INTRO
Many things have been said about the Mongols, but one thing that can’t be
denied is that they affected the lives of almost everyone in Eurasia. From the Western and Eastern
Europeans to the west, to the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese in the east and Vietnamese, Burmans,
and Javans to the south, every polity had to fight against them. In this video we will talk about how
various peoples, including the Mongols themselves, tried to defend against the Mongol attacks, about
their armies, strategies, tricks and much more. This video is made available for free thanks to
our Youtube Members and Patrons. We fund our free content through our program of exclusive
videos made for our members and patrons, who get two documentaries per week not
available to the public. Join their ranks and watch the series on the Albigensian
Crusade, Fall of Sparta, First Punic War, Italian Reunification Wars, History of Prussia,
Biography of Sulla, Russo-Japanese War, Reconquista, Pacific War, Persian Wars, and War
of Spanish Succession and much more. All this is made for, and with generous donations from, our
backers. So if you’re enjoying our content and want to both see more and support the cause of
history, consider becoming a youtube member or patron. Join their ranks via the link in the
description and pinned comment to learn our schedule, get early access to all videos, voting
rights on future videos, and much more. You will be able to watch more than 100 exclusive
videos today. Thanks for supporting us! #1 Western Europeans
When the armies of Batu and Subedei withdrew in 1242, Europe was in a state of panic.
Hungary had been occupied for a year, the Polish Duchies had been ravaged and Mongol forces had
darted into the eastern parts of the Holy Roman Empire and Austria. Early in 1242 Mongol armies
had also cut through the Balkans, with one force perhaps even approaching Constantinople,
then under the rule of the Latin Empire. During Batu’s leisurely withdrawal from Hungary,
he thoroughly sacked anything which had survived the first Passover. Then, he sent more troops
into Halychyna-Volhynia when passing through there. Ultimately he did not return to Mongolia,
but settled on the Volga Steppes. The Mongols did not disappear into the distant mists, but
seemed all too close and ready to strike again. The situation in Europe was tense. Pope Gregory IX
had died in August 1241 in the midst of a violent confrontation with the Holy Roman Emperor, and
his successor had reigned only days before he too passed away. It took two years for a new Pope,
Innocent IV, to be ordained. In the Holy Roman Empire, an attempt at an anti-Mongol Crusade in
1241 under the Emperor’s son Conrad had collapsed into civil war in Germany by that autumn. In 1242,
the Saintonge War broke out between France and England. Despite optimistic suggestions
by the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II, there would be no united front among the European
monarchs in the immediate aftermath of the Mongol Invasion. For those on the frontline of a
possible Mongol return, such as Béla IV, King of Hungary, this was unwelcome news.
The powers of Europe had, by and large, offered no real support during the midst of the
Mongol onslaught, and it was clear no assistance would be forthcoming for further preparation.
When King Béla returned to his kingdom in the fall of 1242, he quickly got to work. He had
no pretensions that the Mongols would not come back to finish the job, and threatening letters
demanding his submission were a regular feature of the rest of his reign. Béla had to prepare
for their inevitable return. One of his first actions was to bring the Cumans back to his realm.
These Turkic nomads had previously sought shelter in Hungary before the murder of their leader
caused them to abandon Béla to the Mongols. Béla coaxed them back with promises of land and
a marriage alliance. His son István was married to a Cuman Princess who was then baptised.
The Cumans were given a section of the Great Hungarian Plain depopulated by the Mongols.
The hope was for the now-settled Cumans to be a first line of defense should the Mongols
return. For the rest of the thirteenth century, Cuman horse archers remained one of the
most important parts of the Hungarian army. Much of the kingdom’s population had been
driven to the westernmost part of Hungary, near the Austrian border, or north into what is
now Slovakia. From the Danube River westwards Béla ordered, and encouraged the nobility, to build
more fortifications, particularly in stone, and on more rugged, hard-to-access locations. These
had been some of the few fortifications which had survived the first Mongol assault, such as at
Esztergom, though they also represented ongoing trends in European castle construction. With the
death of the last Babbenburg Duke of Austria in 1246, Béla then went to war, unsuccessfully, with
his Bohemian neighbour Ottokar over those lands, a failed effort to push his kingdom even more
west. One of his key strategies was also to establish a network of marriage alliances with
Polish Dukes, the Duke of Bavaria, the Princes of Halychyna-Volhynia, and with Rus’ princes who
had fled into Hungary. With Halychyna-Volhynia, Béla offered encouragement for
its ruler, Daniil Romanovich, to declare his independence from the Mongols as
King of Ruthenia, making a convenient buffer-state between Hungary and the Mongol Empire.
Alongside those relationships, Béla continued to contact the Pope and the Holy Roman
Emperor, seeking aid, funds, troops, whatever they could spare, presenting himself as the front-line
defender of Christendom. With Pope Innocent IV, Béla had a relatively supportive ally, who
organized the First Council of Lyons in 1245 to deal with the threats to the Christian peoples:
the Mongols, the fall of Jerusalem in 1244, and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick. But Innocent’s
Papal successors were less keen on Béla’s continued exultations for support. Pope Alexander
IV and his successor Urban IV both essentially told Béla to shove it, critiquing his reliance on
pagan Cumans and basically telling him the Mongol invasions were punishments for the sin of the
Hungarians. In the end, little material Papal assistance ever actually came to the Hungarians.
The results of Béla’s policies we will return to in a few minutes, but we can compare his efforts
with the suggestions his contemporaries made. The most deliberate European response to the
Mongol invasion was the Council of Lyons in 1245. Pope Innocent IV invited hundreds of prelates from
across Europe to discuss the problems facing the Church. Among other important pontifical matters,
such as deciding the colours of Cardinals’ hats and excommunicating Emperor Frederick, the Church
Council heard from those who had experienced the invasion first-hand in Eastern Europe. It was
decided to learn more about these Mongols, and to do so several embassies were organized.
These were made up of the Mendicant Orders, the Franciscans and Dominicans. The most well-known
of these was Giovanni de Pian del Carpine, or John de Plano Carpini as his name is more
commonly rendered. Carpini departed on his mission in 1245, arriving in the Mongol imperial
capital of Qaraqorum in time for the election of Great Khan Güyük in 1246, before returning
with the Khaan’s letters demanding the Popes and King come to Mongolia to submit. It was an
impressive journey for a 65-year-old Italian. During his travels Carpini took extensive notes,
observations and conducted interviews with as many people as possible, especially from European
captives taken during the Mongol invasion who provided Carpini first-hand details of Mongol
battle strategy. Together, Carpini compiled a lengthy manual on how to battle the Mongols.
Thoroughly he described the appearance, dress, and customs of the Mongols; not in exaggerated
mythic terms, but with the detailed eye of an observer who felt lives depended on it.
His information is accurate, corroborating well with other European, Chinese and Persian
accounts. Carpini’s extensive ethnography of the Mongols —whom he calls Tatars throughout— was no
accident. One of the key strategies, he suggested, was recognizing the difference between the
Mongols, and the people they ruled over, for Carpini believed that should these people be
freed, they would fight against the Mongol menace. Indeed, unity in the face of the Mongols was one
of Carpini’s primary arguments for a successful defense. Carpini was quite aware of the disunity
within Europe even in the face of the previous Mongol attack, and Güyük Khaan himself told
Carpini that he was preparing to finish the conquest. Carpini’s work stressed the need
for cooperation between European powers, both at diplomatic, strategic levels — that is, not to
allow one kingdom to face the Mongols on its own— and at operational and tactical levels — tight
discipline must be kept over troops, they must not break formation to pursue fleeing Mongols, and the
army itself needed to be under unified command. No single power or army, Carpini stressed,
could stand against them. Much of Carpini’s suggestions were to emulate the Mongolian army.
Scouts should always be on watch day and night, while the army itself should be organized
in the Turko-Mongolian decimal structure to ease command. The army had to advance or retreat
together, follow orders and not break off into small parties that could be picked off piecemeal.
In Carpini’s view, the Mongols had to be defeated in the field. He actively discouraged
hiding in castles; doing so, he argued, only allowed the Mongols to overrun the
countryside and kill whoever they came across. A castle was worth nothing if the kingdom
was reduced to ash and its people were taken captive. While he offers advice on how to design
fortifications to resist the Mongols, this was a last line of defense rather than a primary means
of protection. Carpini’s suggestions for castle design mirrored ongoing efforts in Hungary at the
time: that is, on elevated positions difficult to target by siege machines, well supplied,
with deep ditches and well-built walls. But, Carpini urges the defenders not to base their
entire defence on such forts. As he wrote: “Moreover, in regard to this point, it should be
known that the Tartars much prefer men to shut themselves into their cities and fortresses
rather than fight with them in the open, for then they say they have got their little
pigs shut in their sty, and so they place men to look after them as I have told above.”
No, the Mongols had to be confronted head-on, before their armies split to attack several
points. For equipment, Carpini listed the following: “Whoever wishes to fight against
the Tartars ought to have the following arms: good strong bows, crossbows, of which [the
Mongols] are much afraid, a good supply of arrows, a serviceable axe of strong iron or a battle-axe
with a long handle; the heads of the arrows for both bows and cross-bows ought to be tempered
after the Tartar fashion, in salt water when they are hot, to make them hard enough to pierce
the Tartar armour. They should also have swords and lances with a hook to drag the Tartars from
their saddle, for they fall off very easily; knives, and cuirasses of a double thickness,
for the Tartar arrows do not easily pierce such; a helmet and armour and other things to
protect the body and the horses from their weapons and arrows. If there are any men
not as well armed as we have described, they ought to do as the Tartars and go behind the
others and shoot at the enemy with their bows and crossbows. There ought to be no stinting of money
when purchasing weapons for the defence of souls and bodies and liberty and other possessions.”
On his return in 1247, Carpini had his account read out and copied as he travelled, ensuring
that it spread across Europe. As such, his work, the Ystoria Mongalorum, became the most popular
account of the Mongols in Europe in the thirteenth century. Later writers plagiarised and adapted
it. The most famous of these was John Mandeville, a fourteenth century author who copied
from Carpini for his own fictional travels. The question remains though; did Carpini’s work
influence European defensive measures against the Mongols? It is difficult to answer in the
affirmative. While Carpini’s work was quickly popularized, there’s little evidence to connect
it to defensive or offensive measures employed against later Mongol attacks. Aside from the
improved fortifications, Carpini suggested, something which originated independently
of Carpini, the hopes for united armies operating as one body to prevent the Mongols from
overrunning the countryside never materialized. After the Prince of Halychyna-Volhynia Daniil
Romanovich had been encouraged by the Hungarians and Pope to assert his independence against
the Mongols, he received no support beyond a Papal-approved crown, and this independence was
soon crushed. The 1260 invasion of Poland by Boroldai Noyan was immensely destructive, more
so than the first Mongol attacks according to the Polish chronicler Jan Długosz. Here
there was no record of any of Carpini’s suggestions being adhered to; the Poles received
no outside aid, and the battles were all sieges, in which the Mongols overran quickly the
Polish defenders. The Mongols retreated laden with booty and captives, having been given
free roam to ravage the countryside. In Bulgaria, the Jochid prince Nogai’s troops plundered
annually over the 1270s. Only in 1283 did Nogai’s troops, commanded by a Byzantine ally, meet a
significant military defeat against the Serbians, during a failed crossing over the River Drim.
Nogai and Prince Tele-Buqa led a large attack on the Hungarian Kingdom in 1285. Here the defensive
measures of the late Béla IV were put to the test, and once more no influence of Carpini’s
suggestions can be determined. The Cumans who Béla had so carefully recalled to the
Kingdom revolted at the start of the 1280s, in response to Christianization efforts
led against them. Though the revolt was put down in 1282, many of these Cumans fled the
Hungarian Kingdom outright, a number defecting to the Golden Horde, thus unraveling Béla’s
intended offensive arm against the Mongols. The second Mongol invasion of Hungary is only
poorly covered in the extant primary sources, though study of these sources has advanced
our knowledge of the campaign since even our own video on it. While it remains
a popular claim in online circles to assert that fierce European heavy cavalry
under King László routed the Mongol armies, there is no surviving source that describes
any such encounter. Charters issued by László seem to indicate that he stayed in the western
part of the kingdom, mostly in Buda and Pest, throughout the Mongol assault. As
archaeologist Michal Holeščák noted, it seems unlikely that a King so beleaguered and
suffering from harassment from the Church and his Barons would have missed an opportunity
to glorify a victory over the Mongols, had he one to share. Instead, the campaign was
largely one of the small skirmishes and short sieges. The Mongols seemed unwilling to besiege
major sites and ravaged the countryside instead, and when they began to withdraw in the spring of
1285, the sources described them as carrying a considerable amount of slaves and booty; it
seems up to that point, the campaign was by and large successful. Carpini’s doctrine here
evidently played no role in the defence. Only the botched withdrawal through the Carpathians
stopped the campaign from being a success, where lightly armoured Vlachs, Saxons and Szekély
harassed the Mongols armies and freed a number of prisoners. As reported in sources from Poland,
the Rus’ Principalities to Egypt, Tele-Buqa’s army was lost to severe weather, epidemic and
starvation, turning the mission into a disaster. It seems that Carpini’s suggestions were not
heeded in Hungary. When Nogai and Tele-Buqa, now Khan of the Golden Horde, attacked Poland
in 1287, the campaign was much less successful. Major cities repulsed the Mongol attacks, and
the Mongols had to contend with pillaging the countryside and undefended areas. But Carpini
would have found some solace in the fact that some Hungarian lords travelled in Poland to provide
assistance against the Mongols: this was the closest to a united military front ever offered.
The 1280s marked the last of the major Mongol attacks on Europe. Raids launched by the Golden
Horde continued well into the fourteenth century, but these were on a considerably smaller
scale. Throughout the first half of the 1300s, Khan Öz Beğ showed a remarkable willingness to
negotiate for diplomatic settlements when he, the Polish King and the Lithuanian Grand Duke
butted heads over Halychyna-Volhynia. While Öz Beğ wasn’t afraid to threaten a Mongol invasion, his
desires to conquer the Ilkhanate stopped him from ever committing any real strength to the far west.
But after Öz Beğ’s death, the balance shifted. The ravages of the Black Death, ecological and
economic catastrophes and repeated civil wars left the Golden Horde in a state of anarchy from
1360 through to 1380. After being stabilized by Toqtamish Khan, the Horde was once again plunged
into turmoil with the invasion of the great Emir, Tamerlane. In the midst of this, the rulers of
Hungary, Poland and Lithuania invaded Horde’s western lands. The Lithuanians took Kyiv and
drove to the Black Sea. Unfortunately, the sources generally offer little detail into the specifics
of a given victory. Strong cavalry forces marked much of these armies, with their own horse
archers; these were the types of forces which, ironically, often fared the best against the
Mongols, as was the case with the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and the Delhi Sultanate. Thus, Carpini’s
suggestions had little influence on the actual successes European armies did have; but in regard,
he was quite correct. When the Mongol armies were no longer providing a disciplined, united
front, they fell victim to the armies that could. #2 Ruthenians
Eastern Europeans also had to deal with the Mongols. We will focus on the princes of Halych
and Volhynia, today the western part of Ukraine, and the lives of Danylo Romanovich and his
brother, Vasylko. They were sons of Knyaz Roman Mstislavich, who became the powerful prince of the
Rus' principalities in the late twelfth century, becoming Grand Prince of Kyiv, renewing an
alliance with the Byzantine Empire and inflected crushing defeats on the nomadic Cuman people. He
even intervened in the war between Hohenstaufen and Welfs in the Holy Roman Empire and was killed
campaigning against the Welfs' Polish allies in 1205. His sons Danylo and Vasylko were no more
than four and two years old. Halych-Volhynia fell to independent boyars and rival Knyaz, while
Hungary, Cumans, Poland, and the Lithuanians tried to raid or exert control. The city of
Halych switched hands constantly, the young Danylo Romanovich fighting almost every year for
his birthright; the Hungarian King András II, for instance, installed his young son
Kálmán there as Prince of Halych. Steadily the Romanovichi brothers brought their family
back to influence. Alliances turned quickly; Danylo and Vasylko would ally with the Poles and
Hungarians in one year and fight them the next. Plots and rebellions challenged them regularly.
