Wanna write a paper on that? - Let's do it, oh my God, I'm gonna be up all night now. - Let's do that. - Ah, I love it. - All of the degenerate states, it's an information problem. - I love it I think that's a lovely idea. We'll talk about that later. - [Neil] We gotta take a break. - Do I get co-credit? (Neil and Janna laughing) am I gonna be in a paper? - Yeah the credits, yeah Harrison made us laugh during this. During these paragraphs. - Moral support, I was the cheerleader. - So when we come back, more Cosmic Queries, Out There Edition. (futuristic music) We're back, StarTalk, Cosmic Queries, the Out There Edition. All parts of the universe that are far away and freaky and (laughs) we've got some good expertise for that in Janna Levin, Janna, good to have you, and of course Harrison. - Great to be here - So this is the second segment, you're reading questions. The first segment we got through only one question. - Yeah but it was a doozy. - It was a doozy, all about holograms. So what else do you have for us? - This is from Facebook, from Nate Gadeoso, and he said could the entire known universe be the result of a white hole? - Ooh. - [Janna] Ooh, you wanna try it? - Ooh, ooh. Well let me put white holes on the map and then you take it from there okay? So back in the 1970s, when the mathematics of black holes was being explored and formulated, it might have been late 1960s, but it was not deep back in the century, it was like that late, if you will. People noticed that the equations that give you a black hole have a legitimate opposite solution to them. So let me test, Harrison, let me test your 9th grade math knowledge, you ready? - Okay. - Okay what's the square root of nine? - Three. - Okay so what's three times three? - Nine. - Okay, what's negative three times negative three? - Also nine. - So nine has two solutions, doesn't it? - Right. - Right? Square root of nine is negative three, - Plus or minus, yeah. - Yeah, and positive three. So we only gave you one solution, the solution you preferred, but there's the dark side, the negative side, so some questions in science, the mathematics of them reveal that there are two answers that are completely authentic and legitimate. And when people were studying black holes and the mathematics of black holes, a second, in Einstein's equations, a second solution emerged, that was everything a black hole is except the opposite of that. So things only ever came out of this space. And so it would be white, if you were to look for it in the universe. So they said let's look for these things, and people thought maybe quasars which are very bright distant objects in the universe, maybe those are the white hole versions of black holes, and then so we have a white hole and black hole, maybe they're connected. And this was the introduction of a wormhole. Wormhole would connect a white hole to a black hole. Everything goes in the black hole, comes out the other side. So we looked for the properties of a white hole, quasars did not satisfy those properties, and we kind of gave up on 'em. So no one's lookin' for white holes anymore. So that's the farthest I can take it. - Wait, so it is a really intuitive idea. - [Neil] Did I get anything wrong? I think I got - No, yeah, that sounds great. It's very natural to imagine so let's say everything falls into a black hole and you think, it goes where? And that's the whole crisis about the black hole is not the event horizon and all that-- - That's a thing, the hole crisis? (all laughing) - The H, I dropped the W. - The hole crisis. - The word must have gotten stuck in my head. So the idea would be that you can sew on a white hole onto the interior of a black hole and it kind of makes sense because these singularities that people run amok on the streets because they don't want them to exist in nature and they probably don't exist in nature, and the singularities are so problematic that wouldn't it be better instead of having this infinite energy, infinite curvature of space, - [Neil] Infinite density. - Infinite density, literally a hole in space, like the matter gets there in finite time and then what? You don't know what happens to it. Sort of like a cut in space, it's something where physics breaks down, fundamentally. So people had the idea well let's get rid of the singularity and sew the black hole onto the big bang which is also a singularity and so you get rid of both and you repair it in some sense. - Do you think at the center of the black hole it births another universe? - Yes, so that is really-- - See how casually she just said that? (all laughing) Talk about inventing a whole frickin' universe, "Yeah, of course, you get a black hole." - Yeah whatever, so. - I'm still stuck on the plus and minus negative three. - What I love