HOW NOT TO WRITE A MARY SUE - Terrible Writing Advice

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Sorry, Mary Sue. I’m too cool for you now! No. You read the title right. Terrible Writing  Advice is here to instruct writers on how to   avoid writing a Mary Sue. Does this mean I’ve  turned over a new leaf where I produce high   value and well researched videos that truly  inspire and educate new writers so they can   hone their craft without having to rely on cheap  tricks? *Snickers* Yeah Sure. Let’s go with that. Mary Sue is a common term for an overly  perfect character usually designed to be   a shameless self insert of the writer.  However, online discourse has somewhat   watered down the term to mean ‘character I  don’t like’. For the purposes of this video,   a Mary Sue is merely an idealized,  overly amazing character that hurts   the story by being the writer’s pet and probably  a self-insert, basically the classic definition. Now I still stand by my original Mary Sue  video. In fact, here at Terrible Writing Advice,   I still advocate for every character to  be a Mary Sue. Protagonist? Self insert   Mary Sue. Side characters? Sueitably  Sueified. The villain? Suedisticly Sue,   a real Mary Murderer. Background characters?  Suddenly Sueful. Every character should be   a perfect idealize version of the author  and exist solely to fulfill the writer’s   fantasies. But what if… here me out, if other  people think that writing a Mary Sue is bad!   Oh no! I didn’t think about that. Other  writers, and more importantly random people   in internet comments, might declare me ‘Not  a Real Writer!’ the worst thing you can be! I shall write fiction so grand, so perfect,  and so great that no one will ever declare   my characters a Mary Sue. Every last person  on Earth will all universally agree that my   work is in fact objectively perfect in every  way and all of my characters are totally deep,   complicated, and multifaceted reflections of the  human condition. All of humanity has never agreed   on a single thing, but I’m sure all fandoms,  who are infamous for starting endless flame   wars over which not real people should hook up,  will be willing to set aside their differences   to agree that my characters are not a Mary  Sue. Got to keep your expectations realistic! Fear not, for I’ll let you know how to avoid  the pitfalls of accidentally writing a Mary   Sue and definitely not leave writers vulnerable  to falling into this completely different set   of pitfalls right next it! So let Terrible  Writing Advice show writers how to ace those   ‘is this character a Mary Sue’ tests and  show writers how not to write a Mary Sue! Now the first thing every writer learns when  they are trying to avoid writing Mary Sues   is that Mary Sues never have flaws. They are  perfect in every way. Therefore the best way   not to write a Mary Sue is to add flaws.  Does this mean that the writer can just   add a flaw or two to the character and call  it day? Why yes! Yes it does. These include   flaws like too beautiful or can’t choose  between hunky billionaire werewolf or   hunky billionaire highlander. You know.  Real problems that everyone deals with. But if a few flaws or good, then a bunch of  flaws are even better! Just keep lumping on   all kinds of character flaws until the character  collapses under the weight of them. Realistic   flaws can sometimes make a character easier to  identify with, ground their characterization,   and simply make them more interesting. But  were not shooting for realistic or interesting,   but instead trying to throw off those naysayers in  the comments who claim my character is a Mary Sue! Writing characters with flaws works best when  flaws are treated like perks on an RPG character   building system. They give you points to buy more  abilities! Flaws can be taken seemingly at random   and have no connection to the theme, tone, or  even the character’s motivations, backstory,   or most importantly character traits. A writer  definitely shouldn’t see character flaws as the   flip side to character strengths which form a  complete character trait. Simply assume that   character flaws automatically make a character  more interesting rather than being an element   that merits some consideration or something that  can naturally result from solid characterization. Another Mary Sue trait is that everything  always goes their way. So naturally,   the best way to avoid writing a Mary Sue is  to make every single thing in the story go   wrong for them. All the time. That will make the  audience feel sorry for them! The audience will   just ignore how contrived it begins to look when  the character tried to get her morning coffee,   but it somehow resulted in her dog being  run over by the repo truck that towed   away her car before she could drive her dying  grandmother to the hospital. Then the coffee   caught fire and burned her house down. When  