Danylo and Vasylko grew up fighting, soon becoming warriors famed for their strength,
courage, and skill, who took lead roles in combat. Gradually they reclaimed their family lands
throughout Halych and Volhynia, though the city of Halych itself remained under constant threat
from Hungarians and rival knyaz. By the start of the 1220s, the young princes were among the
fiercest warriors in all the Rus' lands. Danylo Romanovich was among the many princes, boyars,
and knyaz who attended the great council in Kyiv, listening to the accounts of terrified Cumans
seeking assistance against a frightening enemy from the east. A great host of Rus' and Cumans,
some of whom had been baptized to seal the coalition, marched into the steppes in the spring
of 1223. Danylo was one of the princes leading parties to observe this new foe, eager to make
a name for himself with his courage, to make a worthwhile comparison to his late father Roman's,
and ancestor Volodymyr Monomakh's victories over nomadic foes. But the Mongols would not be
accommodating to the young prince's desires. The Rus' princes, their retinues, and the
Cumans fought as skilled horse archers, with the Rus’ better equipped. They made a good show
of themselves in the first skirmishes, capturing great numbers of Mongol cattle. They captured and
executed a Mongol commander who had been scouting out the coalition. The Rus' chronicles record
the great excitement of the Cumans at getting their revenge on this Mongol leader, whom they
called Gemya-Beğ. In the opinion of historian Stephen Pow, this was the ultimate fate of Jebe
Noyan, one of the great generals of Chinggis Khan. Jebe's co-commander, Sübedei, could not let this
go unpunished. The Rus' and Cumans pursued the Mongols deeper into the steppes until reaching the
Kalka River, where Sübedei's troops turned about and crushed the alliance. The Halych-Volhynian
Chronicle records Danylo Romanovich fighting fiercely but suffering a wound to his chest,
which, through adrenaline, he did not realize he had incurred until during the bedraggled retreat
from the battle. So ended Danylo's first encounter with the Mongols, but it would not be his last.
Though regarded as the greatest defeat the Rus' princes had ever suffered to that point,
it did not stop their continued fighting. The principalities remained a mess of shifting
alliances, and the Romanovichi grew in strength. The Halych-Volhynian Chronicle reports that
from 1227 onwards, Danylo and Vasylko knew no peace. They continued to battle Poles,
Hungarians, Lithuanians, rival Princes, and Cumans, suffering defeats and victories.
Relations with the Hungarians eased after the death of András and his son Béla IV's ascension
as Hungarian King. Over the late 1230s, Danylo and Vasylko visited Béla and began negotiating a
marriage alliance between their families. Danylo was one of these trips in 1240 when the Mongols
attacked Halych-Volhynia. Like many Rus’ princes, Danylo seems to have failed to take heed of the
fall of the eastern principalities. In late 1239, as the prince of Kyiv, Mikhail Vsevolodovich, fled
the city with the approach of the Mongols, Danylo was content to appoint a boyar, Dmitro, to govern
it on his behalf before departing for Hungary. This Dmitro commanded the city when it fell to the
Mongols in the winter of 1240. Surprisingly, we are told the Mongols spared Dmitro because of his
courage and that he urged Batu to attack Hungary. Danylo learned of the Mongol attack when he
encountered waves of refugees on his way back to Halych. Riding with only a small escort,
Danylo fled into Poland, where he found his wife, children, and brother Vasylko had also
escaped. Late in 1241, after the Mongols moved into Hungary, Danylo and his family returned to
Halych-Volhynia. The sight that awaited them was beyond comprehension; we are told that they could
not enter the city of Berestia on account of the stench of the corpses; at the city of Volodymyr’,
not a single person was seen alive, its Church of the Blessed Virgin filled with the fallen.
Whatever pain and anger Danylo felt, he did not let it despair him but turned
his wrath instead against the boyars, many of whom refused to listen to him or acted as
independent lords. But Danylo’s campaign had to be called off with the return of Batu and Sübedei's
great host from Hungary. The Mongols dispatched a portion of the army to track down Danylo. He
evaded his pursuers, though they wrecked more damage on the country as far as Volodava.
Even then, the shadow of the Great Khan was not far away. Despite the common claim, the Mongol
army did not retreat to participate in an election in Mongolia. Batu only went as far east as the
Volga River, and began dividing up the western steppes to his princes and generals, assigning
tax collectors in the Rus' lands and putting down a Cuman rebellion in the steppe. One of Danylo's
most hated enemies, prince Mikhail Vsevolodovich, was put to death on Batu's order for failing to
show proper reverence to an icon of Chinggis Khan. While almost all Rus' princes and church leaders
paid homage in Batu's court on the Volga, Danylo tried to avoid any formal recognition
of Batu's authority. Danylo was fortunate too, that the destruction in Halych-Volhynia was
not total, for he was quickly able to raise an army for a four-pronged assault on eastern
Poland in 1243, while in 1244, fought Rostislav Mikhailovich, a rival prince backed by Béla IV
to take control of Halych city. By this point, Danylo's son Lev was old enough to join his
father in battle against the Lithuanians, Poles, and Hungarians. Whatever the terror of the
Mongols, Danylo saw the opportunity to consolidate his power; an opportunity his rivals grasped
too. Danylo hoped the Mongols would not return, or at least not immediately, to give himself time
to strengthen his position and fortify his cities. But in 1245, envoys came from the Mongols
demanding his formal submission. Here the Halych-Volhynian Chronicle specifies Danylo’s
fear, as his fortification project was barely begun. With great trepidation, Danylo traveled
to Batu. Tearfully saying goodbye to his family, he spent 25 days with Batu, who greeted Danylo
warmly; Batu considered it wise for Danylo to have come of his own volition, though he felt it
was late. As Batu gave Danylo fermented mare's milk to drink, he told the Knyaz that he was now
one of them and should share in their custom. If the lengthy condemnation in the Chronicle
that follows this encounter is any indication, then Danylo hated his experience with Batu.
Despondent, while returning to Halych-Volhynia, he met a Franciscan monk, John de Plano Carpini,
who the Pope had sent as an envoy to the Mongols. Carpini had already met with Danylo's brother
Vasylko, and now Danylo learned from the Franciscan that the Pope was seeking to organize a
crusade against the Mongols, and an offer was made to Danylo that he could join such an alliance,
if he abandoned the Greek Church for the Roman. While not keen on the religious concession,
the promise of military aid stuck in Danylo's mind. By the time Carpini returned from
Mongolia and met with Danylo in 1247, he found Danylo excited by the plan, sending
letters and envoys back with Carpini to the Pope. Carpini tells us he learned much about
the Mongols from the Romanovichi brothers; some of the anti-Mongol defence measures
Carpini made, and we covered previously, likely came directly from Danylo and Vasylko.
Over the next years, Danylo Romanovich exchanged envoys with the Pope while building
up fortifications, securing his lands, and strengthening his army. The thought of armed
support from the west against the eastern enemy could allow Danylo to punch above his weight. In
the meantime, he used official subordination to Batu to his advantage; Béla IV finally agreed
to a marriage agreement between his daughter and Danylo's son Lev, rather than an attack
on the vassal of the Khan, which would raise Batu’s ire. Danylo also acquainted himself with
Mongolian equipment; in 1248, Danylo personally led an army to Bratislava to assist Béla against
the Holy Roman Emperor. Here, we are told that Danylo, his guards, and their horses were adorned
in "Tatar armor," which was resplendent to behold. By 1253, in Dorohyčyn, Danylo formally adopted
the Catholic faith while being crowned by the Pope's representatives as King of Ruthenia (rex
ruthenorum). Unfortunately, no effort was made to provide material support to Danylo. He received
a crown and nothing else. Once he realized this, Danylo quickly reneged on the commitment
to Catholicism, which resulted in Papal letters demanding his return to the fold. Danylo
likely did not think highly of these threats. Still, by the mid-1250s, Danylo felt strong enough
to take the fight to the enemy. The constant battles with the Lithuanians and other neighbors
made his armies experienced and cohesive, a powerful body of heavy cavalry armed with bows
and javelins, supported by Cuman light-horsemen and sturdy heavy infantry fighting with shield
and spear. Fighting began first as skirmishing along border towns, Mongols and Danylo trying
to secure the loyalty of boyars and punishing those who defected. In 1255, perhaps following
the death of Batu, King Danylo, his brother Vasylko and his son Lev campaigned along the Bug
River, taking several towns under their rule. But the Mongols struck back the following winter
under the command of Quremsa. At Volodymyr, his advance troops were repulsed by Vasylko's
troops. A pitched battle was avoided, though, as Danylo’s had been gathering his troops
at Chełm until the town was destroyed in a devastating fire. The Halych-Volhynian Chronicle
blamed a “damned peasant woman” for the blaze. But people and troops fled, assuming
Chełm had already fallen to the Mongols. While Danylo tried to gather his forces, Quremsa
tried his luck at Lutsk, an unfortified town where many refugees had gathered. He failed to ford
the deep, freezing river, and the townspeople cut down the bridge before Quremsa's troops could
cross it. His attempt to bombard the foe failed on account of strong winds allegedly throwing the
stones back onto the catapults, according to the Halych-Volhynian Chronicle. Quremsa withdrew
soon after, and was promptly removed from his position. Danylo was fortunate, as Quremsa was
a poor commander unable to take advantage of the Knyaz’s misfortune. The Halych-Volhynian
Chronicle reports Danylo was never afraid of him. Quremsa's successor was a different story.
Boroldai Noyan was an experienced general who had accompanied Batu and Sübedei on the great
campaign. He came with a great army too; the new Jochid Khan, Berke, wanted to tighten the leash
on his western frontier. His messengers to Danylo in 1257 came with a simple message: Boroldai was
going to march against the Lithuanians, and if they were truly at peace, then Danylo would join.
After deliberation, it was deemed too dangerous to send Danylo to Boroldai, so Vasylko went in
his brother’s stead. Vasylko fought alongside Boroldai in a number of battles against the
Lithuanians over 1258: Boroldai commended him on his ability. Meanwhile, Danylo navigated away from
Boroldai, successfully avoiding him. An annoyed but placated Boroldai returned to the steppes.
A year of rare peace followed: in Volodymyr’ in November 1259, Danylo and his family were
celebrating the wedding of Vasylko’s daughter, when more messages came from Boroldai, demanding
Danylo and Vasylko in his presence. Vasylko, Danylo’s son Lev, and the Bishop of Chełm went
to Boroldai, whose fury at Danylo’s absence left them trembling. He then ordered they demonstrate
their loyalty by dismantling their fortifications. Reluctantly, they carried out Boroldai’s will
and tore down many of Halych-Volhynia’s walls and towers. Boroldai accompanied Vasylko
to Volodymyr’, and watched as Vasylko set fire to the great wooden walls and dug up the
entrenchments. Boroldai even entered Volodymyr’, enjoying a dinner in Vasylko’s home there.
Only at Chełm was Boroldai denied. The garrison stood their ground, barring the doors and arming
crossbows and catapults against them. Boroldai sent Vasylko to receive their surrender. Under
the eye of Boroldai’s officers and interpreters, Vasylko urged the garrison to submit; but as
he spoke he threw rocks at the ground. His men in the city knew how to interpret it, and
refused the order. Boroldai was frustrated but moved on. Perhaps hearing of Danylo’s flight to
Poland, Boroldai took Vasylko and his army into the Polish duchies and unleashed a swath of
devastation there, sacking several cities and departing with considerable loot. Danylo
avoided this too, by fleeing to Hungary. Danylo returned to Halych, having been
humbled. He spent his last years quietly, passing from illness in 1264, and Vasylko a
few years later. Danylo’s son Lev succeeded the throne as King of Ruthenia. Unlike his father,
Lev Danylovich did not try to resist the Mongols; instead, he used them. To deal with raids
by the Lithuanians or Poles, Lev regularly requested support from the Khan or prince Nogai,
who would in good order provide an army to protect Lev’s border. He learned the lessons of his
father and enjoyed a long reign of comparative stability compared to him. The rule of his family
continued into the early fourteenth century. #3 Mamluks
The southeastern limit of the Mongol invasion was Ayn Jalut. The famous battle and the campaign
surrounding it provided the Mamluk Sultan Baybars with a plethora of lessons he would employ against
the Mongols. Baybars and many of the Mamluks were Qipchaqs, Turkic nomads who lived in the great
grass steppe, which stretches from Ukraine through Kazakhstan. When the Mongols conquered those
steppes in the 1230s, thousands of Qipchaqs were displaced and sold abroad. Baybars and other boys
like him were purchased by the Ayyubids of Egypt, descendants of the mighty Saladin. They were
converted to Islam, and trained to become fearsome soldiers on foot and horseback, equipped with the
finest arms, armours, and horses. Skilled with bow and mace, these slave soldiers, or mamluks,
became some of the greatest horseback warriors of the age. When the French King Louis IX and
his army invaded Egypt on the Seventh Crusade, at the battle of Mansura in 1250, 600 knights
charged against the Mamluks; only a handful of knights escaped alive. In the ensuing days, the
Mamluks not only defeated the Crusader army and captured Louis IX, but murdered the last Ayyubid
sultan, beginning a long period of fighting between Mamluk factions for control of Cairo.
Baybars and his own Mamluk regiments were forced to flee to the Ayyubids of Syria. There,
Baybars urged the Ayyubid ruler, al-Nasir Yusuf, to rally his forces against the approaching
Mongol prince Hülagü. Al-Nasir chose instead to trust in the walls of Damascus and Aleppo.
Baybars, who had always a clear head, knew the great army of Hülagü which had taken Baghdad
would find no trouble picking off poorly-led Ayyubid defenders. Thus, Baybars abandoned
the Ayyubids, and made peace with his rival, Qutuz, now the Sultan of Egypt. Al-Nasir shortly
after abandoned his cities, and Syria swiftly fell to the Mongols in the spring of 1260.
After that, there was no Islamic power in the region to stand against the Mongols other
than Cairo itself. Believing the Mamluks too disunited and weak, and not desiring to
cross the desert in the heat of the summer, Hülegü withdrew with most of his army to the
cooler pastures of Azerbaijan. He sent letters to the Mamluks demanding their submission and
made it apparent that he would return in the autumn. Hülegü left his commander Ket Buqa to
consolidate Syria and Palestine, establishing a new government under a puppet Ayyubid prince named
al-Ashraf Musa. Contrary to some claims, Ket Buqa was not in the midst of preparing to march
on Egypt; he separated his forces into various local pastures to rest for the summer.
Baybars and Qutuz could not let this opportunity slide. The emirs were terrified of the Mongols
and believed them invincible. With difficulty, Qutuz and Baybars assembled a force
commonly estimated at 10,000 Mamluks, and a few thousand refugee soldiers who had fled
the disintegration of al-Nasir Yusuf’s realm, including Turkmen, Kurds, and Bedouin. The march
was daring, and several times Baybars and Qutuz needed to rally the emirs into advancing.
