Speaker Cables Really Don't Make Much of a Difference?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Audioholics
Views: 150,938
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: audioholics, home theater, audiophile, tech, headphones, speakers, amplifier, movies, music, audio, video, projection, bass, subwoofer, hdtv, blu-ray, dolby, atmos, cables, wire, hifi
Id: kR12Ttuxobs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 17min 13sec (1033 seconds)
Published: Thu Mar 25 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
The fact of the matter is that extremely low gauge cables can change resistance/impedance enough to eq the high end response somewhere around 0.25 - 0.5 db up on average.
You know what can also do that? Slightly toeing in your speakers. And thatβs free! Even if different cables offer some sort of eq benefit, even if it is most likely inaudible, there are free and/or much better methods to tune response whether than be DSP, placement, treatment etc.
Buy cables that look nice if you want. Nothing wrong with that. Just know that their practical benefit ends there.
If you don't think cables make a difference, unhook all of them and then tell me how good your system sounds!
Interesting though that he says to throw away the cables that come in the box because they are garbage. That means either all cables are garbage or there are better cables than what come in the box meaning there is a difference in cables. Personally I don't use the supplied cables but I don't spend a lot of money on upgraded cables either. Low mid-end I suppose, primarily because I like the aesthetics of them.
Every competent electrician ever born understands the relationship between wire gauge and amperage, yet there seem to be few electricians in the Venn Diagram intersection with audiophiles.
Disagree. Cables make a huge difference to how well you can show others you have more dollars than sense. :-)
Here we go again, Audioholics viewership must be down this month.
Absolutely incredible thumbnail. Only way it could be better is if his sleeves were torn off.
so true. I recently had classic clear wire for one speaker coz a fancy banana plug one would not reach. both sound exactly the same.
I can only assume the GR-Research / Amir video back and forth video series' is what prompted this video from Audioholics. I think it's kind of ironic that Audioholic's take on speaker cables is "this one (the kimber 8tc, the one he exclusively uses in his main system) is measurably better than other cables in terms of LCR, but since I took a frequency response measurement, and that's not very different, cables must be BS." Especially so because one of the cable kits that Danny Richie sells is literally a Kimber 8tc clone, and the other is a Kimber 12tc clone, which will be better (than the 8tc, which Audioholics deems worthy but also not at the same time) in every single aspect that Audioholics says matters (LCR measurements). I think it's almost dishonest to use frequency response as evidence against cables mattering. Obviously frequency response won't be affected by even the crappiest of cables. The debate is whether the LCR (inductance, capacitance, resistance) of a cable affect the apparent resolution. All of Audioholics measurements (except for frequency response which obviously won't change dramatically with different cables) are evidence for measurable differences between cables. If you're wondering, I'm personally from the camp of "yeah, speaker cables do matter a little bit, but shouldn't be worried about until every single other thing in your rig is perfect." To be clear, I love measurements, they're really useful for understanding what an audio device is doing, and why it sounds the way it does, not the other way around. I'm amazed that ASR types are still trying to prove that different cables don't SOUND different by taking a frequency response measurement. The entire concept of low ESR and ESL in cables and expensive capacitors isn't about frequency response, it's about the fact that every single electrical component is an RLC resonator, and the lower the inductance, the higher the cable capacitance (to a point), the more damped the resonator. I plugged Audioholics posted measurements into a simple online RLC calculator and got that the Kimber 8tc has a resonant frequency of about 80mhz, with a Q of 19.14 and the 14awg zipcord has a resonant frequency of the same about 80mhz, but with a Q of 100. So, what does this tell us? The Kimber Cable will be more than 5x more damped than the 14awg zipcord at any frequency. That's a contextualized interpretation of a measurement that's actually relevant to the subjectivist claim Audioholics is trying to refute. Audioholics has put out some quality content in the past, but I hate when these kinds of oBjEcTiViSt content creators call everything "snake oil" and that anyone who believes in it is a "shill" or scammer. Audio clearly has a snake oil problem, but in my opinion, it's equally wrong to make broad claims that "cables don't matter, all capacitors sound the same, frequency response and THD are all that matter, you can't hear below -110db," calling out more experienced, more educated audio designers that are widely praised for their skills, especially when making ad money misinforming the public (who's the shill selling snake oil now?). Most audio designers' decisions are based on an almost 200 year old theory that would be taught in any introductory analog electronics class at university, that most people could understand from watching a few youtube videos, and takes 5 minutes to verify. To all the self proclaimed objectivist publishers, you aren't even just the average consumer. This is your job, it's your responsibility to make sure you know what you're talking about. Choosing to spew this worthless misinformation makes you no better than a scientologist. I used to think Danny Richie calling people "flat earthers" was just name-calling and unprofessional, but he really has a point (I wish he could communicate it in a more professional way, but it's his brand). You can't call yourself an "objectivist" or claim that you're doing "Audio SCIENCE" when you reject the globally accepted current understanding of electrical physics. ObJeCtIvIsTs, do better.