Good afternoon everybody. Today I'll be presenting
the research that I have been working on over the last seven years. The background of my
work is that I have been really active in solar activity prediction as well as natural disasters.
I've been doing such work continuously for seven years and I have discovered a lot of connections between
solar activity and Earth changes. And of course I found some connection with electricity and the Electric
Universe, and I would like to present this work to you today. First things first, the objective of
this talk is going to be to provide some insight into a global natural disaster forecasting technique.
Second is to utilize [electrical] properties of space and planets in explaining the occurrence of natural
disasters. Third is to explain the interaction between solar activity and planetary alignment,
and how this can lead to natural disasters on Earth. So, many of the things such as planetary
alignment are observations that many observers around the world [suspect
there may be] some connection, but it's really hard to explain how it works.
So, I will be presenting some of the scientific experiments to help verify that this can be true,
science. Next we start with the word ‘forecast’. The definition of ’forecast’ is to predict, or to
estimate something we want to know in the future. And in order for someone to know something in the
future, such as how each person came to this conference, of course we must have done this type of thing
before. This requires a lot of experience, like we actually need to know the destination where
we are going, and what kind of tools we are going to use and implement. And actually make the effort
to do it. And of course nobody learns how to walk from the time we are born; we have to practice
first. It takes a lot of time to develop the skills. So, in order for someone to make a successful forecast, we
start with looking at the subject of interest just the way it is and see what are the things that we can learn
about the relationships between the two things. First I would like to use this picture from David
Sommerville & Hugh McLeod about how we actually obtain some understanding of something. So we start
with data, which is a collection of various types of information and we catalog it in a way that
allows us to find some relationship between the various pieces of data. And of course we require
knowledge, or in this case we're looking for scientific knowledge, to help connecting all the data
and understand how each type of data or information is linked to the others. And it requires insight -
of course we have to know where we are going. So that's very important in terms of doing the forecast.
So, we have to have insight, that there is a path toward the goal. And of course, to accomplish all
this, we have to put in effort. So, we call this wisdom. It's choosing the right path, using the
right tools, and spend efforts to make it work. As to the path to choose, we want to choose
the shortest path. And of course to use the tools, there are so many different tools. You
want to use the tools that are the most effective. And the most effective tools in nature
are what we call the laws of nature, because these type of tools never change
over time, unlike some scientific theory which is based on a certain perception. It may change if we
change perceptions. So, in this case we look into the ultimate law of nature which several philosophies
around the world have discovered and draw the ultimate conclusion that everything that occurs in this
universe happens for a reason. And that's dependent upon many things. So that means, one thing cannot
exist without relying on some other things to exist. And not only that, when it exists, it never
lasts forever. It goes away as the factors that try to sustain its existence go away.
So, the other tools I'm planning to use are of course the laws of physics and of course in
this conference we talk about the Electric Universe. So, we'll be using the electrical theory to help
explain a lot of natural disaster phenomena. And of course we use ‘electric’ [theory] to explain
the Earth's interaction with the local environment. In addition to that, we rely on wave properties
to help explain things on a more microscopic scale model. So that's why I propose to use the term
‘quantum vibration’ to explain the solar system scale interaction. I will go over the word ‘quantum’
later in this talk as to why we want to use this word. So next, we're going to [discuss] how
we do the natural disaster forecast. Of course, just like everyone here has come to this
room, or Suzan and Dave Talbott set up this conference, of course the first thing is it has to be important.
Otherwise you're not going to do it. That means ‘significance’ is one of the factors we use
in natural disaster forecasts. Once we know that it's important, we're going to say, when are we going
to do it. So that's ’timing’. The last thing is, 'where', which is right now in this hotel room. The same
things apply for a natural disaster forecast. We're looking for what’s its significance; we
want to look at the timing which is the initiation, of the event; and of course the occurrence of the
event. In terms of significance, we emphasize high damage, meaning it could impact
human infrastructure. If it's something that happens on a regular basis or is considered to be
really normal, then there is no point to do it. Last but not least, its location, which will be
specific to different types or different zones on Earth. But for this presentation, I'll be focusing on
the two factors here: significance and timing. The location will be a subject beyond
this talk. So next, we want to implement the basic understanding of electricity in
and applied to natural disaster forecasting. The simplest way to look at a natural disaster is,
it has to happen for a reason and it needs some energy accumulation to happen before something can occur.