They caught Ket Buqa Noyan off guard, who had to quickly collect his soldiers from across the
region: a core of Mongols with Georgian, Armenian, and local forces, with a large Syrian contingent
under al-Ashraf Musa, the prince the Mongols made titular head of Syria. Its exact size is
uncertain, but likely similar to the Mamluk army. The two armies met in early September 1260 at
Ayn Jalut. It was ground well-suited for cavalry, the backbone of both armies. Fighting began with
skirmishing; Baybars led the Mamluk vanguard, a day’s ride ahead of Qutuz, and was forced to fall
back after the first day. On the 3rd of September, the full Mamluk army arrived and formed up.
Different medieval sources emphasize different aspects. Mamluk accounts stress the early arrival
of the Mongols, while the Ilkhanid sources describe a Mamluk ambush. Uniformly, they depict
a hard-fought battle, with the Mongols pushing back the Mamluks and requiring Qutuz to reform his
army twice, lest it breaks. Three factors led to the ultimate Mamluk victory that day. While it’s
sometimes claimed the Mamluks defeated the Mongols through superior numbers or with gunpowder,
neither seems born out. Notices of these weapons at Ayn Jalut come from later military treatises
which aim to glorify these weapons. Instead, Qutuz and Baybars’ leadership preventing a Mamluk
rout was key. But also commonly overlooked was the defection of al-Ashraf Musa, an Ayyubid prince
allied to the Mongols and stationed on their left flank. Either fearing the outcome of the battle
or in agreement with the Mamluks, al-Ashraf and his forces fled the field, allowing the Mongol
army to be enveloped. And hence the third factor for the Mamluk victory was their superior armour,
weapons, and training for extended close-quarter combat. Thus, with some difficulty, the Mamluks
cut down the Mongols and killed Ket Buqa. Qutuz and Baybars pushed the Mongols to the border
and set about gaining the submission of regional princes, rewarding those like al-Ashraf Musa, or
punishing those who had allied with the Mongols, while appointing a new governor for Syria.
Qutuz was not long to enjoy his victory; Baybars assassinated him, revenge for Qutuz’s
murders of Baybars’ allies. According to Baybars’ chancellor and favoured biographer,
Ibn Abd al-Ẓāhir, Baybars’ own sword, rightly guided by Allah, struck down Qutuz.
Baybars was enthroned as Sultan and set about consolidating power. Ayn Jalut hadn’t broken
Mongol military power; Baybars had gambled everything he had in order to defeat what was
essentially a garrison, not the full Mongol army. He knew the Mongols would seek revenge in
greater numbers. At the end of 1260, another small Mongol army attacked Syria, which was defeated
handily at Homs in December, a much-needed boost to confirm the outcome of Ayn Jalut.
From his own experience and reports of other Mongol conquests, Baybars built his defense.
Several factors were seen as key to the Mongols’ victories: a disunited defense and too much trust
in city walls gave the Mongols freedom of movement and local superiority of force. Detailed
information networks were needed to track and prepare for Mongol advances. Diplomatically
the Mamluks needed friends and allies to relieve some of the pressure, while also maintaining their
own internal lines of communication. In effect, to prevent the situation al-Nasir Yusuf had
experienced. The Mamluks had to play to their strengths, particularly their strong core of
heavy horsemen and the limited routes of advance, and deny the Mongols their own advantages, their
mobility, and numbers. Baybars was going to design his entire kingdom to counter Mongol invasions.
Baybars was also extremely fortunate. When Hülagü learned of the death of his brother, Grand Khan
Möngke, he began to annex territories in Iran and the Caucasus that his northern cousins
considered theirs; the soon-to-emerge Golden Horde. Their tax collectors had been stationed
throughout these lands, and after Möngke’s death, Hülagü ousted them for himself. The ruler of
the northern branch of the Mongols, Berke, was a Muslim who already disliked Hülagü for his
murder of the Caliph; the annexation of lands he considered his own, coupled with the mysterious
deaths of some of Berke’s kinsmen in Hülagü’s army, and without a Great Khan to mediate between
them, led to war breaking out between the two princes in 1262. Hülagü spent the remainder of
his life at war with Berke of the Golden Horde; when he died in 1265, his son Abaqa took up
the throne and continued the fighting. This provided Baybars valuable years to nurture his
strength without any significant Mongol attacks. Baybars’ first steps were securing
the internal situation. Cities and principalities from Jordan through to
Syria were subdued through force or treaty, while he incorporated the Bedouin Arabs of Syria
into the defense, preventing them from allying with the Mongols. The governor of Syria appointed
by Qutuz rebelled and declared himself Sultan, forcing Baybars to lead a campaign there to
crush him and further consolidate his hold there. Baybars forced most of the Crusader settlements
to accept treaties that protected his routes and allowed Baybars to reinforce Syria with soldiers
and food supplies to overcome famine. The Crusader states were generally a minor annoyance, to fall
at the Mamluks’ leisure: Antioch fell to Baybars in 1268, Krak des Chevaliers in 1271, and a slew
of other Crusader sites by the end of his life Given his lack of royal background
and shaky claim to legitimacy, Baybars needed to reinforce his position in
Cairo. To this end, he found a distant relation to the last Abbasid Caliph, and quickly had him
declared as a new Caliph in 1261. Inexplicably, he declared an attack on Baghdad with his new
Caliph, marched as far as Damascus with him, and then sent the Caliph out with only some 400
men into Mongol lands. The result was the second caliph was killed on Hülegü’s order. What exactly
Baybars hoped to achieve here confused even people at the time, and despite efforts to justify it,
it seems Baybars simply made a rare misstep. But, generally, Baybars was more effective.
He focused strongly on control of information; with spies in the Ilkhanate, he wanted to know if
a Mongol army was moving before even the Mongols knew it. His spies are alleged to have spread
misinformation to destabilize the Ilkhanate at times. It was important to the Sultan to know
immediately about Mongol movements and other news, and for this, he established the barid. Perhaps
inspired by the Mongols’ yam postal system, this was a system of relay stations for messages
to travel quickly right into the Sultan’s hands. This was supported by signal towers, permanently
manned and with bonfires and smoke signals, as well as messenger pigeons, improved roads,
and bridges. At its height, a rider could travel from Egypt to Damascus in three days.
He also refocused the fortifications of the region; when taking a Frankish or rebel city or
castle, Baybars had its fortifications destroyed, while border fortresses, primarily
along the Euphrates frontier with the Ilkhanate like al-Bira and al-Rahba, were
strengthened. Permanently garrisoned, these forts survived numerous failed Mongol assaults.
There was also a strict system in place should the Mongols pass the border forts. As stated, Baybars
wanted to prevent isolated garrisons from being picked off one-by-one by the Mongols, as had
happened to the Khwarezmian Empire. Baybars’ order was for garrisons to retreat to an agreed
point, where they would mass up and face the Mongols in a unified body, or await the arrival
of the Sultan and the main army This strategy was employed in every major Mongol attack on Syria
over the decades, and proved a most effective defensive measure. Baybars also made it customary
to advance with his forces as soon as the news came of a Mongol attack. This generally served
to frighten off smaller Mongol raiding parties, while also reminding the Syrian population
that the Sultan would be there immediately to protect them, or to punish defectors. And
when smaller Mongol parties withdrew, Baybars could then raid over the border, particularly
against the Il-Khan’s allies in Armenian Cilicia. Baybars also improved the army, especially
the Royal Mamluks whose ranks he expanded and rewards heaped upon them, but also the halqa,
the non-Mamluk, lower-status army. These were free men, native Egyptians, Kurds, Turkic auxiliaries,
or the sons of Mamluks, who grew to dominate this body over the fourteenth century, and
fill roles the prouder Mamluks refused to. The Mamluk garrisons in Cairo, particularly of
the Bahriyya Mamluks to whom Baybars belonged, were reinforced, with hippodromes built in
the city to train them, which also served to give entertainment to the population, while
also reminding them of the Sultan’s power. But Baybars also had to expand the
Mamluk regiments, and for this, he needed steady access to Turkic slaves from
the steppe. For this, Baybars made treaties and encouraged good ties with the Genoese and the
newly restored Byzantine Empire under Michael VIII. The Genoese ferried the Qipchaqs on their
ships or sold them from the Crimean ports, and the Byzantines kept the Bosphorous open for their
passage. But most importantly, Baybars needed the cooperation of the Mongols in the Golden Horde to
allow this trade in the first place, or to stop them from harassing the Byzantines. This brings
us to the alliance between Berke and Baybars. Upon learning of the war between the Golden Horde
and Hülegü in 1262, Baybars sent a letter to Berke Khan through an Alan merchant. It stressed the
Islam of both men, and encouraged Berke’s war against the Ilkhanate, but with no response from
Berke. A more fruitful opportunity came later that year, with a host of Mongol refugees. There were
troops originally from the Golden Horde who had been provided to Hülegü for the campaign
against the Nizari Isma'ilis and Baghdad, but were betrayed and attacked by Hülegü at the
beginning of hostilities. Some fled to Afghanistan under their commander, some to the Golden Horde,
and the rest to Egypt. Baybars quickly jumped on the opportunity. He welcomed them to Cairo with
a glowing reception, and made a great show of how well he treated these Mongols. Their leaders
were made emirs, and the rest were incorporated into the Mamluk army. These were the first of the
wafidiyya: the Mongols who fought for the Mamluks. They were far from the last. Periodically, other
Mongol refugees fleeing turmoil in the Ilkhanate, captured by the Mamluks after a victory, or sold
as slaves during Mongol civil wars, ended up in Mamluk Egypt and incorporated into the army and
elite. In time, some became the most powerful men in the Mamluk state. One, named ironically
Ket Buqa, even became Sultan in the 1290s; the longest reigning Mamluk Sultan, an-Nasir
Muhammad, had a Mongolian mother; and Baybars himself took three wafidiyya women as wives.
They gave Baybars deeper knowledge of the Mongol army. In addition to his spies
within the Ilkhanate, Baybars was likely among the most well-informed individuals
in the Mongol military as there ever was, allowing him to further finesse his strategies.
On the initial welcoming of Mongols into Egypt in late 1262, Baybars installed a new Caliph, then
sent another letter to Berke Khan telling him of how he had so kindly treated Berke’s soldiers.
He urged Berke to take up Jihad against Hülegü, and this time Berke responded kindly, kicking off
a diplomatic relationship that would last another two centuries. So began the alliance between
the Golden Horde and Mamluks, and while it never resulted in any military cooperation, it did keep
access to Qipchaq slaves open for the Mamluk army, despite some periods of cooler relations.
Additionally, it unbalanced the Ilkhanate, which always feared a joint attack by the Mamluks
and Golden Horde, a threat the Mamluks always encouraged. Preventing the Ilkhanate from massing
all of its considerable strength on the Mamluks, served Baybars’ defenses all the better.
While Mamluk sources like to present this as a relationship of equal partners, with the
Mamluk Sultan in a role as guardian of Islam and the religious senior, it’s speculated that
the Golden Horde saw this as a submission of the Mamluks to them. The Golden Horde Khans, as
rulers of the Qipchaq steppe and its peoples, may have seen it natural for the Qipchaqs in
Egypt to submit to them, made all the easier by their shared religion. For in Mongol imperial
ideology, only the Chinggisids were legitimate rulers. Further, Mamluk embassies always bore a
great number of expensive gifts for the Khans, while the Golden Horde rarely sent gifts in
return, as it may have seen this as tribute. This is not just a modern observation;
a later Mamluk scholar, al-’Ayni, complained of how uneven the relationship was, and
believed the Golden Horde had the better of it. By the time of his death in 1277, Baybars
had created a system designed to negate Mongol military prowess. A strong army
well-versed in Mongol attacks was one thing, but in addition to this offensive weapon, Baybars
effectively prepared a lengthy defensive network, too, while diplomatically preventing the Ilkhanate
from focusing solely on the Mamluks militarily. And it is a testament to its ability, that
only on a single occasion did it fail in 1300, when the Il-Khan Ghazan overcame
the boy-sultan al-Nasir Muhammad at Wadi al-Khazandar. As a result, the Mamluks
outlived the Ilkhanate by almost 2 centuries. #4 China
When Chinggis Khan invaded North China’s Jin Dynasty in 1211, this was
the latest, if most dramatic, round in a series of invasions going back well over a millennium.
When his armies crossed the Gobi desert, much of northern China had already been under the rule
of nomadic and semi-nomadic horse-archer conquest dynasties since the 10th century. From active
defence to dissuasion and everything in between, all sorts of tactics and strategies had been
employed, with varying levels of success, to stymie the advance of the nomads.
These relationships were not uniform, but we can observe some general trends. Firstly
was the difficulty for Chinese armies to operate in the open steppes of Mongolia. Nomads subsisted
off their herds, who survived off the veritable ocean of grassland. For Chinese armies reliant
on baggage trains and products of farmland, the steppes seemed a desert. Additionally, more
mobile nomadic armies generally avoided direct conflict with Chinese invaders, dragging them
along as their supplies wore thin and striking when they weakened, or dispersing utterly and
denying confrontation at all. Though these challenges could be met by skilled commanders
like the Yongle Emperor of the Ming Dynasty, for lesser generals it led to humiliating disasters.
With that said, let us look at the means employed against the nomads. It’s best to deal first with
the most famous; the Great Wall of China. Though Chinese border fortifications go back before
even the first imperial unification by the Qin, the Great Wall of China is not a single structure
that has survived history. China’s first emperor, Qin Shi Huangdi, constructed an infamous Long
Wall on his state’s northern border. However, that wall, made of pounded earth and layers of reeds,
long since eroded. Rather, different dynasties in China built a number of walls in different places
and maintained them for short periods. The iconic winding structure that stands today was built by
the Ming Dynasty during the sixteenth century, some 400 years after the Mongol conquest of China.
In the time of Chinggis Khan, there were border walls constructed by the Jin Dynasty which ran
through flatlands in Inner Mongolia, consisting of low rammed-earth walls and ditches. But the
tribes manning these fortifications submitted to Chinggis Khan, and allowed him free passage.
Border walls were neither the first nor last line of defense. They served three primary purposes:
first, dissuading nomadic attacks along a certain route; second, a signaling service to alert of
enemy attacks, and give time for garrisons behind the wall to mobilize for the threat; and third,
control over border trade. Chinese dynasties often restricted the sale of weapons to the nomads,
and building their border walls could, in theory, control this trade or funnel it to a few select
choke points for tax purposes. Over-reliance on walls as pure defensive structures, were usually
signs of the dynasty’s weakness, as occurred in the late-Ming period after the humiliation of
the Tumu Crisis in 1449, when Mongols captured the Ming Emperor and besieged Beijing. After this,
the Ming began the expansion of the Great Wall to first protect the route to Beijing from the north,
and gradually almost the entire northern frontier. Generally, the actual first line of defence
against nomadic attacks was prevention. That is, dissuading them diplomatically, or
encouraging the nomads to fight each other. A common tool of persuasion was extensive gift
giving, essentially a sort of Danegeld to buy off the nomads before their attack. Though more than
one court-official bemoaned this as humiliation, it was considerably cheaper than an actual
invasion. While sometimes claimed these treaties intended to ‘civilize’ and weaken the ‘martial
ability’ of the nomads with Chinese culture, there isn’t great support for this. For nearly the first
century of its existence, China’s illustrious Han Dynasty had to recognize the Xiongnu rulers
in Mongolia as ‘equal brothers,’ who were owed annual tributes, known as the heqin 和親 treaties,
sending mammoth amounts of silk alongside grain, princesses and other treasures. As a ‘means to
civilize the barbarians,’ they rather failed, and appears a retroactive justification. The
Han had more success against the Xiongnu by encouraging revolt among its vassals and princes
and strengthening its rivals, coupled with a few well-placed campaigns of its own.
