Joe Rogan Experience #1276 - Ben Shapiro
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: PowerfulJRE
Views: 5,545,904
Rating: 4.6756444 out of 5
Keywords: Joe Rogan Experience, podcast, Joe Rogan, JRE #1277, 1277, Ben Shapiro, comedy, comedian, jokes, stand up, funny, mma, UFC, Ultimate Fighting Championship
Id: sCD9zjf_YRU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 154min 20sec (9260 seconds)
Published: Wed Apr 03 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Live Chat - http://discord.gg/JoeRogan
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
lol Joe is trying so hard to get Ben to smoke
It took Joe 29 minutes to talk about chimps lmao
I think where Ben talks about the difference between a progressive (or did he say liberal?) and a conservative upon finding a fence in the middle of nowhere is in the right ball park but not the best example. It also only really applies for someone like him who is always engaged in debate over these issues.
Both Thomas Sowell on the right, and Steven Pinker on the left, had a similar observation about the left and right intellectual debate over society, policy etc. They just used different words to describe it. According to them, in "A conflict of visions" from Sowell and "the blank slate" by Pinker there are two conflicting visions. For Sowell they are the unconstrained vision (left) and the constrained vision (right). For Pinker, they are the utopian vision (left) and tragic vision (right).
Paraphrasing but it comes down to basically... the unconstrained vision that appeals to the left is based on ideas like there are problems and solutions to those problems, and enacting the solutions is a matter of will, that human nature can be improved (in a moral sense) to bend to it and that there can be people who put aside self interest that will make decisions for society that are a benefit to all, even if there is collateral damage. There is less weight given to experience and tradition.
The constrained vision is less optimistic about human nature which it sees as inherently self-interested. There are not often solutions to problems but instead trade offs, making compromise inevitable. Experience and tradition and rule of law are the center of the vision.
Obviously there are crossovers everywhere and it's not quite as simple as above (after all, they both wrote full books on the subject!) but it does seem to strike about right in political debate. It's why politicians so easily talk past each other.
Even just recently I saw Dan Crenshaw (the republican dude with the eye patch) talk about how people on his side of the debate tend to be incorrect when they think those on the left are wrong about problems they perceive. He said they aren't usually wrong about the problems at all, they just propose solutions that are wrong or off target etc. The same can be said for the left too, the right wing isn't always wrong about problems they point out in society, but to the left because of their vision of the world their solutions (or trade offs) seem wrong, or off target.
Some shit like that anyway :P
Joe: Hey Jamie pull up one of Shapiros debate videos on YouTube for the folks at home who don't know him.
Jamie: pulls up
"BEN SHAPIRO SKULL FUCKS LIBERAL SNOW LEOPARD WITH FACTS AND LOGIC; FACTS DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR MICRO PENIS EDITION (TURN YOUR VOLUME DOWN OR YOUR ASS WILL BLEED)"
"When you told Dave Rubin you wouldn't go to his wedding, did he get butt hurt?"
Joe said no pun intended, butt fuck me that's funny out of context
I wish that Joe brought Ari on with Ben, i think it would be interesting to hear them discuss their differing experiences as orthodox jews. I think that would make for a really interesting and entertaining podcast.
I'd love to see Ben Shapiro and Tim Pool in a contest to see who could read off the Micro-machine commercial the fastest.
Eddie Bravo is on his way