Jordan Peterson On The Meaning Of Life
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: H3 Podcast Highlights
Views: 585,758
Rating: 4.9432716 out of 5
Keywords: h3 podcast, podcast, h3h3, h3h3productions, ethan klein, ethan and hila, chaos, daoism, jordan peterson, order, meaning of life, jordan, peterson
Id: rU64s0_38AE
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 44sec (944 seconds)
Published: Thu Feb 01 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
To answer your question, you'd want to look into functional neuroanatomy, and cognitive neuroscience, and focus on work in the biological bases of behavior in humans.
That said, this interpretation of hemispheric lateralization is somewhere between antiquated, and willfully ignorant. At it's very best it is a wild oversimplification of what each hemisphere does, but just for some immediate and irrefutable examples: your left hemisphere supports sensation and motor control for the right side of your body, and the right hemisphere supports this process for the right side (they do the same thing, not order vs chaos). This is broadly also true in vision for example.
A more specific example of this division falling apart is that many cognitive processes (with some notable exceptions, like language processing) suffer from damage to either hemisphere. Or to even more distinctly address the order/chaos approach, you might look at memory processing in navigation, in which it is (somewhat contentiously) asserted that there are (at least) two memory systems for navigating, a controlled (maybe more order-y) effortfull route planning system which you use when you are calmer and less threatened (supported by frontal regions and the hippocampus), and a more habit based automatic system which you use when more when under stress (maybe more of a chaos-y system). However, these systems are not left vs right, they each utilize different sets of neural structures (each uses more than two structures). (Goodroe, Starnes, Brown, 2018: The Complex Nature of Hippocampal-Striatal Interactions in Spatial Navigation).
There ARE some major bifurcations that people talk about in cognitive processing (Dorsal vs. Ventral Stream Processing in vision, Declarative vs. NonDeclarative memory, Arousal and Valence in Emotion) but none of them would really support the point that he seems to be making in this video. It would be similarly valid to say that there are four lobes of the brain, and four elements in nature, and since fire has a lot of light, occipital cortex is for processing fire - Therefore, there are four natural elements.
An easy read summarizing some of the current literature is the wikipedia article on hemispheric lateralization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateralization_of_brain_function) and if you'd like to go deeper here's a psychology today article talking about how we don't really think this in neuroscience anymore (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-theory-cognitive-modes/201401/left-brain-right-brain-wrong). Or if you want a more comprehensive refutation of this idea, here's a meta-analysis of lateralization of creativity (Mihov, Denzler, Forster, 2010) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278262609002371
TLDR: The field would be functional neuroanatomy / cognitive neuroscience, but the claim he's making is old timey thinking about the brain that hasn't been taken seriously since the mid nineties.
Complete bullshit. This guy is talking out of his ass. Bilateral symmetry has nothing to do with order and chaos. Neither do our left and right hemispheres. Dude has a pop psychology view of cognitive neuroscience and doesn't seem to understand evolution either. Nothing must be because we've evolved this way. "Evolution is nonrandom, but not progressive." Evolution does not have a goal that it is "working" towards. There is no such thing as a higher or lower species. Radially symmetrical animals exist too by the way. He took the left hemisphere's "interpreter" nickname and popped it into a black box of confirmation bias until this pseudoscienticfic, pseudophilisophic psychobabble spewed out. If you ask a right hemisphere lesioned person what letter this is
H
H
H
H
H H H H
They'll likely say that an L. That is because the left hemisphere is specialized in global processing, it tends to look at the big picture, make inferences about cause and effect. The left lesioned patient would say its H because of the right hemisphere's tendency to do local processing, pays more attention to the details. Yeah its not great at inferring the temporal succesion of events. But apparently our right hemisphere represents chaos because of that? Oh shut up.
Its much more complicated than that too and if someone needs me to bring out Gazzaniga's cognitive neuroscience textbook I will.
There's tons more lateralized specializations found through split brain and lesion research but the point is that the OGs of split brain research R. Sperry and M. Gazzaniga would rip this guy apart if they heard him misinterpreting their work that way.
I'm sorry for this rant but damn I hate this pseudointellectual nonsense that never gets challenged by the people who actually could point out his bullshit. Lets get an evolutionary biologist and a cognitive psychologist to publicly put him in his place.
This dude comes on a podcast with Ethan who knows nothing about neuroscience and exploits it to have a platform where he can spew a bunch of raw, unimpeded, sewage. He knows no one in that room will stop him.
He's being a science communicator. In science citations and evidence are required to come to any determination. The brain is so poorly understood, that simplifying it in the way he does isn't actually possible. There have been procedures (neurosurgery) that have indicated that physically severing connections between the two hemispheres of the brain produces strange behaviors. Furthermore, introducing anesthesia into one hemisphere of the brain helped human beings determine the location of Broca's Area (motor speech area) which has been found to often exist on only one hemisphere, statistically on the same side in most humans. These types of experiments/diagnostics/studies help humans reverse engineer the design of the human brain (trauma is also included). For example ataxia has been linked to the cellebellum through those mechanisms. So to say, one half is for this, and the other for that is a misleading oversimplification in my opinion as a student. Hope that helps!
In terms of information processing of mental operations, Cognitive science. In terms of the the world being chaos and order, philosophy.
I would also say functional neuroanatomy, but yeaaaaah it's mostly just pop science