Reasonable Questions for Anti-SJWs Part 1 (I'm so sorry.)

hello again this is the prim Reaper I wanted to do something a little different for this video and I'll have to apologize in advance because I know that everyone and their dog has already done their own version of it but I've wanted to respond to this video ever since it first came out and I didn't have a youtube channel back then so I'm gonna do it now damn it however since I know that everyone has done a response to it already I'm going to go ahead and speed up the original clip so that I don't have to waste as much time on the same old video so for those who are willing to indulge me here is part one of two of my answers to reasonable questions for auntie sjw's unable to understand the irony of responding to the perceived political correctness of the left with exaggerated reactionary hypersensitivity of Europe when I see people respond to instances of political correctness with exasperation they're usually doing it for one of two reasons number one they're doing it for comedic purposes you know exaggeration for the point of humor and number two they're angry because the political correctness they're criticizing at the time has the potential to lead to the legitimate cooling or even destruction of Rights and Freedoms for example poorly thought-out laws such as the UK's misogyny hate crime Fiasco or Canada's anti Islamophobia motion with the potential to restrict free speech or affirmative consent laws and universities reversing the burden of proof when someone is accused of sexual assault or rape these are perfectly legitimate concerns and they ought to be challenged wherever they arise hypersensitivity is overreacting when a man tries to explain something to you or attributing the airconditioning being turned up to sexism when you're wearing a flowery sundress and everyone else in the office is wearing a suit what hypersensitivity is not is being afraid and reacting negatively to the prospect of having your rights taken away why don't we take you three skills oh no no no what is it with you people and the colourful hair and cat eye glasses I can pick out styles and avatars and generalize it to an entire group to look at me this isn't a reasonable question Brandi sjws this is you taking a select few ante sjws who happen to use skulls as their avatars and generalizing it to everyone else - I don't know make fun of us I don't even know what you're doing with this are you trying to make auntie s JW seem edgy by virtue of their use of skulls you're not addressing any actual points with this your spot two spots actually in this video spent asking this stupid question could have been given to people at least attempting to ask real questions good job how do you define right-wing Anki sjw's often have an aversion to being labeled as right-wing yes they regularly defend the right and bash the left therefore a wife and label right-wing advancing to you I just expected right-wingers uses a pejorative can you not see how labeling people as if they giving you over dresses is also pejorative let me tell you about a few of my beliefs I support universal health care I think the idea of the universal basic income is good and eventually probably necessary ideas more jobs replaced by automation I support paid maternity and paternity care in fact things that many people in North America work too much and should probably get more vacation time in general if you were to ask me about who would pay for these things I would say that I think a flat tax rate is probably fine but I think that those that make extreme amounts of money say greater than eight or nine figures should have upper limits on the amount they're allowed to earn each year because that much money is more than the average person can even comprehend having and I really don't think that any one person or even any one family needs that much when there are people who are starving in ghettos often within view of their multi-story mansions and don't worry I'm not talking about mere multimillionaires or anything I'm just saying that I think 60 people should not hold the same wealth as 50 percent of the population that's ridiculous as a Canadian I'm not technically surrounded by guns and gun culture and I think that America has a few too many and could stand to cut back on them though I know a no right band would never work and be totally unproductive I think that we should accept refugees though I do think that we should limit the amount that we accept and I think that it's fine to accept only families so I think refusing to accept single men is [ __ ] if we're also accepting single women that is not equality ah now tell me which of those views sounded particularly right-wing to you I know that a lot of my own viewers will happily disagree with many of my views especially the one about the pay limit and you know what that's great I think that having a diversity of ideas is actually really important I don't claim to have all the answers and having people around with different political viewpoints prevents echo chambers from forming but if you call me a right winger just because I challenge feminists and sjw's I can safely tell you that you're full of baloney people in my position who challenge your labeling of right-wing aren't doing so because they're offended or have an aversion being labeled right-wing they're doing so because you're wrong it's not a pejorative to call someone a Christian when they're actually an atheist it's just wrong I feel like many of you folks read a lot more offense and Auntie sjw's than most of them actually feel I know that being offended is kind of your thing so on betting that's probably why to address your second point people labeling you as sjw's or aggressives is not the same as you labeling them right wing if you said liberals or left-wing you might have a point but the terms sjws and regressives have specific uses they're meant to be bad because oftentimes SJW told strong anti-free speech anti-male anti-white infantilizing and well progressive views these words are pejoratives because they refer to bad things get the difference rather than telling people you disagree with could drink bleach wouldn't be more productively to have natural conversation I think if you feel matter or its communicative swish okay this might be because of the people that I subscribe to but I've never actually heard anyone tell others to drink bleach far more often I see people joking about how they would like to drink