MARK: HELLO AMERICA, I'M MARK LEVIN, THIS IS "LIFE, LIBERTY AND LEVIN." THIS IS ALSO A SAD DAY. IN AMERICAN HISTORY, ONE OF THE SADDEST ON. THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND BIDEN ADMINISTRATION KNOW NO LIMITS FOR RETENTION OF POWER, NO QUESTION ABOUT IT. JOE BIDEN SAID THE OTHER DAY, HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS WITH THE INVESTIGATION OF DONALD TRUMP. HE IS A LIAR, A LIAR ABOUT SHELL CORPORATIONS AND MONEY FROM COMMUNIST CHINA AND ABOUT MONEY FROM UKRAINE. A LIAR ABOUT MONEY FROM ROMANIA. HE IS A LIAR ABOUT DOCUMENTS, A AND HIS OWN HISTORY, WE HAVE A MAN IN OVAL OFFICE WHO IS A LIAR BIDEN SIGNED OFF ON FBI REVIEW OF TRUMP RECORDS. NATIONAL ARCHIVE LETTERS REVEAL FROM AUGUST. WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT? BIDEN WHITE HOUSE AT REQUEST OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SIGNED OFF TO HAVE FBI AND INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY TO EXAMINE HUNDREDS OF PAGES OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION OF FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP -- >> THERE YOU HAVE MERRICK GOING TO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. SAYING YOU CAN'T COME DIRECTLY TO US, YOU HAVE TO GO TO WHITE HOUSE, THEY CIRCLE BACK TO WHITE HOUSE. WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL'S OFFICE AND JOE BIDEN, THEY AGREE TO SEND THIS MATTER TO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KNOWING DAMN WELL WHAT WOULD HAPPEN, THAT IS WHAT TRIGGERED THIS. GENERAL WARRANTS, THAT WAS ISSUED BY A FEDERAL MAGISTRATE JUDGE, THE FRAMERS OF YOUR CONSTITUTION HATED GENERAL WARRANTS. OR THEY WERE CALLED WRITS OF A ASSISTANCE, THEY WERE USED BY THE KING IN SEARCH OF CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. FEDERAL PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN CHOPPING AWAY AT THIS OVER THE YEARS. THEY HAVE CHOPPED IT OFF A LIMB IN CASE OF DONALD TRUMP. HERE IS WHAT YOUR 4 AMENDMENT SAYS: >> SO WHAT IS PROBABLE CAUSE? THAT SAY REASONABLE BASIS TO BELIEVE A CRIME WAS COMMITTED. THEY HAD NO REASONABLE BASES TO BELIEVE THAT A CRIME OF THE COMMITTED, EVEN IF DONALD TRUMP HAD CLASSIFIED IN INFORMATION, WHICH HE DID, IT IS NOT A CRIME FOR HIM TO POSSESSION IT. WHEN DONALD TRUMP LEFT WHITE HOUSE HE WAS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN HE ARRIVED IN MAR-A-LAGO HE WAS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHENEVER HE TOOK WITH HIM, YOU CANNOT THEN TURN AND SAY, HE VIOLATED ESPIONAGE ACT OF "1917". AND TRY TO CHARGE HIM WITH ESPIONAGE. DOJ DID NOT ACT IN GOOD FAITH WHICH IS REQUIRED UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES TOO, AMERICAN'S FOUNDERS HATED GENERAL WARRANTS, BUT THE GOVERNMENT HAS RESURRECTED THEM, THERE WAS A REPORT, WOOPS WE'RE SORRY WE HAVE A MILLION CASES WHERE INNOCENT CITIZENS WERE MONITORED THAT IS A GENERAL WARRANT. 