So, we look at electric energy accumulation in this case. The simplest model for understanding this,
is a capacitor or a battery. When you have a capacitor or battery, there's polarization. So, this is
charge separation. And when there’s charge separation, there's always some stress that's building up in that
volume of energy. Next, when charge is building up to a certain point, it starts to show some telltale sign. For
example when capacitors start to break down, they start to produce some kind of noise or vibration. And that's when
it's reaching some threshold. So, in terms of natural disasters such as earthquakes, or volcanic eruptions,
or tornado formations, there's a threshold and there are signs such as radioactive emission such as radon
gas that is emitted near the earthquake prediction zone, or there's a mechanical movement. We can
sometimes see clouds that look like cloud ripples. People call that earthquake clouds. And of course there
are other types like thermal or electromagnetic radiation. So, these are warning signs of a natural
disaster, In this case. So, we can understand this through understanding electrically. The last stage
is the energy release. When energy is released from a volume, it can come in different forms. If it's released
in the atmosphere, we call it flash floods, storm, rain, tornadoes, hurricanes. If energy is released underground,
we call that earthquakes. Many scientists have discovered a lot of electrical discharge underground when
earthquakes occur, as well as above the ground. So next we're going to talk about what helps energize
these events? There are many different factors. One is the external factors which is space,
surrounding space; the other is internal factors. But for the internal factors it is very
difficult to find data. So, in this case we focus more on the external factors which is space
and solar activity. This slide here shows the Sun which on the left-hand side is producing
a coronal mass ejection. If you look carefully, you can see a big glob of plasma and you
see the planet Venus, as [the plasma] reaches Venus. You see how it energized the surroundings of the planet
and it might start to show somewhat of a tail, right here. And there's also a fluctuation of the solar wind.
So, during the time when there are solar activities, such as fluctuation in the solar wind, coronal
mass ejections, always something happens to the atmosphere of the earth. If we want to
study the interaction between the surrounding plasma and the earth, we have to conduct an experiment.
One of the simple experiments I've done at home. It is really simple; it consists of a
vacuum chamber which is connected to a pipe containing a pressure gauge, pressure
valve and a vacuum pump. We use a battery which generates power for the high frequency AC generator.
We can also use a DC generator and it's connected to a magnetic sphere at the center of the vacuum chamber.
So when we apply high voltage to it, you start to see a plasma glow which is right here. Here it starts to glow
and the place that glows the brightest is around the pole. We may look at this as some kind of aurora event.
And of course, what happens when you have external factors come into play? Here is a very simple experiment.
All you do, is just put your hand close to the chamber which provides a place where there is high
conductivity that can seed plasma. So what happened, when we do that again? This is what happened.
There's plasma connected to the hand, right here. And two forms of brightness occur around the equator in
addition to the energy that goes to the pole. So that suggests that when we have a solar activity event,
it actually impacts every place around the world. So that energy goes into the atmosphere. This is in the
case where there's a CME event that reaches the earth. Another clue is if you look at a satellite image like
this one, you see the total electron number density at 400 kilometers above the earth. We see two strips of
high plasma density, just like we see in this experiment. Next, we go into more details about how we do the
forecast. So this relates to how plasma density plays an important role in modulating the atmospheric
energy, so we can do some type of prediction. A simple one to begin with. Let's start with the
Sun. If we look at the Sun, there's a period when there's a low number of sunspots and there's a period
when there's a high number of sunspots. The difference is plasma density. Now that's one aspect of it. If we
look in the ionosphere, when a lot of sprites occur, that's the time when space contains a lot of plasma.