bleach as in they would rather drink bleach and kill themselves instead of listening to what you have to say now we can talk about the merits of this kind of humor if you want I understand that some people hold different types of jokes in different regard but that's not what this question was referring to was it I don't want to give you zero credit I'm sure there are plenty of trolls in some common sections telling people they disagree with to drink bleach and kill themselves and as I've mentioned in previous videos these people are trolls and these kinds of low effort comments aren't worth the effort to respond to but it kind of shows your mindset here when you choose to focus on these sorts of NT sjw's rather than those making well-researched refuse to your arguments you claim to be proponents on rational logical evidence and argumentation that's great that's entirely doable but when I look at your online activity when I know that I don't know for example the Twitter thing that's often not what I say how do you reconcile it came to the evidence base and lack another negative again stuff like islands of trolling use all ends of [ __ ] posting or telia well I know I'm probably in the minority when I say this but I don't have a Twitter I've never had a Twitter in my mind I was like wow a shitty or more restrictive version of Facebook in which I have a limited number of characters to say anything sign me up or you know don't but that being said I don't understand why you would be looking on Twitter for anything resembling a rational logic based discussion there's really not a lot of room for depth in 140 characters not to mention it's perfectly okay to favor logical evidence-based discussion in general and yet behave differently on certain platforms kind of like how you can behave with your close friends in ways that you might not behave with your sweet elderly grandparents right time right place and all that some people might just use something like Twitter or Facebook for [ __ ] posting if that's their thing or they may just stick to using them for socializing with friends or organizing events looking on Twitter for rational discussion is like looking on neopets for dating services the next one is just a skulls guy again it's just a repeat of the first time he asked it and as I said it's a waste of a slot that could have been used to ask a real question next are you landing the ridiculous puzzle if you have to popularize like if de W and caption your directors had lost whatever meaning they wanted and only chose now as my children chosen pejoratives pretty rarely meaningful context ridiculous buzzwords meant to derail conversation a I'm sure this won't come back to bite you in the ass later in this very same video talk about burying the needle on the ironi meter what say I wait to address most of this question until then what I will say now is that I feel like these words with the notable exception of [ __ ] aren't as meaningless as you'd like to believe sure some people might throw them around a little more than they ought to but for the most part when I see these words use their youth consistently unlike a few others that certain other people like to throw around but like I said we'll talk later for the last time want to get review people and connect an actual literal felonies like you might want to work on that and I thought the mapper tool it would select only without diving and I'm thinking that one which I had but then assaulted a police officer and finally I was convinced I can't believe the people that made this video green let this guy these questions are actually the worst reasonable my ass what is it with you people in commuting phonies he says as he posts one individual that committed a felony if this was an anti hjw that posted one single black mugshot and said what is it with you and committing felonies you guys would flip your collective [ __ ] if I were to ask you seriously right now what is it with you people and making false rape accusations with a photo of Jack your mattress girl you would be justifiably pissed off at me for making a shitty generalization about feminists as a whole based on the actions of one or two people someone in your own video complains about being asked to speak for all other feminists you guys can't even be consistent amongst yourselves let alone ask us anything so the moral incarnate special still goes on a perfect example my sister for other than the final solution so compile or they'll just look like about like a finals position so far we are called off with far less muscular backs honest I don't know if it'll throw a little paragraph misrepresent the feminist position Oh dear me that would really be a shame to misrepresent someone else's position wouldn't it how could anyone misrepresent anyone else anyway I have in fact been taking an in-depth look at feminist issues as my first major project for this channel I have examined issues that I thought were easy pickings and issues that I felt were legitimately important I've done a fair bit of research and educated myself just a little bit more on the facts surrounding human trafficking and FGM and although I haven't covered it in my videos yet I do think that the discussion surrounding abortion is a valid concern aside from my own personal research though I take two issues with your question first of all a lot of feminists themselves don't talk about the most robust feminist issues I almost never hear prominent feminists talking about things like human trafficking or FGM at least not nearly as much as I hear them talking about frivolous or misleading crap like the wage gap or mansplaining if many people in your own circles can't be arsed to talk about them how can you ask it of auntie sjws or anti-feminist after all a large portion of content from anti-feminist comes from doing response videos to feminist videos and arguments the second issue I have is that I think you and the other people in this video could stand to take your own advice and really challenge yourself by taking up the most robust anti-feminist or MRA arguments rather than simply dismissing them as a lot of s GWS and feminists seem to do for example giving the first page of your videos yields about 33% bearing bashing videos right now don't get me wrong I've got nothing against bearing but it strikes me as odd that someone figuratively popping out their chest and asking why aren't you really challenging yourselves but the most robust feminist issues is spending