a character endures hardships, humiliation,   or otherwise experiences tragedy, it can build  both empathy and sympathy with the audience   provided the audience feels the character is  worthy of it. Lump too much crap on them and   the audience will simply sympathize harder,  not start laughing a how ridiculous it is. Will the audience feel sympathy for a deeply  unlikable character who refuses to improve   their situation? Of course! When a writer wants a  character to be likeable, obviously the writer is   tying to make a Mary Sue! Therefore I shall make  my character as unlikable as possible! Who wants   to read about likeable characters anyway? Only  amateurs who stupidly write Mary Sues want to   pen characters that people would actually enjoy  spending time with. That’s not how to write! That even extends to the character doing  anything in the story that’s actually   important. Another common Mary Sue quality is  that they are essential drivers of the plot and   that everything that happens is about them. This  problem can easily be avoided if the character   merely does nothing at all. They just passively  sit there and do nothing while the plot bends   around them like a black freaking hole. There’s  nothing wrong with a reactive character rather   than an active character. But to make sure no  one calls my character a Mary Sue, I will have   them just sit there and have stuff happen around  them rather than take a single action that would   move them closer to achieving their goals,  which they don’t have anyways. My character   would never have a goal or motivation, because  only a Mary Sue would actually want things. What about abilities? Well Mary Sue has all  kinds of cool powers and abilities. So my   character will not have any. Even if it would make  no sense for the setting. If a writer does want,   then they can give their character a couple  of worthless powers. No one can complain that   my character is the center of everything  and super special even if she’s the only   non-magic user at a school made only for  magic users. Is it that overpowering magic   powers can rob the story of any tension if used  excessively? Is that even overwhelming powers   and abilities can still be made interesting  by having the character use them in fun and   unique ways? No. I can’t think of a single  popular story that features an overpowered   main character. If they did then that character  would be a Mary Sue and therefore not a good   character. And no one loves Mary Sue…  I mean outside of the fiction at least. Now that I have a character that is completely  unlikable, has no abilities, way more personality   flaws than is reasonable, and has zero ability or  motivation to move the plot forward, there is no   way they could be called a Mary Sue even if all  the characters still obsess over her. The entire   universe still bends and revolves around her and  she is still the star of the story. What? You   think just because she’s described as super ugly  that all the attractive cast still won’t fawn over   her? I can’t have that. The whole point is to  stop the audience from accusing her or being a   Mary Sue. Not stop me from writing an indulgent  character whose presence hurts the story. See? She makes mistakes all the time. Mary  Sue would never do that. I mean the story   bends over backwards to make sure all of her  monumental screw-ups don’t matter while all   the characters just forgive her for some reason,  but she still technically makes them. Which makes   her technically not a Mary Sue! Ha! Man, I’m  smart! I’ve treated all the symptoms so the   disease should magically disappear! Besides,  other characters still do stuff on their own   like buy my main character gifts, so it’s not  like she is still the center of the universe. I can’t have my character share any of the  common Mary Sue traits. See! This massive glut   of articles on the internet says so! It’s full  of common Mary Sue traits that you never see in   extremely popular characters from successful  franchises. I can’t think of a single popular   character that’s super attractive, has amazing  superpowers and abilities, literally has the plot   revolve around them, and are special enough  to have the fates of entire universe shaking   prophecies hinge on their actions. Obviously no  one wants that and it will never sell. Could it   be that Mary Sue is so hated, particularly in fan  fiction, because she often usurps the roles of   already popular characters while failing to mimic  the character qualities that made them so popular   in the first place? And that people consume fan  fiction typically to enjoy spending more time   with the characters that they love. Only to find  that this glittery haired, eye color changing,   stale biscuit of a character is there bending  the main cast to her will with zero blowback from   anyone. Well except for maybe the story commenters  and reviews. No