the most about that is it means that the black hole, small is it might be on the outside, So let's say our sun became a black hole by some intervention, 'cause it wouldn't naturally collapse to a black hole, it's not big enough, but if it were, it would be only about six kilometers across, be a very small object on the outside, but on the inside it could be as big as a whole universe, so it's like Doctor Who's TARDIS. - I was about to say, I was so excited, I was like that really sounds like a TARDIS. - Yeah that's hittin' geek buttons right there. - It's bigger on the inside than the outside suggests, and one way it could be bigger is it could be a whole big bang, it could be a whole universe. The reason that's sort of fallen out of favor is because there are reasons to suggest that if that were true the universe would become very unstable to these things. Because if there's just some random probability for a black hole spontaneously creating a universe in its interior, it would be, even though seemingly unlikely, it would just be such a, what's the word I'm looking for, such a enormous proliferation of them that it would actually make the world unstable, and so it's sort of fallen out of favor. - We don't want that. - It depends on who you ask. - There's enough instability in the world. - I'm all writing this for my new screenplay called The White Hole. - So some old fashioned relativists who only think about space and time still like the idea - Relativist is someone, an expert on Einstein's Relativity Theory. - Yes and studies primarily space time. And those who study things like string theory and particle physics are more skeptical about the idea because their work seems to suggest this instability. So sometimes the counts are split on this stuff. It can-- - Could be a very tense dinner party. - (laughing) yeah. - So what you're saying is wherever there's a black hole there's another universe. - [Janna] If that's the case, yes. - So this'd be like a Swiss cheese in the higher dimensional, - That's right, but that universe, okay so space and time switch places interior to the black hole so while you're imagining a universe which is spatial, the black hole would be in its past and therefore inaccessible. So it would look like the big bang was solely in the past, it wouldn't be a place you could go to in the new universe. It would be a time in your history. (Harrison laughing) - We gotta take a break, no (laughing) - And they're just now getting rid of CBD products in New York? Oh man, the timing's terrible. - No, just if I repeat what I think I heard you just say, if you fall into a black hole, the universe you came from, you will see the entire future history of the universe unfold in front of you in an instant. - Yes, so the black hole's bright on the inside. - Bigger and brighter on the inside. (Janna laughing) Yeah, there you go. - Yeah. - Alright gimme another question. - That's good, I just don't wanna let any of the alt right know about this white hole, 'cause they'd be like see I told you there's another one. Alright, what's your, this is from a Patreon candidate, contributor, Frank Kane, which I think, is he related to Bob Kane? That's the guy who made Batman. What's? Probably not but Batman shout out. What's your take? - [Neil] Probably not. - But if a whole universe can fit in a black hole. - [Neil] Plus he's The Batman. - That's your. - [Neil] The Batman, right? - What is your take on negative mass? I've read that if it exists we can hold open wormholes, travel backward through time, make a warp drive and all sorts of crazy stuff. If the math says possible do you think that means it really is possible? - Woo, so start there first. If you have a mathematical understanding of a theory that is working, does everything that comes out of the math have to be true? - I mean, we don't obviously know the answer to that question but it does seem like nature always finds a way. I mean we've been sitting here - I've seen Jurassic Park. - talking about black holes, yeah. (all laughing) - Right. So black holes were originally just a thought experiment on paper and you know Einstein thought nature would protect us from their formation, he didn't actually think they were real. He thought the math was accurate and beautiful and interesting and important but not that it could possibly form. - He could have predicted black holes and just the idea was so preposterous. - He literally said well there's much more important things to think about right now, and the fact that nature figured out a way to make 'em by killing off a few stars is just kind of amazing and it seems to happen over and over again, these seemingly implausible concepts, end up being challenged by our limited intuition, our limited intuition is challenged