The most effective means of defence was preventing nomadic unity through divide-and-rule
tactics. Over the 10th to early 12th centuries, eastern Mongolia and parts of North China
were controlled by the Liao Dynasty, which was ruled by the Khitans, a people related
to the Mongols. After their conquest of Mongolia, they established garrisons, forts, and towns
across Mongolia, and ruled through what is called a Dual Administration: using customary law of
Khitans and other nomads in the steppe, and Tang Dynasty laws for its Chinese and Bohai population.
In addition to garrisons and a more familiar law, the Liao Dynasty also reorganized the population
of the Mongolian plateau into a number of bu 部, which can be translated as unit, department,
or tribe. This saw the removal of existing nomad leaders, and their replacement with loyalists to
the Liao Dynasty, each given an allotted region to call their own, while also serving as units for
taxation and administrative needs. This method kept the Liao secure on their steppe border,
though less so on their northeastern border, where the Jurchen people in Manchuria
eventually rose up, toppled the Liao, declared the Jin Dynasty, and conquered north China.
However, the Jin did not take Mongolia and with the passing of the Liao garrisons, the steppes
were in a power vacuum. Groups like the Kereyid who had not been under direct Liao control,
grew to become the most powerful, while others, like the nascent Mongols ruled by the grandfathers
of Chinggis Khan, were becoming a nuisance. Here, the Jin employed a very different technique
than the Liao: they made the peoples along their borders their vassals, who manned the
lines of fortifications the Jin built in the steppes just south of the Gobi, and provided
titles, luxury goods, beneficial trade ties, and military support to those specific group.
For the second half of the 12th century, this was chiefly the Tatars in eastern Mongolia,
who acted as the enforcers of Jin interests, and stopped any other group from becoming too
powerful. And when the Tatars grew too rebellious, the Jin switched their support to another people
who would then push down the Tatars. In the 1190s this was a Kereyid Khan named To’oril,
and a rising Mongol warlord named Temüjin. Unfortunately for the Jin, while their attention
was distracted by internal troubles and war with the Southern Song Dynasty, this young warlord
in the north went on to subjugate the nomads. In 1206 he declared the Mongol Empire and took
a new title: Chinggis Khan. Soon after, he took his new nation on the offensive against the Jin.
What did the Jin do to confront the Mongol attack? As already noted, the Jin’s border guard largely
submitted to the new Mongol Emperor. Yet the Jin themselves were no meek force, and arguably
held the single greatest military in the world at the time. At their core were Jurchen horse
archers and fearsome heavy cavalry, supported by Khitan horsemen and thousands upon thousands
of Chinese infantry and crossbowmen. As the North China plain is divided from the Mongol steppes
by the Yan Mountains, the Jin defense focused on the select navigable passages through them, which
were guarded by strong gates and towers. The Jin reinforced these gates, spreading caltrops and
ditches before them. Fierce fighting followed, but the Jin were overconfident. The Mongols
relied on deserters, spies, and scouts to inform them of Jin positions, allowing them to
find unguarded passes and exploit weakness. To overcome the Jin forts while lacking their own
siege tools, the Mongols employed feigned retreats in abundance, and haughty, or revenge-seeking, Jin
defenders fell for it with startling regularity. The Jin were hampered by poor leadership; within
the first two years of the war with the Mongols, the Jin’s offensive and political capabilities
were ground down. A coup in 1213, and the new emperor abandoning the central capital of
Zhongdu heralded this. Soon after arriving in the new capital of Kaiping, the new Jin Emperor
launched a large invasion of the Song Dynasty to the south! The further division of the strained
Jin forces weakened their ability at organized resistance. Many cities were simply left to their
own devices against the Khan’s horsemen. With the accession of a new Jin Emperor in 1224, and the
absence of the main Mongol armies in Khwarezm, and peace between Jin, Song and the Tangut
Kingdom, efforts were made to better prepare against the Mongols. The Yellow River now stood
as the primary barrier between the Jin state and the Mongol Empire, and the few routes around or
over it were given extra garrisons and reinforced. This also saw the creation of a new army to
better combat the Mongols. Called the “Loyal and Filial Army,” this was an army specially made
for anti-Mongol activities. Composed of captives and deserters from the Mongol army, it was a
mixed force of Northern Chinese, Tangut, Uighur, Naiman and Qipchaq origin, fighting as mounted
horse archers like the Mongols. Paid triple that of regular soldiers and armed with fire weapons,
this became the vanguard of the new Jin offensives to reclaim their lands. Shortly after the
enthronement of the new Great Khan Ögedei, news came that this army inflicted several
serious defeats on the Mongols. One of these was even against a rising Mongol general named
Sübeedei, whom a furious Ögedei nearly removed permanently from command in his wrath.
The Jin were at their most effective when they fought the closest to the Mongols.
However, this final effort was too little, too late. By 1234, in alliance with the Song
Dynasty, the Mongols crushed the last of the Jin resistance. Soon after, the Mongols and Song were
also at war. Here, the Song frontier differed from the Jin experience. The Song had fought with
armies of horsemen back to Khitan invasions, when one of their strategies had been planting
a belt of forests along the frontier to break up Khitan cavalry formations. The Song territory
was less forgiving to cavalry, both hillier, and damper, cut by many rivers, marshes, wetlands,
and rice fields that could rot the hooves of horses and spread disease among the northerners.
The Song Dynasty’s modern reputation for military incompetence is undeserved though. The resistance
of the southern Chinese was some of the fiercest the Mongols would face. The Song’s large cities
were protected by mighty walls and wide moats; border forts and walls guarded major routes,
while the mighty Yangzi River served as an immense natural barrier, patrolled by the Song navy. The
Song employed all matters of defensive weaponry, from counter-artillery catapults and
giant cross-bows, fire-lances and bombs, to well-armoured infantry protected by long
spears and stout shields. The Song court, if far from ideal, still managed to produce some
skilled leadership, most famously Jia Sidao, and managed a surprising degree of flexibility. While
the Mongols often deeply penetrated the Song borders, rapid mobilization of several Song armies
made it difficult for Mongol gains to be held, and often these cities were retaken soon
after the Mongols passed. In Sichuan province, there was fierce resistance in over forty years
of almost continuous warfare, which bogged down Great Khan Möngke and cost his life from infected
waters in a siege, while Song defenders killed his top generals. The Song defence was
based around employing the maximum amount of friction against the Mongols, hoping that
their tenacity would eventually wear them down. It proved, however, a misplaced strategy. Courtly
infighting and arrogance of Chancellor Jia Sidao struggled to deal with the economic cost of the
decades long war. Court expenses didn’t end as more and more financial and manpower was thrown
into the conflict. Despite its immense population, the Song struggled to field enough troops against
the Mongols, who were mobilizing not just Mongols and men from across Northern China, but from
across Asia. Turkic horsemen, siege engineers from the Ilkhanate, ship builders from Korea,
were all compiled for Khubilai Khaan’s conquest of the Song. The vigour with which the Mongols
approached the Song war outstripped that which the Song could produce and finally, after tremendous
effort, the last of their hold-outs fell in 1279. The expulsion of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty from
China in 1368 did not end Mongol attacks, and the new Ming Dynasty had to relearn
how to defend against them. The early Ming period saw invasions of Mongolia, some
led by the Yongle Emperor himself. This disrupted life in the steppe, destabilized the
Northern Yuan and won a number of victories, but never resulted in conquest or definite
gains. Under the Yongle Emperor’s watch, the Ming encouraged rivalries between the Western
Mongols, the Oirat, and the Yuan remnants, sending supplies and titles to both parties,
helping create a division in Mongol society and never letting either become too powerful. But
the Yongle Emperor’s death in 1424 ended the most effective campaigns and political meddling,
which allowed the Oirat under their leaders Toghon and his son, Esen Taishi, to dominate
Mongolia by the end of the 1430s. The few Ming armies sent against him were crushed, as
Esen Taishi campaigned from Manchuria to Central Asia. The Ming decided instead to cut
off trade with Mongolia entirely. In response, Esen Taishi began raiding the Ming border. When
the young, inexperienced Ming emperor tried to face him in the battle directly, Esen Taishi
captured him in 1449 and laid siege to Beijing. In reaction to this humiliating failure, the Ming
went on the defensive, beginning their Great Wall along their northern border. Even still, Northern
Yuan armies penetrated the frontier, and in 1550 Altan Khan laid siege to Beijing again. The
greatest protection the late Ming received, was the break-up of this renewed Mongol unity
and the growth of rival aristocrats in Mongolia itself as the Khan’s influence waned. This
precipitated the expansion of the descendants of the Jurchen, the Manchu under Nurhaci and his
Huang Taiji, who managed to diplomatically isolate the last reigning Chinggisid monarch in Mongolia,
Ligdan Khan. With Ligdan Khan’s death in 1634, his son submitted to the Manchu and their newly
established Qing Dynasty. With the young khan as their subject, the Manchu managed to take
submission, through threat, force, or diplomacy, of almost all the Mongols. Here, the Qing employed
the actions of the Khitan Liao; Mongol political units were broken up and reassigned to Qing
loyalists to make a new aristocracy, and thus dismantle the network that would previously have
led revolts. Mongol horsemen thus accompanied the Qing in the conquest of China in the coming
years. Though sporadic Mongol revolts broke out, they were too few and disunited against
the immense Qing armies, well armed with ample gunpowder weapons, to pose an existential
threat, though they certainly alarmed the Qing. #5 Korea The Conquest of China opened the road to Korea.
The thirteenth century kingdom of Koryo, ruled by the house of Wang, had successfully resisted
previous northern invasions by the Khitan Liao and Jurchen Jin, who had also fought as horse archers
like the Mongols. Generally, the Koreans entered into beneficial tribute relationships with these
states in order to maintain peace. After 1170, the Korean kings were reduced to figureheads, while
military dictators acted as the de facto rulers of Korea. General Ch’oe Ch’unghon took power in the
1190s, beginning the military dynasty that would rule over Korea throughout the Mongol conquests.
The 1211 Mongol invasion of the Jin Empire, Koryo’s northern neighbour, brought unease to
the peninsula. The Korean ambassador to the Jin was killed in the fighting, while new break-away
states and Jin deserters began to harass Korea’s border at the Yalu River. In autumn 1216, several
thousand rebelling Khitan horsemen blazed through the frontier. Skilled horse archers, the Khitans
drove deep into Korea, menacing the capital, modern Kaesong. With effort, the Koreans halted
their advance. Unexpectedly, in the winter of 1218, the Mongols sent some 30,000 troops into
Korea with a simple message to the Koreans: they would crush the rebel Khitans, the Koreans would
provide troops and supplies to assist with this, and would then pay tribute to the Great
Khan. After a brief delay in answering, the Koreans acquiesced, sending 1,000 picked
troops and 1,000 bushels of rice. The rebel Khitans were crushed, and Korea began
sending tribute to the Mongols in 1219. Korea’s first Mongol experience was relatively
peaceful. Though forced to send tribute, their cities had not suffered. The dictator
Ch’oe Ch’unghon’s advancing age, failing health, and desire to pass his rule onto his son stopped
him from provocating. A keen observer, he had judged the danger of this new foe, expecting the
relationship would differ little from Liao’ or Jin’s tribute demands. Ch’oe Ch’unghon died in
late 1219 and was succeeded by his oldest son, Ch’oe U. A military man like his father and
decisive leader, Ch’oe U, helmed Koryo for the next two decades. Ch’oe U detested the Mongols’
demands, especially for valuable otter skins desired for their water-resistant properties.
While Chinggis Khan was absent in Central Asia, his chief commander Muqali had been left
to maintain pressure on the Jin Dynasty. With Muqali’s death in 1223 and a reduction in the
Mongol military presence, the political situation changed dramatically; while the Jin made peace
with their neighbours, a Mongol vassal kingdom in Manchuria ruled by Puxian Wannu declared
his independence. He sought to ally with Koryo, which declined but made their own moves. In 1225
the chief Mongol envoy to Korea mysteriously disappeared while transporting the annual tribute
north. The Koreans insisted it was bandits, but the Mongols put the blame square on Koryo.
Ögedei Khaan was enthroned in 1229, and demanded both Puxian Wannu and the Koreans to be punished.
Initially the new Khaan demanded Koryo aid in an attack against Wannu. With the failure of the
Koreans to comply, Ögedei ordered an invasion of the peninsula, the first of six Mongol
invasions. Led by Sartaq-Qorchi, the army crossed the Yalu River in autumn 1231. The attack
was overwhelming; Koryo’s armies were annihilated in the field and Kaesong surrounded. Yet there
was notable resistance at a few fortified cities, especially Kuju. Famed for a victory over
the Khitans in 1018, in late 1231 through early 1232 under the command of Pak So, the city
withstood weeks of assault. The most famous event occurred early in the siege. The southern wall
of the city was defended by Kim Kyongson and a skilled unit of pyolch’o, translated as Defense
Command Patrol, Extraordinary Watches or Night Patrol. These were local troops from outside
the regular army, an elite militia specializing in guerilla warfare. Sending most of the unit
inside the city, Kim Kyongson led a group of 12 picked men before the south gate. Telling
them “not to think of their lives and accept death as their fate,” Kim and his men withstood
four or five Mongol charges, girding the city to further resistance. Attacks were launched on
the walls day and night: the Mongols pushed carts of dry grass and wood to the gates to burn
them, only to be destroyed by Korean catapults; a tower built before the walls to protect sappers
was destroyed when the Koreans dug holes through their own walls to pour molten iron onto it. 15
large catapults were driven off by the Korean counter artillery; scaling ladders were toppled
by Korean polearms. Bundles of sticks soaked allegedly in human fat, set aflame and hurled
into the city could not be put out with water, but the crafty Koreans smothered them with mud and
earth. Another catapult team made 50 breaches in the walls, which the defenders filled as they were
made. After a month of terrible destruction but no success, the siege was lifted, the Mongols
declaring the city was protected by heaven. Military ruler Ch’oe U came to terms with the
Mongols in January 1232, and was so frustrated that Kuju had continued to resist that he wanted
to have its commanders, Pak So and Kim Kyongson executed, fearing that their defiance would
provoke Mongol retaliation. Here the Mongols interceded, saying: “Although he went contrary
to our orders, he is a loyal subject of yours. We are not going to kill him now that you have
already pledged peace with us. Would it be proper to kill the loyal subjects of all your cities?”
Still, Koryo had submitted to Sartaq-qorchi in the first month of 1232. The tribute demands
were massive. 20,000 horses, 20,000 otter skins, slaves, royal hostages and clothing for 1
million men were demanded, alongside gold, silver and other treasures. Appointing overseers,
Sartaq withdrew his forces, considering the peninsula conquered. The Koreans were less
keen to comply. The demands were onerous; while Koryo sent much in gifts, it was unwilling
to send royal hostages and could barely produce 1,000 otterskins. By the summer of 1232, Ch’oe U
moved King and court moved from Kaesong to Kanghwa island, under naval protection. Mongol officials
in Korea were murdered, and the peninsula was in open revolt. Sartaq returned in the fall of
1232, blazing a trail of destruction across the country's northern half until he was killed
during a siege by a Buddhist monk-turned-archer, Kim Yunhu. On Sartaq’s death, the Mongol army
withdrew. As Ch’oe U ably predicted, the Mongols’ lack of navy would stop them from being able to
get the royal court into their hands by force. The Mongols were not done with Korea.
The defection of one Korean commander, Hong Pogwon, gave them control of the lands north
of Pyongyang, which Hong was made the overseer of. The next attack came in the summer of 1235, after
the conquest of North China. This campaign, led by Tangut Ba’atar, was hugely destructive; with
the assistance of Hong Pogwon, by winter 1236, he had penetrated some 470 kilometres into Korea.