4 CENTURIES PRIOR TO U.S. FOUNDING. ENGLISH JURISTS AND LEGAL SCHOLARS REJECTED GENERAL WARRANTS -- >> THEY CONDEMNED THEM AS DID OUR FOUNDING GENERATION. NOW THEY ARE IN USE, HERE I HAVE IT THE WARRANT. THE WARRANT SAYS, THE SEARCH WARRANT. AUGUST 5, 2022. IN PART IT SAYS, ATTACHMENT A: THEY MENTION MAR-A-LAGO, DESCRIBED AS MANSION WITH APPROXIMATELY LOCATION TO BE SEARCHED INCLUDE THE PRESIDENT'S OFFICE, ALL STORAGE ROOMS ALL OTHER ROOMS AND AREAS WITHIN THE PREMISES USED OR AVAILABLE TO BE USED BY THE FIRST LADY. OR THE PRESIDENT. AND HIS STAFF. BOXES OR DOCUMENTS COULD BE STORED. SOUNDS BROAD TO ME. DOES NOT INCLUDE AREAS CURRENTLY AT THE TIME OF SEARCH OCCUPIED RENTED OR USE BY THIRD PARTIES THIS SAY HUGE PROPERTY, I HAVE BEEN THERE. THAT SEEMS BROAD TO ME, HERE IS THE AFFIDAVIT. TWO-THIRDS IS BLACKED OUT. SEE THAT. REMEMBER THIS? THIS? REDACTED SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT. IT SAYS AMONG OTHER THINGS: >> PERSON? BUT NOT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE TIME OF THE REMOVING OF THE DOCUMENTS OR FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES THIS IS INCREDIBLE. THIS IS A DEFECTIVE 7 SEARCH WARRANT ON MANY GROUNDS, WHAT ABOUT DUE PROCESS WITH THE FIFTH AMENDMENT? WHAT DOES IT SAY, NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED ARE LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, THAT INCLUDES THE RIGHT TO A LAWYER. EVEN MIRANDA OF A MASS MURDERER, YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO A LAWYER. IT IS BELIEVED CORRECTLY, YOU CANNOT BE PROPERLY DEFENDED IF YOU ARE ACCUSED BY A GOVERNMENT. YET IN CASE OF DONALD TRUMP, HIS LAWYERS WERE BRUTALIZED. WASHINGTON D.C. COURT. JUDGE RULES TRUMP LAWYER MUST TESTIFY AND DOCUMENTS "NEW YORK TIMES," FEDERAL JUDGE HAS RULED THAT -- IN MARCH, THAT PROSECUTOR OVERSEEING INVESTIGATION OF FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS, CAN PIERCE ASSERTIONS OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND COMPEL ONE OF HIS LAWYERS TO ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS BEFORE A GRAND JURY, ON -- THIS IS LAST DAY SHE SERVED ON COURT THEN RETIRED. AN OBAMA APPOINTEE. THAT PROVISIONAL ALLOWS PROSECUTOR TO WORK AROUND THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIV PRIVILEGE WHEN THEY HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE THAT LEGAL SERVICES -- >> THIS IS EXTRAORDINARY. TO DO THIS AGAINST A FORMER PRESIDENT. LEADING CANDIDATE. REPUBLICAN NOMINATION. WHO HAS AUTHORITY TO MOVE DOCUMENTS. NO STATUTE CAN TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WHY DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE THIS AUTHORITY? BECAUSE HE IS THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THAT IS WHY, HE DOESN'T REPORT TO INFERIOR EMPLOYERS, THEY REPORT TO HIM. THEY ARE NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION. HE IS IN THE CONSTITUTION. NOT ONLY THAT A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE AGREES WITH ME, HER NAME IS JACKSON. BILL CLINTON HAD STUFF IN HIS SOCK DRAWER. JUDICIAL WATCH, SUED THEY WANT THEY STUFF. AND IN PART HERE IS WHAT DEMOCRAT ANOTHER OBAMA APPOINTED JUDGE SAID IN RESPONSE IN DEFENSE CLINTON, UNDER THE STATUTORY SCHEME DECISION TO SEGREGATED PERSONAL MATERIALS IS MADE BY THE PRESIDENT, DURING THE PRESIDENT'S TERM -- THAT