by nature actually doing it. - The point is the universe is big enough with enough things happening that even a completely rare thing is gonna happen. Or unlikely thing. - Now I'm gonna contradict myself and say now that I'm playing devil's advocate I would say, you know, the square root of two, you asked about the square root of nine, the square root of two I would say doesn't exist in physical reality as far as we know. It's only in our minds that it exists. - Right, it's not a thing. - I can't make anything that has length square root of two because it will eventually end at some finite digit which is an approximation of square root of two but it's not square root of two. - The decimals go on forever, like pi. - Yes in irrational numbers the decimals go on forever, but any length of any thing or any measurement of any kind will only be a rational number and an approximate to an irrational, maybe. So we can't measure pi, ever. And we can't measure anything with square root of two length. - Bummin' me out. - And so, then - I want a pie with the diameter pi so it just goes on forever. You'd always be baking it. - So you can say well that maybe I just gave you an example that proves that not every mathematical concept can be realized in physical reality. - Okay but I'll give you a pass that one. What do you call it, in golf what's it called? Give you uh, a...? - Oh God, you're asking me sports questions. (Neil laughs) I remember in high school I was into the coach. - Thank God you looked at him. - [Neil] Mulligan, I'll give you a Mulligan, I think it is. - There you go. - So alright, so now tell us about negative mass. - So negative mass is problematic. - Does it exist in anybody's -- - Not that we know of, we have seen negative energies in very subtle contexts where you have two plates that are very close to each other where you can create a negative energy in the quantum states between the plates. - So these are, this is when-- - I dated some girls with negative energy. (all laughing) - So you're talking about like a capacitor plate, like metal plates, you get 'em really, really close, so that they're closer to each other than the wavelength of the particles in the matter that comprise them. - Yeah in some sense, it's like saying if I can't have a water wave between two walls whose wavelength is longer than the width - Than the walls. - between the walls, exactly. I mean, not a standing wave. And so the idea is that it prunes some energy, meaning that in some sense there's less states on the inside because of this than there are on the outside where you have a whole continuum of possibilities. - So that's negative energy between two plates. - It can create under certain circumstances a negative energy, and then you'll see a pressure on the plates. - Alright, so-- - The plates'll either push apart or move together. - If matter and energy are equivalent, E equals MC squared, if you're gonna give me negative energy, why can't you hand me negative mass? - Yeah I mean, it-- - There. (all laughing) - Well here's, okay, so here's the problem with the negative mass is that it seems highly unstable. So if I literally had a particle like the electron whose fundamental mass was literally negative and whose E equals MC squared energy was literally negative in that sense, then it would be possible to make tons of these and balance it with the generation of positive energy, respect conservation of energy, right? So then I could get an infinite energy resource by making negative energy particles because that would have to, by energy conservation, lead to the creation of a positive energy somewhere. So runaway argument would be-- - And then when you bring them together they annihilate, and then you have-- - Well I don't know, maybe they're not antiparticles, maybe they don't annihilate. They just might have negative mass. So in other words, I could have zero energy in my laboratory and I could have the best energy company conceivable. - Starting with zero energy. - Zero energy, it costs me nothing to make negative energy particles because I just have to create, whether I like it to not, positive energy in response, meaning I can generate incredible positive energy at essentially no cost. And that is just not, it would be so unstable. - [Neil] It's not stable in the universe. - It sounds good at first, like we power New York City at no cost. We get rid of fracking and coal and all of these you know, fossil fuels, but we also destroy the universe in a completely unstable event where the negative energy runs out of control, creating infinite positive energy and the whole thing blows up. - Harrison, I think it was-- - That sounded like the plot of a super villain. (all laughing) I think I've seen this in a Spider-Man film. - You're