Proof Romans Invented Jesus Christ - The Flavian Signature

the book Caesars Messiah shows that the Gospels were written by a family of Roman Caesars called the Flavians they created the Gospels as a political tool they wanted to create a different version of Messianic Judaism they had fought against a messianic movement in Judea that was obviously militaristic and violently opposed to Roman rule so the Gospels were created to replace that version of Messianic Judaism the reason that the Romans wanted to create their own Savior Messiah is because they wanted to have a pacifistic Christ the Christ that they were fighting against was a military Messiah the storyline of Jesus is fiction it was based upon a military campaign of a Roman Caesar named Titus Flavius the reason that people have not recognized that the character Jesus Christ is fiction is simply because they haven't understood the genre that the Gospels were written in the Gospels are in fact a Roman mockery of a kind of literature that the Jews produced in the first century and this type of literature is referred to as typology typology is simply basing one character upon another and is found throughout Hebraic literature in the Old Testament to link one prophet to another prophet at the very first page of the book of matthew the author has created a primer a small example of the typology that's going to extend throughout the all of the works and what matthew has done is he has taken stories from the Old Testament and place them into his story of the pre ministry of Jesus he has taken names locations and concepts from the Old Testament and he has woven them into his story about Jesus Christ and he has placed them in the same sequence so that when you compare one story to the other the Old Testament with the New Testament you can see that Moses was connected very directly to the character that matthew is writing about Jesus Christ the reason that Moses was chosen as the archetype of Jesus is because he was the first savior of Israel and so by connecting him to directly to that particular Hebraic prophet you show that Jesus Christ is also a savior of Israel and what's interesting is that this shows that the character Jesus Christ is fiction the events in his life were are not original historical episodes they were simply taken from another look now the same thing is true about the entire rest of Jesus's ministry it is all taken from another book so I'm going to present a outline an abbreviated version of what I have named the Flavian signature in the gospels and this is essentially the type of logic connections between the ministry of jesus and the military campaign of titus flavius now these connections occur on the side of jesus christ of course we find them in the gospels the military campaign of titus flavius was written by his historian Flavius Josephus and so I will be showing these connections between the Gospels and the Flavian history of the of the military campaign get the online versions of both the Gospels and of wist ins translation of Josephus so that you can actually go step by step you can repeat every single connection that I am making here and you will be able to see for yourself this amazing relationship between Josephus and the gospel and I am confident that you will recognize that this was obviously deliberate and this will be become particularly clear when I get to certain areas in the Gospels that have what I call almost a virtual literary barcode so that you can see that these very unusual events are occurring in both stories and they're occurring in the same sequence it begins at the same location for both of these individuals the Sea of Galilee at the Sea of Galilee Jesus comes and tells his disciples that from now on if you follow me you will catch men now this is mirrored by the experience that titus flavius has where he comes to the Sea of Galilee his men go out into the sea to attempt to destroy the Jews who are in their fishing boats the boats are sunk the Jews attempt to swim to safety and the Romans catch them like fish the typology that Matthew had used is ends directly before this episode in Matthew you can see that you know you have the typology that links Jesus to Moses and then just a few lines later suddenly here you have this odd parallel between Jesus and Titus and this is really quite strange that given that the beginning of Matthew is all of this typology and this is something that scholars do not dispute that the connection between Jesus and Moses was deliberately created but here you have a parallel that's just as good as the ones we saw in in the story between Jesus and Moses and yet no one has ever asked this obvious question it's the same location it's at the beginning of the ministries of both of these individuals and you do have this very odd parallel concept of fishing for men so having started having made this simple step of just asking the question is it possible that these events were deliberately wired together as we had seen occurred in the events that led directly up to it just asking that simple question is all anyone needs to do to enter into the most profound archaeologic discovery in Western civilization that simple step takes us right into the Flavian signature once you start to recognize and believe that the that these stories the story of Jesus and them in the military campaign of titus flavius once you recognize that they were wired together you can read in a different way you can read with that strong bias and these parallels will start to pop out now where does the bias come from as we go through this you'll see that there are many parallels which are absolutely crystal clear and they form a kind of foundation from which everything else can be seen so as I go through it I'll wreck I'll point out to you the the the first parallel and this is something that frankly just baffles me is that the journeys are the same and I'm going to describe it now so we won't have to go into it and too much detail later on but the fact is you start out in Galilee at the Sea of Galilee you then go out into the Galilean countryside then at a certain point Jesus declares that he's going to go on to Jerusalem he takes the journey but when he gets to the city he doesn't go directly in he stays outside the city for a while he then has a triumphal entrance into Jerusalem and then the story of Jesus takes you outside of the city again for the crucifixion well this is the exact journey that Titus takes now this in and of itself is perhaps not overwhelmingly strong evidence that the two stories are wired were deliberately connected but it is suspicious it's it it rises to the level of suspicion and curiosity why are they exactly the same I mean for example why does Jesus wait for a period of time before he goes into Jerusalem what's the point of that when you when you look at the storyline of Jesus's ministry it is mysterious I mean why does he go to these particular places in this sequence why does he stop but once you start to question was this done because they author is wiring Jesus directly into the story of Titus then you start to have this bias that I talked about so that's the first point I want to make is that the the actual locations are exactly the same and this of course mirrors the typology that I talked about previously the typology that connected Jesus to Moses had the same physical journey so that this