Stanczyk or the Sad Clown Paradox

I find this painting extremely powerful. Its composition, its colour palette and  its subject matter all come together to   make this one of the saddest paintings I’ve seen. But this painting is different from any other  paintings we’ve seen on this channel so far.   Usually when I find an interesting painting  and do research on its background and context,   I find it even more appealing; I feel like I  discovered a whole new perspective on this work   of art and it makes me enjoy it even more. When I  did research on this painting, that didn’t happen. It was painted by Polish artist Jan Matejko who  became known for painting historical scenes. For   example, The Sermon of Piotr Skarga won the 1865  Paris Salon’s gold medal. Two years later, he won   another gold medal at the Paris World Exhibition  with his painting Rejtan, or the Fall of Poland. Stanczyk, which is what this painting  is called, was made early in Matejko’s   career. He was only 24 when he painted  it. Stanczyk is the name of the subject;   a famous court jester who became known by  performing during the Polish Renaissance   under King Sigismund I the Old. He wasn’t only an  entertainer, as you might expect from a jester,   but he was also extremely smart and would,  through his performances, do social commentary.   He’s considered now more like a cultural  icon in polish culture and appears in books,   plays and, of course, paintings. Matejko  represented him in different scenes such   as The Hanging of the Sigismund bell, The  Prussian Homage and Gamrat and Stanczyk. Matejko’s most notorious scenes  are usually extremely busy with   many figures and a lot of action,  but Stanczyk is very different in   that regard. Instead of being the depiction  of a public event, it’s much more intimate;   we’re alone with the famous jester. He’s  completely lost in thought, his posture shows   despair and the fact that he’s alone and turning  his back to the party speaks of his melancholy. Alright, so here’s the historical context:  First, the painting’s full title isn’t Stanczyk,   but Stańczyk during a ball at the court of Queen  Bona in the face of the loss of Smolensk. Stanczyk   is worried for the future of Poland. They were at  war with modern day Russia and they had lost the   city of Smolensk in 1514. This is probably  what the letter is announcing. What might   be worrying Stanczyk even more, is the royal  family’s carelessness as to what’s happening   to their empire. The representation of a dwarf  carrying a lute would be, in Matejko’s time, a   symbol of decadency. Out of the window, we can see  the Wawel Cathedral where kings are coronated and,   next to it, a comet, which was actually sighted  in 1514, symbolizing the downfall of the empire. There are some historical incongruities  in this depiction. The title leads us to   believe that Queen Bona was actually the Queen  of Poland during the fall of Smolensk in 1514,   but she only became queen in 1518. The  year 1533 is also written on the letter,   which is not concordant with the fall of Smolensk. But knowing all this historical context and the  story behind this painting doesn’t, to my great   surprise, add to my appreciation of it. It’s  the first time this happens. To be honest,   I’d probably find this painting more powerful if  the cause of the jester’s sadness was unknown. Well, let’s take a closer look at the  painting to see what gives it power. Let us first look at its composition. First, there  are two backgrounds on each side of the scene. One   is showing the outdoor scenery, placing the whole  event at night, while the other shows a party and   its many guests. In the room, there’s a table with  a letter on it and, next to it, Stanczyk. He is,   of course, the subject of the artwork and he’s  placed right in the centre of it. Our eyes are   naturally driven towards him because of the  strong contrast between him and the dark wall,   which is in itself, framing him. The colours  are extremely dark. There’s a bit blue and   green around the window area, but darkness  really dominates the painting. Of course,   there’s also the red of the party and the  red in Stanczyk’s costume which, in a way,   implies that the two should  both be united, not separated. And I feel like that’s exactly why this painting  is so sad. It’s this separation between the   subject and the party. It’s the depiction of a  jester who, instead of being at the ongoing party,   is sad and lonely. He’s not only refusing to  attend it, he’s turning his back to it, secluded   in darkness. There’s a disconnection between the  party and Stanczyk, who, out of all the people in   the kingdom, should be the one attending it;  after all, it’s his job. This adds another   layer of sadness to this scene. This man, whose  vocation is to entertain people, make them laugh,   make them happy... can’t even cheer himself up.  This tragedy has an official name: The Sad Clown   Paradox. For example, a study on this phenomenon  was published in 1981 and was titled “Pretend the   World Is Funny and Forever: A Psychological  Analysis of Comedians, Clowns, and Actors”. This paradox has often been used to  trigger an emotional response in an   audience. How sad is it to see someone  working super hard to make people laugh,   yet can’t make themselves laugh. This kind  of self-sacrifice has been depicted in   Edward Hopper’s Soir Bleu, Bruce Davidson's The  Dwarf and, more recently, Todd Phillip’s Joker. Stanczyk is, perhaps, one of the  earliest depictions of the sad clown   paradox. What makes it even sadder  is that Stanczik is modelled after   Matejko himself. This could be, in a  way, a very desolate self-portrait. Now I’d like to know what you think. Did  learning about the historical context   behind this painting make you appreciate it  more? Do you believe it’s important for us   to understand the causes of Stanczyk’s  torment. What’s more important to you:   The story the painting is telling or  the emotions it’s making you feel? And as always, we encourage you to  subscribe if you enjoyed the video   and we’d like to thank Isaac and every  other patron for supporting us. If you   want to join them in their support,  check us out at patreon.com/thecanvas.

Channel: The Canvas

Views: 2,022,907

Keywords: documentary, painting, analysis, meaning, explained, Art, History, Art History, The Canvas, Canvas, Artist, jan matejko, jan matejko stanczyk, matejko, stańczyk, sad clown paradox, sad clown painting, sad jester, stanczyk jan matejko, stanczyk matejko, edward hopper soir bleu, soir bleu edward hopper, joker, sad joker, sad joker painting, sad clown, matejko stańczyk, matejko paintings, stanczyk painting meaning

Id: bvEHyeph1B4

Length: 7min 26sec (446 seconds)

Published: Thu Feb 06 2020

Reddit Comments

[u/Trauma-Hunter]

Good work!