going to after this episode airs, I'm sure. - I think it's Kurt Vonnegut that one of his books, I don't remember which book said the last sentence ever spoken in the universe was by a scientist (laughing) who says to the other scientist, "Let's try it this other way." (all laughing) This is the scenario you just described. - Yeah, exactly. - The whole universe goes unstable and disappears. - So some people say, look, I have an observation that proves that there's not negative mass particles, and that's the fact that the universe appears to be stable. - [Neil] And we're here. - For, you know, for 14 billion years. - [Neil] Wow. - Pretty good. - Alright, gimme another one. - [Harrison] Alright, we got Mike Berry-- - This stuff is out there, squared. - [Janna] I'm lovin' it, this is right up my alley. - Man. - I was worried you were gonna ask me about stuff that happened more recently than like half a billion years ago, in which case I'd be lost. - Oh yeah, no, no, then I'd take care of that one, I'm good with that. Alright. - We have Mike Berry on Facebook and he said, "I've never heard this explained. "If the observable universe is roughly fifteen billion "years old," as you've just said, "and if a star like ours lasts 12 billon, "how can our sun be a third generation star?" - Oh! - So I would say 14 billion is a little bit closer, a little bit less than 14 billion. Because what's a billion among friends? - Between friends, between astronomers. - Yeah among astronomers. - Yeah, we're around a third generation star, so the life expectancy is not relevant to what generation you are, so there, because the generation that we speak of is we think of the stars that create the elements that are then scattered back into the universe and give another generation this enrichment. Those stars live, hundred thousand, a million years. - They're much shorter lived, - Much shorter lived - Because they didn't have the heavy elements, precisely because they were first generation. - Yeah, so you get the high mass stars, don't live very long, and fortunately they blow up. (Janna mumbles) If they didn't blow up, they'd keep their heavy elements and the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon that's in our bodies, would be forever locked in stars and the universe would have never had life, would not have even had planets. - Mm-hmm. - Because these high mass stars make these elements and explode, scattering their enrichment across the galaxy it enables the next generation of stars to have slightly more of this, the next generation of stars have even more, so that you'd expect the frequency of planets and other interesting chemistry to take place will all the elements on the periodic table, the later your generation is, the more chemical latitude you have. (Janna laughs) - This is also the story of the Greenbaum family. - Oh is that right? - The previous generation living shortly, exploding. - Oh, I get it. And you are particularly enriched. (laughs) - A lot of chemical latitude. - We've got time for one more before we take a break. - Sure, we got Jezebel Lorelei from Facebook and she writes, - What, that's a real name? Jezebel Lorelei? - [Harrison] Yeah. - Whoa that's a movie name right there. - [Janna] Yeah. - What's the smallest a black hole can be and is there a name for the atom that is one neutron less than that atomic weight? - Wait, say the last part again? Is there an atom on the periodic table that's one neutron less than that atomic weight? Was that the question? - So it's, what's the smallest a black hole can be and then is there a name for an atom that is one neutron less than that weight? - It's definitely less than a neutron's weight. Wait, so no wait, actually it's not, no. - Are those two different questions? - There's a comma in it. - There's a comma? - They've been jammed together. - Don't you know the trick of answering the question you can and want to? - Yeah, yeah, sure. - Regardless of which one you've been asked? - Yeah okay, she's just gonna answer the one she knows she can answer. Okay, go. - So I can't remember - Just the smallest black hole just the smallest black hole. - The actual number. So we do know that it is conceivable, well we don't, okay. It is conceivable that a microscopic black hole could be made under very extraordinary conditions. Now, we say that the limit of the mass of it is related to the strength of gravity and that gives us a scale of how heavy it could be and it's heavy compared to things like electrons but it's incredibly light compared to - [Neil] Golf balls - Anything, right, else on the, exactly. So I think it's about the weight of a little pile of sand. Imagine a modest pile of sand. That would be about the weight it could maintain and be consistent with what we