Poker Hands - Daniel Negreanu Is Stunned By INSANE Bet From Doug Polk
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Doug Polk Poker
Views: 1,611,471
Rating: 3.0236886 out of 5
Keywords: poker 2016, 2016 poker, phil ivey, fedor holz, high stakes poker, wcgrider, poker hands, the poker guys, poker guys, breakdown, tv poker, phil hellmuth, tom dwan, daniel negreanu, going south, wsop, world series of poker, ept, european poker tour, pokerstars, poker stars, live stream, live poker, online poker, internet poker, big one for one drop, high roller, nosebleeds
Id: bOC77yYpnGU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 12min 1sec (721 seconds)
Published: Mon Oct 17 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Love the end bit, lol. Scott does seem like kind of a douche; makes watching this hand so much more fun.
Worth the watch for last minute, LOL
I really thought that 200k bet was a bit fishy but it worked out just the way he envisioned, if turn went check check Negreanu for sure would have value bet and get called, pretty sick line from dougy fresh
Doug is better at poker than me.
That said, I think he's significantly underestimating Negreanu's range here. He 3 bet (one the larger side) from the SB against a hijack open and cutoff call.
If his range does include a lot of non-paired and non-ace hands then Doug's line is great, but does it? I've watched Dnegs a fair amount and I wouldn't think so. I'd be surprised to see him turn up with less than KQs, especially against a table this tough where he's not likely to get out of line oop often. So I would think the big majority of his range is pairs >99 and hands which contain an ace...all of which are beating us on the turn.
Doug's line is definitely better than just calling down a river bet, but I wouldn't have a problem checking back turn and folding river.
The turn bet does give him the opportunity to more credibly bluff the river, but he obviously wasn't really planning on that, because the 6 is a fine card to follow through on (Doug has way more 6s in his range than Dnegs) and he insta-checks it down.
So I'm with Seiver there at the end. This play only makes sense if we think Dnegs has a wide SB 3b range, which from what I know about his game...he doesn't.
Woah, that bet WAS...insane.
So much that the caps in the title should be even bigger I think.
So in summary is the idea that making a ~10% of pot bet in order to buy a free showdown as long as you think you then have >10% showdown value a good play? I guess mathematically that makes sense to me. However does 99 really have >10% showdown value here? I feel like 99 is behind all of Daniels range here.
I like the idea I guess but I'm really hard pressed to find a situation where that theory is applicable. Can someone offer a different example?