The Koreans could not field armies against them, and alternative strategies were developed
to respond. Just as the court had fled to Kanghwa Island, most of the population outside
of fortified settlements fled to coastal islands or mountain refuges to escape Mongol riders.
Offensives were limited to guerilla warfare, pyolch’o units launching surprise night raids,
ambushes through mountain passes and striking small parties. Hitting quickly and hard and using
local terrain, these small units were more mobile than even the Mongols. It was a frustrating
way of war for the Mongols, and destruction increased when they got frustrated. Fortified
settlements were left to fend for themselves, and when they did fall, the destruction
was horrific. The countryside was ravaged, and the death toll was horrendous. The guerilla
tactics harassed but could not stop the Mongols, who could not bring the country to submission.
Korean defections to the Mongols were enormous. By winter 1238, the Korean court was willing
to come to talks with the Mongols to halt the destruction. As the Koreans feared, Mongol demands
were stiff. Alongside the expected tribute, the Mongols required a census and for the
Korean King Kojong to present himself to the Mongol court at that time. For the military
ruler Ch’oe U, this presented an issue. His legitimacy rested on his control of the King;
Mongol demands would remove him from power. Peace on Mongol terms could not be accepted as long
as the Ch’oes wanted to remain in control. For two years, the Koreans made excuses not to send
the King until a distant relation was made up to be the Crown Prince and sent to the Mongol
capital of Qaraqorum in 1241. The Mongols found out about the deception… 14 years later. By then,
he was a loyal member of the Mongol court and even married the daughter of Great Khan Möngke.
With the “royal” hostage and resumption of tribute, Ch’oe U achieved a six-year truce. The
Mongols still wanted the royal court to return to the mainland though, and their envoys grew ever
more insistent on the matter. Ch’oe U spent the next six years building elaborate fortifications
on Kanghwa Island and readying militia units, while consecrating Buddhist projects like the
Tripitaka Koreana to secure heavenly favours. In autumn 1247, the new Khan, Güyük, ordered
another attack under Amukhan and Hong Pogwon. Again the countryside was abandoned for
coastal islands and mountain fortresses; guerilla attacks were launched; the northern half
of the peninsula was desolated. The deaths of Khan Güyük in summer 1248 and Ch’oe U in winter 1249
brought a relative calm. Ch’oe U was succeeded by his son, Ch’oe Hang, not the equal of his
father or grandfather. More arrogant and hasty than his father, he struggled to maneuver the
complicated politics of Koryo and Mongol attacks, and within months he faced coup attempts.
In 1251 Möngke was confirmed as Great Khan; again, envoys demanded the Korean King visit the
Mongol court and abandon Kanghwa island. Again, excuses were made. King Kojong was too old and
sickly for such a trip, but the Koreans suggested sending the crown prince again, while preparing
for the expected invasion. By 1252 Möngke sent Prince Yeku into Korea in August 1253 alongside
Amukhan and Hong Pogwon. Mongol envoys announced that King Kojong had six days to comply and meet
Mongol representatives on the mainland. Though the King actually met with Mongol envoys
on the straits across from the island, it achieved nothing. Once more Mongol forces were
unleashed on the peninsula while the people fled to their hideouts. Pyolch’o raids attacked
Mongol parties, and Mongols destroyed the cities which fell to them. Yeku was held up and
fell ill during the long siege of Ch’ungju, ably defended by Kim Yunhu, the same Buddhist Monk who
had killed Sartaq some 20 years prior. Ultimately, Möngke recalled Yeku before the end of the year
due to his feuding with another prince. Amukhan and Hong Pogwon continued the campaign for a
few more weeks, organizing a brief effort at amphibious warfare: seven captured Korean ships
landed Mongol troops on Kal Island in early 1254, to no great result. Amukhan pulled the
troops back in spring, returning in August with reinforcements under Jalayirtai Qorchi, with
more demands for submission that went unheeded. Early in the summer of 1255 Jalayirtai and
Amukhan fell back to the northern border; by then, aside from years of destruction and
abandonment of farmland, the peninsula was also in the midst of an ongoing drought. In the first
year of Jalayirtai’s command in Korea an estimated 206,8000 persons were taken captive. The suffering
was horrific. Jalayirtai’s forces attacked again in autumn 1255, beginning a ship building
program. Frustrated with the continued resistance, the Mongols were considering assaulting the well
defended Kanghwa Island. A sense of Jalayirtai’s frustration is evident in his response to Korean
envoys in mid-1256. The envoys came asking for peace and Mongol withdrawal, to which Jalayirtai,
incensed with pyolch’o attacks in the night, snapped “if you desire peace and friendship, then
why do you kill our soldiers in great numbers?” Jalayirtai’s withdrawal in the autumn of 1256 was
no respite. Famine gripped even Kanghwa island. When Jalayirtai returned in the spring, it must
have been apparent that the Ch’oes were hanging by a thread. Ch’oe Hang soon died, succeeded by
his son Ch’oe Ui, who proved a very poor choice. His attempts to win favour by grants of food to
the populace and court did not offset bad advisers enriching themselves and his own poor decisions.
Alienating just about everyone in the court, the pressure of the situation finally led to
a coup. Officers led by Kim Injun assaulted Ch’oe’s palace in May 1258. Ch’oe Ui tried to
escape over the walls but was too fat to get himself over. Caught by the assassins, Ch’oe
Ui’s death ended six decades of Ch’oe military rule in Korea. Gaining the support of the elderly
Kojong and handing out the wealth of the Ch’oe’s, Kim Injun made himself the new military
governor. However, his position was much weaker than the Ch’oe’s had been and still refused
to submit to the Mongols. Mongol envoys who arrived in the summer of 1258 brought threats that
they would storm Kanghwa Island, and in August, Jalayirtai received further reinforcements.
Refusal to supply either the Crown Prince or the King was met with unchecked destruction across
the Korean peninsula. If the Royal court did not come to them, the Mongols would impose direct
rule. No matter how bloody the pyolch’o attacks were, they could not stop the Mongols.
Resistance broke in 1259. Revolts against military rule began across the country, and towns
and cities surrendered on the arrival of the Mongols rather than continue fighting. With food
supplies exhausted, their military forces ground nearly to dust, and in the spring of 1259, a peace
deal was reached. The Crown Prince, Wang Chon, was to travel to the Mongol court as a royal
hostage, the court moved back to the mainland, and the defences of Kanghwa were demolished. Kim Injun
was not removed, but his power was considerably lesser than that of the Ch’oes. Organized Koryo
resistance to the Mongol Empire was over. In May 1259, Prince Wang Chon set out for the imperial
court and inadvertently became the first foreign ruler to recognize MKhubilai as the next Great
Khan of the Empire. In turn, Khubilai provided Wang Chon with an armed escort to return to
Korea and be installed as the new king, as the venerable Kojong had died in July 1259. Kojong
had reigned through the entire Mongol-Korean war, and fittingly he died only weeks after it ended.
Wang Chon, known better by his temple name, Wonjong, proved a loyal vassal to Khubilai Khan,
marrying his son and eventual successor to one of Khubilai’s daughters. Military rule
in Korea ended in 1270 after a series of assassinations and rebellions, and the Korean
court finally returned to the mainland. With that, Koryo was a fully incorporated client kingdom. The
King ruled in earnest, though with Mongol backing; when briefly ousted by a coup, Khubilai’s
forces came in and reinstalled him. Yet Mongol demands upon Korea did not grow any less
burdensome. Wonjong had to mobilize the Koreans for another war, this time fighting alongside the
Mongols. Korean ships, food supplies and men were needed by Khubilai Khan against the island
of Japan, which had spurned his demands for submission. Korea was to be a launchpad for
the first Mongol Invasion of Japan in 1274. #6 Japan
The Kamakura Bakufu had been preparing for a Mongol attack for
several years before the first invasion in 1274. Diplomatic contacts between the Mongols and Japan
had begun in 1266, and repeated envoys followed over the next few years. The rude, silent
treatment of Mongol envoys would have been an offensive maneuver regardless of the Mongols’
rather infamous opinion on the matter, and the potential consequence could not have been lost on
the part of the Japanese. Mongol emperor Khubilai Khan’s letters demanding Japanese cooperation
and submission became increasingly harsh, which, coupled with contacts with Southern China’s
Song Dynasty, meant the Japanese must have been quite aware of the risk they faced on such
a course of action. But being an island nation, Japan must have felt reasonably secure at first.
This began to change in 1268. That year, a new, more energetic and confrontational man became
the shikken, the de facto ruler of Japan and regent for the shogun, and in turn, regent for the
emperor. This was the 18-year-old Hojo Tokimune, the man who steered Japan through both Mongol
invasions. Never one to back down from a fight, Hojo Tokimune anticipated early on the
potential threat Japan faced, and, soon after his appointment, began to send additional
soldiers to patrol and prepare defences on Kyushu, one of Japan’s southern islands close to Korea.
Not only its proximity to Korea, but its wide, accessible and protected beaches and bays made
it an ideal landing site. The likeliest of these was Hakata Bay, the most direct harbour for ships
approaching from Korea. Thus the Kamakura Bakufu centered defence preparations here, with
scouts and patrols keeping watch over it and garrisons steadily being placed in proximity.
The Hojo clan was right to expect an invasion via Korea. In 1268, the same year of Hojo Tokimune’s
ascension, Khubilai Khan ordered the Koreans to begin the construction of a new fleet of
1,000 ships. Though the Southern Song Dynasty remained the primary target, the construction
of the fleet in such proximity to Japan could not be kept hidden. Indeed, when a large revolt
broke out in Korea the next year, which briefly deposed the Korean King Wonjong, some Koreans made
their way to Japan. They brought news with them of the revolt, and requested Japanese assistance
against the Mongols. None was forthcoming, and the Mongols crushed the revolt by 1271,
reinstalling Wonjong and strengthening their hold over the peninsula. A Mongol army was
now stationed in Korea to further secure it. But the words of the Koreans confirmed
the suspicions of Hojo Tokimune. They must have brought with them words of the fleet
construction and rumours of an attack on Japan. As Khubilai Khan’s envoys continued to
come to Kamakura, there could have been little doubt of the threat now on the horizon. Hojo
Tokimune’s government had to put Japan on a war footing. Yet the curious nature of Japan’s
government at the time had to be navigated. While Japan was nominally ruled by the Emperor,
the Emperor was a powerless figure, reduced to figurehead by the Shoguns of the Minamoto clan in
the late twelfth century. But at the very start of the thirteenth century, the death of the shogun
left only young boys as heirs, prompting the creation of a regent position, the shikken, from
the Hojo clan, who did not give this position up. Thus the de facto ruler of Japan in the 1200s
was the regent of the regent for the emperor. This caused some legal troubles for the Bakufu,
that is the shogunate, as it could only raise troops who were gokenin, landholders who were
vassals of the shogun. In the lead-up to the first Mongol invasion, Hojo Tokimune legally could not
raise any great army from across Japan. By sending troops from Kamakura, who he had direct access
to, Tokimune could only hope that other lords may follow his example, but he could not enforce it.
Another issue plagued Kamakura’s troops. Many of the gokenin, reliant on their landholding
for income, had, in the decades since the establishment of the Bakufu, parcelled out their
lands in each generation. By the eve of the Mongol invasion, many of these lands had diminished so
much that for gokenin in Kyushu like Takezaki Suenaga, they were only able to raise 5 troops to
accompany them; average for the gokenin of Kyushu, but more than what the common gokenin
of Honshu, Japan’s largest island, could muster. Many of the gokenin struggled to
handle the costs of outfitting themselves and their mounts in the necessary arms and armour, let
alone their retainers and still yet cover the cost of travelling to Kyushu. To remedy this, in the
years leading up to the first Mongol invasion, the Kamakura Bakufu passed laws forbidding
the transfer or sale of gokenin lands to non-relatives; land already sold had to be
returned for the original price, and in 1271 this was changed so that these lands had to be returned
for free. By doing so, Hojo Tokimune hoped to improve the ability of the gokenin to meet the
costs of the upcoming confrontation. At the same time, he consolidated positions of power around
himself and his family, an effort to centralize command in the face of the many powerful lords
across Japan whose egos could impede his strategy. In late 1274, the fleet of Khubilai Khan’s
newly established Yuan Dynasty set out from Korea to Japan. The islands of Tsushima and
Iki were swiftly overrun within a few days. While the islanders put up a spirited defence,
they were simply too few to delay the advance. A few refugees from the islands brought word to
Honshu and the Bakufu. Hojo Tokimune was ready; upon learning of the Yuan’s approach, he
is recorded stating, “Finally! This is the most momentous event of my life!” When a
priest asked how he planned to respond, Tokimune shrieked, “Katsu!” - victory.
Tokimune’s preparations had been underway for years. Most of the defending troops along
Hakata Bay were local gokenin raised in Kyushu, but additional troops from Honshu were sent in the
final months before the attack. He had prepared well, and the Mongols landed precisely where he
had anticipated. When the boots of Yuan troops disembarked on the soft sands of Hakata Bay on
November 19th, 1274, the shogunate’s warriors were there to meet them. As the Yuan ships had neared
the bay, word was sent to rally the garrisons, and even as the first clashes began, more gokenin
and their retainers were rushing from across Kyushu to join them. The fighting that ensued was
fierce. The Yuan had brought the larger force, many of its men of greater experience than that
of the Japanese. Over the course of the day, the Yuan troops broke through several sections
of the Japanese line and burned down neighbouring towns. Still, the level of Japanese resistance
and preparedness was greater than the Yuan had anticipated. The archery of the samurai was
better than expected, as they picked off one of the top Yuan commanders and stole his horse.
The Yuan realized this expected “puny island” was putting up greater defence than they had
come prepared for, and that their overconfident force was not large enough to fight their way
through the defenders of Kyushu or possibly occupy all of Japan. A withdrawal was undertaken
in good order: eyewitness accounts like that of the gokenin Takezaki Suenaga indicate a carefully
managed withdrawal on the part of the Yuan forces, returning to their ships and sailing back
to Korea. While rough weather made the return journey more difficult, stories of great
typhoons sinking the first Yuan fleet are later exaggerations not present in contemporary sources.
For Hojo Tokimune, the divine support had not been in the form of waves but through ensuring of
the Japanese victory with their own means. But Hojo Tokimune was under no impression
that he had broken Mongol power in any way, and knew another attack was forthcoming. Khubilai
Khan would want revenge as certainly as the sun would rise again over Japan— especially
once the envoys Khubilai sent in 1275 were executed by the Japanese. Hojo Tokimune did
not sit on his laurels but immediately began to prepare for the next invasion. He had
seen what had worked well and importantly, he also understood where his preparations
had not been enough— and with the next assault likely to be much greater, he needed to
double his efforts if he wished to withstand it. To do this required more samurai to be in Kyushu,
and this required greater control over samurai regardless of whether they were gokenin or not. To
aid in this Tokimune replaced many of the shugo, military governors of Japan’s provinces, with
Hojo clan loyalists and family members to carry out his orders. In an expansion of his
powers, both gokenin and non-gokenin troops, troops not normally under his jurisdiction,
could now be levied for Japan’s defence. The power of the shugo was also increased locally
in order to facilitate this, for many of the warriors now being called up for duty may
have chafed at falling under Bakufu control. Traditionally, the Bakufu and Japanese
governments had rewarded samurai for their valour in combat against the enemy, with
riches and lands taken from defeated factions. In a war in Japan, there were many lands to
redistribute; but no such riches could be gained from a foreign foe who left little behind. Many
of the gokenin had not only put their livelihoods and lives at stake to travel across Japan to
Kyushu; many would do so again travelling to Kamakura city for their reward. The rambunctious
Takezaki Suenaga, for instance, sold his horse and saddle to pay for his journey to Kamakura from
Kyushu. Though he succeeded in getting rewarded, the Bakufu was reluctant to pay the expense for
rewarding all these samurai, did not wish them to leave their posts in Kyushu, and did not want
them to beggar themselves, and sell all their horses and equipment before the Mongols returned.