think is the limit of the strength of gravity and it would be an incredibly tiny, microscopic black hole. I mean, I can't even. - Oh yeah, it'd be really small, yeah. The event horizon size of the black hole - It would be really small. - But wait a minute. - I should know the number, 10 to the, what is it, 10 to the minus 45 seconds after the big bang was around the time of quantum gravity so if I multiplied that maybe by the speed of light I would roughly get the size of a black hole or something like that, but anyway you can ask me, ask me later, I'll crunch some numbers. - Okay, ten to the minus fifteen meters or something. - Yeah. - So but, black holes evaporate so they can become so small that they don't exist at all. - Oh, good point. So those black holes are incredibly unstable to evaporation. Because the idea that Hawking foisted on its head, - [Neil] The late Stephen Hawking. - The late Stephen Hawking, the amazing Stephen Hawking, that black holes, although they let nothing out, they somehow still evaporate. That tremendous paradox that we've been grappling with since the 70s. He also realized that the temperature is colder the bigger the black hole. So they evaporate more slowly, the bigger they are. So we've never seen astrophysical black hole evaporate 'cause they're way too cold for us to perceive the evaporation. - [Neil] That's the big ones, yeah. - The big ones that are made by dying stars. A microscopic one made in the early universe would presumably evaporate in an instant. And it would be, so people have looked for that, they've looked for little explosions, higher energy explosions in the very early universe, to see - Gamma ray bursts. - if there were primordial black holes. - Small bursts, but we haven't found them though. Yeah yeah yeah. Oh right, yeah we gotta wrap up this segment of Cosmic Queries The Out There Edition We'll be right back. (futuristic music) - StarTalk, Cosmic Queries, The Out There Edition. This is the first time we've done an Out There edition, I think we have to do this more often. - This is fun. - And Janna you are like a neighbor up the street at Barnard in Columbia, so we'll just. - Yeah absolutely, I just take a stroll. - [Neil] Yeah yeah we'll have to like have a bat signal. - Just stroll down the park. (all laughing) - Are you out there? We need you here for an Out There. And Harrison again thanks for bein' on StarTalk. My Pleasure. - So you got cosmic queries for us, what do you have? - Oh yeah, we got-- - Let's make this entire segment the lightning round. - Absolutely. - Oh we're gonna be faster. - They used to give me a bell, I don't know what happened to my bell. But a lightning round, so this will just be more sound bite answers, just so you can get to more questions. - Totally. - Absolutely. We have Tony_LE738 on Instagram, Says, is there an opposite to a black hole that just spews out things? - White hole. (Neil and Janna laugh) - Been there, done that. - I think it just spews out endless garbage. No, okay. Ben Ratner at Ben Makes TV on Twitter, what is your favorite recipe for a good soup? - Ooh, it would be, primordial soup. - Nice. (laughing) - I didn't mean to step on your announcement, I was reading it out loud. - Oh yeah for me a good soup would be all the basic ingredients that are foundational to biochemistry. Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen. Carbon is the stickiest element on the entire table. It can make more kinds of molecules than any other elements combined so gimme a soup with carbon, nitrogen and oxygen in it and I can show you life. - Can you read the ingredients of the primordial soup, does yours have the - [Neil] The ingredients? I used to be able to, let's see. - Is this a real one? - Oh yeah, okay. Quick and easy instructions. Mix soup, one can of sea water, okay? Lightning, heat, uncovered in early years. (laughing) This is like the early earth year. For two to three millennia. Save the simple molecules to form larger more complex molecules. For creamier soup, use one can of organisms. (all laughing) So that'd be the best kind of soup at all. - I prefer a split pea. - [Neil] Alright keep goin' Harrison. - Alright we got Joshua Willham from Facebook. - [Neil] We're still in quick mode. Lightning mode. - Yeah, if you could suddenly know the answer to any question, what question would you choose? - Suddenly knowing the answer is so disappointing. As a scientist the whole fun is figuring it out. I didn't know if I'd suddenly wanna know the answer to any question other than when's my Uber coming or something. (all laughing) - You just have to look at your phone. - Yeah that's not a mystery on that one. - They have physics that are unbelievable where the car just jumps through a building and you're like that was some physic