Quantum Electrodynamics and Feynman Diagrams
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: ScienceClic English
Views: 170,144
Rating: 4.9661264 out of 5
Keywords:
Id: X-FEU4mQWtE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 33sec (933 seconds)
Published: Sat Feb 27 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
wow very well explained,thanks, do you also do QCD ? and a pretty good youtube channel you have hope it grows, you have my sub
This was awesome thanks for posting it
I don't like this presentation of Feynman diagrams. It's better to think of the diagrams as book-keeping devices for the perturbative expansion, rather than having a literal meaning in terms of particles. Particles are more accurately poles that occur in the sums of diagrams, rather than the lines themselves.
Funny, because in math we used QED too
That was excellent. Can any recommend any resources for further education on the subject? Questions that are floating around in my head at the minute are:
Why is it valid to say that only the first few least complex Feynman diagrams can form an accurate approximation?
How are we defining 'least complex' in that situation? Number of vertices, number of virtual particles?
What determines whether a photon carries momentum opposite to it's direction of travel or not?
How does one 'sum' different Feynman diagrams? I'd have guessed something like a path integral along each electron's line, but that doesn't account for situations where the number of particles is not conserved (e.g. an electron/positron annihilation)
Does the reversed phase direction of a positron really imply it travels backwards in time?
And about a million more questions! For reference, I've got reasonable QM knowledge around single particles - but only surface level QFT.
Very nicely done and very informative. What are you going to do next?
Merci alessandro , tes videos sont toujours au top !
Thanks for posting, this was great.
Could anyone here help suggest more reading about how the modeling was done to achieve all of the Feynman diagrams? Is there some methodology to deriving the models?
Why does it only describe electrons? Why not other particles?