is why it is so interesting that Jesus and Titus have the same physical journey and it added it requires of an alert reader it isn't it isn't really just a supposition in my part I think it's a requirement of every scholar and every person that wants to know the truth about the Gospels is to ask the question was the geography was the journey created to mirror that of Titus Flavius all right so I'm going to just go through some of the of the stories that are parallel that we're wired I'm not going to go into any detail but I'm just going to - to describe them so that people can at their leisure read them carefully and make a connection you then have a strange story in both Josephus's tale of Titus's military campaign and the Gospels where you have a you have to keep holy the Sabbath by restoring a right hand then you have the the story of the demon of Ghidorah and just immediately before that you have a tale of john who's possessed by a demon you as you go through the story of the demons of Ghidorah you'll see that it is an exact parallel to the Battle of Ghidorah that Titus had where you even have you can you can actually lay the what happens to the herd where they rush to how they drowned the stories are very very similar and in fact the parallels between the tales have been covered by many scholars after Ghidorah you have the identification of the christ happens in both stories at the same place following the identification of the Christ you have descriptions of binding and loosening little stories which describe both binding and loosening and these are very very important parallels and have been seen by other scholars but they have not bothered to place them into the sequence after the time in the Galilean countryside you now have a point of decision where Titus decides to go on to Jerusalem and he sends his troops ahead of him a certain group of them to meet him there Jesus has the exact same event he decides suddenly that he has to go unto Jerusalem and the Gospels say he sends his messengers ahead the Good Samaritan is just a fascinating piece of typology the story and the Gospels describe someone who's you know been he's on the road to to Samaria he's grabbed by a group of robbers they steal his mule they beat him up and at this point in the campaign of titus flavius he appears with the twelfth Legion and Josephus recounts how well they have been refurbished the twelfth Legion was attacked by a group of Jewish rebel on the road they stole their mules and stripped them of their clothes and goods Titus who is described as coming through Samaria has refurbished the Legion and now is walking with them to to Jerusalem so Titus the story of the Good Samaritan which there have been so many things written about as to what it means and what exactly Jesus is talking about is actually just a representation of Titus refurbishing a legion that it had its mule stolen from it and then going forward to wage war against the Jews now you get outside Jerusalem both both of these individuals come out to outside Jerusalem and they pause now in Titus's gaze it's because he needs to organize his triumphant entrance into the city and same is true in Jesus though we don't exactly know why he can't just walk in at this particular point but he doesn't he stays outside and he has these events and when you compare the events between Jesus and Titus as they are outside of Jerusalem you can really start to see some of the connections becoming very very clear Jesus talks about knocking on the door he talks about the the authors of the Gospels talk about how the Jews are trying to lay traps for him they talk about the Jews increasing in number surrounding Jesus I mean these are all obviously you know related to the campaign that Titus is waging and you can see this when you when you actually put the experiences right next to each other that Jesus and Titus are both essentially having these battles with Jews directly outside of of Jerusalem and when you compare them in their sequence you can see that that the this event of Jesus the events that that occurred to me as he was outside Jerusalem are definitely all simply were based upon what is happening to Titus as as his military campaign goes forward I wanted to go through a few of the parallels in a little more depth because what I'm presenting here is a barcode in other words this is a connection between Titus's military campaign and Jesus's ministry that is so direct and so transparent that it's really indisputable there really isn't any way that this connection that I'm going to show you could have been accidentally created it wasn't just the people in writing the Gospels who were looking for interesting stories to put into their character of Jesus this is clearly proof this these events when you lay them on top of one another and you compare you know the parallels are absolutely clear evidence that Jesus is a fictional character whose story is based upon titus flavius so the first of these parallels I call the wou saying Jesus now in both Josephus and the Gospels you have the character called Jesus who goes into a long litany of woes uses the word woe over and over again the character in Josephus has just so many connections to the character in the Gospels that many many scholars have written about them if if you look in the internet you'll see this the wou saying Jesus and Josephus is by hundreds of people is claimed to have been based upon the character and character in the Gospels what they haven't recognized is that when you look at the two storylines that the wou saying Jesus appears at the same place in in both tales the character in Josephus who is a woe saying Jesus has is is an obvious representation of the character in the Gospels okay he enters Jerusalem during a pilgrimage festival he delivers a woe Oracle against Jerusalem he is seized by the leading citizens both Jesus's are beaten and later scourge neither one of them answers a direct question during the interrogation they are both taken to the Roman per crater they're called madmen and the word is the same it's a special Greek word both of them as are referred to as madmen using this word both Jesus's prophecies their own death and then both of them die so you can see that this is very suspicious that that there are all these direct connections between the character and Josephus who also has the name of Jesus but when you place this event in the overall storyline then it really becomes dramatic then it becomes very very difficult to say wait a second how could this possibly be this is obviously typology some some author is creating this character Jesus Christ in the gospel and is using characters from Josephus to to to build them up following that event you have a very distinct connection between the so called innocence being beaten worse than the guilty very unusual concept and in both cases that occurs immediately following the Wow saying Jesus here we have a parallel that is simply impossible to ignore it is so direct and when it is placed in sequence it becomes part of what I'm referring to as the barcode and I'm actually going to read just a few lines so that people can hear with their ears exactly how profound these these these similarities are in in Josephus wrote that the sedition had been divided into three factions was now reduced to two at this point in the Gospels Jesus is asked if he comes if he came to