impossibility. - Or it just does a flip around and you know. - Did Uber discover a black hole in the city, I dunno how it jumped. - Worm hole, worm hole through the building. Still, for me the answer I want is to the question we don't know yet to ask. - [Harrison] Ooh. - Would you recognize it if you heard it? - Because the day we learn what that question is I no longer care. I'll await the day when the next question comes that I didn't know to ask. And this is strongly resonant with Janna's answer, where the quest to the answer, science is not so much about answers but the search for answers and that's where you learn, you stumble on things, you discover the structures of things you didn't even know that was a question you needed to ask. So yeah I'm all into the search. So these are-- - I'd like to have the answer, just not suddenly. - [Neil] But not sudden. (laughs) - I don't want it to be never either. Never is frustrating. - Very good, that's a very healthy posture. Otherwise there's a psychological problem you're having. - Yeah there is, yeah exactly. - I like an escape room so within 60 minutes, that's when I wanna get the answers. Alright we got Scott York on Instagram. Could dark matter or dark energy be any indication of alien technology that is beyond human comprehension? - Ooh. Go. Don't look at me! - This feels more like a Neil. - Okay here's what I would say, I'll give you my answer but I wanna hear your answer, okay? Just because there's something in the universe we don't understand, doesn't mean it's aliens. (laughing) It doesn't mean it's magic. - Otherwise my VCR was made by aliens. (All laughing) - Right, you still have a VCR? - Exactly, the fact that I have a VCR-- - We really need to get you that grant, my God. - Would reflect alien intervention somehow. - First you talk about Mary Tyler Moore, you're talkin' about VCRs, how the hell old are you guys? No. - Oh sorry, my beeper went off. (all laughing) - Oh, the beeper. So I think, wait what was the question again? - [Janna] Could dark matter and dark energy be evidence of aliens? - It's tempting, it's always tempting to ascribe something completely extraordinary as the cause for something we don't understand. We've been doin' that forever. But as a scientist you have to resist that because the history of that exercise is one of abject failure persistently. So to say it was actually magic, or it's actually God, or it's actually an alien, and then you study it and it's reducible to known forces, or maybe you'll discover a new force but it's still not magic, it's still not God, and it's still not aliens. So if I'm betting I would say it's probably not as much as we would really love it to be. - Now the place we should be lookin' for aliens is a place we actually know where to look which is on exoplanets and that's where there really is a very serious prospect that there are aliens. Now, having said that-- - [Neil] These are planets orbiting other stars. - Yes, exactly, planets orbiting other stars. We think that in our Milky Way of which there are hundreds of billions of stars that there are probably more planets than there are stars in the Milky Way and so that's suddenly a stunning number that we didn't realize, what, 20 years ago. - Yeah but you're just talking about some kind of living organism. - Right, I was gonna say, don't be disappointed. - We're talking about aliens, we're talkin' about - yeah, we can talk to 'em - Serious ray gun aliens, ya know? - Absolutely. - The aliens, right. - Area 51. - I know. They're probably - Abducted - More like the kind of thing you wipe off your shoe, which is sad. - Yeah, exactly. - That's for sure. - Some primordial ooze that is itself the mat of life. You're so un-fun with that. It's true but un-fun. - Who knows? - A book that says How to Serve Man but turns out it's a cookbook. Alright, K Fudge from Instagram, how many black holes are there? - Kate Fudge? - K Fudge. - K Fudge. - [Neil] Oh excuse me I thought you said Kate Fudge. - Somebody's hungry. - [Neil] Alright. - How many black holes are there? - So in our galaxy, we just said that there are a few hundred billion stars in our galaxy. About 1% of them at the end of their lives are going to be big enough to collapse all the way through to become black holes. And so that's a lot, right? - Yeah 1% of a hundred billion is a billion black holes. - It's a billion black holes, and in addition to that we know there are tens of thousands of black holes around the super massive black hole at the center of our galaxy. So the center of our galaxy harbors a black hole a few million times the mass of the sun and it has tens of thousands of black holes specially segregated around it. So that's just our galaxy. Now you're saying in the observable universe there