Shocking new evidence: Madeleine McCann's suspected killer revealed | 60 Minutes Australia
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: undefined
Views: 4,784,684
Rating: 4.6225038 out of 5
Keywords: 60 Minutes, 60 Minutes Australia, Liz Hayes, maddie mccann, madeleine, madeleine mccann, what happened to madeleine mccann, mccann parents, christian bruckner, christian brueckner, who killed madeleine mccann, madeleine mccann murder, praia da luz, portugal, germany, brunswick, secret lair, sex offender jailed, kerry needham, ben needham, kate mccann, gerry mccann, where is madeleine, madeleine mccann investigation, documentary, murder investigation, german police, missing
Id: Pvqu9Wd388c
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 42min 53sec (2573 seconds)
Published: Tue Oct 13 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I think it has to do with the way Maddie was abducted. From what I gather speaking to other people near me (I’m English) it seems people are pissed off with the parents because they left Maddie & the other kids unattended on nighttime’s which the killer took advantage of.
Also it seems to upset everyone that the parents were never chastised in the media for this & a lot point fingers at the high paying jobs & status in society as to why whereas normal lower class working people would of been called terrible parents.
That’s just my take from gauging people locally
They were negligentful. There’s not really a question about that. I think that’s why. They left tiny tiny children alone. At night.
The parents get attacked because they're shitty parents.
I would like to give my perspective about this, about the case and the questions you asked. I'm not from an English speaking country, I'm from Spain, and I've always felt like non English speakers got a very different perspective of this case, at least based on conversations I've had about the topic with people from English speaking countries.
Let me preface this by saying that I don't trust the police. I don't mean only Portuguese police, I mean police in general. I could cite the reasons but it's irrelevant to this comment. But I think that pointing out the fact that i don't trust the police in general is necessary to establish that I'm not in favour of what the police did in Maddie's case. They definitely screwed up things and made everything more twisted than it already was.
That being said, I feel no sympathy for the McCann's. And although I definitely don't condone or support any attacks or harassment directed towards them, I understand the reasoning behind it.
I was a kid myself when Maddie went missing. I was 11, old enough to remember the news about it and old enough to understand how bad the situation was. I also remember feeling somewhat scared about it. The whole case made me feel threatened, like what happened to her could happen to me too. And even though I was a child myself, many things about the parents felt wrong. Like the fact that they left a 3 yo and two babies alone in a foreign country so they could have fun. I was 11 and I was rarely ever left alone at that age. The exception was when I was in my own home: I lived in an apartment building with very secure doors, and we lived in a high floor too, so the chances of anyone entering were basically nonexistent. Even so, my single mother would only leave me alone from time to time, if she had to run some errands and my much older sibling was not home. Honestly, I don't think it happened more than a handful of times. I believe that was the common thing for me until I was 13 or 14. And that was the common thing for my cousins and classmates too. It was the normal thing for all of us. We wouldn't have been left alone being 11 in a foreign country, not even for a short period of time, that's for sure.
The reality is, the McCann's and their friends left a bunch of toddlers and babies alone just so they could have fun and get drunk together. Yes, parents have the right to have fun apart from their kids, but not at the expense of the children's safety. Leaving them alone was terrible by itself, it was neglectful and irresponsible and incredibly selfish. But if you add context to what they did, it's even worse. They were in a foreign country. Their children were small, unable to fend for themselves. They were staying in a ground floor apartment with no security system whatsoever. And still, they left their kids there. Even if there wasn't any stranger nearby looking to kidnap a kid, anything could have happened. For instance, a short circuit could cause a fire and the kids would be effectively helpless, unable to get out. Even without someone actively harming the kids, the McCann's and their friends put the children in danger. And that's a fact, regardless of whether they are involved in Maddie's disappearance of not. I'm not fond of kids and I don't plan to have kids at all, but the idea of leaving a kid alone in such circumstances, particularly kids who are that young, makes my skin crawl. I'll never understand why they did it.