bring peace on earth and he states not at all rather division from now on five and one house will be divided three against two and two against three so notice that that Jesus did not come to Bing to bring peace like Titus the division in both cases is noted and of course the three to two this parallel is very unusual very very complex very unusual all of these concepts swirling around all of these different ideas war division three four two and yet when you place it in context it becomes even more vivid stronger now a trivial parallel but a very perfect one Jesus predicts that a fruit tree should be cut down if it doesn't bear good fruit and Titus orders all of the fruit trees between the Roman camp and the city walls cut down Jesus predicts that a fruit tree will be cut down Titus orders the fruit tree to be cut down you have a story where the the Roman siege apparatus has given the Jews only a very narrow door and Josephus then records the points of a compass that described how this door has been shut jesus has a story that has these exact concepts you have trivial parallels now about Jesus wondering you know what is the best way to build a tower but then if you look into Josephus you'll see that in fact Titus is looking at that exact point for the best place to build a tower now Jesus mentions the sending of a delegation to find peace Titus sends a delegation to find peace okay now we come to really the the most interesting of all of the the parallels in the gospel is a fascinating just from the perspective of literary analysis of how they actually were able to achieve this very innocuously in the Gospels you have the triumphant entrance of Jesus you know the the people cry out the son is come and then you have this bizarre story where Jesus is told to make these people quiet down and he says oh no no if they were quiet that the stones themselves would cry out and then Jesus goes on in states that something has been blackened from your eyes hidden from you so you can't see it it doesn't really make a lot of theological sense but when you place that story in context with Josephus it just comes to life because it is at this point that Josephus makes his famous mistake Titus has his entrance into the city at this point he fires a stone from a catapult and it goes right into the city the Jews have a watchman who cries out when he sees the stone coming but Josephus wrote that the watchman didn't say a stone is coming Josephus made a mistake supposedly he wrote the watchman cried out the Sun cometh so this in context again is amazing many many people have tried different ways to get around Josephus is mistake in fact a lot of them and if you get that's one reason why you need to use the wisdom translation because it's very very literal many modern translators simply just miss translate it they say they have the watchman stating the stone is coming but what Josephus wrote was the Sun cometh and then in the next line Josephus actually has the stone crying out he and Whiston very faithfully translates very precisely it is only that's why I recommend using wisdom because he's so literal you can see it actually in the text the stone cries out this is followed then by a description of the Romans being aware that the Jews can see the stone and so they blacken it they hide it from their eyes when you place these concepts on top of one another and next to one another it is absolutely transparent this is directly wiring one story into the other there is no way absolutely no way that that Josephus would make the only real error in grammar he makes as an entire book at the exact point in the storyline that the Sun cometh in the Gospels this is beyond impossible this did not happen these stories are wired for sound and now we can actually prove it we can go into real proof because following the Sun cometh we now have parallels which are not conceptual but they are the same thing Jesus predicts that Jerusalem will be encircled with a wall Titus encircles Jerusalem with the wall there is no ambiguity here at all this is literally the same thing and yet it is occurring at exactly the correct point in time now at the point that in the Gospels Jesus at this point drives out the thieves from the area in front of the temple this famous story of Jesus driving out the the polluters of the temple area at this point in the storyline and Josephus Titus gets control of the area in front of the temple and he refers to the group that he's driving out with the same greek word which indicates that they are robbers or thieves the same word that Jesus used to describe them now we're going to come to the final point in what I call the barcode Jesus predicts that the abomination of desolation which is an event that Daniel predicted actually will come to pass and Josephus records that in fact the abomination of desolation occurred at this exact point so when you then look back at this collection of events when when you go to the fruit tree when you look at the Sun cometh when you then see the stone crying out and the the things which cannot be disputed the encircling of the wall the of summe the encircling of the city with the wall the driving of the the the thieves and robbers away from the area directly in front of the temple and then the abomination of desolation it's simply impossible these are very very unique concept there are not a dozen books that even describe these concepts the abomination of desolation the encircle enough Jerusalem with the wall these are very very unusual concepts they could not occur in the same sequence accidentally this is really important for our culture to understand where Christianity came from and this is direct evidence you can actually walk this path and come to this conclusion you can know that Christianity was an invention of the Romans it was done to pacify their subjects and this is important because it gives us a different way of understanding government how government operates the tools that government uses the purpose that government has for the various propaganda apparatus I think it's it's just it's it's it's a requirement of alert citizens to know how the Gospels were written why they were written who produced them what was the purpose and back of all this this is good citizenry everyone should be involved in this everyone should be looking at this reading it and coming and recognizing that this was where the Gospels originated the Gospels came from the Flavian imperial court all right so I'm not going to go into the final parallels because you can simply buy the book if you want to gain insights into these but you will see that in both Josephus and in the Gospels you have a a human Passover lamb a Last Supper where the son of Mary becomes a human Passover lamb you have a crucifixion of three a group of three where one survives and that joseph of arimathea are in Josephus story Joseph bara Mathia takes them down from the cross and then the conclusion of the Gospels is the prophecy that Jesus makes concerning Simon and John that Simon will be taken where he doesn't want to go bound and given a death to glorify God and John will be spared at the conclusion of Josephus the rebel leader Simon and John are captured John is given perpetual imprisonment and Simon's experience is an exact parallel of or excuse me an exact fulfillment of the prophecy that Jesus gave so that is the Flavian signature you you