are as many galaxies as there are stars in the Milky Way. You got a lot of black holes out there. - And all evidence shows that every red blooded galaxy like the Milky Way has got a super massive black hole in its center. - Yeah so we've got hundreds of billions of those and hundreds of billions times a billion of the smaller ones. - Surrender now. (all laughing) - Is that like the worst Milky Way? Like a Milky Way candy bar that's realistic has a black hole in the middle of it? No thank you. On the black hole tangent, Tony, I'm sorry, Jeek.2 at Instagram, wrote "can a black hole eat another black hole?" And if so, - Oh yeah. - Would it lead to its growth? - Absolutely. - Like a Pac Man theory of black holes. - Absolutely, one of the most-- - Pac Man, your references are so classic old! I love it - Pac man! - But I have to make fun of it 'cause we had - Can we come to your house and see what you've got the set up there? - I've been to a couple of 80's escape rooms recently so it's on my mind. - Do you have a cell phone? (all laughing) - It's very large. - Wait, what was the question? Oh yeah, black holes eating other black holes. That is one of the most exciting things that's happened this century, is the direct recording of the sound of space-time ringing due to the collision of two black holes, which if you want to call it them eating each other you could. They merged and they created a bigger black hole so each one was about 30 times the mass of the sun and so we know that there is a black hole out there in that rough direction, as far as we can ascertain, that is 60 times the mass of the sun, and yes they get bigger, they get bigger by almost as much as you would think. The energy that they lost in terms of like, literally, E equals MC squared energy that wasn't the sum of the parts came out in this ringing of space-time. And it was recorded by LIGO, this fantastic instrument. It happened in, must've been 2015. - It's a new window to the universe that's measuring the ripples in the fabric of space rather than the ripples in the energy of light. - And this is what Black Hole Blues was all about, I was writing it while they were on this campaign, yeah. - Your book. - And they hadn't succeeded while I was writing and I was really writing it, precisely ties in with what we were talking about earlier about the pursuit. And you know it was 50 long years that they strove to build this instrument and get this detection - So wait a minute your title of your book is Black Hole Blues is that 'cause you didn't think they would find it? - Yeah. - And then they found it and now your book has the wrong title. - Yeah, so amazingly, Rai Weiss, who won the Nobel Prize alongside Kip Thorne and Barry Barish for that discovery, said to me about a month before the detection occurred, "If we don't detect black holes, this thing is a failure." And so I got the title, really thinking about Rai saying that. That he's now in his 80s, he started this as a young man, and it was the Black Hole Blues, but they told me well before the book came out, they told me about the detection, so I didn't wanna re-write it, 'cause I think it is all about the pursuit, but I did have a lovely close where they make the discovery. - Okay, I didn't get to that close yet in your book. - [Janna] Yeah (laughing) - Now I'm gonna go ahead to find it. Gimme more. - Alright, we got Michelle Akempura from Facebook, "if everything is supposed to be expanding away from each other how come our galaxy is on a collision course with Andromeda?" - Okay, I got this. I got this. - I'm gonna have to throw down after. - I got this. So the expansion of the universe, is think of it as a stretchy fabric that if, and it doesn't matter where you are, you'll think you're at the center of that stretching and you'll see objects moving away from you in every direction. Objects that are near you will not be moving away as fast as objects that are farther away. 'Cause every, let's say for every meter it stretches ten centimeters, okay? Well that means at two meters it stretches 20 centimeters. At three meters it's 30 centimeters. That's how stretching works in the fabric. So, all galaxies have speeds relative to each other. If you have a nearby galaxy it's goin' faster than the stretching speed of the universe in the space near me, so my gravity overcomes anything the universe is doing for things nearby. So nearby galaxies are goin' on like the universe is not expanding, they don't really care. Their gravity is strong enough to create motions that overcome the expansion of the universe itself. But we're not gonna collide with a distant galaxy 'cause the stretching of the universe is taking us away faster than that can ever happen. - I just wanted to make reference to, I think it's