The Bakufu thus forbade samurai to leave Kyushu, citing military necessity. Of the estimated 6,000
Japanese who fought in the first invasion, only 120 received rewards, mostly those of the higher
class. While useful at the moment, in decades to come, this had severe consequences for the Bakufu,
as many samurai found themselves impoverished by paying all of their own expenses for the campaign.
Tokimune prepared in other ways; further divine help was sought, as shrines and temples across
the islands were ordered to pray for Japan’s victory. To better defend Hakata Bay and prevent
the breakouts of the first invasion, the order was given to expand the sea wall. It appears
a minimal set of fortifications had existed at certain points around Hakata Bay, remnants
from fears of Chinese invasions in centuries past. Now they would be expanded well beyond
any previous system. Built 50 metres inland, 20 kilometres east and west of Hakata Bay, an
approximately 3 metre high to 3.5 metre wide wall was quickly raised. It was a simple but effective
concept; a defensive structure for the Japanese to hide behind and fight from, which would obstruct
any movements of landing parties which may seek to flank the defenders of Hakata Bay. Landing
assaults by sea were hard in the best of times, and this would not be the best of times.
For the wall’s construction, whoever’s land had the wall pass through it, was responsible
for the cost and construction of that section. While it was another cost-saving measure for the
Bakufu, it angered many and hampered construction; it was supposed to be complete before the end of
1276, but construction continued through 1277. At the end of 1275, Hojo Tokimune and his advisers
even discussed taking the fight to the enemy and launching some sort of invasion of Korea. While
it never materialized, orders were made to prepare some ships and gokenin. Undertaking such a task,
though was eventually recognized to be beyond their abilities while at the same time planning
the defence of Kyushu; even though already the Bakufu was dealing with reports of conflict
between officials and gokenin with the increasing demands being levied on them, all the while
forbidding samurai to leave Kyushu. The ships and men raised for the scrapped invasion of Korea
were instead sent to defenders at Hakata Bay. When the larger Yuan fleets of the
second invasion set out in summer 1281, Hojo Tokimune’s preparations showed their
success. He benefited from struggles on the part of the Yuan, with one of their fleets delayed
in its launch. The sea-wall worked exceptionally: instead of landing and beginning their assault,
the Yuan fleet skirmished along the shore, trying to seek some unguarded section. With the
Yuan staying offshore, the Japanese took their own ships to bring the fight to them. In the night,
the samurai rowed up beside the Yuan warships, scaling them and battling on the decks. A
few islands off Kyushu’s coast were taken, but by the time a storm surge at the end of August
1281 scattered the Yuan ships, their will to fight had been sapped and had been unable to force
their landing. Thus, Tokimune’s ploy worked well. Even after this victory, Tokimune did not let
his guard down. A furious Khubilai continued to send envoys with demands for submission, and made
plans for a third invasion. Tokimune continued to maintain garrisons and patrols on Kyushu, with the
gokenin who lived there forbidden from leaving the island without permission of the Bakufu. Kyushu
island itself came under greater control of the Hojo clan, with more Hojo shugo appointed there to
keep a close eye on this strategically vital area. The sea wall continued to be maintained, stores
of weapons and other war materials were gathered, and any official or landowner who complained
was swiftly replaced by someone more pliable. Another plan for a Japanese invasion of Korea was
even discussed, though once more went nowhere as the threat of a third Yuan attack remained too
high. This third invasion never materialized, and Mongol interest in a third attack quickly
dissipated with the death of Khubilai Khan in 1294. But Hojo Tokimune never knew that
relief; he died in 1284, only 32 years old. He was succeeded by his young son. With the boy
too young to rule, power fell into the hands of another regent. Thus from 1285 until 1293,
Japan was ruled by the regent of the regent acting for the shogun acting for the emperor,
who was in turn sidelined in his own court even more by his father, the previous emperor,
who had retired yet still ran things there! Without Tokimune’s presence, the careful system he
had balanced began to fall apart, as rival lords began conspiring against each other for power
in the vacuum. Thousands of gokenin who had impoverished themselves to fight for the Bakufu
never received rewards, for even after the second invasion, these had mostly been given to important
Bakufu and Hojo clan supporters and allies. In this way, the Bakufu inadvertently created a
class of very dissatisfied and very well-armed men. While the threat of a third potential
Mongol invasion kept everyone playing nice for a few years, by the 1330s, the once mighty
Kamakura Bakufu had collapsed into civil war. #7 Vietnam
However the interests of Kublai stretched to the south, too. The Kingdom of
Đại Việt, or Annam as it was known to the Chinese, had dominated the northern part of Vietnam since
the start of the eleventh century, centered around the Hong River with their capital at Thăng
Long, modern day Hanoi. Predominantly Buddhist and wealthy through a rich agricultural base, in
the 1220s, the ruling Lý Dynasty of Đại Việt was succeeded by the Kings of the Trần family. The new
Trần Dynasty reformed the kingdom, centralizing power and expanding their agricultural base,
strengthening the kingdom. Chinese was the official language of the court, and Trần made good
relations with its neighbours: the Song Dynasty to the northeast, to which Đại Việt paid tribute
and nominal allegiance in exchange for gifts and lucrative trade; to the northwest, trade flowed
with the Dali Kings in Yunnan; to the south, a cordial period began with the Chams.
The Chams are a part of the far-flung Austronesian people, inhabiting central
and southern Vietnam for millennia. For most of their history, they were a
collection of small, competing Hindu and Muslim kingdoms. However, in the twelfth century,
they entered a new period of unity in the face of an invasion by the Khmer Empire of Cambodia, the
builders of Angkor Wat. United under a ‘king of kings,’ the Chams repulsed both the Khmer
and Đại Việt when they invaded Cham lands. Though not as centralized as Đại Việt, from the
mid-twelfth century onwards, the King of Kings based out of the city of Vijaya wielded more
influence over the other Cham kings and princes— this was the nature of the kingdom of Champa. This
was the political situation in Vietnam when Mongol armies arrived in the mid-thirteenth century.
Đại Việt was the first to encounter Mongol armies. In 1253, on his brother's orders,
the Grand Khan Möngke, prince Khubilai, marched into Yunnan and conquered the Dali
Kingdom. Though Khubilai returned north, his general Uriyangqadai stayed in the region
and continued to subdue the local peoples. Uriyangqadai, the son of the famous Sübe’edei, led
a series of wide-ranging campaigns across Yunnan, the edges of Tibet, to the small kingdoms on the
southwestern edge of the Song Dynasty. In this process, Uriyangqadai came to the northern border
of Đại Việt. The Mongols expected the submission of Đại Việt, but given that the entire aim
of the campaign was to open a new front in the Song War, Đại Việt was not a primary target.
The immediate strategic concern was to prevent the Trần kings from offering any support to the
Song Dynasty. Möngke Khan was planning a massive, three-pronged assault upon the Song for 1258
and needed Uriyangqadai’s forces to meet their schedule. With Đại Việt’s considerable trade
and tribute contacts with the Song, the Mongols wanted to know if the kingdom would not harass
Uriyangqadai’s army. He sent envoys to the Trần court at Thăng Long asking for free passage for
the army but received no response. Cautiously, in the winter of 1257, Uriyangqadai and his son,
Aju, entered Đại Việt with 10-30,000 men, Mongols supported by locally raised troops from Yunnan.
Splitting his forces into two, Uriyangqdai ordered the vanguard to cross the Thao River, north
of Thăng Long, but not engage the Việt forces; Uriyangqadai knew of the river fleets used by Đại
Việt, and desired to draw them into an ambush and thus neutralize their mobility. The vanguard
commander did not listen and attacked the Việt, and a frustrated Uriyangqadai then advanced to
support him. Despite the insubordination and the Việt war elephants, the Mongols had the better
of the battle, with Mongol archers focusing on the elephants’ eyes. However, a defiant rearguard
allowed the Trần leadership to escape the battle via ship, and the always-strict Uriyangqadai
ordered the execution of that vanguard commander. The Trần forces' effort to stop the Mongols
from crossing the Phù Lỗ river was foiled when the Mongols found a ford to cross and then rout
the Trần army. Uriyangqadai then marched onto the capital city, Thăng Long, only to find
it abandoned. The Trần King, the government and most of its population had evacuated the
city, taking most of the foodstuffs with them. Vietnamese and Chinese sources differ on
precisely what followed. Uriyangqadai, at least, withdrew and was harassed by local forces as they
went. The Trần King then offered tribute to keep the Mongols at bay. While ambushes, heat, humidity
and tropical disease can be blamed, Uriyangqadai simply did not have time to stay in Đại Việt
any longer due to Möngke Khan’s timetable. After the withdrawal, Uriyangqadai was crossed
into the Song Dynasty’s southwestern border in a failed effort to link up with Möngke Khan.
The Trần Kings anticipated a continuation of their relationship with the Song, giving tribute
every few years to keep the peace and enrich both parties, and Champa followed suit. The Mongols
were willing to accept this for a few years, but Möngke’s brother and successor Khubilai Khan
began demanding the Trần and Cham kings confirm their allegiance in person to him. With the
fall of Song in 1279 to Khubilai’s Yuan Empire, there was no buffer between them. Khubilai grew
impatient as Đại Việt and Champa sheltered many refugee Song officials. By 1280 Khubilai demanded
that if the Trần king could not come in person, he must send a massive golden statue
of himself and increased tribute to the kingdom’s most skilled doctors, artisans,
scholars and most beautiful women. They refused. This was perceived as insubordination, and
once the Chams imprisoned Yuan envoys in 1282, Khubilai had his pretext for war. Striking at
Champa first could place Đại Việt in a vice grip between Yuan China and an occupied Champa. The
politically fragmented Champa must have seemed an easy target, Khubilai’s officials telling him
less than 3,000 men would be needed to overrun the Chams. After the failure of the second invasion
of Japan in 1281, Khubilai was also hungry for victory. Worn out by the intensive 1270s, by the
1280s, Khubilai was no longer a patient man and had outlived his wisest advisers and most veteran
commanders. Having come to expect total victory, Khubilai now demanded it immediately.
In December 1282, Sogetu, the governor of Fujian, departed with 5,000 men from
former Song lands aboard a hundred ships, arriving near the Cham capital of Vijaya in
February 1283. Though the city fell after a short fight, the Cham leadership, King Indravarman
V and Prince Harijit, escaped into the mountains. Sogetu tried to pursue, but in the jungle, his
men were ambushed and driven back, and Sogetu retreated to the coast to dig in and ask for aid.
The Yuan court’s response was slow, still planning for a third invasion of Japan. Only in March
1284, once the third Japanese invasion was finally abandoned, was an army of 20,000 dispatched by
sea to aid Sogetu. Delayed by a brief mutiny, they arrived the next month to link up with
a Sogetu, who had begun sacking Cham cities along the coast. The Cham King Indravarman sent
word he was willing to submit but would be unable to offer tribute due to the plundering. Such
concerns did not really bother the Mongols. By August 1284, Khubilai’s eleventh son Toghon
was ordered to march through Đại Việt to assist Sogetu. The Yuan ordered the Trần King to supply
this army, but they refused, expecting a trap. At that time, the reigning King was Trần Khâm.
His father, the previous king Trần Thánh Tông, was still alive but ‘retired,’ abdicating the
throne to act as ‘emperor-emeritus’ for his successor while avoiding that strict
court protocol. According to a later chronicle, the ‘emperor-emeritus’ Trần Thánh
Tông, summoned elders and advisers from across Đại Việt to discuss the best course of
action. Supposedly, they all shouted in unison, “Fight!” And so, the Trầns began to prepare
for the assault, readying officers and men. Of these, one man is the most famous: Trần
Quốc Tuấn, known better by his later title, Prince Hưng Đạo. The nephew of the first
Trần King and son of a traitorous father, Hưng Đạo was a shining beacon of loyalty
and filial piety. Alongside his charisma, his natural talent and skill made him a favourite
for chroniclers to fawn over. One notable blemish marked his character: as a young man, Hưng
Đạo had an affair with an imperial princess engaged to another man. With the oncoming Mongol
threat in 1284, Hưng Đạo marked himself out by his preparations, training men and officers before
taking a leading role in the strategy himself. In January 1285, Khubilai Khaan’s son
Toghon and an Uyghur general, Ariq Khaya, led some eight tumens from Yunnan into Đại Việt.
Accompanying them was an ousted member of the Trần royal family, Trần Ích Tầc, who the Yuan
had declared the new King of Đại Việt and were going to place onto the throne. Another column
came from the northwest under Nasir ad-Din, who had previously fought in Burma and was a son
of the Central Asian Muslim who governed Yunnan. Việt border troops were quickly overcome, and the
Yuan advanced south while Sogetu headed n orth, a great pincer movement on Đại Việt. Prince
Hưng Đạo tried to delay Sogetu but was repulsed, with Sogetu capturing 400 renegade Song officials
from Hưng Đạo’s army. By the time Sogetu linked up with Toghon, the Yuan had an entire river
fleet under the command of Nasir al-Din’s son, Omar. Omar chased the Trần King to sea while
Toghon and Sogetu captured Thăng Long. Armies sent against them were annihilated, and many
Trần generals defected to the Yuan forces. But this was the final success of this campaign.
Again, Thăng Long had been evacuated to deny the Mongols. Yuan forces and supply lines were
overextended, running low on food while heat and disease took their toll. The Việt troops also
employed psychological warfare on the Yuan. In June, one of the Yuan generals was killed, and
ambushes ravaged his army. A former Song Dynasty officer and his entourage, fighting alongside
Việt troops, donned their old armour to panic some Yuan detachments, many of whom were former
Song subjects. The fallen Vietnamese had tattooed “kill the Tatars!” on their bodies, angering,
frustrating and frightening Yuan forces. Toghon, deeming the position untenable, ordered a
poorly-organized retreat, which left Sogetu and his army behind. Sogetu attempted to fight
his way north, only to be captured and killed, his army surrounded and destroyed.
The Việt campaign was a fiasco, one of Khubilai’s own sons failing to deliver
victory. Khubilai was so furious he refused to allow Toghon in the capital and ordered a third
attack. The Trần pretender Ích Tầc once more joined them, and great effort was taken to prevent
a repeat of logistical issues. A fleet of supply ships was assembled on the southern Chinese coast
to ferry troops and provide the food necessary for an army assembled from across the Yuan
realm, perhaps 100,000 men, in addition to 500 warships and transports. Toghon was given a final
chance to redeem himself before his aging father. It should not be imagined that Việt and
Champa were unscathed. The Mongols had meted out savage reprisal on any city that
fell. Crops and rice fields were destroyed, starvation and horrors greeting the population
caught in the middle. Thousands fled into the wilderness to escape the Yuan armies: their
suffering from disease, and lack of water and resources goes unmentioned in the sources. The
capital of Thăng Long had been looted and occupied for the second time in thirty years. In Champa,
the evidence is less clear, but it seems Sogetu burned his way through many of the most prominent
cities along the coast in his march north. The third invasion began in October 1287.
Two armies marched overland, the main led by Toghon. On the sea, Omar and Fan Yi led warships
hunting for the Việt navy. The large transport fleet followed some days behind Omar’s armada.