so much time picking on one single anti fj-w channel maybe this is just one of those do what I say not what I do kind of deals I want both of them for Laura Bush or else in contrast I think it's a practical decision and programs out there world which is really focus on what's the profit examples are feminists and go to go to the testing nutrition especially the kind of solutions needed not necessarily guided and to show I would actually like you to let me know because I'm not hopping around representing fantasy I'll actually think that we could get something done with organic Sarla of all the people on this video this is the person I think asked the most reasonable and legitimate questions I may disagree with your views on the whole but I do think that your being the most genuine and respectful and the least smug and condescending out of everyone here so legitimate kudos to you for that they should have given the annoying blonde guy spots to you instead that's your question here I'm glad that you acknowledge and are concerned about men's issues I think it's great that you've worked with these issues in real life a potential aspiration of mine is to get into counseling for men's issues at current I'm volunteering with a crisis hotline and I'm greatly distressed when a man calls looking for shelter and I have none to offer him additionally whatever any training related to men's issues comes up I always leave it the chance to join in there was recently a men's domestic violence class and I was the only one in the course to be aware of the fact that domestic violence is approximately 5050 between men and women while I would have absolutely no problem setting aside my differences in working for the greater good to help men's issues I think that you might find more of an issue asking sjw's to put aside their differences to work for the greater good to help men's issues while equity feminists for example christina hoff sommers may work legitimately towards the goal of equality for the sexes many radical feminists which by the way is what I refer to when I use the term sjw's will instead actively sabotage talks and events involved with men's issues following the fire alarm at the University of Toronto and Ottawa University of York cancelling an international men's day event after feminist protest FEM is threatening Erin Pizzey for suggesting that they should help male victims of violence as well as women Phyllis goes on now I don't expect you to answer for these people don't get me wrong but I just want you to know that if an TF JW's resists trusting feminists that say they want to help with men's issues this is why they might be a little hesitant and this video is a little bit old by now so I'm not going to be sending anyone any messages but I hope that you've got a legitimate response to this back when it first came out yes there wait a minute because I've also heard you folks insist that you have no yesen to feminism in generally specifically third wave feminism that you have a quarrel with so what is there's wave feminism specifically and what specifically about third wave feminism do you have a comment I'm not even sure why Steve shives decided to come on this show it's not like he would actually allow anyone to respond to him anyway but in the interest of discussion third wave feminism can be pretty easily distilled down into the concept of intersectionality if first wave feminism was looking for equal rights such as the vote without equal responsibility of the draft of course but that's neither here nor there and second wave feminism was looking to increase sexual freedoms and address workplace and legal inequalities then third wave feminism is the aftermath of all this struggling to keep itself relevant now that equality to men female superiority in some ways just look at the sentencing gap for one example has been attained thirdly feminism is the kind of feminism that eats itself from the inside because some feminists happened to fancy themselves higher up on the victim totem pole than others third wave feminism acts to shut down men's issues gatherings shouting things like this is what men's rights look like or MRA go away and in perhaps not quite the very next breath will screech that feminism is for men too I wouldn't say I have no objection to feminism in general there are many small issues I take all throughout feminism but third wave feminism is certainly the war first of the lot browsable fungus represents old fellas but this men's rights activist doesn't represent old man's racket she doesn't and even assuming he is an MRA rather than some salty jackass at Mik Wendy's he doesn't either generalizing an entire group based on one person is stupid why am i continually asked the answer for the views of feminists if I agree when Stannis was overall aims but don't agree much with those particular tennis there's anything that I can ask you to answer to anybody who labels himself similarly to you even if you don't agree much this follows along with my answer to the last question I personally do not ask other people to answer to the views of others this is my problem with labels oftentimes two people can identify with a certain label yet have wildly different viewpoints or identify more strongly with different elements of that label one example might be two people who identify as Christian one focusing on loving thy neighbor and the other focused on hating non-believers at most what I would hope is that you challenge feminists behaving in a way that you don't agree with when you see it to try and help them see the right way for example if you disagree with feminists saying kill all men I would hope that you would be inclined to explain why this might not be a productive thing to promote however I wouldn't call you a man hater for identifying as a feminist when some feminists say kill all men because many do not I try wherever possible to be consistent on this point all you can do all I can do all anyone can do is to try to research and challenge your beliefs to have a solid foundation for your mindset and to try to help others do the same and correct bad strategies and misinformation when it arises I don't answer for anyone else and neither should you however one final point I would like to make here if a lot of people in a group are behaving in a way that you don't approve of and someone then eventually asks why you still choose to identify with that group do consider your reasoning carefully and don't just assume