flames plz. In original fiction   Mary Sues can typically be the result of simply  poor execution and author favoritism getting in   the way of storytelling. I could try to dissect  exactly what makes Mary Sues unlikable. But I   think I’ll instead fixate on all of those  common traits everyone keeps talking about. This makes taking all of those ‘Mary Sue’  tests that float around on the internet an   excellent use of time. What a great way  to learn characterization. Reducing Mary   Sue to a freaking power level. This  is definitely a useful tool and not a   complete waste of time better spent just  writing and learning through mistakes. I don’t have time to write. I have to spend  time worrying about what other writers will   think of me! What if a big successful  writer tells me I’m no good a writing   because I wrote a Mary Sue? Yes. Super  successful writers clearly have the time   to personally tell other writers that they  are writing wrong! And not even the writers,   I had to worry about everyone on the  internet calling my character a Mary Sue! My work must be liked by everyone! Everyone who  writes Mary Sues does so because they are lazy.   If you put in enough work, then you can make a  work that’s perfect! That’s how that works! That’s   why I’ve never met a writer still workshopping  their very first book for over a decade. It’s   a matter of sheer effort, not experience.  Put in enough time and I can write the best   story in the world and when my story becomes mega  popular there will not be a single person on the   planet call my protagonist a Mary Sue! Every  writer should carry this exact expectation. Obsessing over what everyone will think will  never lead to the writer missing what their   target audience will think. Better to  assume every lifeform on the planet   Earth will become a megafan rather than  simply accept that a lot of people aren’t   going to like my work and that’s okay.  Don’t worry. It’s not a matter of when   someone calls a character a Mary Sue,  only if they do. That if being if anyone   bothers to read my work at all. But why  wouldn’t they? My work is Mary Sue free! Corporations take note. This style of character  creation is great for big franchises that have   achieved the coveted cash cow status. Don’t make  a new character or a good character when we can   make a bland committee designed character  with as much personality as a wet potato,   but with none of the potential to cook  into some actually good. This character   can’t be a Mary Sue, because if they were  they might actually be more interesting. It’s important for the writer to understand  what the audience wants from a character   in fiction. And people are great at  articulating exactly what they want   and never complain about it when they get it  to the letter. People obviously don’t want a   character that they can project onto,  feel special, do interesting things,   or any other qualities. They want something  that’s so bland and tasteless that it would ace   every Mary Sue test ever. Because the character  is never there to make the story worth enjoying,   they are there because I don’t want to  get called out for writing a Mary Sue. Never mind that a character can be deeply  unlikable, self-centered, a huge jerk,   and still in be fascinating to read or watch.  So can a character that is likable, selfless,   and kind. Because all of those traits, both  positive and negative, serve the story or   their characterization. Which is a mistake,  because obviously character and story should   be beholden to the author’s anxieties instead.  The important thing is to indulge, just rather   than the author’s wish fulfillment,  it’s instead the author’s anxieties. If only there were a way between a self-indulgent  blatant Mary Sue and a bland boring play it safe   character? If only there were a way  to write characters that have traits,   that encompass both good and bad qualities  depending on the circumstance as well as a   solid motive. Alas, I’ve played too many  RPGs and as such can only see characters   as a collection of stats and perks rather  than people with opinions and perspectives. My first work must be a magnum opus! When writing,   you start out producing amazing works of  art rather than having to actually build   skill through experience and learning from  mistakes. A writer can’t just go ahead and   write god awful indulgent crap to get it out of  their system. Never should a writer accept that  It’s okay to be bad. You can always  write something better later.  