Leonard Susskind - Why Black Holes are Astonishing
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Closer To Truth
Views: 552,733
Rating: 4.8891797 out of 5
Keywords: closer to truth, robert lawrence kuhn, Why Anything, why black holes are important, Leonard Susskind, Black Holes, dark energy, space and time, understanding black holes, what is a black hole, are black holes real, what do black holes do, what is at the center of the galaxy, Theoretical Physics black holes, philosophy of science, cosmology black holes
Id: d_XuFkVdAYU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 13min 30sec (810 seconds)
Published: Sun Jun 13 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
This man gives me strong John Malkovich vibes
What I don't get is he says black holes evaporate, therefore any matter once goes in the black hole eventually comes out in the form of radiation. How does that fit with the loss of information theory?
One thing worth noting: you definitely should notice your passage through a black hole's event horizon, even if it's a very big black hole with a huge event horizon radius, simply due to the fact that once you're past the horizon, ANY signal (including the signals sent by your own neurons) can only travel TOWARDS the center of the black hole, never out from it. In other words, say you're passing through the event horizon face-first; now your frontal cortex right beneath your forehead will never again be able to pass signals to your brainstem at the base of your skull. Likewise, your eyes would no longer be able to send signals to the visual cortex at the back of your skull.
It's a quite literal mindfuck.
Also want to add the Susskind is my favorite author for explaining things - I love his books. He's at the Feynman level, imho.
Question 1: Is Hawking Radiation a basically mathematical theory that tries to explain why information is not lost when matter falls into a Black Hole, or is it an observed phenomenon for which Hawking has provided a theoretical explanation? Have we actually observed Hawking Radiation?
Question 2: If objects falling into a Black Hole appear to move slower in our frame of reference, and never actually disappear beyond the event horizon, why don't we see a bright mass of matter surrounding every former star that collapsed into a Black Hole?
I think my favorite part of the video is around the 12:20 mark when he claims we have no choice, then says of course we can do something else but draws a blank on an example of something else to do other than search for the truth being driven by curiosity. I am glad people like him exist.
I wonder what would happen if you let a segment of a large chain or rope enter the black hole and then pull it back. Will it be cut off or return as a whole.
I'm confused. He says the "information" entering the black hole is lost. That it is destroyed in the singularity of the black hole.
And because physics says information cannot be destroyed, we need a [unification] theory for both physics and quantum mechanics.
Yet it seems that information is still in the black hole...where the matter and energy of the collapsed star(s) also is.
So it seems we're unable to locate that fallen information, but it's not really "lost". Right?
What am I missing? Or am I about as dense as a black hole?
Something I'm really confused about, is he saying that if I'm outside an event horizon and I'm watching something pass the horizon, that object I'm watching would look like it's frozen there forever? Like if I watch it for 20 years it'll still be there?