Is Life Possible on Mars?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Atlas Pro
Views: 666,993
Rating: 4.9057455 out of 5
Keywords: space, spaceX, mars, martian, martian life, life, life on mars, life mars, mars life, space exploration, Earth, NASA, Curiosity, Curiosity rover, Spirit rover, War of the Worlds, John Carter, Alien, Alien life, Extraterrestrial life, Extraterrestrial
Id: Qma9l3-MryY
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 16min 15sec (975 seconds)
Published: Wed Apr 11 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
The video is nice, but it's clearly just a smattering of information from 'popular scienec' sources.
It get's a lot of basic science wrong (in exactly the way a lot of news articles have presented things). For example, tardigrades aren't the magic monsters many articles make them out to be, and while Mars did cool down faster due to its size, this isn't strictly due to thermodynamics. Even the Earth would've cooled down by now if thermodynamics was the only consideration. Subsurface radioactivity is the more significant factor. Relatedly, the lack of a planetary magnetic field isn't what stripped Mars of its atmosphere. This has been disproven by multiple lines of evidence, and the persistence of this false factoid is starting to drive me nuts. While solar winds do carry away gasses from the upper Martian atmosphere, they also induce a magnetic field in the upper atmosphere. When the solar winds increase in intensity, so to does the induced field (and its protective effect). As a result, the volume of gasses lost don't actually increase much with solar wind intensity, what does increase is the speed at which they're blown away from Mars. What actually accounts for most of Mars' losses is photoionization. Ultraviolet light (specifically the higher frequency portion of it) has the requisite energy to break (ionize) many compounds. The lighter products which can result from this often have an easier time rising through the atmosphere, making them more likely to be blown away by solar winds. So, while solar intensity does increase atmospheric loss, the wind vs the magnet field isn't the dominant dynamic. This distinction is important because if photoionization is the problem, then the real issue is the lack of an ozone layer. It's also worth noting that this doesn't mean the small size of Mars hasn't played a (different) role in the planet not having much of an atmosphere. The smaller size, which led to more rapid cooling, which led to decreased geological (areological) activity, didn't just cause the internal magnetic field to shut down. It decreased the amount of gasses being released into the atmosphere from the ground. So again, while the lack of an internal magnetic field didn't directly cause the thin atmosphere, they are related.
As a sanity check for those who don't know much about the principles I just referred to, think about Venus. It doesn't have an internal magnetic field, and it's closer to the Sun than Mars, yet it still has an extremely thick atmosphere.
I suppose this, strictly, doesn't matter if you just want to know if life could've existed on Mars. For that, you just need to know if the conditions were right. But, if you want to explain those conditions with facts about the planet, please get them right. The propagation of false information isn't helpful.