The next step: you go down toward the atmosphere and just look at the sky. A simple observation
when the sky is clear, there is less plasma concentrations and then, as we move towards
small clouds and it becomes more condensed, you start to see more electricity, a plasma discharge
or tornado formation. We can call that Birkeland Currents as well. In this case
we have a time period of low plasma density, and one of high plasma density and
they are actually highly linked to the Sun. When we talk about low sunspot numbesr and high
sunspot numbers, this does not only include the 11-year cycle, but all the sub cycles which have been
changing very rapidly, like within a few days, from low activities to high activities. So, how do we
relate this to natural disaster, or how do we link this to electricity? So when the sky is clear, you have a
strong electric field and there's not a lot of current going on in the sky. During the time when there's
a lot of lightning and thunderstorms, we see strong magnetic fields. So, we see a power
transfer and dissipation. If you want to predict a natural disaster, such as when a storm will
start to occur, we look at the precursor which is the sky that looked just like this, where we
see how clouds build up from from light clouds to really dense clouds. And this is a global event which
means that it happens around the world. However, there are some places where this type of event occurs more
noticeably than in other areas. But it is a common observation. How can you predict earthquakes?
This is the opposite. So you're looking at the times during the period where charge has an opportunity to
build up, that means during a strong electric field. When we want to predict earthquakes, I'm talking
about really large earthquakes, they typically occur when the sky is clear.
No rains, less humidity, very dry and of course there could be strong winds. Because
the E-field can produce ionic winds are causing sudden disruptions in the weather, but in terms of just
wind, not from the moisture content perspective. The other [strong earthquake] condition
is when the sunspot number is at its peak and is in the declining phase. So, this is
how we use electricity to help understand and predict a natural disaster. Let's look into case
studies from the last two years, 2015 and 2016. Last year, one of the biggest hurricanes that
occurred was Hurricane Jacqueline which happened in September 2015. The sequence of events started with a
lot of solar activity and CMEs. We see that the [solar] storm started to form on September 27th. This happened
after one of the coronal mass ejection events. Next we have one of the largest solar flares of the year, a
size M7 solar flare. If you looked at the sky at that time, you saw how the clouds started to accumulate globally.
That second CME helped to accelerate the strong solar wind. Additionally, we have extra X-ray radiation.
Finally, the last CMEs that happened on September 30th, helped energize the storm for the last time before it
decayed. And of course a new storm formed on that day. So, we just discussed the case when there's a sunspot
peak as well as a peak in solar activity. The next case covers a period when there's low solar activity.
In this next case the Chilean earthquake happened on September 16th, 2015. During this time, as you can see,
the sunspot cycle was going into a 116-day decline. It reached a convergence point at this day before
shooting back up. So there's actually a disruption in the energy cycle over a two-month period or more.
And of course this trigger event happened and four days later we had a magnitude 8.3 earthquake.
So, I have discovered this pattern and have published this work in the New Concepts in
Global Tectonics Journal last year; so you can see the reference here. And of course it happened with another
warning sign from space [having to do with] the planetary alignment. We will talk about that very soon. Another
popular observation that people have adopted around the world, is looking at a coronal hole (which is the
black spot like this) as it moves and rotates and aligns with the Earth. The problem with this observation
from my perspective is that it happens so frequently, like every three to five days. So that’s
pretty difficult to use for predicting earthquakes without using other types of factors.
But again, I am not an expert in doing coronal hole observations. So that's what I saw so far.
And not only that, we see the dualities between storms and large earthquakes.
So during a time when there's a lot of storm [activity], like in this case we see
on September 5th, 2015 that there are five tropical storms active on Earth at the same
time and right before the earthquake occurred all of these storms just disappeared. So there's
some kind of energetic exchange between atmosphere and underground right before a
large earthquake. There are also some type of earthquakes that occur around the peak of the storm
as well, but not as intense. Another case study which happened recently. The Japan and Ecuador
earthquakes that happened on April 15-16, 2016. You see the same pattern repeated again here.