that someone is trying to tell you to answer for the entire group you might just find that the general actions and my perception of that group really doesn't align with your viewpoints as well as you might think and then it might actually be who've you to reconsider holding that label exactly to that because they spent too much time whining I then talk about real problems then why aren't you talking about those problems instead of just whining about the other people over and over and over say literally is moving to scale is priority that's like even lower right you don't get real problems you've got those things that feminists worry about and then you've got you going how dad yes how dad I have different priorities from me why can't I do what I do whine about whining forever for a living not healthy not speaking about real problems is only one of many issues I take with sjws I take far more of an issue with sjws shut down discussions of real problems when it comes to issues they don't like insult people for their sex or skin color or try to claim to speak for all women when they talk about whatever it is they choose to discuss at any given moment real problem or otherwise furthermore your examples for things feminists worry about sexual assault and racism are often overblown utilize faulty statistics or rely on assumptions that preclude certain people from being victims of racism which is in itself racist as for how anti sjw's like to spend their time I'll give you that there certainly are some that just spent on complaining about what sjw's are saying but even this in and of itself is still more useful than what a lot of sjw's are doing because you see if sjw's are promoting beliefs and mindsets that will actively result in problems for others see affirmative consent laws resulting in miscarriages of justice for several innocent men accused of sexual crimes for one example then rallying against these beliefs may just prevent those problems from occurring in the future however like many others in this video you're being extremely uncharitable with many anti F JW's because there are also many of them that do like to talk about actual issues several that dedicate their videos to detailed research of important primary resources related to their concerns several that dedicate their work to spreading awareness of genuine inequalities and helping those affected by it yours and damn near everyone else is focused on only those wrecking feminists reviews just makes you look like you were trying to spin a narrative rather than actually start a dialogue how very reasonable of you why don't you think is concerned with actual feminist theory in academia you are like threatening people for human see what did I just say anyway I don't seem concerned with feminist academia because I'm not every piece of feminist academia I've encountered in my academic career I have rejected the premise wholesale one example that stands out strongly in my mind was found with anna counseling theory textbook the reason for this is that most of the theories and practices of counseling discussed in the book involved general practices however the second I got to the feminist theory chapter all of a sudden everything begins talking about how heterosexual white males can't properly understand anyone else and how women are oppressed let me read you an excerpt from early in the chapter that really sparked my ire feminist therapists have challenged the male-oriented assumptions regarding what constitutes a mentally healthy individual and raised some critical questions why are women more frequently diagnosed with depression that our men in our society can theories developed by white males from Western cultures appropriately serve the needs of women in counseling of women of color of others who experience marginalization and depression in our society hmm I wonder why women are more frequently diagnosed with depression than men it could be because women at a basic biological level produce more estrogen a hormone known to be very closely related to women's emotions particularly depressive emotions it couldn't be that women are more likely than men to seek professional help and therefore receive more diagnosis for their problems now it's clearly a patriarchal conspiracy - oh I don't even know and assuming that people can't empathize or understand others because of their sex or skin color isn't that a little sexist and racist Knack couldn't be feminist academic theory turns what many would see is normal human relationships or communications into needlessly adversarial or antagonistic interactions feminist academic theory draws fighting lines between people where there would otherwise not need to be any not one piece of feminist academic theory I've read corresponds with any of my real-world experiences so I have zero use for it in fact I think it's actively harming society and damaging relations between people of different sexes and races as a result I think it should be challenged wherever possible if this constitutes simply wrecking feminists for views in your mind then so be it anyway I think I'll cut this off here and finish off the rest of the questions in a separate video just to avoid either of them being long-winded again I'm sorry for doing this when I know so many people already have but I actually feel like a lot of these questions are a great way to help me organize and put forth some of my own views in an easily digestible manner I'll finish off the other half of these questions and then I'll either get back to the last few feminist issues I want to talk about from my old list or I'll try a new angle I have so many different topics that I want to discuss that it can be difficult to pick which to talk about I guess I'll see what strikes my fancy after this as always thanks so much to all of my subscribers for the lovely comments and discussions so far your support and respectful conversations really drive me to keep challenging my views and improving my videos where I can I hope that even as this channel continues to grow we can carry forward this quality of discussion for as long as possible so thanks again and I hope to see you all again for the next one

Channel: The Prim Reaper

Views: 6,724

Rating: 4.9104476 out of 5

Keywords: Reasonable Questions, Anti-feminist, Antifeminist, SJW, Anti-SJW, Egalitarian, Egalitarianism, Men's Rights, MRA, Prim Reaper, Left-wing, Right-Wing

Id: 5P8ruR9C56g

Length: 24min 33sec (1473 seconds)

Published: Tue Mar 07 2017