Toghon’s troops defeated several Đại Việt armies, marching to Vạn Kiếp on the Bạch Đằng
River to await the arrival of Omar’s fleet, who arrived after their own victories. Despite
early success, neither force had enough supplies, relying on the transport fleet. But that
fleet was dispersed by a storm and then destroyed by the Việt navy, which under
Trần Khánh Dư had avoided Omar’s warships. With this maneuver, the Yuan plan was broken.
Food supplies ran low, and Toghon again took Thăng Long in February 1288, only to find
it stripped bare again. Once Toghon learned of the loss of the supply fleets, he withdrew to
the stockades they had constructed at Vạn Kiếp, and by the end of March, with his men on the verge
of starvation, he ordered a general retreat. Now, the Việt forces sprung their trap. The Yuan army’s
route was harried by ambushes and the destruction of roads and bridges to hamper their movements.
Tropical diseases spread among malnourished men and beasts, humidity warped their bows, and the
trees howled with the sounds of alien creatures ensuring sleepless nights. Toghon, great-grandson
of Chinggis Khan, showed his pedigree by hiding in a copper tube on the march, then abandoning
the troops to board a warship to sail home. On April 9th, 1288, Omar’s fleet was sailing past
the mouth of the Bạch Đằng river when Việt ships led by Prince Hưng Đạo sailed out to meet him
at high tide. Omar took the bait. Hưng Đạo fled back up the river, Omar in pursuit. Hưng Đạo
smaller and lighter craft cruised by in safety, but wooden stakes placed along the river bottom
impaled the larger Yuan vessels, holding them in place as the tide receded. With the Yuan
ships immobilized, Hưng Đạo attacked: helpless, many Yuan soldiers drowned in the river or fell to
the arrows of Đại Việt, and Omar was captured. The other fleet commander, Fan Yi, attempted to rescue
Omar, but his vessels were boarded, Fan Yi himself killed in the fighting. Some 400 Yuan ships were
captured, capping off a campaign which saw most of its land forces destroyed in the wilderness.
1288 proved a total fiasco. Only a few years after the destruction of the great armada off the shores
of Kyushu, another fleet and army were destroyed with little to show for it. Toghon was sent into
political exile after both disastrous campaigns, his son another disgrace to add to
Khubilai’s troubles of the 1280s. The Mongol failure cannot simply be reduced to
the jungle. It was a factor, as the tropical heat, humidity, and disease wore down troops unused
to the environment, but we can identify more immediate causes. The destruction of the cities
was an insufficient threat, and unable to capture the Việt or Cham Kings, the Mongols were denied
their tools to disable the enemy defense. The Mongols struggled to supply themselves due
to ambushes or vulnerable supply fleets. Most importantly, Yuan leadership totally
underestimated Vietnamese resilience, hampered by the inept and inexperienced Toghon and
a demanding, unrealistic Khubilai. In contrast, the military leaders of Đại Việt, skilled men
like Prince Hưng Đạo, learned from their mistakes, maximized their strengths and struck the Yuan when
they were most vulnerable. While often victorious in the initial field engagements, the Yuan
could not turn these into strategic successes. Still, both Đại Việt and Champa had
suffered terribly over both campaigns, and Khubilai threatened another attack
until his death in 1294. After that, relations eased between Yuan, Đại Việt and
Champa. The kingdoms in Vietnam paid tribute to the Yuan Khans for trade access, gave a nominal
submission and were spared another Mongol assault. #9 Java
In the thirteenth century, Eastern Java and parts of the neighbouring islands
of Sumatra and Borneo came under the influence of the Kingdom of Tumapel, named for the city of the
same name on the island of Java; it was also known as the Kingdom of Singhasari, thanks to its King
Jaya Wisnuhardhana, who changed it to. The Tumapel kings were not absolute rulers, as much of their
kingdom was made up of loosely controlled vassal kings and chiefs. But they controlled a lucrative
position along the maritime trade routes through Indonesia and across the southern coastline of
the Eurasian landmass. By the twelfth century, Java was a leading exporter of goods from China to
India, especially rice, pepper and safflower dye, while In turn, importing gold, silver,
lacquerware, iron goods and ceramics from China. The southeast Asian sea trade was a valuable
market which had been expanding considerably since the ninth century, and one which attracted
the attention of a man hungry for world conquest. By the 1280s, the Mongol Great Khan Khubilai had
successfully conquered China, but other victories were frustratingly eluding him in Central Asia,
Japan, Vietnam and Burma. As he advanced in years, the knowledge that he was failing to bring the
rest of the world under Mongol authority weighed heavily on him. Now in his seventies, with his
poor health, depression, deaths of his friends and family, increasing removal from affairs
of state and awareness of his own impending mortality, Khubilai became desperate for
victories to console his aching spirit. Economic aspects too, were not to be
overlooked, and were simply a factor in the inevitable universal domination. Khubilai’s Yuan
dynasty, while influenced by China’s Confucian norms and traditions, maintained the Mongolian
practicality regarding merchants. Rather than treat them as inherently lower class, they were
invited and rewarded, and trade encouraged. The Yuan government partook in this with the conquest
of the southern Chinese coastline, establishing a Bureau of Maritime Trade at the major port of
Quanzhou. The Bureau not only oversaw and taxed the trade in and out of Quanzhou, but sought
to actively encourage it while settling foreign traders there. Contacts were made across the
region, from the Southeast Asian coast through the Philippines, Indonesia including Java and
Sumatra, to India and the Iranian coastline. There is evidence for south Indian-style Hindu
temples with Tamil transcriptions in Quanzhou from this period, a significant Muslim population
and resettled Persians who called the city Zayton, by which Marco Polo recorded the name. Speaking
of Polo, there is also evidence for an Italian trading community in Quanzhou. It
was an entry point for the world; it was the port that Ibn Battuta, during his
journeys in the 1340s arrived at. The Yuan Dynasty had a keen interest in trade, and sought
to extend their control over it throughout the region— at the same time extending the Mongols’
heavenly Mandate to rule the whole of the world. With these considerations, Khubilai Khan increased
diplomatic missions across the seas of southern Asia, from Malabar to Sri Lanka, ordering the
monarchs and peoples across the sea to submit to the Great Khan. As it was an old tradition
to send a yearly tribute for the privilege of trading with China, most regional states already
undertook a nominal submission in order to have greater access to Chinese ports. While traditional
Chinese dynasties were generally content to accept the trade and maintain the image of themselves
as the centre of the world even if they did not exercise actual authority in these states, the
Mongols were often not quite as lenient. To be a vassal to the Great Khan meant the potential
of making all resources and peoples available to the Khan’s desires, measured through census
and Mongol-appointed overseers. When Khubilai sent his diplomatic missions over the seas,
they often were sent to not just reaffirm or increase the tribute, but to increase the extent
to which these overseas monarchs needed to comply with the will of the house of Chinggis Khan.
One such mission led by an envoy named Meng Qi, arrived in the court of Kertanagara, the king
of Tumapel, sometime in the 1280s. Kertanagara had been the King since the 1260s, and had shown
himself a haughty individual and firm adherent to Tantric Buddhism. Since his ascension he had
expanded his kingdom over eastern Sumatra and most of Java. By all accounts, Kertanagara was
quite keen to solidify his control of trade and spice routes, and much less keen on sharing it
with the distant Khan. In the various sources, after feeling offended by the envoy Meng Qi and
his demands, Kertanagara’s either insulted him, branded his face with a hot iron, cut his nose
off or outright killed him. In either case, he had committed a grievous insult on
an envoy of the Great Khan, which as you may have heard, was not something taken lightly.
Kertanagara’s calculation was likely a simple one. He did not want to increase the share of tribute
sent to China for the privilege of trading, but still wanted that Chinese trade. It was a
reasonable assumption that the island of Java was well outside the range of an actual
attack from China, leaving him physically secure from any repercussions. Once tensions
had cooled, Kertanagara could hypothetically send an apology mission and resume trade.
These were reasonable assumptions, but Khubilai Khaan was not feeling reasonable. By the later
1280s, the deaths of Khubilai’s closest confidant, his wife Chabi, chosen heir Jingim and his most
important advisers, as well as alcoholism and depression had clouded his judgement. Khubilai’s
earliest campaigns against the Dali Kingdom and Song Dynasty were marked by thorough preparation
and intelligence gathering, taking advantage of weaknesses within the enemy to bring the final
victory. Decades later, isolated and depressed, surrendered by yes-men who lacked the ability
to stand up to him and desperate for victory, Khubilai had come to rely on throwing manpower
at a problem, hoping tactical successes would lead automatically to strategic victories.
Khubilai’s knowledge of Java was minimal, but he did not care. The ruler of some island in
the sea had no right to insult the Master of the World. Thus, Khubilai ordered an attack upon the
Kingdom of Tumapel and bring Kertanagara to heel. At least, this is the understanding from the
Chinese language sources of the Yuan and Ming Dynasties. In the medieval Javanese and Balinese
sources, the incident with Meng Qi the envoy is unmentioned. Instead, Khubilai was a friend of the
minister Madura Wiraraja, who requested Khubilai provide military assistance to the royal family of
Tumapel. In this version, Kertanagara was usurped by a man named Jayakatwang, and Khubilai’s forces
quite respectfully came, defeated the usurper, placed the rightful heir, Kertanagara’s
son-in-law Raden Vijaya, on the throne and took in exchange only a beautiful princess
for Khubilai to marry. Generally speaking, most reconstructions rely on the Chinese account,
though the Javanese sources are interesting for how they justify and depict the Yuan presence.
Regardless, an invasion fleet and army were prepared in 1292. 20,000 men, mainly from southern
China, were mobilized aboard 1,000 vessels. The army was led by the former Song commander
Gao Xing, the navy by an Uighur named Yiqmis, and all were under the overall command of a Mongol
called Shibi. The commanders prepared carefully, having learned from the disastrous naval assaults
on Japan and Đại Việt. They had onboard a year’s supply of grain and 40,000 ounces of silver
to purchase more supplies. The commanders met with Khubilai himself before their departure: the
Khan of Khans told Shibi to leave naval matters to Yiqmis’ expertise, and that they must proclaim
on their arrival they were not an invasion force, but merely there to punish Kertanagara
for harming a Yuan envoy. If true, it may reflect an understanding that facing battle
in unknown lands, against a foe they did not know, was not ideal; the strategy it seems was to
simply overawe the Javanese, the mere threat of their presence anticipated to be enough to earn
a victory. The fleet set out in winter 1292-93, making a short stopover in Champa, now paying
tribute and at peace with the Mongols. There, officers were dispatched on diplomatic missions
to Lamuri, Samudra, Perlak and Mulayu in Sumatra, seeking tribute and submission. By March
1293 the fleet was off the coast of Java, and preparing to make landfall. It was decided to
send a diplomatic force ahead of the main fleet, to convince Kertanagara to submit and avoid having
to make landfall at all. If there was no progress on the diplomatic front in a week, then the
fleet was to follow up as a show of force. The diplomatic mission found no success, for
matters had changed considerably in Java by the time of their arrival. The haughty king of
Tumapel, Kertanagara, was dead, slain by his vassal, Jayakatong of Gelang, based in the city
of Kediri. Kertanagara’s son-in-law, Raden Vijaya, based in Majapahit, was resisting him, and the
Yuan had arrived in the midst of a civil war. A week after the envoys were sent, the armada landed
at Tuban, where part of the army under Gao Xing and Yiqmis disembarked and marched to Pachekan.
The rest of the army was to follow aboard the ships under the command of Tuqudege, sailing
through the Straits of Madura and rendezvous with the land force. At Pachekan, Jayakatong’s
navy blocked the Brantas River, but made no move against the Yuan. The Yuan commanders landed and
set up a banquet, inviting the Javanese to come over and discuss terms. No response was made by
the Javanese, and after a while the Yuan fleet and army advanced. Jayakatong’s navy retreated before
them and after garrisoning Pachekan, the Yuan forces made their way inland along the Brantas.
As they moved inland, they were greeted by envoys of Raden Vijaya, begging Yuan help:
the young prince had only a small force, and Jayakatong of Gelang’s army was on its way to
attack Vijaya’s base at Majapahit. In exchange, Vijaya would submit to the Great Khan. Seeing
supporting Vijaya as the key to gaining the submission of Java, Yiqmis ordered Gao Xing to
take a part of the army and intercept Jayakatong, while Yiqmis took the rest of the force to
reinforce Majapahit. Jayakatong managed to evade Gao Xing and reached Majapahit, only to
find Yiqmis had already assembled his forces to meet Jayakatong's tired troops. After a night of
stand, the next day Gao Xing arrived with the rest of the Yuan troops, and altogether they drove
off Jayakatong’s army. Raden Vijaya once again promised his total submission to the Great Khan if
the Yuan forces helped him defeat Jayakatong for good, and after providing them maps, a week later
they set off for Jayakatong’s capital at Kediri. The Yuan moved in three columns: the fleet on
the Brantas River under Tuqudege, with Gao Xing and Yiqmis taking their forces up either bank,
while behind them traveled a large force from Majapahit under Raden Vijaya. The army made good
time and reached Kediri within a few days, finding Jayakatong prepared with a large force. The next
day, from the morning until early afternoon, Jayakatong’s force advanced three times, and
three times they were repulsed with heavy losses by the arms of the Yuan Dynasty and Majapahit.
By the end of the day, Jayakatong’s army broke, fleeing across the river or into Kediri with
Jayakatong. An assault on the city followed, and by nightfall Jayakatong surrendered.
For the next week, the Yuan were the masters of Java. Raden Vijaya’s promised submission now
had to come: for this, he desired to return to Majapahit with a small, unarmed Yuan escort to
properly witness his formal submission. While that force departed for Majapahit, Shibi sent
most of the army back to Pachekan, while he stayed in Kediri with a small force, thinking
he had handily conquered Java for the Khan. Once Raden Vijaya saw that the Yuan
troops had let their guard down, at the end of the day he killed the Yuan escorts
who followed him back to Majapahit, rallied his armies and urged the people of Java to repel the
foreign invaders. Only narrowly did Shibi escape the trap for him at Kediri. He fought his way back
to Pachekan, losing up to 3,000 men. Back aboard the ships the commanders argued over whether
to counter attack or to retreat, ultimately choosing the latter. Not knowing the country,
outnumbered and unlikely to find local support, they understood further combat would likely
only have one disastrous outcome. With that, Shibi ordered a withdrawal back to homeport.
While they did bring back some trophies, maps of Java, population registers, spices,
gold, silver, rhino horn and prisoners, this did not offset the costs of the campaign. Not as
disastrous as the invasions of Japan or Vietnam, even this tactically well-executed campaign
could not be turned into a strategic victory, and resulted in a humiliating retreat. Khubilai
was furious, punishing the commanders, stripping them of a third of their property and rewarding
them with 50 blows from the rod. Once Khubilai Khan died in early 1294, there was no stomach
to avenge that defeat, or those others suffered in Southeast Asia. By contrast, Raden Vijaya
established a powerful empire based in Majapahit that came to rule most of modern Indonesia and
Malaysia, founded in part with Mongol assistance. By the end of the 1290s, after Khubilai’s
death, Vijaya sent missions to the Yuan Dynasty to resume valuable trade contacts. Despite their
reputation for destruction across much of Eurasia, in the Javanese chronicle there is but a single
reference to the Mongols destroying towns and sending people running in flight: reflective
of the hope for a less-destructive campaign, perhaps helping with the memory of the
invasion becoming that of Khubilai coming to assist his friends in exchange for a beautiful
princess. It was a rather different view than their forces earned in many other places.