About an eight-week period of decline before converging back. And of course there's a
trigger point, right about three days before a big earthquake. So, we can actually predict
these things as we understand how the sunspot patterns work and how the energy cycle of
the sun works. Similarly, if someone wants to look at the coronal holes. See how this black
spot here starts to align on April 15. Next, look at how we can predict earthquakes
and storms together, but especially earthquakes. This is a plot of global wind speeds of
all storms combined on each particular day. You can see that the y-axis here is wind
speed in knots and the x-axis is the date. If you want to predict the earthquakes look in the zone
where there's no storm, or the storm just died down. So there's two periods here and we see that an earthquake
occurred in those time periods. One is the Taiwan earthquake of magnitude of 6.4, and
the other is magnitude of 7.8 in Indonesia. Now we move to a more system level scale, now that
we understand the energy exchange between space, atmosphere and underground. Now we go to the
solar system scale because we want to predict how the space weather fluctuates far in advance.
So now we're going to the quantum vibration theory. In this theory I use the term quantum,
because it's the minimum amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction. We look at Earth as a
fine dot in space, so this qualifies as a quantum. It's something really tiny. A natural disaster, even
though it occurs and looks really big to a human, it is almost negligible in the solar system. So the
quantum vibration is pretty much the vibration, the little bit that is just enough to produce a noticeable
interaction by us. So we use us [ourselves] as a sensor. I just want to introduce a little bit of the
concept here which I have spoken about in the last Electric Universe conference, which is about resonant
coupling in the solar system. In this theory we treat the solar system as a resonant system where the
Sun is the center of the vibrations and Earth sits approximately in the third harmonic of this vibration.
There's a lot of evidence that suggests that such type of wave travels at the speed of
light, but there could be other types of wave as well, like plasma waves. The frequency
is calculated to be around three millihertz, based on the distance and the velocity of light.
We can reproduce an orbital plane that resembles a protoplanetary system shown here, as well
as our solar system. We want to extend this theory [so that we are able to] predict solar activity, or some space
weather fluctuation around the earth, far in advance. Another thing I want you to notice about Jupiter’s
orbit here. You notice there are two clumps of asteroids here, and we will try to
create an experiment that reproduces such types of separation [of the asteroids].
Now we move on to planetary-space interactions. This is one possible explanation of
planetary alignment phenomenona, so we used a Chladni plate which consists of an
acrylic disc with grains of salt on top. Here, you can see that when we apply
energy, it starts to organize itself into a ring. As we change the frequency, you see how
things evolve over time. In this case we use the frequency of 1049 Hertz which is at
the resonant peak of this structure. The diameter of the plate is 11 inch, if someone
wants to reproduce it. So, it's producing four rings. Now we're going to introduce boundary
conditions which are planets. In this case I mimic a planet with magnetic balls
put on the top and bottom of this plate so that they secure each other. So one planet doesn't do
much. From this observation we see that a system that is unorganized, when we
apply vibrations, becomes organized. We now start to introduce our planet
as one of the boundary conditions. So what happens if you put more planets or
‘dots’ into a system? So, that's one planet. Now we go to two planets. We see that the
local space environment starts to change as more objects are introduced into the system.
And not only that, when it sits at the right location, you start to see how energy gets condensed or gets
scattered. So, this really resembles the Bohr atomic model where a standing wave occurs around the orbital path of
an atom. So, for two planets: when two planets are in line, we start to form a symmetrical shape. And
when the planets are strategically placed at certain stable spots, you see how energy gets condensed.
And when it's placed at other places, it gets scattered. Here we not only have two planets, we've got
multiple planets in the solar system so we want to go do some more experiment here. In this case
we look at how we modulate the frequency. As we modulate the frequency we can see that
the energy [distribution] changes, but the energy around the planets remains about the same.