Channel: CAESAR'S MESSIAH

Views: 436,558

Rating: 4.3463078 out of 5

Keywords: Gospel, Jesus (Deity), Titus, Flavius, Flavian, Vespasian, Josephus, Roman Origins of Christianity, Jesus Myth, Real Jesus, Son of Man, Second Coming, Christianity (Religion), Roman Empire (Country), Fritz Heede, Joe Atwill, Christ, Christ Conspiracy, Myth of Jesus, imperial cult, Pagan origins of Christianity, Flavian Dynasty, wars of the jews, Rabbinic Judasim, Judaism (Religion), Timothy Freke, Kenneth Humphreys, resurrection, Easter, Christmas

Id: 4UqG8w7ezUQ

Length: 33min 55sec (2035 seconds)

Published: Mon Mar 25 2013

Reddit Comments

[u/unwin]

This video makes me sad since it's so disorganized and not clear which writing copy which.

All I got was that they parallel each other, but it doesn't show who copied who. The christian claim would be that Titus copied the story of Jesus.

Christians will just see the multiple gospels as proof that the singular writing of Josephus copied the gospels.

I keep hearing that it's clear, but having Josephus make the mistake of using the word 'son' looks like he is the one stealing. If the gospels said "the stone cometh" I could see his claim.

This just sounds exactly like when Christians claim something but it's all just speculation and interpretation.

Did I miss something that proves Josephus wrote first, and the 'son' mistake makes sense if he's not stealing?