In the end, Java successfully defended the Mongols with perhaps the most minimal amount of
destruction to their own lands; through guile, they took advantage of a well-prepared, but
hesitant, Yuan army, and were thereby able to not only use Mongol troops to their advantage,
but inflict upon them a defeat with relatively little bloodshed. In many ways, it was the
most effective, least cost-intensive and most beneficial resistance put up by any of the
states we have looked at over in this video. #10 Mongols
Although the Mongols fought countless enemies, none of the conflicts were as fierce as the ones
against other Mongol polities. Let us begin with the Toluid Civil War, the first and most important
of the Mongol civil wars. Ariq Böke and Khubilai were younger brothers of Möngke, the last
recognized Great Khan of the united empire who died in 1259, and both wished to succeed him. Ariq
was based in the old Mongol capital of Qaraqorum, located in the Orkhon Valley in Mongolia,
while Khubilai was based in Kaiping, a city he had constructed in today’s Inner Mongolia.
From this position, Khubilai controlled access to Mongol-ruled Northern China. While Ariq had
more support from other members of the imperial family for his claim as Great Khan, Khubilai had
more immediate, practical advantages. Ariq did not have access to large armies, while Khubilai
controlled many of the armies which had just been used in the war against the Song Dynasty, leaving
Khubilai to start the war off with a tremendous advantage in manpower. Furthermore, Qaraqorum
was reliant on a constant flow of grains and other food supplies to supplement its largely
non-nomadic population. When war broke out, Khubilai cut off Ariq’s access to food supplies
from North China and invaded Mongolia, defeating Ariq in battle in autumn 1260, and forcing Ariq
to abandon the untenable position at Qaraqorum in the face of Khubilai’s advance. For a conflict
over who had the right to rule the Mongol Empire, making it clear Ariq could not hold the imperial
capital was a powerful symbolic move. Khubilai’s armies forced Ariq to withdraw to the Yenisei
River Valley. While the Yenisei is a comparatively rich agricultural region, with the cultivation
of wheat, millet and barley going back millennia, it was insufficient against Ariq’s enemy. Ariq
was reduced to border raids and infighting with his own allies, before a harsh winter eradicated
his herd animals and forced his surrender by 1264. From the outset, Khubilai was more willing to
commit to all-out war against his brother; Ariq appears, until quite late, to have been under the
impression Khubilai would recognize Ariq’s claim, giving Khubilai a head start in preparing for
war. Khubilai’s ability to bring the resources of Mongol-ruled China to bear against Ariq, and
thereby cut Qaraqorum off from supply, was the ultimate card in Khubilai’s favour. While the
details of the battles between Ariq and Khubilai are sparse, Khubilai’s armies consistently
had the better of the engagements, and Ariq had far fewer troops to call upon. Khubilai’s
advantages were beyond what Ariq could muster. The defeat of Ariq Böke was not the end
of Khubilai’s troubles with his family members. With Qaraqorum rather exposed, Khubilai
permanently moved his capital to two cities; Kaiping in Inner Mongolia, renamed to Shangdu, and
Dadu, also called Khanbaliq, on the site of modern Beiing. The result, though, was that Khubilai’s
control over much of Mongolia was tenuous, and subject to raids from princes who continued
to resist. Qaidu, of the Ögedeyid Khanate, and his ally Du’a of the Chagatai Khanate, dominated
Central Asia and raided Khubilai’s frontiers from the Tarim Basin to western Mongolia. A
host of independent princes, largely sons of the previous Great Khans Möngke, Ariq Böke
and Güyük, held minor courts from Dzungaria, the Altai Mountains to the Yenisei River valley,
switching from fighting each other, to allying with Qaidu, to at times joining Khubilai. In the
fast eastern part of Mongolia and in Manchuria, the descendants of Chinggis Khan’s brothers also
proved rebellious. Thus throughout his efforts to complete his conquests in China and abroad,
Khubilai Khan had to send troops to deal with his cousins in Mongolia continuously. While none had
the power to overthrow Khubilai Khan, they could threaten his hold over Mongolia and other border
regions. Khubilai had to find ways to deal with almost annual attacks along a vast frontier.
Around 1271, Khubilai dispatched his sons Nomoqan and Kököchu with a large army into
Mongolia, pushing onto Almaliq to drive back Qaidu while another army pushed across the
Silk Road cities of the Tarim Basin. By 1275, these gains had been reversed. Hoqu, a son of
Güyük, succeeded in driving Khubilai’s armies from the Tarim Basin. The next year, a mutiny by the
princes Shiregi and Tuq-Temür in Mongolia resulted in Khubilai’s sons being captured and sent to the
Golden Horde, where they spent the next decade. Then, Shiregi and Tuq-Temür attacked Qaraqorum.
However, the princes’ fragile alliance soon frayed, and Shiregi and some of the other princes
abandoned Tuq-Temür to join Khubilai. At the same time, Khubilai sent a large response force
under his star general, Bayan of the Ba’arin, and Tuqtuqa of the Baya’ut Qipchaq. Both were
experienced commanders, with Bayan the mastermind of the final conquest of the Song Dynasty.
Leading an army of horse archers, including a thousand Qipchaq warriors, they defeated
Tuq-Temür near Qaraqorum. Shiregi was forced to execute his former ally Tuq-Temür, before being
sent off to exile on an island off China’s coast. Khubilai was pleased with the performance of his
generals, particularly Tuqtuqa, whose warriors became one of the key arms of his anti-Mongol
defense. Parallel to the Mamluk Sultanates in Egypt and India, Khubilai felt the best way to
deal with steppe horse archers in battle was better-equipped horse archers. Tuqtuqa’s family
had been Qipchaq lords before the Mongol conquest, and the Mongols recognized their military
potential and dispersed them around the empire as frontline troops. Tuqtuqa’s father Banduchaq was
assigned to Khubilai’s armies during his conquest of the Dali Kingdom in Yunnan in the 1250s,
and had proved their mettle again during the war against Ariq Böke. The Mongols always sought
to reward those who showed hereditary ability, and following the defeat of Shiregi, Tuqtuqa and
his men were given promotions and vast tracts of land around Khubilai’s capital at Khanbaliq.
Further, Qipchaq slaves and soldiers in Khubilai’s realm were assigned to Tuqtuqa’s command. In
1286, they were formed into a regiment called the Qipchaq Guard [Qincha wei 欽察衛 ], consisting of
a core of various Turkic steppe warriors fighting from horseback, supplemented by Alans, Mongols
and thousands of former Song Dynasty infantry and archers. The command of the Qipchaq Guard was held
by Tuqtuqa’s descendants until the end of Mongol rule in China. Though one of several such guard
units, the Qipchaq Guard was by far the largest, richest and most prestigious and held
tremendous influence in the Yuan realm. The Qipchaq Guard was soon put to the test. In
1287, a revolt broke out in eastern Mongolia, led by Prince Nayan, a descendant of Chinggis Khan’s
youngest brother Temüge, with another revolt in Manchuria by Prince Qadan. Nayan overcame
Khubilai’s commander Bayan of the Ba’arin, and it was feared the Nayan would coordinate with
Qaidu and seize Mongolia. Khubilai Khaan, by this point in his early seventies, depressed, obese,
gout-ridden, and nearing the end of his life, roused himself for one more march. According to
the Yuan Shi, Khubilai was frustrated that his own Mongol troops showed hesitation to fight other
Mongols— their tendency was to dismount and chat in Mongolian, rather than fight. Khubilai called
upon the Qipchaq Guard, who had no such issues and would be merciless. From a command post on the
back of four elephants, Khubilai Khan went on his final campaign, backed by the Qipchaq Guard, while
other Yuan armies blocked the advances of Qaidu and Qadan, preventing them from linking up with
Nayan. Against the full might of Khubilai Khan, Nayan was overcome. Amongst Khubilai’s units were
top-of-the-line weaponry; a brigade of Koreans in his service apparently brought with them handheld
gunpowder weapons, leading night assaults on some of Nayan’s encampments. Nayan himself was
defeated, captured and executed, though some of his allies continued to resist for several years.
Tuqtuqa was put to the task of reducing them, too. After Khubilai Khan’s death in 1294, his grandson
Temür succeeded him as Great Khan, ruling under the name Öljeitü Khan. Among the first things he
did was richly reward Tuqtuqa and his son Junqur, and then send him to the frontiers to continue
battling Qaidu and his allies. This consisted of repelling annual raids or launching their
own expeditions into enemy territory west of the Altai. Tuqtuqa spent the
rest of his life in Mongolia, dying there in 1297. His son Junqur inherited
his position as commander of the Qipchaq Guard. Under Temür Öljeitü Khan, a more structured
defense system was set up across the frontier. In a vast arc stretching from the
original homeland of Chinggis Khan along the Onon-Kherlen Rivers to the northern foothills
of Tibet, a series of commanders were stationed with thousands of troops to respond to incursions.
Temür Öljeitü Khan put overall command under his brother, Kammala, in Qaraqorum. He also expanded a
policy of his grandfather Khubilai of sending vast numbers of Chinese labourers into the regions
and Qaraqorum, to establish self-sufficient communities, expanding agriculture and
crafts production to support these large frontier garrisons and reduce some of the
state burden in equipping and feeding them. Temür Öljeitü Khan switched to an offensive stance
after his son-in-law, Körgüz, King of the Önggüt, was captured and killed by Du’a in 1298. A
furious Temür Öljeitü called upon the resources of his empire. While Khubilai had continued
to send invasion forces over the seas and into southeastern Asia until his final days, Temür
Öljeitü halted almost all other military activity and directed the might of the Yuan Dynasty against
Qaidu and Du’a. He appointed his nephew Qayishan as overall commander of the Yuan forces in
Mongolia, and provided him with a vast army backed by the Qipchaq Guard under Jungqur and
his son, El-Temür. In early 1301, a series of battles were fought around Mount Tiejiangu
south of the Altai Mountains over several days. Despite the fierce clashes, the outcome was
inconclusive, and Qayishan fell back to Qaraqorum, Qaidu’s troops harassing him the entire way
and burning the pasture behind him. However, both Qaidu and Du’a were injured in the battles,
and Qaidu succumbed to his wounds soon after. Du’a lost his interest in fighting against
the great power of the Yuan Dynasty; when rumour came a few years later of a threatened
coordinated attack against the Chagatai Khanate by the other Khanates, Du’a submitted to Temür
Öljeitü and invited the other khanates to do the same. Over the course of 1304, the various
Mongol Khanates all once again recognized the overlordship of the Great Khan, a recognition
Temür’s grandfather Khubilai never achieved. As a part of this, Du’a and the Yuan divided the
territories of the late Qaidu between them. Despite similar quality of troops and tactics, the
Yuan Dynasty was continually victorious in these wars. It was able to continually use its vast
resources against its rivals, setting up numerous garrisons to respond to incursions and showing
greater unity of command, allowing it to bounce back from defeats when they occurred and bring
its elite troops into play. Meanwhile, its enemies were reduced to hit-and-run tactics and plagued
by infighting. While Yuan advances were halted in Southeastern Asia and Japan, against other Mongol
troops the Yuan were able to perform much better. Other strategies can be observed in the wars
between the Ilkhanate in its conflicts with the Golden Horde and Chagatai Khanate. The
Ilkhanate and Golden Horde first went to war almost concurrently with the Toluid Civil
War. These battles were largely fought over the Caucasus Mountains, which the Golden Horde invaded
repeatedly from the 1260s to the 1380s, hoping to seize them from the Ilkhanate and its successor
states. Many of these battles were inconclusive, and the frontline rarely shifted. The opinion of
the written sources from the Ilkhanate and later, is that while the Khans of the Golden Horde
could field immense armies, the Ilkhanid troops were better equipped. In the narrower, uneven
terrain of the Caucasus mountains, the better supply lines and equipment of the Ilkhanid troops
could be maximized, though rarely do we have any precise details on the course of these battles.
The Ilkhans often responded to these incursions personally, taking with them their keshig and most
elite units to prevent the Golden Horde’s horsemen from advancing too deeply. The Ilkhanid soldiers
largely fought defensively, rarely pursuing their foes back into the steppes. In late 1262, Hülegü’s
son Abaqa did just that, only to be lured into a trap by Berke Khan and routed. While fleeing,
Abaqa crossed over the frozen Terek River, only to lose even more of his army when the ice
broke beneath them. The shocking defeat soured the Ilkhanate on any further expeditions into Golden
Horde territory. Following the end of the initial conflict, Hülegü’s successor Abaqa, constructed
a wall and ditch along the Kura River and left a garrison there to defend it, ensuring it would
slow down any Golden Horde advances long enough for the Ilkhan to respond in force. For its part,
the Golden Horde left a large, permanent garrison in the steppes north of the Caucasus, to prevent
the Ilkhans from ever attempting to make that journey north again. The result was an effective
stalemate; both states were far too powerful to overcome the other or its defensive preparations.
To the east, with the Chagatai Khanate, the Ilkhanate’s frontier was more open and
harder to defend with such static works. The Ilkhans left garrisons in that region, and often
put their designated heirs in charge of Khurasan, tasked with responding to attacks by the Chagatais
or the Negüdari raiders from Afghanistan. Here, the Ilkhanid responses were somewhat
less effective, and many of the Chagatai or Negüdari raiding parties escaped before the
Ilkhan’s troops could arrive. On rare occasions where larger-scale invasions did occur, as by
the Chagatai Khan Baraq in 1270, the Ilkhans responded personally in great force. Abaqa Ilkhan
caught Baraq Khan near Herat in 1270, successfully outmaneuvering Baraq and inflicting a crushing
defeat upon him. The Ilkhanid army appears not only to have been much larger, better equipped
and better supplied, but it was better led, too, compared to the Chagatayid army, which even
seems to have had trouble feeding and supplying horses for its men in the dry conditions around
Herat in July 1270. After Baraq Khan’s death, Abaqa then invaded the Chagatai Khanate, a rare
occurrence for him, and thoroughly sacked Bukhara, one of the chief cities of Transoxiana and
the Chagatai lands. The message was clear; major attacks on the Ilkhanate would result in
major retaliations. It was not until the 1300s that the Chagatai undertook larger-scale attacks
on the Ilkhanate again. The success of these too, were generally halted by effective Ilkhanid
responses or Chagatai infighting. At times the Chagatais tried to coordinate these attacks
on the Ilkhanate with the Golden Horde, but the timing never quite succeeded and the
Ilkhans always managed, with some difficulty, to respond to them one-by-one. An attack by the
Chagatai Khan Esen-Buqa on the Ilkhanate in 1315, was halted due to an invasion of the eastern
Chagatai Khanate by Yuan Dynasty troops; border forces under Junqur and the Qipchaq Guard drove
deep into the Chagatai lands, seizing pastures, animals, families and cities. Fear of coordinated
assaults between the Ilkhanate and Yuan Dynasty against the Chagatai Khanate, and the increasing
instability in the Chagatai Khanate from the late 1320s onwards, put an end to such efforts again.
These khanates could unleash devastating warfare on each other, but each one was too powerful
to be conquered; the resources necessary for the task would require each khanate to leave its
lengthy borders exposed. Even for the states that had the relative advantages, the Ilkhanate and
Yuan Dynasty, victories were still costly, bloody affairs and the campaigns expensive occurrences.
We have many more exciting videos on the Mongols and their wars coming up, so make sure you are
subscribed and press the bell button. Please, consider liking, commenting, and sharing - it
helps immensely. Our videos would be impossible without our kind patrons and YouTube channel
members, whose ranks you can join via the links in the description to know our schedule, get
early access to our videos, access our discord, and much more. This is the Kings and Generals
channel, and we will catch you on the next one.