Annie Hall, the line where - [Neil] Oh okay go on. - The character won't do his homework because he's, - The kid, the kid - because the universe is expanding, and his mother says "you live in Brooklyn, Brooklyn is not expanding!" (all laughing) And it's true, Brooklyn is not expanding for precisely the reasons Neil just gave that the earth is bound together more strongly than the expansion can tear apart. - [Neil] Universe in this section, the expanding universe is not gonna break apart the earth. - Yeah. - But now a bunch of developers have bought Brooklyn and it is expanding at an incredible pace. (Janna laughs) Alright so we got, - It's gotta be fast! - Kyle Toth from Venice, Florida. "What lies beyond the observable universe? "Do we have an estimated size of the entire universe?" - Ooh. - I love this. - Janna take it. And by the way, but we're still kind of in speed mode but we're gonna end with your answer to this question. - Okay, lovely. - No pressure. - That's a lot of pressure. It is conceivable that the universe is actually finite in the same sense that the earth is finite. If I leave New York City and I walk in as straight a line as possible, and I go for as long as I possibly can, I come back to New York city again. It is conceivable - Without ever falling off an end. - Without ever turning left or right, falling off an edge, going forward and backward. - So you can walk forward forever. - Forward forever, it just keeps coming back around and around - In a finite space - and around again. Now if the whole universe is like this I literally would leave the Milky Way in a spacecraft, I would travel in a straight line, watch the galaxy recede behind me, not turn left, not turn right, never stop, forward, not fall off the edge of the universe, but see the Milky Way approach in front of me again. - What? (all laughing) How many, how many-- - We need a mic drop on this, alright here. (imitating banging) - There you go. (all laughing) - Did you hear it? - That was an audio mic drop right there. - How many seasons of this podcast would you have to listen to before you saw the Milky Way again? - That's right, we would look back and because light has a finite travel time we would hear podcasts from our past, like you could look back and see yourself as a child if you waited long enough for the light to come back around again. - From the other direction, yeah. - From the other direction, and so we could actually resolve serious quandaries by being like, well if we wait a billion years we can actually watch it again. (laughs) - Just to get to the arguments made about who said what over dinner. - To see what really happened. Exactly. - Exactly. - Who broke the plate, right? - There's a sad old astronaut alone like, "I told you, Janice. This was all worth it." - So but okay so that's a finite universe but just as equally the universe could be infinite and we're just our own observable pocket within some infinite universe. - Right it is also possible, that the universe is infinite and beyond the observable universe is this infinite stretch of space. But you know, Einstein said "only two things are infinite, "the universe and human stupidity." And then he said, "I'm not so sure about the universe." (all laughing) - That sounds like we should end on that note doesn't it? - Einstein mic drop. - Wow, that was Cosmic Queries, Out There Edition, our very first on that theme. But clearly we're gonna have to do this again. 'Cause there's no end to those kind of questions, particularly if we get Janna kinda answers right there. Janna it was great, and I've been loving your book, - Thanks it was fun. - [Neil] The Black Hole Blues. (laughing) Harrison thanks for coming back on StarTalk. - Oh my pleasure. - [Neil] And HarrisonGreenbaum.com, look for where you, for your stand up gigs, and you're also a magician. - Absolutely. - [Neil] Like as you said, that's the double threat. (laughing) - Very common. - Very common, very common. And I've been your host, Neil deGrasse Tyson. This has been StarTalk. And as always, I bid you to keep looking up. (futuristic music)
Info
Channel: StarTalk
Views: 324,509
Rating: 4.8684616 out of 5
Keywords: StarTalk, Star Talk, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Harrison Greenbaum, Janna Levin, far out, theories, holographic universe, time dimension, white holes, black holes, negative mass, theoretical physics, dark matter, dark energy, sun, time, gravitational waves, LIGO, Black Hole Blues and Other Songs From Outer Space, Andromeda galaxy, observable universe, Milky Way, science podcast, space podcast, astronomy
Id: lK1lQvO8Rbs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 50min 46sec (3046 seconds)
Published: Tue Apr 16 2019
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.