This is only a fractional change by about 0.6 percent of the frequency. When we have a solar eruption,
it's expected that the helioseismic activity on the Sun is changing at that time. So, you see that it's not
only the space surrounding where this coronal mass ejection occurs, but everything in the solar system
changes all together. Now we're going to three planets. So, this is going to be more interesting,
We're going to see something even more funny. So, this is when we have three planets aligned
to each other; they move as it moves away. Okay, so the more the planets come into
alignment, the more condensed the energy becomes. And if you notice here, right there's
two lumps of particles that actually form around the planets. I believe this resembles
how the particles formed the asteroids clumped together around Jupiter’s orbit.
They split equally distant from Jupiter. This is when they are misaligned. Now
[they are] really misaligned, but two remain in alignment. The next experiment is we're
going to put in more, boundary conditions. And you start to see how it works.
It keeps moving. Now we're going to misalign everything. So, now we've moved Venus
out of its orbit. It still has some symmetry in it. Now we're going to move everything out, all the energy
is scattered. So now everything's all over the place. As you can see, if we assume Earth is the third
planet here, what happens to the outer planet does not have much influence on the energy of the inner ones.
So that's when the planets are aligned, four of them. That's three and the fourth is just moving out.
The fourth planet doesn't really have a lot of impact. So next sequence: aligned and not
aligned at all. So we can start to see how so many people have been using planets to do
[earthquake] prediction. And I believe this is the reason. Because during that time a lot of things
fluctuate more frequently than at other times. Next we're looking for more evidence of this resonance.
So, looking to the harmonic resonance of the solar system, we should be able to see such harmonics
occur on the planet level. And the best place to look at is the pole area. At the pole, you can see dualities.
There's a black spot on the North Pole of Mercury. There's a white spot on the South Pole.
So there's a temperature difference. In Venus, the second planet, you've got two vortex [systems].
At the North Pole, there are two [vortices]. while the South Pole system has an infinity-
symbol shape. On Earth, it's very hard to see, so we look at the wind system. On both the South
and the North Pole (looking at the wind map,) we can vaguely see three vortices. This result is in agreement
with research by Bruce Leyborne who has proposed that the energy coupling from space to
the earth is basically a Y-Delta transformer, which consist of three nodes. Looking at this, it is
easy to guess that on Mars you should see four vortices around the poles, and that's what we see.
A rectangular shape on the North Pole and on the South Pole the ice is now starting to
vanish and you see less ice at the center. Regarding Jupiter, I am not quite sure.
But of course here’s the popular one, which is Saturn with six (nodes), and the hexagonal shape at
the north pole. So, there's a lot of evidence for resonant vibration occurring in the solar system, and we can
actually use it for solar activity predictions and climate predictions. Here are some references of researchers that
have been doing predictions such as sunspot formation. The graph on your left hand side shows the result of using
planetary alignment to predict sunspot formations over multiple solar cycles. However, there are
irregular cycles and regular cycles, so so there are many details that went into this graph.
Also, John Nelson has used [planetary positions] to predict shortwave radio propagation each day.
And of course there are people who do a lot of prediction for earthquakes. Last but not least,
as one of the last experiments, a case study here. It's a case study of the Indian Ocean
earthquake that happened on June 2010. and of course there is solar activity during
the time when the planets are aligned. So, in this case you see multiple planets
aligned in the center in the same plane and the Earth is 90 degrees from that alignment.
You can see how sunspots peaked during the time when planets came into alignment. The main
earthquake had a magnitude of 7.5 and was followed by another earthquake of magnitude
of 7.0 about three days after the main event. I have already explained these connections
[to planet alignment] in my last presentation. And of course there are coronal hole
alignments that you can use to do the forecast. This concludes my talk. [To summarize] we have
proposed a natural disaster forecasting technique here, that is based on electrical and quantum vibration
theories. I have tried to verify these theories through my own observations as well as
other people's observations. We have done laboratory experiments to confirm that
this approach can provide an explanation for a mystery that has been observed
over the last few hundred years. So, this concludes my talk and thank
you everyone for listening. [Music] [Music]