To me, that means they are partially responsible for whatever happened to that little girl. And that brings me to another relevant factor in regards to why they have been attacked over the years: economic privilege. They were extremely neglectful towards their kids, that's undeniable. We know for sure they were leaving very young children alone just so they could get drunk. They left those kids alone despite the fact that the resort offered a free nanny service. Hell, they could have even taken turns at babysitting themselves if they didn't want a stranger babysitting their kids. But they wanted to go out, and instead of being responsible, they left the kids alone. I couldn't wrap my mind around that when I was a kid, and to this day, I still don't understand it now. There was no reason at all to do what they did. It's unjustifiable. And to me, regardless of whether they did something to Maddie or not, that makes them partially guilty. Most of us assume Maddie is dead, and as harsh as it sounds, they will always be partially to blame for it. But they never faced legal charges for what was obviously neglect. Why? Some say it's because the disappearance of Maddie was bad enough. But some say it's because they are upper class and their inherent privilege protected them from it. Considering how the case has been handled internationally, their privilege has definitely helped them in many ways, like being able to get stuff that other parents of missing kids haven't had access to.
Because though I don’t believe they killed her, their actions absolutely lead to her being abducted. This is not a case of “everybody makes mistakes.” They made multiple choices that night that resulted in their child’s disappearance. Further, I don’t believe for one minute them and their friends were completely honest with the police about their actions that night. They knew what they were doing was very irresponsible and worried they’d get in trouble for it. Again I don’t believe they did, but it’s easy to see why people believe they may have harmed her in some way especially on accident because of their obvious carelessness. Whoever did abduct her in my opinion observed and possibly interacted with the tapas group and knew they weren’t watching their kids. It really bothers me they never got any kind of neglect charge.
I may be wrong on this also, but didn’t the McCanns also somewhat defend CB and say that the police couldn’t just go around accusing people??
Also because they still haven’t done anything about the supposed evidence. There’s tons of other cases where they’ve supposedly found whoever only for it not to be the right person.
It has been 5 months. I feel if he was the guy they would have charged him with her murder already. They say they have a strong case but all it would take would be a shred of physical evidence, like DNA, fingerprints, etc.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I can tell, they don't have any physical evidence on CB. I'm not the type to attack anyone, especially when the correct placement of guilt is so unclear, but it would be wrong to exonerate them completely at this point. The existence of a suspect who fits circumstantially is not the same as proof. Witness testimony that Gerry was seen carrying a small child down the road that night, the missing duffel bag, the presence of blood of some kind in the car trunk, and the small span of time when an abduction could've taken place leave me skeptical. Of course, some of those things may be unrelated, but we don't know. It's all circumstance and he-said she-said. It's not great to publicly vilify the parents when nothing good will come of it, but ruling them out would be a big mistake, in my opinion. Downvote me to hell if you'd like, I don't mind!
Edit: It just seems a lot like they've been searching all these years for someone with an awful, vile history that they can pin this on too, because that person is a monster regardless--they've decided it wasn't her parents and now they're in a mad dash to just get the case closed and peg someone for it. This may not be the truth, but I've got enough doubts in their evidence against CB that I think it's possible.
People attack the parents because they don’t want to believe something like this could happen to them. They convince themselves her parents must have done something wrong or had something to do with her disappearance because otherwise they’d have to accept that terrible, random things happen for no reason and sometimes there’s nothing you can do about it. It’s awful and it’s ugly, but it’s a measure of self-protection.
I'll get down voted to hell for this, but it's the truth: Her parents deserve to be attacked. I have two children. They're babies. As their mother, they rely on me to make good choices to protect their best interests. It's on me, no matter what. From putting them on their backs to sleep to car seats and everything in between until they are adults, their father and I are responsible for their well being.
Leaving three babies unattended is wrong. Period. Her safety was ultimately left to her parents and they left alone. People are capable of awful, terrible things and that should be anticipated. The least we can do is expect parents to be responsible with and for their children. We owe them that much.