But what then? Just not share it with world! How  will people know my character isn’t a Mary Sue   then? I must share my genius with the world  for the sake of seeking validation rather   than focusing on improvement. Then I’ll spend the  rest of my time on the internet arguing semantics   over what is and isn’t a Mary Sue. Which for  a writer is a great use of time and resources. Fixating on the label Mary Sue is way more  productive that just focusing on writing a   good character. A perfect writer can never write  a Mary Sue. A writer must be perfect and loved by   everyone and never make a mistake or have any  flaws and be the best most amazing writer that   everyone always talks about and obsesses over  all the time. I must become the most special   important writer ever that everything revolves  around. Only then will I be a… a uh… Uh oh! GUARD: Federation sold us a fresh  batch I see. Move along prisoners… GUARD2: Oh hey! He’s got the old rig. GENERAL: Old rig? GUARD2: Yeah. The old mark 1 animation rig.  We’re already on mark 2. Don’t worry. They’ll   update you after orientation. GENERAL: Orientation? MERC CAPTAIN: Welcome, scum, to Wagwater.   MEGACORP’s elite mercenary company. GENERAL: Wait! We’re going to be   soldiers of fortune? Does that mean  I’m finally going to get my war!? CORPORATE SUIT: Oooo. No. We don’t use the big W  word anymore. Focus group says that’s a no no. We   prefer the term security contract. We’re not  invading. We are providing prompt and direct   security services. As a new Security Defense  Associate, it’s very important that you maintain   Wagwater’s high standard of customer service.  Especially considering Wagwater is a subsidiary   of Megacorp. Unless you get into trouble, in  which case Megacorp has no idea who you are. GENERAL: That… just sounds like sales? CORPORATE SUIT: The orientation  video will explain it better. NARRATOR (V.O.): Terrorism got  you down? Democratic reformers   trying to mess up a perfectly good military  junta? Former client states asserting their   sovereignty? Megacorp has the solution for you! Wagwater security company! Don’t settle for any   old soldier of fortune. Wagwater provides  high energy security solutions for a new   age to actualize your earning potential. And  now it’s your turn to become part of the team!  As a new Security Defense Associate you will be  expected to maintain a high standard of customer   service at all times. If a client insists on a  committing a war crime, you are to refuse in no   uncertain terms… Unless they purchase gold plan!  Be sure to also offer our false flag service to   cover up the crime and snag that upsell! All sales made by a Security Defense   Associate give a commission that will be put  toward reducing your sentence. Just remember   that all equipment will be charged to you  including spent ammunition so make ‘em count! Complete your full tour of duty and you may even  be given a chance to join the rest of Megacorp   in Nebula. Secure your place now before the rest  of the TWA expanded universe explodes in a vortex   of unsustainable greed! GENERAL: Wait. What?! NARRATOR (V.O.):But let’s not focus on  that. Get excited for your new dream   platform Nebula!Nebula is a streaming  platform built by YouTubers, podcasters,   and other creatives. Should YouTube fall,  the TWA Universe will live on thanks to   Nebula. A place free from YouTube’s fickle  policies allowing for experimentation in   content. Exciting opportunities await along  with outstanding Nebula Originals like Real   Time History’s Series on the Soviet nuclear  program called Red Atoms. Or Lindsay Ellis’s   Nebula Original on Jurassic Park. Singing up  using TWA’s link also gets you free access   to Nebula Classes where the Creators on Nebula  offer you tricks and tips for being a creator   or just generally good advice. Like Simon Clark’s  Turn Data into Stories. Georgia Dow’s extremely   useful class on Beating Anxiety. Or How to Analyze  Stories and Enrich Your Own from the mind behind   Like Stories of Old. Support the channel. Secure  your place before it’s too late! Use the link in   the description and escape to Nebula today! Megacorp is not liable for the destruction   of the Terrible Writing Advice Expanded  Universe. The CEOs actually don’t plan   to save any of you chumps. More space  for us! See offer for more details. CORPORATE SUIT: Well I hope we all learned  something inspiring. It’s important to   maintain high quality customer service when we  inflict… uh I mean when we provide satisfaction   guaranteed security service. And for  our first security contract, you will   finally remove those pesky Space Communists to  pave the way for Greed’s ultimate ascension. GENERAL: Killing space communists!  Great! The Federation’s democracy   didn’t work out. Maybe corporations  running things won’t be so bad?
Info
Channel: Terrible Writing Advice
Views: 412,897
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Terrible Writing Advice, writing, Bad advice, Novel, Novel writing, Writing a book, book, J.P. Beaubien, J.P.Beaubien, Terrible, JPBeaubien, JP Beaubien, Mary Sue, Avoid writing a Mary Sue
Id: m4sy_kEt5sI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 17min 24sec (1044 seconds)
Published: Thu Oct 05 2023
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.