IS WHAT SHE WROTE IN MARCH OF 2012, NEVER APPEALED. SHE SAYS SINCE PRESIDENT IS ENTRUSTED WITH MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS DURING HIS TIME IN OFFICE, IT WILL BE DIFFICULT FOR THIS COURT TO CONCLUDE THAT CONGRESS INTENDED HE WOULD HAVE LESS AUTHORITY TO DO WHAT HE PLEASES WITH WHAT HE CONSIDERS TO BE HIS PERSONAL RECORD, SHE SAID HE HAS THOUGHT. TO MAKE SUCH A DECISION. WHAT ABOUT THE ESPIONAGE ACT? REMEMBER PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT DOES NOT HAVE A CRIMINAL PENALTY. BUT ESPIONAGE ACT. WHAT ABOUT THAT? OCTOBER OF 2022, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION HARDLY A CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATION, TALKING ABOUT THE ESPIONAGE ACTION THIS CASE PRESIDENT AT POWERS. HERE IS WHAT THEY SAY, THEY CONCLUDE THIS -- SIMILARLY, PREVAILING LAW. FEDERAL OFFICIALS, PRESIDENT IS THE PRESIDENT. TO ESTABLISH SPECIFICITY AND MEMORIALIZATION FOR FUTURE HANDLING, BUT EXTENT OF A PRESIDENT'S LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DECLASS MATERIALS, WITHOUT THOSE FORMALITIES HAS YET TOE CHALLENGED IN COURT, WE HAVE A ROGUE PROSECUTOR AND ROGUE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAID WE'LL CHALLENGE IT IN COURT, WE'RE INDICTING YOU. IS THAT THE WAY, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN WE'RE SUPPOSED TO FIGURE IT OUT, EVEN IF YOU BELIEVE THERE SOME CONFLICT OR CONFUSION, I DON'T THINK SO. THAT IS NOT THE WAY IT WORKS. WHAT ABOUT THIS ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION? THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TOOK THE POSITION OBSTRUCTION WITH ESPIONAGE ACT PRESIDENTIAL RECORD ACT AND A FORMAL POSITION WITH FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE, DEMOCRAT NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT IN 2016, THEY HILL CLINTON THEY SAID WE'LL NOT PROSECUTE SOME CASES THAT IS THEIR PRECEDENTS, AND HILLARY CLINTON CASE IS MUCH WORSE THAN YOU KNOW. PETER VAN BUREN, A NATIONAL SECURITY ATTORNEY, AND FORMERLY THE STATE DEPARTMENT HE WROTE A COMMENTARY IN REUTERS HE SAID: REMEMBER ALL E-MAILS AND SERVERS: >> COMEY AT THE TIME DID SAY, SOME MARKED E-MAILS CLASSIFIED WERE FOUND ON THE SERVER, HE SAID THERE WERE MORE THAN SOME THERE ARE A LOT. AND HE GOES ON: >> CLINTON CLAIMS SHE TURNED OVER ALL WORK RELATED E-MAILS DESPITE THIS. THE QUESTIONS OF PERJURY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WERE NOT ADDRESSED. AND IN STATEMENT COMEYY LAWYERS SAID THEY DELIGHTED ALL E-MAILS. HE ADDED: >> NONE OF THIS WAS ADDRESSED IN CONTEXT OF DESTRUCTIVE EVIDENCE. NONE WAS ADDRESSED BY DEPARTMENT CAN OF JUSTICE IN RELATION TO, DIRECTOR OF FBI LABELED LEADING CONTENDER FOR PRESIDENCY AND HER STAFF AS EXTREMELY CARELESS IN HANDLING AMERICA'S SECRETS. THIS IS GENERALLY SEEN AS POSITIVE NEWS BY CLINTON SUPPORTERS. THE NEW STANDARD OF BEING NOT UNDER INDICTMENT. THE QUESTIONS NOT ADDRESSED BY FBI REMAIN. OBSTRUCTION. FALSE STATEMENTS. THEY HAVE NOW APPLIED TO DONALD TRUMP. THAT WAS THE POSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 11 YEARS AGO. BUT IT IS NOT TH
